Writing Women into the Russian Revolution of 1917

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 214-231
Author(s):  
Adele Lindenmeyr

Abstract While scholarship on Russian women’s history has flourished in recent decades, the participation of women in the 1917 Revolution continues to be under-researched and poorly understood. This article explores various reasons for the marginalization of women in studies of the revolution. It reviews promising recent research that recovers women’s experiences and voices, including work on women in the wartime labor force and soldiers’ wives, and argues for the usefulness of a feminist and gendered approach to studying 1917.

1989 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 439-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise A. Tilly

Recently, I attended a seminar at which a historian of women presented a dazzling interpretation of the polemical writing of Olympe de Gouges and its (not to mention her) reception during the French Revolution. A crusty old historian of the Revolution rose during the question period and inquired, in his own eastern twang, “Now that I know that women were participants in the Revolution, what difference does it make!” This encounter suggested to me what I will argue are two increasingly urgent tasks for women’s history: producing analytical problem-solving studies as well as descriptive and interpretive ones, and connecting their findings to general questions already on the historical agenda. This is not a call for integrating women’s history into other history, since that process may mean simply adding material on women and gender without analyzing its implications, but for writing analytical women’s history and connecting its problems to those of other histories. Only through such an endeavor is women’s history likely to change the agenda of history as a whole.


Author(s):  
И.К. Богомолов

В рецензии анализируется монография Джуди Кокс о «женском» взгляде на российскую революцию. Констатируется, что эта новая попытка создать историю «женской революции» в целом оказалась неудачной. История женского движения в России на рубеже XIX–ХХ веков прослежена автором поверхностно с привлечением узкого круга источников и с явным перекосом в сторону большевистской партии. В результате в работе обойдены вниманием многие известные деятели революционного движения, например Мария Спиридонова. В то же время появление такой работы позволяет задуматься о целесообразности отдельных, «мужских» и «женских», обобщающих историй российской революции, как и других социальных катаклизмов сопоставимого масштаба. The article analyzes Judi Cox’s monograph which views the Russian revolution through the lens of female perception. The author of the article maintains that Cox’s attempt to write the women’s history of the Russian Revolution can hardly be called successful. The author of the monograph investigates the history of the women’s movement in Russia at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries in a rather superficial way. The author of the monograph relies on a meager number of sources and views the situation from the Bolshevist perspective. As a result many prominent revolutionaries, such as Maria Spiridonova, remain in the shadow of oblivion. However, the monograph makes one wonder about the necessity of investigating social dramas, such as the Russian revolution, through the prism of male and female perception.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (42) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Freitas ◽  
Nivia Barros ◽  
Adriana Mesquita ◽  
Irias Das Silva

Este texto tem como objetivo resgatar a participação feminina na constituição da história do Serviço Social, dando visibilidade aos caminhos percorridos e aos papéis desempenhados por algumas mulheres. Para isso, analisamos o caso das pioneiras da Escola de Serviço Social de Niterói, da Universidade Federal Fluminense (ESSN/UFF). O resgate de suas falas, através da história oral, foi o caminho metodologicamente traçado. Iniciamos o texto revisitando a história profissional para, em seguida, discutirmos acerca da necessidade de retirar da invisibilidade o protagonismo dessas mulheres ao construir uma profissão. Aprofundar essa dimensão aponta para a importância de pensarmos algumas questões, como a história das mulheres, o uso da dimensão do gênero e os feminismos na pesquisa acadêmica, o que compreendemos como um grande desafio que se coloca para a profissão.Palavras-Chave: história do Serviço Social; feminismo; gênero e história das mulheres.  Abstract – This text aims to recuperate the participation of women in the constitution of the history of social work, giving visibility to the paths covered and the roles played by women. In order to do this, we analyze the case of the pioneers of the Universidade Federal Fluminense’s Niterói School of Social Service (ESSN/UFF). The recuperation of their speeches, through oral history, was the methodological route. We begin the text revisiting the professional history and then discuss the need to remove from invisibility the protagonism of these women when building a profession. Deepening this dimension points to the importance of thinking about some issues, such as the history of women, the use of the gender dimension and feminisms in academic research, which we understand as a great challenge for the profession.Keywords: history of social work; feminism; gender and women's history.


Author(s):  
Chinyere Ukpokolo

Writing on women in Nigeria is an ambitious venture, considering the multiplicity of ethnic groups that make up Nigeria, and the historical antecedents and cultural particularities of the various ethnic groupings. Women in Nigeria can, therefore, be studied more appropriately within the historical trajectory of the continent of Africa, by examining the different nationalities that constituted “Nigeria” in the early 20th century, and finally through the dissection of identities, power, and the experiences of diverse categories of women in postcolonial Nigeria. There is a need to avoid undue generalizations about women in Nigeria. In postcolonial Nigeria, women’s experiences are differentiated based on the extent to which the superimposition or assimilation of external cultural traits—which manifest along class lines, the rural-urban divide, ethnicity, and religion—have altered indigenous lifeways. Africa’s contact with the Arabian world in the 7th century impacted on women’s experiences in areas where the Islamic religion was introduced. Prior to the contact of Africa with the European world in the 15th century and the subsequent imposition of British rule, what became “Nigeria” in the early 20th century were disparate groups with different cultural, political, and historical configurations. The amalgamation of the northern and southern protectorates in 1914 gave birth to “Nigeria.” These historical events redefined and reshaped the place and participation of women in society. In precolonial Nigeria, women enjoyed certain privileges, prestige, and recognition, which colonialism and emerging Western economic rationality later undermined. Women-led protests against the colonial administration were prevalent and led to policy changes intended to take women into account in government policies. In postcolonial Nigeria, women confront the forces of tradition, modernity, and the neo-patriarchy, forces that contend with their drive for self-definition, while they struggle, against all odds, to remain afloat.


1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1022-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret R. Rogers ◽  
Meryl Sirmans

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document