scholarly journals Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Update of Concepts and Management Recommendations of European LeukemiaNet

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (35) ◽  
pp. 6041-6051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Fabrizio Pane ◽  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Giuseppe Saglio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Molecular Monitoring ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Consensus Conferences ◽  
Cytogenetic Monitoring ◽  
Management Recommendations ◽  
Monitoring Response

PurposeTo review and update the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including monitoring, response definition, and first- and second-line therapy.MethodsThese recommendations are based on a critical and comprehensive review of the relevant papers up to February 2009 and the results of four consensus conferences held by the panel of experts appointed by ELN in 2008.ResultsCytogenetic monitoring was required at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Molecular monitoring was required every 3 months. On the basis of the degree and the timing of hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular results, the response to first-line imatinib was defined as optimal, suboptimal, or failure, and the response to second-generation TKIs was defined as suboptimal or failure.ConclusionInitial treatment was confirmed as imatinib 400 mg daily. Imatinib should be continued indefinitely in optimal responders. Suboptimal responders may continue on imatinb, at the same or higher dose, or may be eligible for investigational therapy with second-generation TKIs. In instances of imatinib failure, second-generation TKIs are recommended, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation only in instances of failure and, sometimes, suboptimal response, depending on transplantation risk.

scholarly journals The Role of Monitoring the Bcr-Abl Transcript Levels in the Management of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-74
Author(s):  
Aliz-Beáta Tunyogi ◽  
I Benedek ◽  
Judit Beáta Köpeczi ◽  
Erzsébet Benedek ◽  
Enikő Kakucs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Molecular Monitoring ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Transcript Levels

Abstract Introduction: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal myeloproliferative disorder; the molecular hallmark of the disease is the BCR-ABL gene rearrangement, which usually occurs as the result of a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) were the first drugs that targeted the constitutively active BCR-ABL kinase and it have become the standard frontline therapy for CML. Monitoring the treatment of CML patients with detection of bcr-abl transcript levels with real time qualitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) is essential in evaluating the therapeutic response. Material and method: At the Clinical Hematology and BMT Unit Tîrgu Mureș, between 2008-2011, we performed the molecular monitoring of bcr-abl transcript levels with RQ-PCR in 16 patients diagnosed with CML. Results: We have 11 patients on imatinib treatment who achieved major molecular response. One patient lost the complete molecular response after 5 years of treatment. Two patients in blast crisis underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from identical sibling donors. The first patient is in complete molecular remission after 4 years of the transplant with mild chronic GVHD. The other patient had an early relapse with treatment refractory disease and died from evolution of the disease. Three patients with advanced phases of the disease present increasing transcript levels. We performed the dose escalation, and for two of them the switch to the second generation of TKI. Conclusions: Regular molecular monitoring of individual patients with CML is clearly desirable. It allows for a reassessment of the therapeutic strategy in cases of rising levels of BCR-ABL as an early indication of loss of response.

Current Therapies for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-125
Author(s):  
Laureen K. Kenealy ◽  
Courtney B. Christenson ◽  
Casey B. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Molecular Monitoring ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Current Therapies

Management strategies for patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have changed dramatically since the introduction of imatinib into clinical trials in 1998. Imatinib is generally accepted, at present, to be the most appropriate initial therapy for newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML; however, a proportion of patients will not respond adequately. Many of these patients may benefit from alternative treatment strategies, including second- and third-generation BCR-ABL kinase inhibitors and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Additionally, with continued improvements in molecular monitoring, it is much more clinically routine to measure ongoing treatment efficacy or characterize pending disease relapse via molecular analysis. The challenge is to now combine molecular monitoring information with timely treatment decisions to achieve the best possible outcomes. Additionally, unanswered questions about HSCT remain, and include (1) What is the role of allogeneic HSCT in CML? (2) What type of transplant, reduced-intensity or myeloablative, should be performed? The goal of this article is to provide an overview of where we stand in the treatment of CML in 2008.

scholarly journals Allografting for Bosutinib, Imatinib, Nilotinib, Dasatinib, and Interferon Resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia without ABL Kinase Mutation

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
B. Uz ◽  
O. Bektas ◽  
E. Eliacik ◽  
H. Goker ◽  
Y. Erbilgin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Abl Kinase ◽  
Kinase Domain Mutation ◽  
Kinase Mutation

The current treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) consists of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, high-risk CML may present with an aggressive course which may result in blastic crisis or a “difficult-to-manage” state with available treatments. The aim of this paper is to report a patient with complicated CML resistant to treatment and progressed despite the administration of bosutinib, imatinib mesylate, nilotinib, dasatinib, interferon alpha 2a, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The striking point of this case story is that no Abl kinase domain mutation against TKIs has been detected during this very complicated disease course of CML. Meanwhile, challenging cases will always be present despite the hope and progress in CML in the TKI era.

scholarly journals A Retrospective Analysis about Frequency of Monitoring in Italian Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients after Discontinuation

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3692
Author(s):  
Matteo Dragani ◽  
Giovanna Rege Cambrin ◽  
Paola Berchialla ◽  
Irene Dogliotti ◽  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Molecular Monitoring ◽  
Delay In Diagnosis ◽  
Number Of Patients

Successful discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been achieved in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Careful molecular monitoring after discontinuation warrants safe and prompt resumption of therapy. We retrospectively evaluated how molecular monitoring has been conducted in Italy in a cohort of patients who discontinued tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment per clinical practice. The outcome of these patients has recently been reported—281 chronic-phase CML patients were included in this subanalysis. Median follow-up since discontinuation was 2 years. Overall, 2203 analyses were performed, 17.9% in the first three months and 38.4% in the first six months. Eighty-six patients lost major molecular response (MMR) in a mean time of 5.7 months—65 pts (75.6%) during the first six months. We evaluated the number of patients who would experience a delay in diagnosis of MMR loss if a three-month monitoring schedule was adopted. In the first 6 months, 19 pts (29.2%) would have a one-month delay, 26 (40%) a 2-month delay. Very few patients would experience a delay in the following months. A less intense frequency of monitoring, particularly after the first 6 months off treatment, would not have affected the success of treatment-free remission (TFR) nor put patients at risk of progression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document