scholarly journals Variation of Solar Wind Parameters During Intense Geomagnetic Storms

2017 ◽  
pp. 80-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayush Subedi ◽  
Binod Adhikari ◽  
Roshan Kumar Mishra
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Geomagnetic Storms ◽  
Solar Maximum ◽  
Coronal Holes ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Energy Coupling ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
Geomagnetic Disturbance ◽  
Strong Impact ◽  
Geomagnetic Disturbances

Geomagnetic disturbances are caused by enhanced solar wind magnetospheric energy coupling process. The principal cause of geomagnetic disturbance is the magnetic reconnection that establishes an electrodynamical coupling between the solar wind plasma and magnetosphere. Around solar maximum, the main structures emanating from the sun are sporadic Coronal Mass Ejection (CMEs) and their interplanetary counterparts (ICMEs). During the descending and minimum solar cycle phases, coronal holes occur more often. They appear as dark regions confined to Solar poles during the solar maximum but expand in size and moves toward the solar equator during the descending phase. In this work, we have taken three different geomagnetic storms during solar maxima. For the interpretation of events, we used interplanetary solar wind data and geomagnetic indices. These satellite data and Dst indices (ranging from -100nT to above) are interpreted by using the method of cross correlation. The values of Bz found approximately 20nT, -50nT and -20nT respectively. Similarly, the value of Dst is -250nT, -400nT and -300nT which shows very intense effect. Likewise, the correlation coefficient we obtained from this research work strongly suggest that interplanetary magnetic field Bz has strong impact for the cause of geomagnetic storms.The Himalayan Physics Vol. 6 & 7, April 2017 (80-85)

scholarly journals The effect of the high-speed stream following the corotating interaction region on the geomagnetic activities

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 662-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Watari
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Coronal Hole ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Coronal Holes ◽  
Geomagnetic Disturbance ◽  
Seasonal Effect ◽  
Solar Cycles ◽  
Geomagnetic Disturbances ◽  
High Speed Stream ◽  
Long Duration

Abstract. The high-speed stream following the corotating interaction regions (CIRs) was analyzed. As a result of the analysis, it is found that the geomagnetic field is continuously disturbed in the high-speed stream in question. The geomagnetic disturbances with long duration recurred several rotations between December 1993 and June 1994. These disturbances were associated with a large recurrent coronal hole expanding from the south pole of the Sun. High-speed solar wind from this coronal hole was observed by the IMP-8 satellite during this period. However, the observed intensities of the geomagnetic disturbances were different for each recurrent period. This is explained by the seasonal effect. The disturbed geomagnetic condition continued in the high-speed stream after the passage of the CIRs. The long duration of these disturbances can be explained by the continuous energy input into the Earth's magnetosphere from the high-speed regions following the CIRs. This kind of long-duration geomagnetic disturbance in association with coronal holes has been observed in the declining phase of other solar cycles. The relation between the coronal-hole area and the maximum solar-wind velocity is not good for the well-developed large coronal hole analyzed here.

scholarly journals Asymmetric multifractal model for solar wind intermittent turbulence

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Szczepaniak ◽  
W. M. Macek
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Maximum ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
Intermittent Turbulence ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Scaling Parameters ◽  
Generalized Dimensions ◽  
Multifractal Nature ◽  
Turbulent Cascade

Abstract. We consider nonuniform energy transfer rate for solar wind turbulence depending on the solar cycle activity. To achieve this purpose we determine the generalized dimensions and singularity spectra for the experimental data of the solar wind measured in situ by Advanced Composition Explorer spacecraft during solar maximum (2001) and minimum (2006) at 1 AU. By determining the asymmetric singularity spectra we confirm the multifractal nature of different states of the solar wind. Moreover, for explanation of this asymmetry we propose a generalization of the usual so-called p-model, which involves eddies of different sizes for the turbulent cascade. Naturally, this generalization takes into account two different scaling parameters for sizes of eddies and one probability measure parameter, describing how the energy is transferred to smaller eddies. We show that the proposed model properly describes multifractality of the solar wind plasma.

scholarly journals Latitudinal extent of large-scale structures in the solar wind

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331-1339 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Elliott ◽  
D. J. McComas ◽  
P. Riley
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Coronal Holes ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
Ecliptic Plane ◽  
Plasma Parameters ◽  
Field Polarity ◽  
Interplanetary Physics ◽  
Hydrodynamic Code

Abstract. Comparison of solar wind observations from the ACE spacecraft, in the ecliptic plane at ~ 1 AU, and the Ulysses spacecraft as it orbits over the Sun’s poles, provides valuable information about the latitudinal extent and variation of solar wind structures in the heliosphere. While qualitative comparisons can be made using average properties observed at these two locations, the comparison of specific, individual structures requires a procedure to determine if a given structure has been observed by both spacecraft. We use a 1-D hydrodynamic code to propagate ACE plasma measurements out to the distance of Ulysses and adjust for the differing longitudes of the ACE and Ulysses spacecraft. In addition to comparing the plasma parameters and their characteristic profiles, we examine suprathermal electron measurements and magnetic field polarity to help determine if the same features are encountered at both ACE and Ulysses. The He I l 1083 nm coronal hole maps are examined to understand the global structure of the Sun during the time of our heliospheric measurements. We find that the same features are frequently observed when both spacecraft are near the ecliptic plane. Stream structures derived from smaller coronal holes during the rising phase of solar cycle 23 persists over 20°–30° in heliolatitude, consistent with their spatial scales back at the Sun.Key words. Interplanetary physics (solar wind plasma)

scholarly journals Dynamical evolution of the inner heliosphere approaching solar activity maximum: interpreting Ulysses observations using a global MHD model

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1347-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Riley ◽  
Z. Mikić ◽  
J. A. Linker
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Maximum ◽  
Dynamical Evolution ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Activity Maximum ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Fields ◽  
Interplanetary Physics ◽  
Interaction Regions

Abstract. In this study we describe a series of MHD simulations covering the time period from 12 January 1999 to 19 September 2001 (Carrington Rotation 1945 to 1980). This interval coincided with: (1) the Sun’s approach toward solar maximum; and (2) Ulysses’ second descent to the southern polar regions, rapid latitude scan, and arrival into the northern polar regions. We focus on the evolution of several key parameters during this time, including the photospheric magnetic field, the computed coronal hole boundaries, the computed velocity profile near the Sun, and the plasma and magnetic field parameters at the location of Ulysses. The model results provide a global context for interpreting the often complex in situ measurements. We also present a heuristic explanation of stream dynamics to describe the morphology of interaction regions at solar maximum and contrast it with the picture that resulted from Ulysses’ first orbit, which occurred during more quiescent solar conditions. The simulation results described here are available at: http://sun.saic.com.Key words. Interplanetary physics (Interplanetary magnetic fields; solar wind plasma; sources of the solar wind)

White-light solar corona structure observed by naked eye and processed images

2020 ◽  
Vol 495 (2) ◽  
pp. 2170-2178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vojtech Rušin ◽  
Paul Prikryl ◽  
Emil A Prikryl
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
White Light ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Geomagnetic Storms ◽  
Interplanetary Space ◽  
Coronal Holes ◽  
Human Vision ◽  
Naked Eye ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
White Light Corona

ABSTRACT Light and dark adaptation and luminance contrast enhancement are well-known characteristics of human vision that allow us to observe a wide range of light intensity not fully captured in standard camera images. The naked-eye observations of total eclipses, some recorded with spectacular detail in artists’ paintings, reveal structure that is consistent with images obtained by telescopes equipped with recording media. The actual shape of the corona during a total eclipse depends not only on the phase of the solar cycle but, as can be simply demonstrated, also on the day-to-day variability and spatial distribution of coronal intensity that is determined by solar surface magnetic fields, including the locations of coronal holes that are the sources of high-speed solar wind causing geomagnetic storms. The latter were very similar for the eclipses in 1932, 1994, and 2017, which is the main reason why the naked-eye observations, as well as the processed images (1994 and 2017), of the white-light corona displayed very similar shapes. White-light corona image processing is a useful technique to enhance the contrast to observe fine-scale structure that is consistent with the physics of the solar atmosphere shaped by the magnetic field drawn out into the interplanetary space by solar wind.

scholarly journals Formation of a strong southward IMF near the solar maximum of cycle 23

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 673-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Watari ◽  
M. Vandas ◽  
T. Watanabe
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Magnetic Fields ◽  
Geomagnetic Storms ◽  
Solar Maximum ◽  
Interplanetary Shocks ◽  
Physical Processes ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Fields ◽  
Interplanetary Physics ◽  
Solar Wind Parameters ◽  
Interplanetary Disturbance

Abstract. We analyzed observations of the solar activities and the solar wind parameters associated with large geomagnetic storms near the maximum of solar cycle 23. This analysis showed that strong southward interplanetary magnetic fields (IMFs), formed through interaction between an interplanetary disturbance, and background solar wind or between interplanetary disturbances are an important factor in the occurrence of intense geomagnetic storms. Based on our analysis, we seek to improve our understanding of the physical processes in which large negative Bz's are created which will lead to improving predictions of space weather. Key words. Interplanetary physics (Flare and stream dynamics; Interplanetary magnetic fields; Interplanetary shocks)

Recurrent high-speed solar wind co-rotating interaction region imprint on the ionosphere and atmosphere: GPS TEC variations and atmospheric gravity waves

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Weygand ◽  
Paul Prikryl ◽  
Reza Ghoddousi-Fard ◽  
Lidia Nikitina ◽  
Bharat S. R. Kunduri
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Gravity Waves ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Geomagnetic Storms ◽  
Coronal Holes ◽  
Lower Thermosphere ◽  
Ionospheric Currents ◽  
Atmospheric Gravity Waves ◽  
Atmospheric Gravity

<p>High-speed streams (HSS) from coronal holes dominate solar wind structure in the absence of coronal mass ejections during solar minimum and the descending branch of solar cycle. Prominent and long-lasting coronal holes produce intense co-rotating interaction regions (CIR) on the leading edge of high-speed plasma streams that cause recurrent ionospheric disturbances and geomagnetic storms. Through solar wind coupling to the magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere (MIA) system they affect the ionosphere and neutral atmosphere at high latitudes, and, at mid to low latitudes, by the transmission of the electric fields [1] and propagation of atmospheric gravity waves from the high-latitude lower thermosphere [2].</p><p>The high-latitude ionospheric structure, caused by precipitation of energetic particles, strong ionospheric currents and convection, results in changes of the GPS total electron content (TEC) and rapid variations of GPS signal amplitude and phase, called scintillation [3]. The GPS phase scintillation is observed in the ionospheric cusp, polar cap and auroral zone, and is particularly intense during geomagnetic storms, substorms and auroral breakups. Phase scintillation index is computed for a sampling rate of 50 Hz by specialized GPS scintillation receivers from the Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network (CHAIN). A proxy index of phase variation is obtained from dual frequency measurements of geodetic-quality GPS receivers sampling at 1 Hz, which include globally distributed receivers of the RT-IGS network that are monitored by the Canadian Geodetic Survey in near-real-time [4]. Temporal and spatial changes of TEC and phase variations following the arrivals of HSS/CIRs [5] are investigated in the context of ionospheric convection and equivalent ionospheric currents derived from  a ground magnetometer network using the spherical elementary current system method [6,7].</p><p>The Joule heating and Lorentz forcing in the high-latitude lower thermosphere have long been recognized as sources of internal atmospheric gravity waves (AGWs) [2] that propagate both upward and downward, thus providing vertical coupling between atmospheric layers. In the ionosphere, they are observed as traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs) using various techniques, e.g., de-trended GPS TEC maps [8].</p><p>In this paper we examine the influence on the Earth’s ionosphere and atmosphere of a long-lasting HSS/CIRs from recurrent coronal holes at the end of solar cycles 23 and 24. The solar wind MIA coupling, as represented by the coupling function [9], was strongly increased during the arrivals of these HSS/CIRs.</p><p> </p><p>[1] Kikuchi, T. and K. K. Hashimoto, Geosci. Lett. , 3:4, 2016.</p><p>[2] Hocke, K. and K. Schlegel, Ann. Geophys., 14, 917–940, 1996.</p><p>[3] Prikryl, P., et al., J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics, 121, 10448–10465, 2016.</p><p>[4] Ghoddousi-Fard et al., Advances in Space Research, 52(8), 1397-1405, 2013.</p><p>[5] Prikryl et al. Earth, Planets and Space, 66:62, 2014.</p><p>[6] Amm O., and A. Viljanen, Earth Planets Space, 51, 431–440, 1999.</p><p>[7] Weygand J.M., et al., J. Geophys. Res., 116, A03305, 2011.</p><p>[8] Tsugawa T., et al., Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L22101, 2007.</p><p>[9] Newell P. T., et al., J. Geophys. Res., 112, A01206, 2007.</p>

scholarly journals Super Strong Geomagnetic Storms and their Relation with Energetic Solar Features and Disturbances in Solar wind Plasma Parameters

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-156
Author(s):  
P.L.Verma P.L.Verma ◽  
◽  
Manoj Kumar Mishra ◽  
Monika Mishra ◽  
Preetum Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Geomagnetic Storms ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
Plasma Parameters

scholarly journals Earth’s geomagnetic response to solar wind changes associated with solar events at low latitude regions at the TRE MAGDAS Station

2021 ◽  
Vol 880 (1) ◽  
pp. 012009
Author(s):  
R Umar ◽  
S N A Syed Zafar ◽  
N H Sabri ◽  
M H Jusoh ◽  
A Yoshikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Geomagnetic Storms ◽  
Interplanetary Space ◽  
Coronal Holes ◽  
Magnetic Activity ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Geomagnetic Fields ◽  
Solar Events ◽  
Solar Wind Parameters ◽  
Mass Ejection

Abstract The Sun’s magnetic activity influences disturbances that perturb interplanetary space by producing large fluxes of energetic protons, triggering geomagnetic storms and affecting the ground geomagnetic field. The effect of two solar events, namely Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) and Coronal Holes, on geomagnetic indices (SYM/H), solar wind parameters and ground geomagnetic fields has provided magnetic ground data, which were extracted from the Terengganu (TRE, -4.21° N, 175.91° E) Magnetometer (MAGDAS) station, and investigated in this study. Results show that the physical dynamic mechanism in the Earth’s magnetosphere is triggered by various solar wind parameters associated with CMEs and Coronal hole events during the minimum solar cycle of 24 at low latitudes. It is important to study solar wind-magnetosphere coupling because it has an impact on ground-based technological systems and human activities.

scholarly journals Solar cycle effect on geomagnetic storms caused by interplanetary magnetic clouds

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 3383-3389 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.-C. Wu ◽  
R. P. Lepping
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
Solar Minimum ◽  
Geomagnetic Storms ◽  
Solar Maximum ◽  
Solar Wind Speed ◽  
Magnetic Clouds ◽  
Active Period ◽  
Quiet Period ◽  
Solar Wind Parameters

Abstract. We investigated geomagnetic activity which was induced by interplanetary magnetic clouds during the past four solar cycles, 1965–1998. We have found that the intensity of such geomagnetic storms is more severe in solar maximum than in solar minimum. In addition, we affirm that the average solar wind speed of magnetic clouds is faster in solar maximum than in solar minimum. In this study, we find that solar activity level plays a major role on the intensity of geomagnetic storms. In particular, some new statistical results are found and listed as follows. (1) The intensity of a geomagnetic storm in a solar active period is stronger than in a solar quiet period. (2) The magnitude of negative Bzmin is larger in a solar active period than in a quiet period. (3) Solar wind speed in an active period is faster than in a quiet period. (4) VBsmax in an active period is much larger than in a quiet period. (5) Solar wind parameters, Bzmin, Vmax and VBsmax are correlated well with geomagnetic storm intensity, Dstmin during a solar active period. (6) Solar wind parameters, Bzmin, and VBsmax are not correlated well (very poorly for Vmax) with geomagnetic storm intensity during a solar quiet period. (7) The speed of the solar wind plays a key role in the correlation of solar wind parameters vs. the intensity of a geomagnetic storm. (8) More severe storms with Dstmin≤−100 nT caused by MCs occurred in the solar active period than in the solar quiet period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document