Definitions of response and monitoring response for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

2013 ◽  
pp. 93-107
Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2270-2270
Author(s):  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
Antonella Gozzini ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2270 An update of the European LeukemiaNet criteria for monitoring response of chronic myeloid leukemia patients was recently published and provisional criteria to evaluate patients during second generation TKI therapy after resistance to imatinib were proposed. In our study we retrospectively tested these criteria in a large series of CML patients resistant to imatinib further treated with second generation TKIs with the aim to analyze the outcome of suboptimal response and failure patients compared to those with optimal response and to validate the provisional criteria for monitoring response. One hundred twenty-seven CML patients resistant to imatinib were collected from 6 different Italian hematologic centers. There were 66 males and 61 females, median age 54 years (range 25–80). Twenty-seven patients were in late chronic phase after IFN resistance. Ninety-seven patients received second-generation TKI after acquired resistance, whereas 30 patients had primary resistance. We found that at different time points (3, 6 and 12 months), patients classified as failure showed significantly worse 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and event-free survival (EFS) than sub-optimal and optimal response patients. At 3 months, “failure” patients, had an OS of 83% compared to 86% of sub-optimal and 97% of optimal response patients (p=0.001); PFS was 77% for failure patients compared to 92% and 99% for sub-optimal and optimal response patients, respectively (p=0.001), whereas EFS was 41% for failure vs 59% for sub-optimal (p=0.001) and 85% and optimal response patients, respectively (sub-optimal vs optimal p<0.001). At 6 months, OS was 82%, 88% and 99% for failure, sub-optimal and optimal response patients (p=0.05), respectively; PFS was 82% for failure compared to 94% and 99% for sub-optimal and optimal response patients, respectively (p=0.001); EFS was 47% vs 69% for failure and sub-optimal response (p=0.001) and 86% for optimal response patients (sub-optimal vs optimal, p<0.001). At 12 months again OS was 84% for failure patients compared to 95% and 99% for sub-optimal and optimal response patients (p=0.04); PFS was 86%, 95% and 99% for failure, sub-optimal and optimal response patients, respectively (p=0.001) and EFS was 48% for failure, 67% for sub-optimal response patients (p=0.002) and 89% for optimal response patients (sub-optimal vs optimal, p<0.001). We found that ELN provisional criteria identified at any times worse EFS for sub-optimal response patients, similar to that of failure patients, and failure criteria at 3 months identified patients who had worse PFS and EFS. ELN provisional criteria for second-generation TKIs treated patients appear to clearly predict outcome and can be useful to identify patients at high risk of progression. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 2799-2810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naranie Shanmuganathan ◽  
Devendra Keshaorao Hiwase ◽  
David Morrall Ross

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (35) ◽  
pp. 6041-6051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Fabrizio Pane ◽  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Giuseppe Saglio ◽  
...  

PurposeTo review and update the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including monitoring, response definition, and first- and second-line therapy.MethodsThese recommendations are based on a critical and comprehensive review of the relevant papers up to February 2009 and the results of four consensus conferences held by the panel of experts appointed by ELN in 2008.ResultsCytogenetic monitoring was required at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Molecular monitoring was required every 3 months. On the basis of the degree and the timing of hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular results, the response to first-line imatinib was defined as optimal, suboptimal, or failure, and the response to second-generation TKIs was defined as suboptimal or failure.ConclusionInitial treatment was confirmed as imatinib 400 mg daily. Imatinib should be continued indefinitely in optimal responders. Suboptimal responders may continue on imatinb, at the same or higher dose, or may be eligible for investigational therapy with second-generation TKIs. In instances of imatinib failure, second-generation TKIs are recommended, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation only in instances of failure and, sometimes, suboptimal response, depending on transplantation risk.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16612-e16612 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Teitelbaum ◽  
D. Spencer ◽  
V. K. Bollu ◽  
B. Chastek ◽  
J. Coombs ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Fabio Stagno ◽  
Paolo Vigneri ◽  
Vittorio Del Fabro ◽  
Stefania Stella ◽  
Salvatore Berretta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document