scholarly journals Triple Helix Innovation Model: Inspiration from Germany

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendro Wicaksono
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Alliances ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Research And Innovation ◽  
Open Research ◽  
Collaborative Innovation ◽  
Innovation Projects ◽  
Innovation Model

The presentation discusses the implementation of triple helix innovation model 3, where government, universities, and industries collaborate closely to create an integrated innovation environment. The implementation in Germany focuses on university spin-off, open research and innovation projects, strategic alliances and clusters, an collaborative innovation labs. Finally, implications on Indonesian context are presented.

A Triple Helix Model Based on Open Collaborative Innovation in Colombia

2019 ◽  
pp. 238-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Del Pilar Ramirez-Salazar ◽  
Rafael Ignacio Perez-Uribe ◽  
Carlos Salcedo-Perez
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Regional Innovation ◽  
Joint Work ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Collaborative Processes ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
Creative Solutions ◽  
Collaborative Innovation ◽  
Innovation Model ◽  
The Government

The open collaborative innovation model based on a triple helix proposes a way by which collaborative processes and innovation networks create value. It contains seven components: (1) innovation challenges, (2) internal-external knowledge, (3) paradigm change, (4) leadership, (5) interinstitutional and transdisciplinary teams, (6) communication, and (7) creative solutions; and six principles: (1) identity, (2) agreements,(3) flexibility, (4) commitment, (5) recognition, and (6) trust. This research emphasizes on the importance of Component 5 for programs of open collaborative innovation, since the joint work among the academy, the government, and the industry to create a triple helix consolidates systems of regional innovation that are necessary to improve national competitiveness and productivity.

scholarly journals Research: From Idea to Commercialization

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendro Wicaksono
Keyword(s):  
Data Management ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Research Topics ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Business Plans ◽  
The Road ◽  
Research And Innovation ◽  
Innovation Model

The presentation focuses on the processes in research and innovation, from transforming ideas to research topics to exploitation and commercialization of research results, It also describes the research and innovation landscape in Germany and the implementation of the triple helix innovation model, The road of commercialization of research results is also presented including data management, IPR management, and creating business plans.

scholarly journals Overview of Education, Research, and Innovation in Germany

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendro Wicaksono
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Education Research ◽  
Vocational Education ◽  
Open Innovation ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Innovation Management ◽  
Dual System ◽  
Research And Innovation ◽  
Innovation Model

The presentation describes the overview of higher education in Germany related to education, research, innovation, and internationalization. The focus of the education part is the dual system of vocational education. The presentation presents the triple helix open innovation model for research and innovation management. Finally, the presentation describes the comparison of internationalization methods in different countries.

Managing triadic supplier relationships in collaborative innovation projects: a relational view perspective

2022 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Patrucco ◽  
Christine Mary Harland ◽  
Davide Luzzini ◽  
Federico Frattini
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Exchange ◽  
Relational View ◽  
Empirical Examination ◽  
Supplier Relationships ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Complementary Resources ◽  
Triadic Relationships ◽  
Collaborative Innovation ◽  
Innovation Projects ◽  
Innovation Project

Purpose Suppliers are essential partners in innovation projects, as they own resources, knowledge assets and capabilities that complement those of buying firms. In today’s competitive environment, firms may choose to collaborate with suppliers beyond dyads, forming triadic or three-party relationships. Using the theoretical lens of the relational view (RV), this study aims to explore what type of triad configurations firms use to govern supplier relationships in collaborative innovation projects, how they choose to share resources and implications for project performance. Design/methodology/approach The authors use interview data from buyers and suppliers in six case studies of firms involved in ten collaborative innovation projects. The four constructs of the RV are used to observe how firms govern triadic relationships, combine complementary resources, invest in relationship-specific assets and manage information and knowledge exchange with and between suppliers in innovation projects. Findings Four archetypes of triadic relationships in innovation projects – labeled Triangle, A-frame, D-Frame and Line – are presented and characterized in terms of their structural and relational features. The authors discuss how each triad archetype is applicable to different innovation projects according to specific project characteristics. Originality/value This study is pioneering in its empirical examination of triadic relationships in collaborative innovation projects. It provides a novel typology of four archetypes of triad from the perspective of collaborative relationships with suppliers. Through applying the RV, it advances understanding of how triadic relationships are governed, how they invest in relationship-specific assets, how they combine complementary resources and how they exchange knowledge and information in each type of triad appropriate to different innovation project settings. To date, much of the extant literature has focused on dyads.

scholarly journals ORBIS (Open Research Biopharmaceutical Internships Support) – building bridges between academia and pharmaceutical industry to improve drug development

2020 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. e419
Author(s):  
Janina Lulek ◽  
Emilia Jakubowska ◽  
Sharon Davin ◽  
Aleksandra Dumicic Dumicic ◽  
Grzegorz Garbacz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Delivery Systems ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Dosage Forms ◽  
Pharmaceutical Companies ◽  
Drug Bioavailability ◽  
Horizon 2020 ◽  
Medicine Development ◽  
Research And Innovation ◽  
Open Research ◽  
Staff Exchange

Open Research Biopharmaceutical Internships Support (ORBIS) is an international, Horizon 2020 project funded by Maria Skłodowska-Curie Actions, Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE) programme. Six academic institutions and four pharmaceutical companies from seven countries cooperate with the aim to improve the preclinical pathway of medicine development through increased Research and Development (R&D) productivity, especially focusing on processes and technologies which address the challenge of poor drug bioavailability. The RISE scheme supports secondments, meaning that early stage and experienced researchers are sent to consortium partner institutions to advance studies on pharmaceutical preformulation, dosage forms and drug delivery systems and methods of biopharmaceutical evaluation. The ORBIS project enables secondees to gain news skills and develop their competences in an international and intersectoral environment, strengthening the human capital and knowledge synergy in the European pharmaceutical R&D sector.

scholarly journals Characteristics of Sustainable Bioeconomy in the CEE Macro-region

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 5-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktória Vásáry ◽  
Dorottya Szabó
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Food Industry ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Sustainable Growth ◽  
Eastern European ◽  
Strategic Research ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Research And Innovation ◽  
Transnational Cooperation ◽  
The Individual

In the coming decades to achieve further progress in sustainable growth of agriculture, aquaculture, forestry and food industry in the CEE countries there is a need to face specific challenges through the lens of bioeconomy, thus by shifting the emphasis to research, innovation and transnational cooperation for knowledge-based development. A shared strategic research and innovation framework that has already been offered by the Central-Eastern European Initiative for Knowledge-based Agriculture, Aquaculture and Forestry in the Bioeconomy, i.e. by the BIOEAST Initiative might enable these countries to work towards the development of a sustainable bioeconomy while effectively joining the European Research Area. The study is aimed at conceptualizing bioeconomy, analysing key socio-economic indicators of the ‘BIOEAST countries’ bioeconomy and describing the implications for policymakers based on the results of the ‘BIOEAST Bioeconomy Capacity Building Survey’. Based on the results of the survey the major findings of the research verify and strengthen the objectives of the BIOEAST Initiative. The individual results of the survey in terms of major bottlenecks in the supply chain, missing elements hindering competitiveness, the opportunities to raise competitiveness and functions of the intervention system led to the conclusion that the creation of sustainable bioeconomy explicitly requires triple-helix stakeholders to find efficient collaboration mechanisms and build synergies.

Paradigms of Governance

2015 ◽  
pp. 555-576
Author(s):  
Sylvain Lavelle
Keyword(s):  
Public Affairs ◽  
Social Rules ◽  
The Public ◽  
Research And Innovation ◽  
The People ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
Innovation Projects ◽  
Ethical Governance

The elaboration of some paradigms of governance lies upon the opposition between the democratic and the non-democratic, namely, as will be shown and defined, the technocratic (skilled-based power), the ethocratic (virtue-based power), and the epistocratic (wisdom-based power). The point in this opposition is that, contrary to the democratic paradigm, the non-democratic ones assume that the condition for social rules or decisions to be valid is their reflecting, discussing and making by an elite of experts, virtuous or wise individuals or groups. There is no doubt in these paradigms a basic distrust as to the ability of the people to take in charge the public affairs and then to elaborate the appropriate standards and norms accounting for the regulation of actions and conducts. The re-construction of these four paradigms (the democratic and the non-democratic) can be illuminating as regards the interpretation of the actual expert and law-driven trends in the ethical governance of technology. It appears, indeed, that the paradigms of technocracy as well as that of ethocracy still operate in the design of governance settings aimed at regulating research and innovation projects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document