scholarly journals Single Visit Root Canal Treatment: Intensity of Postoperative Pain Using AH Plus Sealer Versus Endosequence BC Sealer in Patients with Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

2021 ◽  
pp. 102-113
Author(s):  
Muna Abubaker Beshir ◽  
Hany Samy Sadek ◽  
Heba El-Asfouri
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Apical Periodontitis ◽  
Root Canal Treatment ◽  
Treatment Intensity ◽  
Single Visit ◽  
Ah Plus

scholarly journals Postoperative pain of patients with necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis following single visit endodontic treatment versus multiple visit endodontic treatment using triple antibiotic paste: a randomized clinical trial

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1203
Author(s):  
Safeya AbdurRahman ◽  
Saied M. Abdel Aziz ◽  
Shaimaa I. Gawdat ◽  
Ahmed M. AbdalSamad
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Apical Periodontitis ◽  
Endodontic Treatment ◽  
Single Visit ◽  
Triple Antibiotic Paste ◽  
Multiple Visit ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: A randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare the postoperative pain following endodontic treatment of necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis. Treatments were performed in multiple visits with application of triple antibiotic paste interappointment dressing or single visit without interappointment dressing. Methods: In total 44 participants were assigned randomly into two groups. Group A: multiple visit endodontic treatment with triple antibiotic paste interappointment dressing; group B: single visit endodontic treatment without interappointment dressing. Postoperative pain of participants was assessed after 24, 48, 72 hours and one week using numerical rating scale. Results: No statistically significant difference was found in postoperative pain after 24, 48, 72 hours and one week between the two groups. Conclusion: Triple antibiotic paste as an interappointment dressing in multiple visits endodontic treatment was not proved to reduce the postoperative pain compared to a single visit in patients with necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis who did not have an interappointment dressing. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02947763. Date: 28th October 2016.

scholarly journals Comparison of the effect on postoperative pain between instrumentation with and without connected electronic apex locator: a randomized clinical trial

F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 868
Author(s):  
Khoa Van Pham ◽  
Cuong Hoang
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Single Visit ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Root Canal Instrumentation ◽  
Electronic Apex Locator ◽  
Group 1

Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the postoperative pain between root canal instrumentation with unconnected electronic apex locator and instrumentation with connected electronic apex locator. Methods: Forty-two patients were randomly divided into two groups (n=21). Group 1 was treated using the traditional endodontic motor with unconnected electronic apex locator (EAL) and group 2 was treated using the endodontic motor with connected EAL. All teeth were treated in single-visit endodontic therapy. Postoperative pain levels at 6, 24, 48, 72 h and 1 week were recorded by patients. The data were collected and analyzed using the χ2, and Mann-Whitney U tests with significance at 0.05. Results: Postoperative pain levels were significantly reduced by half at 6 hours in both experimental groups; however, no significant differences were found in postoperative pain levels between the two groups at all considered times. The postoperative pain levels using a percussion test were reduced on day 7 in both groups, and there was no significant difference in this variable between two groups. Conclusions: Both groups have a similar effect on reduction of the postoperative pain for endodontic patients undergoing root canal.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Effects of a Bioceramic and Conventional Resin-Based Sealers on Postoperative Pain after Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 2661
Author(s):  
Kiche Shim ◽  
Young-Eun Jang ◽  
Yemi Kim
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Continuous Wave ◽  
Root Canal Treatment ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 2

Background: This clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of bioceramic sealer and resin-based sealer on the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain. Methods: Patients with anterior teeth or premolars requiring root canal treatment were assigned to group 1 (n = 51). Those with molars requiring treatment were assigned to group 2 (n = 57). In groups 1En and 2En, root canals were obturated with Endoseal MTA using the single-cone technique. In groups 1AH and 2AH, the sealer used was AH Plus with the continuous wave technique. On the day of canal filling, each patient was instructed to indicate their pain intensity over the 7 day postoperative period, at rest and, while biting, using a visual analog scale. Results: There was no significant difference in the incidence or intensity of postoperative pain between the Endoseal MTA and AH Plus groups during the 7 day postoperative period (p > 0.05). Less time was needed to seal the root canals with Endoseal MTA, especially in group 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Endoseal MTA and AH Plus had similar effects on the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain. The obturation time was shorter when using Endoseal MTA compared to AH Plus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document