WHY 'OPEN INNOVATION' IS OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES

2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (04) ◽  
pp. 715-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAUL TROTT ◽  
DAP HARTMANN
Keyword(s):  
Open Innovation ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Academic Literature ◽  
False Dichotomy ◽  
Innovation Model ◽  
Closed Innovation

The concept of 'open innovation' has received a considerable amount of coverage within the academic literature and beyond. Much of this seems to have been without much critical analysis of the evidence. In this paper, we show how Chesbrough creates a false dichotomy by arguing that open innovation is the only alternative to a closed innovation model. We systematically examine the six principles of the open innovation concept and show how the Open Innovation paradigm has created a partial perception by describing something which is undoubtedly true in itself (the limitations of closed innovation principles), but false in conveying the wrong impression that firms today follow these principles. We hope that our examination and scrutiny of the 'open innovation' concept contributes to the debate on innovation management and helps enrich our understanding.

scholarly journals Emergence of the open innovation model and factors of transition to it

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (01) ◽  
pp. 310-319
Author(s):  
Natalya Udaltsova
Keyword(s):  
Open Innovation ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Academic Literature ◽  
The World ◽  
Transnational Companies ◽  
Innovation Model ◽  
Faster Development ◽  
Implementation Of Innovations ◽  
Closed Innovation

Modern transnational companies are increasingly resorting to the open innovation model. The role of innovation is growing all over the world. The development and implementation of innovations in the current activities of companies characterize the effective competitive development of an organization in the market. This model has a number of advantages: faster development of innovations, the ability to save on R&D via outsourcing innovations, access to the most modern innovations of other companies, etc. The purpose of this study is to identify the factors that determine the transition of an increasing number of companies in the world to the open innovation model. In this paper, using the analysis of academic literature, various views on this process have been considered. The work identifies the factors of the development of the open innovation model in the modern world. As a result of the study, the authors have identified the factors that determine the transition of companies to the open innovation model from the traditional closed innovation model.

Web-Based Intellectual Property MarketPlace

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 58-68
Author(s):  
Isabel Ramos ◽  
José Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Open Innovation ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Innovation Strategy ◽  
Data Bases ◽  
Web Based ◽  
The Past ◽  
Bibliographic Data ◽  
Innovation Model

In the past year, knowledge and innovation management have acquired increasing relevance in organizations. In the last decade, open innovation strategy, and in particular, crowdsourcing innovation model has also gained increasing importance. This model is seen as a new innovation model, capable of accelerating the innovation process. Therefore, it is important to understand how organizations can best take advantage of this innovation model. This paper approaches in two ways for commercializing intellectual property: crowdsourcing innovation, and intellectual property marketplaces. Thus, with the intention of understanding the concepts and practices, the study started by collecting scientific articles through bibliographic data bases. The paper provides knowledge about concepts and practices underlying the ways for commercializing intellectual property. It also contributes with a proposal of architecture for an intellectual property marketplace, based on the analysis of practices about crowdsourcing innovation and intellectual property marketplaces. This architecture is still in a draft stage, but already includes helpful insights for organizations interested in applying the open innovation strategy.

Understanding open innovation in small and medium-sized museums and exhibition halls

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 4357-4379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando E. García-Muiña ◽  
Laura Fuentes-Moraleda ◽  
Trinidad Vacas-Guerrero ◽  
Juan José Rienda-Gómez
Keyword(s):  
Open Innovation ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Visitor Experience ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Innovation Model ◽  
Publicly Owned ◽  
Type Of Institution ◽  
Hostile Environments

Purpose The hostile environments in which museums operate force them to be innovative. Most of them have fewer resources and are publicly owned. Because these factors may hinder their innovative potential, this paper aims to propose an open innovation model adapted to this type of organization to improve visitors’ experience. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative method based on a thematic analysis is carried out. Data sources are: (i) focus group with stakeholders from the destination and (ii) in-depth interviews with museums experts. Findings This new framework is important because it brings something new to a field that previous research had barely considered. The study of the implementation of open innovation in publicly owned small and medium-sized museums brings to light the growing importance of the relational, organizational, technological and experiential dimensions, their interactions and their main constituent factors. Research limitations/implications The study is limited to a specific type of institution, and results should not be extrapolated to other contexts. The construct of open innovation is highly complex, and that advises future research to include other players. Quantitative methods and longitudinal techniques will contribute to tackling new challenges in future research works. Practical implications Results are helpful for museum managers and policymakers. Stakeholders improve their comprehension of how an open innovation model works because the paper offers a few guidelines for its active designing. A solid networking based on trust and the emphasis on improving the visitor experience determine making-decision processes. Originality/value The paper provides a systemic innovation management model for museums, where there is almost no previous research. It is theoretically supported in the open innovation paradigm, as well as the absorptive capacity framework. The emerging and central role of the experiential dimension constitutes another notable contribution to literature.

Web-Based Intellectual Property Marketplace

2013 ◽  
pp. 203-213
Author(s):  
Isabel Ramos ◽  
José Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Open Innovation ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Innovation Strategy ◽  
Data Bases ◽  
Web Based ◽  
The Past ◽  
Bibliographic Data ◽  
Innovation Model

In the past year, knowledge and innovation management have acquired increasing relevance in organizations. In the last decade, open innovation strategy, and in particular, crowdsourcing innovation model has also gained increasing importance. This model is seen as a new innovation model, capable of accelerating the innovation process. Therefore, it is important to understand how organizations can best take advantage of this innovation model. This paper approaches in two ways for commercializing intellectual property: crowdsourcing innovation, and intellectual property marketplaces. Thus, with the intention of understanding the concepts and practices, the study started by collecting scientific articles through bibliographic data bases. The paper provides knowledge about concepts and practices underlying the ways for commercializing intellectual property. It also contributes with a proposal of architecture for an intellectual property marketplace, based on the analysis of practices about crowdsourcing innovation and intellectual property marketplaces. This architecture is still in a draft stage, but already includes helpful insights for organizations interested in applying the open innovation strategy.

scholarly journals The Integration of Independent Inventors in Open Innovation

2012 ◽  
pp. 131-145
Author(s):  
Gavin Smeilus ◽  
Robert Harris ◽  
Andrew Pollard
Keyword(s):  
Open Innovation ◽  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
New Products ◽  
New Product ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Academic Literature ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Innovation Model

Whilst current academic literature points to the growing importance of Open Innovation as a means of companies capturing new products from sources other than internal R & D facilities; the integration of independent inventors, a source of innovative new products, within Open Innovation has proven challenging. This chapter presents a series of preliminary Critical Success Factors, driven by current academic literature, which are intended to positively contribute towards independent inventors becoming more successful suppliers of new product ideas to businesses operating an open innovation model; with the intention that adherence to such factors may have a positive influence on the effectiveness and future sustainability of Open Innovation.

OPEN INNOVATION GROUNDWORK

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050013 ◽  
Author(s):  
BJORN REMNELAND WIKHAMN ◽  
ALEXANDER STYHRE
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Empirical Analysis ◽  
Open Innovation ◽  
Life Science ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Detailed Account ◽  
Academic Literature

Although the concept of open innovation has gained much attention in the field of innovation management, few studies have so far theorized how such initiatives are being enacted in practice. This study is based on an inductive empirical analysis of how AstraZeneca, a large biopharmaceutical corporation, implemented an open innovation initiative called BioVentureHub. In the paper we introduce a theoretical model of open innovation enactment based on four interrelated processes. Three of these processes — conceptualization, mobilization, and operationalization — include activities related to preparing for open innovation, what we call open innovation groundwork. The fourth process — facilitation — involves translating the groundwork into actual open innovation. The study contributes to the broader open innovation domain by its detailed account and theorizing of how open innovation is established in practice. Our methodological approach complements the previous research on open innovation that mostly are based on retrospective accounts or are conceptual in nature. Moreover, the study contributes by illustrating a novel initiative from the life science industry, where open innovation is frequently discussed but where still only a few empirical examples are found in academic literature

scholarly journals Overview of Education, Research, and Innovation in Germany

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendro Wicaksono
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Education Research ◽  
Vocational Education ◽  
Open Innovation ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Dual System ◽  
Research And Innovation ◽  
Innovation Model

The presentation describes the overview of higher education in Germany related to education, research, innovation, and internationalization. The focus of the education part is the dual system of vocational education. The presentation presents the triple helix open innovation model for research and innovation management. Finally, the presentation describes the comparison of internationalization methods in different countries.

Creating and Capturing Value through Crowdsourcing

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Systems Biology ◽  
Computer Science ◽  
Open Innovation ◽  
Product Innovation ◽  
Collective Intelligence ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Uk

Examples of the value that can be created and captured through crowdsourcing go back to at least 1714, when the UK used crowdsourcing to solve the Longitude Problem, obtaining a solution that would enable the UK to become the dominant maritime force of its time. Today, Wikipedia uses crowds to provide entries for the world’s largest and free encyclopedia. Partly fueled by the value that can be created and captured through crowdsourcing, interest in researching the phenomenon has been remarkable. For example, the Best Paper Awards in 2012 for a record-setting three journals—the Academy of Management Review, Journal of Product Innovation Management, and Academy of Management Perspectives—were about crowdsourcing. In spite of the interest in crowdsourcing—or perhaps because of it—research on the phenomenon has been conducted in different research silos within the fields of management (from strategy to finance to operations to information systems), biology, communications, computer science, economics, political science, among others. In these silos, crowdsourcing takes names such as broadcast search, innovation tournaments, crowdfunding, community innovation, distributed innovation, collective intelligence, open source, crowdpower, and even open innovation. The book aims to assemble papers from as many of these silos as possible since the ultimate potential of crowdsourcing research is likely to be attained only by bridging them. The papers provide a systematic overview of the research on crowdsourcing from different fields based on a more encompassing definition of the concept, its difference for innovation, and its value for both the private and public sectors.

scholarly journals Crowdsourcing and open innovation: a systematic literature review, an integrated framework and a research agenda

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Livio Cricelli ◽  
Michele Grimaldi ◽  
Silvia Vermicelli
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Open Innovation ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Four Dimensions ◽  
Word Analysis ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractIn recent years, Open Innovation (OI) and crowdsourcing have been very popular topics in the innovation management literature, attracting significant interest and attention, and inspiring a rich production of publications. Although these two topics share common themes and address similar managerial challenges, to the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic literature review that digs deep into the intersection of both fields. To fill in this gap a joint review of crowdsourcing and OI topics is both timely and of interest. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to carry out a comprehensive, systematic, and objective review of academic research to help shed light on the relationship between OI and crowdsourcing. For this purpose, we reviewed the literature published on these two topics between 2008 and 2019, applying two bibliometric techniques, co-citation and co-word analysis. We obtained the following results: (i) we provide a qualitative analysis of the emerging and trending themes, (ii) we discuss a characterization of the intersection between OI and crowdsourcing, identifying four dimensions (strategic, managerial, behavioral, and technological), (iii) we present a schematic reconceptualization of the thematic clusters, proposing an integrated view. We conclude by suggesting promising opportunities for future research.

SOCIO-ECONOMIC ESSENCE AND CONTENT OF THE CATEGORIES «INNOVATION PROCESS» AND «INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY» (QUESTIONS OF THEORY AND METHODOLOGY)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (181) ◽  
pp. 28-38
Author(s):  
A.A Stepanov ◽  
◽  
M.V. Savina ◽  
I.A Stepanov ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Digital Transformation ◽  
Innovative Activity ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
Economic Paradigm ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Functional Process

Based on a critical analysis of the authors’ various points of view on the content of the concepts of “innovation process” and “innovation activity” from the standpoint of modern concepts of innovation management in the era of information and digital transformation, the features of interrelated categories of the innovation process and innovation activity reflecting transformational changes in the moment are clarified and disclosed and the perspective of an innovative economic paradigm and perceived through the specifics and features of functional process-activity metamorphoses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document