Assessing children’s understanding of complex syntax: a comparison of two methods
We examined the effect of two methods of assessment, multiple-choice sentence-picture matching and an animated truth-value judgement task, on typically developing children’s understanding of relative clauses. Children between the ages of 3;06 and 4;11 took part in the study (n = 103). Results indicated that (i) children performed better on the animation than on the multiple-choice task independently of age (ii) each testing method revealed a different hierarchy of constructions (iii) and the testing method had a greater impact on children’s performance with some constructions more than others. Our results suggest that young children have a greater understanding of complex sentences than previously reported, when assessed in a manner more reflective of how we process language in natural discourse.