Radiation load of the personnel of the Samara region during medical procedures for the period 2016-2018

2020 ◽  
pp. 759-759
Author(s):  
S. S. Somov ◽  
K. V. Yakusheva
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Medical Procedures ◽  
Individual Dose ◽  
Dose Limit ◽  
Radiation Load ◽  
Dose Rates

A comparative analysis of the radiation dose rates of medical workers of the Samara region during medical procedures for the period from 2016 to 2018 was carried out. The results of the average annual individual dose of personnel working with sources of ionizing radiation showed stable values of radiation exposure comparable to the dose limit for the population.

scholarly journals Radiation Awareness for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Hybrid Operating Room: An Instant Operator Risk Chart for Daily Practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110074
Author(s):  
Quirina M. B. de Ruiter ◽  
Frans L. Moll ◽  
Constantijn E. V. B. Hazenberg ◽  
Joost A. van Herwaarden
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Dose Rate ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Radiation Risk ◽  
Dose Limit ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Dose Rates ◽  
Rate Prediction ◽  
Operator Dose

Introduction: While the operator radiation dose rates are correlated to patient radiation dose rates, discrepancies may exist in the effect size of each individual radiation dose predictors. An operator dose rate prediction model was developed, compared with the patient dose rate prediction model, and converted to an instant operator risk chart. Materials and Methods: The radiation dose rates (DRoperator for the operator and DRpatient for the patient) from 12,865 abdomen X-ray acquisitions were selected from 50 unique patients undergoing standard or complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in the hybrid operating room with a fixed C-arm. The radiation dose rates were analyzed using a log-linear multivariable mixed model (with the patient as the random effect) and incorporated varying (patient and C-arm) radiation dose predictors combined with the vascular access site. The operator dose rate models were used to predict the expected radiation exposure duration until an operator may be at risk to reach the 20 mSv year dose limit. The dose rate prediction models were translated into an instant operator radiation risk chart. Results: In the multivariate patient and operator fluoroscopy dose rate models, lower DRoperator than DRpatient effect size was found for radiation protocol (2.06 for patient vs 1.4 for operator changing from low to medium protocol) and C-arm angulation. Comparable effect sizes for both DRoperator and DRpatient were found for body mass index (1.25 for patient and 1.27 for the operator) and irradiated field. A higher effect size for the DRoperator than DRpatient was found for C-arm rotation (1.24 for the patient vs 1.69 for the operator) and exchanging from femoral access site to brachial access (1.05 for patient vs 2.5 for the operator). Operators may reach their yearly 20 mSv year dose limit after 941 minutes from the femoral access vs 358 minutes of digital subtraction angiography radiation from the brachial access. Conclusion: The operator dose rates were correlated to patient dose rate; however, C-arm angulation and changing from femoral to brachial vascular access site may disproportionally increase the operator radiation risk compared with the patient radiation risk. An instant risk chart may improve operator dose awareness during EVAR.

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF RADIATION DOSE RATE OF RSG-GAS REACTOR

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Hamzah ◽  
Hery Adrial ◽  
Subiharto Subiharto
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Dose Rate ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Area Measurement ◽  
Radiation Dose Rate ◽  
Safety Level ◽  
Modeling And Analysis ◽  
Dose Rates ◽  
Limit Value

EVALUATION OF RADIATION DOSE RATE OF RSG-GAS REACTOR. The RSG-GAS reactor has been operated for 30 years. Since the nuclear reactor has been operated for a long time, aging process on its components may occur. One important parameter for maintaining the safety level of the RSG-GAS reactor is to maintain radiation exposure as low as possible, especially in the working area. The evaluation results should be able to demonstrate that the radiation exposure of the RSG-GAS is still safe for workers, communities and the surrounding environments. The purpose of this study is to evaluate radiation exposure in the working area to ensure that the operation of RSG-GAS is still safe for the next 10 years. The scope of this work is confirming the calculation results with the measured radiation dose in the RSG-GAS reactor working area. Measurement of radiation exposure is done by using the installed equipments at some points in the RSG-GAS working area and a portable radiation exposure measurement equipment. The calculations include performance of a modeling and analysis of dose rate distribution based on the composition and geometry data of RSG-GAS by using MCNP.  The analysis results show that the maximum dose rate at Level 0 m working area of RSG-GAS reactor is 3.0 mSv/h with a deviation of 6%, which is relatively close to the measurement value. The evaluation results show that the dose rate in RSG-GAS working area is below the limit value established by the Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPETEN) of 10 mSv/h (for the average effective dose of 20 mSv/year). Therefore, it is concluded that the dose rate in RSG-GAS working area is safe for personnel..Kata kunci: dose rates, RSG-GAS, radiation safety, MCNP.

scholarly journals Radiation dose rates now and in the future for residents neighboring restricted areas of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (10) ◽  
pp. E914-E923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kouji H. Harada ◽  
Tamon Niisoe ◽  
Mie Imanaka ◽  
Tomoyuki Takahashi ◽  
Katsumi Amako ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power Plant ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Dose Rate ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
External Dose ◽  
Dose Rates ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi

Radiation dose rates were evaluated in three areas neighboring a restricted area within a 20- to 50-km radius of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in August–September 2012 and projected to 2022 and 2062. Study participants wore personal dosimeters measuring external dose equivalents, almost entirely from deposited radionuclides (groundshine). External dose rate equivalents owing to the accident averaged 1.03, 2.75, and 1.66 mSv/y in the village of Kawauchi, the Tamano area of Soma, and the Haramachi area of Minamisoma, respectively. Internal dose rates estimated from dietary intake of radiocesium averaged 0.0058, 0.019, and 0.0088 mSv/y in Kawauchi, Tamano, and Haramachi, respectively. Dose rates from inhalation of resuspended radiocesium were lower than 0.001 mSv/y. In 2012, the average annual doses from radiocesium were close to the average background radiation exposure (2 mSv/y) in Japan. Accounting only for the physical decay of radiocesium, mean annual dose rates in 2022 were estimated as 0.31, 0.87, and 0.53 mSv/y in Kawauchi, Tamano, and Haramachi, respectively. The simple and conservative estimates are comparable with variations in the background dose, and unlikely to exceed the ordinary permissible dose rate (1 mSv/y) for the majority of the Fukushima population. Health risk assessment indicates that post-2012 doses will increase lifetime solid cancer, leukemia, and breast cancer incidences by 1.06%, 0.03% and 0.28% respectively, in Tamano. This assessment was derived from short-term observation with uncertainties and did not evaluate the first-year dose and radioiodine exposure. Nevertheless, this estimate provides perspective on the long-term radiation exposure levels in the three regions.

scholarly journals Distribution of Radiation Dose-Rates in Hot Lab of PET Center and Ways of Reducing Radiation Exposure for Persons Working There

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Keiko Osodo ◽  
Kouji Oomori ◽  
Yoshio Ito ◽  
Hideo Shibata ◽  
Kouji Murakami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Dose Rates

scholarly journals Radiation Medical Countermeasures and Use of EPR Biodosimetry to Facilitate Effectiveness of Applied Clinical Procedures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay K. Singh ◽  
Harold M. Swartz ◽  
Thomas M. Seed
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
In Vivo Dosimetry ◽  
Clinical Procedures ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Medical Countermeasures

AbstractThe utility for electron paramagentic resonance (EPR or ESR)-based radiation biodosimetry has received increasing recognition concerning its potential to assist in guiding the clinical management of medical countermeasures in individuals unwantedly exposed to injurious levels of ionizing radiation. Similar to any of the standard physical dosimetric methods currently employed for screening clinically significant radiation exposures, the EPR-based in vivo dosimetry approach would serve to complement and extend clinical assessments (e.g., blood analyses, cytogenetics, etc.), specifically to more accurately assign the extent of ionizing radiation exposure that individuals might have received. In the case of EPR biodosimetry of biological samples such as nails, teeth, and bones, the method has the capability of providing information on the physical dose at several specific bodily sites and perhaps additonal information on the homogeneity of the exposure as well as its overall magnitude. This information on radiation dose and distribution would be of significant value in providing medical management to given individuals at health risk due to radiation exposure. As these measurements provide information solely on physical measures of the radiation dose and not on the potential biological impact of a particular dose, they are complementary, albeit supplemental, to the array of currently available biologically based biodosimetry and clinical findings. In aggregate, these physical and biological measures of radiation exposure levels (dose) would most certainly provide additional, useful information for the effective medical management of radiation exposed individuals.

EVALUATION OF RADIATION DOSE IN DIFFERENT POSITIONS AROUND THE PATIENT TABLE DURING INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY PROJECTIONS

2019 ◽  
Vol 188 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-204
Author(s):  
Y Lahfi ◽  
A Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Dose Rate ◽  
Radiation Protection ◽  
Interventional Cardiology ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Dose Rates ◽  
Patient Table ◽  
The Right

Abstract The aim of the present study was to evaluate the radiation exposure around the patient table as relative to the cardiologist position dose value. The dose rates at eight points presuming staff positions were measured for PA, LAO 30° and RAO 30° radiographic projections, and then normalized to the cardiologist’s position dose-rate value. The results show that in PA and RAO 30° projections, the normalized dose rate was higher by 9–22% at the right side of the table at a distance of 50 cm, while it was higher up to 31% at the left side for the same measured points in the LAO 30°. The differences of normalized dose rates for the both table sides were lower and decreased at farther positions. The obtained results correspond to the recommendations of staff radiation protection in Cath-labs with regards to X-ray tube and detector positions.

"Subacute" course of chronic radiation syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
pp. 572-579
Author(s):  
Irina A. Galstyan ◽  
Nelya A. Metlyaeva ◽  
Mikhail V. Konchalovsky ◽  
Vladimir Yu. Nugis ◽  
Olga V. Shcherbatykh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Dose Rate ◽  
Chronic Exposure ◽  
Prolonged Exposure ◽  
Production Factor ◽  
Clear Understanding ◽  
Dose Rates ◽  
Chronic Radiation ◽  
Radiation Material

Introduction. The use of ionizing radiation as a production factor in the late 1940s - early 1950s. began in the absence of a clear understanding of the permissible radiation doses for workers, as well as knowledge of diagnostic criteria and developed therapeutic measures for developing chronic radiation sickness (CRS). Since then, a great deal of experience has been accumulated in the diagnosis and treatment of CRS. Currently, there are no conditions at the workplace for chronic exposure of workers in doses exceeding the permissible ones. However, taking into account the constant expansion of the scope of using sources of ionizing radiation, it is necessary to remember about the possibility of CRS development due to prolonged exposure in case of violation of their storage or their loss. The study aimed to explore the formation of radiation bone marrow syndrome (RBS) due to chronic exposure in doses that exceed the maximum permissible, accumulated with different dose rates of radiation. Material and methods. We selected the medical records of 27 people (24 men and 3 women) who had RBS as a result of chronic professional gamma radiation exposure. The selection criteria were the diagnosis of grade II-III chronic radiation syndrome (CRS) in the presence of agranulocytosis or anemic syndrome in the period of the disease formation and, especially, in the development of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or aplastic anemia in the period of the CRS consequences. Identified clinical and dosimetric CRS features of 27 patients exposed to chronic irradiation with a dose rate of 0.0002-0,009 Gy/h and the summary dose of 1.7 and 9.6 Gy, accumulated over a period of 6 to 96 months were compared the characteristics of 84 patients CRS exposed a lower dose rates (less than 0,0003 Gy/h) and 26 patients with acute radiation syndrome moderate (II) severity as a result of irradiation the dose rates of 0.14-3,7 Gy/h, total dose of 2 to 4 Gy. Results. The criteria of atypical subacute CRS course are identified: the rate of chronic radiation exposure - not less than 0.001-0.009 Gy/h with a summary dose of 1.7-9.6 Gy accumulated over a period of 6-96 months, the presence of agranulocytosis in the period of CRS formation and anemic syndrome in the periods of CRS formation and outcomes. These signs predict the development MDS in 60% of the patients in the period of the CRS consequences. Conclusion. Retrospective study determined that long-term human exposure to a dose rate of 0.001-0,009 Gy/h (0,005-0,05 Gy/day) and more in the accumulation of a summary dose of 1.7 and 9.6 Gy and duration of contact 6-96 months in 60% of cases can be expected development CRS with a subacute clinical course RBS. The main factor determining this feature of the course of RBS is the dose rate exceeding 0.001 Gy / h (2 Gy/year). In the subacute course of CRS, the early outcome in MDS is essentially deterministic. The development of agranulocytosis and anemic syndrome are typical signs of the subacute course of CRS.

Radiation Exposure From Diagnostic Imaging in Patients with Lymphoma - The Cost Of The Cure?

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 557-557
Author(s):  
Maeve P Crowley ◽  
Siobhan B O'Neill ◽  
Damien C O'Neill ◽  
Joesph A Eustace ◽  
Brian R Healey Bird ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Diagnostic Imaging ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cumulative Exposure ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Radiological Procedures

Abstract Introduction The American Cancer Society anticipates the diagnosis of 80,000 new cases of lymphoma in the US in 2013. Cancer Research UK estimates that more than 80% of Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients and more than 60% of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) patients will be alive 5 or more years after diagnosis. As survival rates improve, focus shifts to ensuring quality of life in survivors and decreasing potential toxicity. Radiological procedures play a prominent role in diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response. Exposure to ionizing radiation has been linked to an increased risk of malignancy (Pearce et al 2012, Miglioretti et al 2013, Mathews et al 2013). Cumulative exposure in excess of 75mSv has been estimated to increase cancer mortality by 7.3% (Cardis et al 2007). There is a paucity of data in the literature regarding cumulative radiation exposure in patients with lymphoma. In cancer treatment, the aim is individualized management strategies. This should also be the goal for diagnostic procedures (O' Neill et al 2011, Fletcher et al 2012). Methods A retrospective review of all patients on a prospectively maintained database with biopsy proven HL or NHL between January 2009 and July 2012 was conducted in a University hospital group. The cumulative effective radiation dose (CED) was calculated using standardized procedure-specific radiation dose levels. Results Four hundred and eighty six patients were included in the study. Mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 59 (17) years and 15% were aged < 40. Fifty-nine percent were men. Sixteen percent had HL; 84% had NHL. There were a total of 1127 patient-years of follow-up, with 15% having <1 year and 10% having 5 or more years of follow-up. Ninety-nine per cent of patients had diagnostic imaging. A total of 5748 radiological procedures were performed, equivalent to one procedure every 70 patient days of follow-up. The median estimated total CED ( IQR) per subject was 69mSv (42-118). Forty- six percent had a total CED >75mSv and 14% had a total CED >150mSv – SeeFigure 1. CT contributed 89% of the radiation dose and PET-CT contributed 8%. Patients aged <40 had a median CED (IQR) of 89mSv (55-124). Seventy-five per cent of these patients had a potentially curable malignancy (66% had HL; 5% had Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma; 4% had Burkitt Lymphoma). Patients who underwent stem cell transplantation had a median CED (IQR) of 162mSv (135-225) with 59% having radiotherapy as part of their management. Univariate analysis showed that age (p<0.001), duration of lymphoma (p<0.001) and stage (<0.001) were associated with CED. Discussion This study highlights the considerable ionizing radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging in patients with lymphoma. This is especially relevant in young people who would be considered the most radiosensitive and at highest risk for secondary malignancies. Low grade lymphomas are relapsing and remitting in nature and frequently require re-staging imaging over many years. Longer follow-up will be required here to potentially explain the non-significant trend between histological subtype and different CED. The American College of Radiology stated in 2013 that when used appropriately, the benefits of ionizing radiation far outweigh the risks. However, to minimize risk, institutions should participate in national dose registries. With the widespread use of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), this will be feasible. Low dose CT imaging has emerged as a mechanism for minimizing CED. Dose reduction strategies incorporating patient-specific information would optimize imaging while minimizing the harmful effects (Shah et al 2012). Novel CT reconstruction algorithms allow diagnostic quality imaging to be obtained at reduced radiation doses without the prohibitive noise that would otherwise be present (Prakash et al 2010). Procedures which do not involve ionizing radiation such as MRI and ultrasound are becoming increasingly popular. There is growing interest in PET-MRI for staging of malignancies (Appenzeller 2013) but as yet, PET-CT remains superior. For patients with potentially curable lymphoma, particularly young patients with higher CED, consideration should be given to these strategies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Chernobyl-level radiation exposure damages bumblebee reproduction: a laboratory experiment

2020 ◽  
Vol 287 (1937) ◽  
pp. 20201638
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Raines ◽  
Penelope R. Whitehorn ◽  
David Copplestone ◽  
Matthew C. Tinsley
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Dose Rate ◽  
Colony Growth ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Radiological Protection ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Exclusion Zone ◽  
Radiation Dose Rate ◽  
Dose Rates

The consequences for wildlife of living in radiologically contaminated environments are uncertain. Previous laboratory studies suggest insects are relatively radiation-resistant; however, some field studies from the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone report severe adverse effects at substantially lower radiation dose rates than expected. Here, we present the first laboratory investigation to study how environmentally relevant radiation exposure affects bumblebee life history, assessing the shape of the relationship between radiation exposure and fitness loss. Dose rates comparable to the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (50–400 µGy h −1 ) impaired bumblebee reproduction and delayed colony growth but did not affect colony weight or longevity. Our best-fitting model for the effect of radiation dose rate on colony queen production had a strongly nonlinear concave relationship: exposure to only 100 µGy h −1 impaired reproduction by 30–45%, while further dose rate increases caused more modest additional reproductive impairment. Our data indicate that the practice of estimating effects of environmentally relevant low-dose rate exposure by extrapolating from high-dose rates may have considerably underestimated the effects of radiation. If our data can be generalized, they suggest insects suffer significant negative consequences at dose rates previously thought safe; we therefore advocate relevant revisions to the international framework for radiological protection of the environment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document