scholarly journals Firm Behavior and the Evolution of Activism: Strategic Decisions and the Emergence of Protest in U.S. Communities

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Piazza ◽  
Fabrizio Perretti

How do firms' strategic decisions affect the emergence and evolution of activism? We examine this question through a study of protests against nuclear power plants in the United States. We find that the decision to cancel construction of a nuclear unit—a substantial victory for activists—is associated with an upsurge in antinuclear protest activity, as emboldened activists stay mobilized even once the level of threat abates. We also find that when a firm decides to complete a nuclear power plant, thereby marking a defeat for activists, antinuclear protests wind down and we witness an increase in mobilization towards other causes. We discuss the implications of our findings for the study of the interaction between social movements and firms.

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Heki Shibata ◽  

In Japan two sets of guidelines pertaining to modern aseismic design are being prepared. One is the guideline for the aseismic design of petrochemical plants and oil refineries, and the other is the code of aseismic design of nuclear power plants. The International Atomic Energy Agency also established its own guideline very recently. Several other countries also provide their own codes or guidelines. Among these, the regulatory guides of the United States are well known and quoted often; however some of them seem to be too sophisticated, for example, the three dimensional input problem. The reason for this is that the requirement of safety for a nuclear power plant is so severe that all events which have even a very low probability of occurrence should be considered. Therefore, if the results of theoretical study indicate an event which may occur even in very low probability, then from the viewpoint of conservatism, the designer must consider that event in this design. Although for the design of a nuclear power plant this might be partly true, the author feels that the probability of occurrence of the event should be evaluated in relation to the potential hazard of the design object. As well as this, he believes that proper understanding of the event in relation to the actual record of failures during past destructive earthquakes should be taken into consideration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2083 (2) ◽  
pp. 022020
Author(s):  
Jiahuan Yu ◽  
Xiaofeng Zhang

Abstract With the development of the nuclear energy industry and the increasing demand for environmental protection, the impact of nuclear power plant radiation on the environment has gradually entered the public view. This article combs the nuclear power plant radiation environmental management systems of several countries, takes the domestic and foreign management of radioactive effluent discharge from nuclear power plants as a starting point, analyses and compares the laws and standards related to radioactive effluents from nuclear power plants in France, the United States, China, and South Korea. In this paper, the management improvement of radioactive effluent discharge system of Chinese nuclear power plants has been discussed.


Author(s):  
Eugene Imbro ◽  
Thomas G. Scarbrough

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has established an initiative to risk-inform the requirements in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) for the regulatory treatment of structures, systems, and components (SSCs) used in commercial nuclear power plants. As discussed in several Commission papers (e.g., SECY-99-256 and SECY-00-0194), Option 2 of this initiative involves categorizing plant SSCs based on their safety significance, and specifying treatment that would provide an appropriate level of confidence in the capability of those SSCs to perform their design functions in accordance with their risk categorization. The NRC has initiated a rulemaking effort to allow licensees of nuclear power plants in the United States to implement the Option 2 approach in lieu of the “special treatment requirements” of the NRC regulations. In a proof-of-concept effort, the NRC recently granted exemptions from the special treatment requirements for safety-related SSCs categorized as having low risk significance by the licensee of the South Texas Project (STP) Units 1 and 2 nuclear power plant, based on a review of the licensee’s high-level objectives of the planned treatment for safety-related and high-risk nonsafety-related SSCs. This paper discusses the NRC staff’s views regarding the treatment of SSCs at STP described by the licensee in its updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) in support of the exemption request, and provides the status of rulemaking that would incorporate risk insights into the treatment of SSCs at nuclear power plants.


2014 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 73-80
Author(s):  
Hui-yi TSENG

In 2013, the Ma administration had implemented various domestic reforms, such as revamping the military trial system and the fourth nuclear power plant construction plan. Ma's popularity rating plummeted after the Wang Jin-pyng wiretapping scandal broke out. Ma managed to balance between China, the United States and Japan. The ineffectualness of the Ma administration is likely to negatively impact on the Kuomintang's performance in the coming local election in end 2014.


Author(s):  
Michael H. Fox

Nuclear power is considered by many to be an old technology locked in the past— they say the future is with solar and wind. Commercial nuclear power began in 1951 when Russia built the first civilian nuclear power reactor, followed by the British in 1956 and the Americans in 1957. In the 1960s and 1970s, nuclear power plants blossomed all over the world. There were 42 reactors in the United States in 1973; by 1990 there were 112. Some of these were closed, so by 1998 there were 104 operating nuclear reactors (the same number operating at the end of 2012) providing about 100 GWe (gigawatts electric ) to the grid. Worldwide, there were 432 operating nuclear reactors as of mid-2013. Nuclear reactors have been providing about 20% of the electricity in the United States for over 20 years, with no emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2 ). France gets nearly 75% of its electricity from nuclear power, the highest proportion of any nation. Germany and Japan each got more than 25% of their electricity from nuclear power in 2010; though Germany shut down about half of its reactors, Japan temporarily shut down all of its reactors, and both are considering permanently closing down their reactors after the accident in Fukushima, Japan, in 2011. So nuclear power has been providing electricity for over 50 years and plays a major role in the energy mix for a number of countries. But nuclear power is also critically important for an energy future that will meet our electrical power needs with minimal production of greenhouse gases and benign effects on the environment. We must go back to the future if we want to make serious inroads into reducing greenhouse gases and global warming. To see why nuclear power is critical for the future, let’s begin our journey by touring a nuclear power plant. The Wolf Creek nuclear power plant sits on the flat plains of Kansas about 60 miles south of Topeka and 4 miles from Burlington, about 200 miles east of the wheat fields I farmed as a kid. A 5,090-acre lake filled with crappie, walleye, large and smallmouth bass, and other game fish provides cooling water for the reactor and also provides a fishing mecca for Kansans. The 10,500-acre site, including the reactor complex and the lake, has about 1,500 acres of wildlife habitat, and about one-third is leased to area farmers and ranchers. The plant itself takes up less than half a square mile. The lake provides habitat for waterfowl, as well as for bald eagles and osprey. It is hard to imagine that electricity for 800,000 people is generated in this pristine area of farmland and nature preserve.


2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Steele ◽  
W. Lee Schwendig

On April 26, 1986, one of a cluster of Russian nuclear power plants at Chernobyl exploded and caught fire. Subsequent publicity was massive. By sheer happenstance the authors had just put into motion a study in which an existing nuclear power plant in the western United States was one of four items being investigated as a nontraditional tourist attraction. This unplanned and unforeseeable upheaval in the macroenvironment produced some unusual results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document