scholarly journals Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on scaffold-free ectopic bone formation in skeletal muscle

2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 242-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munenori Watanuki ◽  
Koshi N. Kishimoto ◽  
Satoshi Kotajima ◽  
Sadahiro Iwabuchi ◽  
Shoichi Kokubun
2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Nakanishi ◽  
Pao-Li Wang ◽  
Morio Ochi ◽  
Kazuyo Nakanishi ◽  
Hideki Matsubara

Micromachines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 1488
Author(s):  
Colleen McCarthy ◽  
Gulden Camci-Unal

As explained by Wolff’s law and the mechanostat hypothesis, mechanical stimulation can be used to promote bone formation. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a source of mechanical stimulation that can activate the integrin/phosphatidylinositol 3-OH kinase/Akt pathway and upregulate osteogenic proteins through the production of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). This paper analyzes the results of in vitro and in vivo studies that have evaluated the effects of LIPUS on cell behavior within three-dimensional (3D) titanium, ceramic, and hydrogel scaffolds. We focus specifically on cell morphology and attachment, cell proliferation and viability, osteogenic differentiation, mineralization, bone volume, and osseointegration. As shown by upregulated levels of alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin, increased mineral deposition, improved cell ingrowth, greater scaffold pore occupancy by bone tissue, and superior vascularization, LIPUS generally has a positive effect and promotes bone formation within engineered scaffolds. Additionally, LIPUS can have synergistic effects by producing the piezoelectric effect and enhancing the benefits of 3D hydrogel encapsulation, growth factor delivery, and scaffold modification. Additional research should be conducted to optimize the ultrasound parameters and evaluate the effects of LIPUS with other types of scaffold materials and cell types.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó ◽  
Renata Luri Toma ◽  
Suellen Maurin Feitosa ◽  
Kelly Fernandes ◽  
Paulo S. Bossini ◽  
...  

Pathobiology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 99-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuliang Wu ◽  
Yumi Kawahara ◽  
Tomotaka Manabe ◽  
Kazuyuki Ogawa ◽  
Masaya Matsumoto ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 902-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaliunaa Ganzorig ◽  
Shingo Kuroda ◽  
Yuichi Maeda ◽  
Karima Mansjur ◽  
Minami Sato ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 87 (10) ◽  
pp. 953-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.H. El-Bialy ◽  
R.F. Elgazzar ◽  
E.E. Megahed ◽  
T.J. Royston

Previous studies have shown that therapeutic pulsed ultrasound (pulsed) has superior stimulatory effect on bone fracture healing compared with continuous ultrasound (continuous). Our predictive hypothesis was that pulsed ultrasound can produce better bone formation during mandibular osteodistraction than continuous ultrasound. Thirty-six New Zealand rabbits were divided into 3 groups of 12. Osteodistraction was performed at 3 mm/day for 5 days. Group 1 received pulsed, group 2 received continuous ultrasound, and group 3 was the control group (distraction only). Bone formation was assessed by quantitative bone density (QBD), mechanical testing, and histological examination. In the first 2 wks post-distraction, group 2 showed enhanced bone formation more than group 1 ( p < 0.05); however, in the 3rd and 4th wks, group 1 showed more bone formation than group 2 ( p < 0.05). Earlier stages of bone healing were enhanced more by continuous, whereas late stages were enhanced more by pulsed, ultrasound. Abbreviations: PULSED, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound; CONTINUOUS, low-intensity continuous ultrasound.


2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila S. Montalti ◽  
Natália V. C. K. L. Souza ◽  
Natália C. Rodrigues ◽  
Kelly R. Fernandes ◽  
Renata L. Toma ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document