Type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents in the world and in Ukraine

Author(s):  
N. B. Zelinska ◽  
K. V. Grishchenko ◽  
E. V. Globa

Introduction. Recently, many studies have been devoted to the study of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) worldwide. In most countries of the world, the increase in the prevalence of DM2 among children and adolescents is accompanied by an increase in childhood obesity. The presence of obesity or overweight in children can complicate the diagnosis of various types of DM. Detection and treatment of DM2 is extremely important for the society due to the wide range of severe diabetes complications.The aim of this work was to analyze the frequency of DM2 according to the Register of patients with DM, and to determine the state of glycemic control in children with DM2. Materials and methods. An analysis of glycemic control in children with DM2 who received various treatment regimens: with diet and lifestyle modifications, or with additional oral hypoglycemic agents (metformin monotherapy, or combination with insulin therapy). The glycemic control was assessed by measurement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level. Results. According to the data Register in Ukraine, the prevalence of DM among children has a tendency to rise — from 8.6 per 10 thousand children in 2005, to 13.14 — in 2019 year. The prevalence of DM2 in 2019 was 0.47 % of all cases of DM, and its prevalence contained 0.062 per 10 thousand children under 19 years of age with significant differences in the frequency of its diagnosis in different regions of Ukraine. We analyzed the state of glycemic control in children with DM2 aged from 9 up to 19 years old (Me 16.2 [15.5; 18.0]), with a  disease duration 0.5—12 years (Me 4.5 [1.0] ; 7.5]). The age of diagnosis of DM2 was 2-17 years old (Me 11.7 [8.5; 15.0]), and 91.3 % of patients had obesity. Diet and lifestyle modifications were used in 34.8 % of patients, metformin monotherapy in 52.2 %, and metformin and insulin combination therapy in 13 % of patients. HbA1c values ​​ranged from 5.0 to 11.4 % (Me 7.2 % [5,8; 8,0]). The proportion of children who had ideal or optimal glycemic control (HbA1c 7.0—7.5 %) was 52.2 %, suboptimal (HbA1c 7.6—9.0 %) — 39.1 %, high-risk glycemic control (HbA1c> 9.1 %) — 8.7 % of children. The most unsatisfactory HbA1c levels ​​were registered in children who received metformin in combination with insulin (Me 10.6 % [10,15; 11,4]). Chronic complications of DM2 have not been reported.Conclusions. We found a low prevalence of DM2 among the pediatric population in Ukraine, more likely due to the low quality of its detection among children diagnosed with DM, as well as among children among high risk groups. Most children with DM 2 were obese. The majority of patients with DM2 (52.2 %) received metformin monotherapy, more than a third did not receive oral hypoglycemic agents. In most children with DM2 (52,2 %), the state of glycemic control corresponded to the optimal (< 7.5 %), but higher levels of HbA1c were found children who received metformin in combination with insulin.

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
Helal S. Alenezi ◽  
Mubasher Kharal ◽  
Muhammad Yousuf ◽  
Yousef Al Saleh ◽  
Salih Bin Salih

Background /Objective: The aim was to assess the glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using American Diabetes Association HbA1c definition of good control of ≤ 7.0%. Methods: This retrospective study conducted in internal medicine outpatient clinics at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. All patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending the clinic from August 2005 to January 2006 were evaluated. Patients with HbA1c measured regularly and under anti-diabetic therapy were included in the study. Last measured HbA1c was used to evaluate diabetic control. Results: Data for 968 (81.5%) patients out of 1188 were available for analysis. Only 211 (21.8%) patients had their HbA1c within the American Diabetes Association recommended target of HbA1c ≤ 7%. Mean HbA1c was 8.98%. Patients were stratified into groups of good (HbA1c £ 7%), average (HbA1c 7.1% - 9.9%) and poor diabetic control (HbA1c ≥ 10%) included 21.8%, 46.2% and 32.0% of the study population, respectively. Mean HbA1c in patients on diabetic diet only, oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin, and oral hypoglycemic agents plus insulin was 7.62%, 8.67%, 8.92% and 9.70%, respectively. Conclusion: Majority of patients in our study did not meet the American Diabetes Association recommended target HbA1c for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Causes for this failure need to be assessed in Saudi type 2 diabetes mellitus population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (10) ◽  
pp. 124-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
K G Lobanova ◽  
A S Severina ◽  
S A Martinov ◽  
M Sh Shamkhalova ◽  
M V Shestakova

Achievement of stabilization of carbohydrate metabolism in patients with diabetes mellitus, receiving renal replacement therapy with hemodialysis, is a significant problem in endocrinology. It has to do with multiple factors of this cohort of patients, which affect the level of glycemia, pharmacokinetic of drugs, the efficiency of glycemic control. At the moment, the most efficiency method of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on hemodialysis is insulin therapy in the basis - bolus regime by analogues of human insulin. The use of oral hypoglycemic agents is significantly limited. The hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) remains the main parameter of glycemic control. The simultaneous use of continuous glucose monitoring allows to reveal the true level of glucose of the blood and to carry out the timely correction of therapy in order to achieve targets for glycemic control and to decrease the risk of hypoglycemic episodes. At the moment other glycemic control markers such as glycated albumin and fructosamine are described. However, in routine practice at the moment these indicators are not used due to the lack of sufficient evidentiary base of their use in this cohort of patients.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
Helal S. Alenezi ◽  
Mubasher Kharal ◽  
Muhammad Yousuf ◽  
Yousef Al Saleh ◽  
Salih Bin Salih

Background /Objective: The aim was to assess the glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using American Diabetes Association HbA1c definition of good control of ≤ 7.0%. Methods: This retrospective study conducted in internal medicine outpatient clinics at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. All patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending the clinic from August 2005 to January 2006 were evaluated. Patients with HbA1c measured regularly and under anti-diabetic therapy were included in the study. Last measured HbA1c was used to evaluate diabetic control. Results: Data for 968 (81.5%) patients out of 1188 were available for analysis. Only 211 (21.8%) patients had their HbA1c within the American Diabetes Association recommended target of HbA1c ≤ 7%. Mean HbA1c was 8.98%. Patients were stratified into groups of good (HbA1c £ 7%), average (HbA1c 7.1% - 9.9%) and poor diabetic control (HbA1c ≥ 10%) included 21.8%, 46.2% and 32.0% of the study population, respectively. Mean HbA1c in patients on diabetic diet only, oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin, and oral hypoglycemic agents plus insulin was 7.62%, 8.67%, 8.92% and 9.70%, respectively. Conclusion: Majority of patients in our study did not meet the American Diabetes Association recommended target HbA1c for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Causes for this failure need to be assessed in Saudi type 2 diabetes mellitus population.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Shuo Lin ◽  
Mu Chen ◽  
Wanling Chen ◽  
Keyi Lin ◽  
Panwei Mu ◽  
...  

Aims. Basal insulin plus oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) has not been investigated for early intensive antihyperglycemic treatment in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. This study is aimed at comparing the short-term (over a period of 12 days) effects of basal insulin glargine plus OHAs and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) on glycemic control and beta-cell function in this setting. Methods. An open-label parallel-group study. Newly diagnosed hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥11.1 mmol/L or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥9% (75 mmol/mol) were randomized to CSII or insulin glargine in combination with metformin and gliclazide. The primary outcome measure was the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and secondary endpoints included time to reach glycemic control target (FPG < 7 mmol/L and 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose < 10 mmol/L), markers of β-cell function, and hypoglycemia. Results. Subjects in the CSII (n=35) and basal insulin plus OHA (n=33) groups had a similar significant reduction from baseline to end of treatment in glycated albumin (−6.44 ± 3.23% and− 6.42 ± 3.56%, P=0.970). Groups A and B have comparable time to glycemic control (3.6 ± 1.2 days and 4.0 ± 1.4 days), MAGE (3.40 ± 1.40 mmol/L vs. 3.16 ± 1.38 mmol/L; p=0.484), and 24-hour mean blood glucose (7.49 ± 0.96 mmol/L vs. 7.02 ± 1.03 mmol/L). Changes in the C-peptide reactivity index, the secretory unit of islet in transplantation index, and insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2 indicated a greater β-cell function improvement with basal insulin plus OHAs versus CSII. Conclusions. Short-term insulin glargine plus OHAs may be an alternative to CSII for initial intensive therapy in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 56-60
Author(s):  
I R Iarek-Martynova

The onset of insulin therapy is an important stage in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its timely beginning ensures better control of glycemia and reduces the negative consequences of chronic glucose cytotoxicity and lipotoxicity. The achievement and maintenance of the stable compensation of the disease are the indispensable conditions for successful prophylaxis and adequate treatment of chronic complications of diabetes mellitus. The ADA guidelines recommend to initiate insulin therapy at the early stages of the disease provided it is dictated by the clinical situation or combine it with the use of oral hypoglycemic agents if the targeted HbA1c levels fail to be reached despite the intake of one or more tableted preparations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Kyong Moon ◽  
Kyu-Yeon Hur ◽  
Seung-Hyun Ko ◽  
Seok-O Park ◽  
Byung-Wan Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document