scholarly journals Overview of Education, Research, and Innovation in Germany

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendro Wicaksono

The presentation describes the overview of higher education in Germany related to education, research, innovation, and internationalization. The focus of the education part is the dual system of vocational education. The presentation presents the triple helix open innovation model for research and innovation management. Finally, the presentation describes the comparison of internationalization methods in different countries.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendro Wicaksono

The presentation presents the link and match models between higher education institutions and industries in Germany. The first model is the dual system in vocational education. The second model is the triple helix open innovation model.


Author(s):  
Olha Pavlenko

The article discusses the current state of professional training of engineers, in particular, electronics engineers in Ukrainian higher education institutions (HEIs) and explores best practices from US HEIs. The research outlines the features of professional training of electronics engineers and recent changes in Ukrainian HEIs. Such challenges for Ukrainian HEIs as lack of collaboration between higher education and science with industry, R&D cost reduction for HEIs, and downsizing the research and academic staff, the disparity between the available quality of human capital training and the demanded are addressed. The study attempts to identify successful practices of US HEIs professional training of engineers in order to suggest potential improvements in education, research, and innovation for training electronics engineers in Ukraine.


Author(s):  
Isabel Ramos ◽  
José Fernandes

In the past year, knowledge and innovation management have acquired increasing relevance in organizations. In the last decade, open innovation strategy, and in particular, crowdsourcing innovation model has also gained increasing importance. This model is seen as a new innovation model, capable of accelerating the innovation process. Therefore, it is important to understand how organizations can best take advantage of this innovation model. This paper approaches in two ways for commercializing intellectual property: crowdsourcing innovation, and intellectual property marketplaces. Thus, with the intention of understanding the concepts and practices, the study started by collecting scientific articles through bibliographic data bases. The paper provides knowledge about concepts and practices underlying the ways for commercializing intellectual property. It also contributes with a proposal of architecture for an intellectual property marketplace, based on the analysis of practices about crowdsourcing innovation and intellectual property marketplaces. This architecture is still in a draft stage, but already includes helpful insights for organizations interested in applying the open innovation strategy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (04) ◽  
pp. 715-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAUL TROTT ◽  
DAP HARTMANN

The concept of 'open innovation' has received a considerable amount of coverage within the academic literature and beyond. Much of this seems to have been without much critical analysis of the evidence. In this paper, we show how Chesbrough creates a false dichotomy by arguing that open innovation is the only alternative to a closed innovation model. We systematically examine the six principles of the open innovation concept and show how the Open Innovation paradigm has created a partial perception by describing something which is undoubtedly true in itself (the limitations of closed innovation principles), but false in conveying the wrong impression that firms today follow these principles. We hope that our examination and scrutiny of the 'open innovation' concept contributes to the debate on innovation management and helps enrich our understanding.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendro Wicaksono

The presentation discusses the implementation of triple helix innovation model 3, where government, universities, and industries collaborate closely to create an integrated innovation environment. The implementation in Germany focuses on university spin-off, open research and innovation projects, strategic alliances and clusters, an collaborative innovation labs. Finally, implications on Indonesian context are presented.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 4357-4379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando E. García-Muiña ◽  
Laura Fuentes-Moraleda ◽  
Trinidad Vacas-Guerrero ◽  
Juan José Rienda-Gómez

Purpose The hostile environments in which museums operate force them to be innovative. Most of them have fewer resources and are publicly owned. Because these factors may hinder their innovative potential, this paper aims to propose an open innovation model adapted to this type of organization to improve visitors’ experience. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative method based on a thematic analysis is carried out. Data sources are: (i) focus group with stakeholders from the destination and (ii) in-depth interviews with museums experts. Findings This new framework is important because it brings something new to a field that previous research had barely considered. The study of the implementation of open innovation in publicly owned small and medium-sized museums brings to light the growing importance of the relational, organizational, technological and experiential dimensions, their interactions and their main constituent factors. Research limitations/implications The study is limited to a specific type of institution, and results should not be extrapolated to other contexts. The construct of open innovation is highly complex, and that advises future research to include other players. Quantitative methods and longitudinal techniques will contribute to tackling new challenges in future research works. Practical implications Results are helpful for museum managers and policymakers. Stakeholders improve their comprehension of how an open innovation model works because the paper offers a few guidelines for its active designing. A solid networking based on trust and the emphasis on improving the visitor experience determine making-decision processes. Originality/value The paper provides a systemic innovation management model for museums, where there is almost no previous research. It is theoretically supported in the open innovation paradigm, as well as the absorptive capacity framework. The emerging and central role of the experiential dimension constitutes another notable contribution to literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document