scholarly journals Does Drilling Induce Hearing Loss after Modified Radical Mastoidectomy? A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 38-41
Author(s):  
Yogesh Neupane ◽  
Bijaya Kharel ◽  
Heempali Dutta
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Radical Mastoidectomy ◽  
Modified Radical Mastoidectomy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Sensory Neural ◽  
Mastoid Surgery ◽  
Sensory Neural Hearing Loss

Introduction Incidence of sensory neural hearing loss following mastoid surgery varies from 1.2 – 4.5%.There are various causes for postoperative sensorineural hearing loss during mastoid surgery. This study aims to identify whether there is any correlation between drilling and postoperative sensory neural hearing loss. MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in the Department of ENT from January 2018 to June 2019. A total number of 68 patients above five years of age who underwent modified radical mastoidectomy for chronic otitis media squamous were included. Revision surgery, preoperative sensorineural hearing loss, injury to the ossicular chain during surgery, patients with lack of follow up or doubtful reports in mentally challenged were excluded from the study. The average bone conduction threshold was calculated from 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ResultsThere were 43 males and 25 females in the study with a median age of 23.5 years (16-55). The mean preoperative bone conduction threshold in the four frequencies of 500 Hz, 1kHz, 2kHz, 4kHz were -2.06dB, -2.06dB, 3.31dB, 4.63 dB respectively and the mean postoperative bone conduction thresholds were 1.03, 1.32, 5.29, 4.04 respectively. There was a decline of mean of 3.09 dB and 3.38dB only at the low-frequencies (500Hz and 1kHz) BC threshold respectively which were statistically significant, whereas at higher frequency there was no decline in average postoperative BC threshold. ConclusionThere is no definite role of drill in inducing hearing loss and if present other causes of hearing loss should be sought in postoperative sensorineural hearing loss.

scholarly journals How Drill-Generated Acoustic Trauma effects Hearing Functions in an Ear Surgery?

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Paksoy ◽  
Arif Sanli ◽  
Umit Hardal ◽  
Sermin Kibar ◽  
Gokhan Altin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Noise Exposure ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Acoustic Trauma ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Radical Mastoidectomy ◽  
Ear Surgery ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Mastoid Surgery

ABSTRACT Objective In otology, a wide variety of devices are used that have significant noise output, both operated ear and the patient. We aimed to determine hearing damages due to drill-generated acoustic trauma in ear surgery. We want to find how degree drill-generated acoustic trauma is responsible from sensorineural hearing loss in ear surgery. Materials and methods We designed a retrospective study about 100 patients who underwent radical or modiphied radical mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty. The audiometric testing was done both pre and postoperatively to detect any significant hearing loss in the immediate postoperative period. The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon sign and Mann-Whitney U tests. This study proposes that hearing loss is caused by drill noise conducted to the operated ear by vibrations of temporal bone. Results A sensorineural hearing loss soon after mastoid surgery is seen due to the noise generated by the drill. Mean pure-tone thresholds obtained was significantly more in mastoidectomy applied patients when compared to tympanoplasty . Mean bone conduction (BC) hearing levels impaired 6,6 dB in 1 kHz, 5.5 dB in 0.5 kHz, 5 dB in 4.kHz and 3.1 dB in 2 kHz in mastoidectomy groups but improved 5.5 dB in 0.5 kHz, 2.2 dB in 1 kHz, 2.7 dB in 2 kHz in tympanoplasty groups. Statistically significant differences were observed at the 0.5-1 and 4 kHz frequencies pre and postoperative in the hearing thresholds of BC changing in mastoidectomy group, however, the averages of ranks of all pre and postoperative measurement of hearing levels show differences between mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty groups was significant in statistically at independent groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion We conclude that drill-generated noise during mastoid surgery has been incriminated as a cause of sensorineural hearing loss. Drilling during mastoid surgery may result in temporary or permanent noise-induced hearing loss. Possible noise disturbance to the inner ear can only be avoided by minimizing the duration of harmful noise exposure and carefull using burr to near the cochlear structures. How to cite this article Paksoy M, Sanli A, Hardal U, Kibar S, Altin G, Erdogan BA, Bekmez ZE. How Drill-Generated Acoustic Trauma effects Hearing Functions in an Ear Surgery? Int J Head and Neck Surg 2012;3(3):127-132.

Sensorineural hearing loss following induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

2015 ◽  
Vol 129 (8) ◽  
pp. 767-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Atchariyasathian ◽  
K Pruegsanusak ◽  
S Wongsriwattanakul
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Choice Of Treatment

AbstractObjective:To compare the incidence of sensorineural hearing loss between those treated with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy followed by carboplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy and those treated with conventional concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods:Serial pure tone audiometry was conducted in 36 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients who were randomised into 2 groups. The first group received docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy followed by carboplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The second group received conventional concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Results:The incidence of sensorineural hearing loss at speech frequency in the first group was 10 per cent and in the second group was 50 per cent (p = 0.0027). Bone conduction thresholds were significantly increased after completion of the treatment at 2–4 kHz in the first group and at all frequencies in the second group.Conclusion:The docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy regimen followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy was associated with a lower incidence of sensorineural hearing loss than conventional concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This regimen may be the preferred choice of treatment for hearing preservation.

Patterns of hearing loss in non-explosive blast injury of the ear

1997 ◽  
Vol 111 (12) ◽  
pp. 1137-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilead Berger ◽  
Yehuda Finkelstein ◽  
Shabtai Avraham ◽  
Mordehai Himmelfarb
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Conductive Hearing Loss ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Ossicular Chain ◽  
Blast Injury ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Conductive Hearing

AbstractA prospective study of hearing loss in 120 cases with non-explosive blast injury of the ear, gathered over a six-year period, is presented. Thirty-three (27.5 per cent) patients had normal hearing, 57 (47.5 per cent) conductive hearing loss, 29 (24.2 per cent) mixed loss and one (0.8 per cent) had pure sensorineural loss. The severity of conductive hearing loss correlated with the size of the eardrum perforation; only a marginal difference was found between water and air pressure injuries, with respect to this type of hearing loss. Of all locations, perforations involving the posterior-inferior quadrant of the eardrum were associated with the largest air-bone gap. Audiometric assessment revealed that none of the patients suffered ossicular chain damage. Three patterns of sensorineural hearing loss were identified: a dip at a single frequency, two separate dips, and abnormality of bone conduction in several adjacent high frequencies. Involvement of several frequencies was associated with a more severe hearing loss than a dip in a single frequency. Healing of the perforation was always accompanied by closure of the air-bone gap, while the recovery of the sensorineural hearing loss was less favourable.

Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Chronic Ear Surgery

1977 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. L. Smyth
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Clinical Evidence ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Ossicular Chain ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Inflammatory Factors ◽  
Speech Discrimination ◽  
Ear Surgery ◽  
Cochlear Damage

The author's series of 3000 consecutive operations of tympanoplasty from 1960 to 1975 were reviewed in regard to the occurrence of sensorineural hearing loss as a consequence of the surgical procedure. Worsening of bone conduction thresholds by 10 dB through the frequencies 500 to 4000 cps, or a 10% reduction in speech discrimination scores were considered significant. Whereas in transcanal tympanoplasty the incidence of cochlear damage was greater in ears when initially the ossicular chain was incomplete, by contrast in combined approach tympanoplasty the risk was greater when the chain was intact initially. It was concluded that cochlear trauma was usually due to 1) the hydraulic effect of excessive stapes manipulation during the removal of disease, and 2) the development of a perilymph fistula. The unpredictable predisposing threat of cochlear fragility due to genetic and inflammatory factors was emphasized and the poor results of tympanoplasty in tympanosclerosis were underlined. The current methods of treating sensorineural hearing loss after tympanoplasty were enumerated and discussed. It was concluded that although those aimed at improving labyrinthine circulation had theoretical backing, there is as yet little experimental or clinical evidence to support the claims of their protagonists.

scholarly journals Sensorineural hearing loss in chronic otitis media: analysis of an overlooked entity!

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1355
Author(s):  
Kishore C. Shetty ◽  
Samatha K. Jayaramaiah ◽  
Biniyam Kolathingal ◽  
Shravan Alva
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Otitis Media ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Chronic Otitis Media ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Media Analysis ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Major Public Health Problem ◽  
Cross Sectional

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> In developing countries, hearing loss continues to be the major public health problem. Among the various causes of hearing loss, chronic otitis media (COM) is one of the commonest. In COM, the presence of sensorineural hearing loss is well established. Our study intends to determine the prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss in chronic otitis media.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was a cross sectional descriptive study of 151 subjects between the age group of 10 and 60 years. Patients having unilateral chronic otitis media of both mucosal and squamosal types were selected. All patients were evaluated clinically and audiologically. The type, duration of disease and type of perforation is correlated with degree of sensorineural hearing loss. Interaural differences in bone conduction thresholds at 500 Hz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz and 4 kHz were also noted.  </p><p><strong>Results:</strong> A statistically significant correlation was noted between type of disease and perforation with hearing loss. A significant interaural difference was noted across the speech frequencies. Sensorineural hearing loss of 19.1% was seen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Significant sensorineural hearing loss is seen in chronic otitis media which was greater in squamosal disease. Statistically significant correlation was noted between type of disease and type of perforation with hearing loss.</p>

Otosclerotic Involvement of the Cochlea: A Histologic and Audiologic Study

1981 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis R. Elonka ◽  
Edward L. Applebaum
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
The Other ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Stapes Footplate ◽  
Temporal Bones ◽  
Similar Incidence ◽  
Sensorineural Loss

This study sought correlations between sensorineural hearing loss and otosclerotic endosteal involvement in 29 temporal bones examined histologically. The sensorineural hearing loss of the affected parts of the cochlea was determined by the last antemortum bone conduction audiogram available. There were eight temporal bones with only stapes footplate involvement, six with one discrete focus of otosclerotic endosteal involvement, and 15 with two or more foci of endosteal involvement. Analysis of audiometric data showed that the group of bones with two or more foci of endosteal involvement had a similar incidence of 45 dB sensorineural loss (9 of 15 or 60%) as did the group with no endosteal involvement (5 of 8 or 62%). The group with two or more foci had a greater incidence of 60 dB or greater sensorineural loss (46%) compared with the groups with none (12%) or one focus (16%) involved. Correlation between hearing toss and involvement of cochlear endosteum was poor. Correlation existed in only 2 of 15 ears with two or more foci involving the cochlear endosteum. There was no correlation in the other groups. It appears that cochlear endosteal involvement alone may not be sufficient explanation for the sensorineural hearing loss found with otosclerosis, except in the most severely involved ears.

scholarly journals Prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss in newborns in a hospital from a developing country

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-63
Author(s):  
Juan C. Ospina-García ◽  
Irene C. Pérez-García ◽  
Diana M. Guerrero-González ◽  
Nataly J. Sánchez-Solano ◽  
Juan D. Salcedo-Betancourt
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Family History ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Universal Newborn Hearing Screening ◽  
Automated Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Mean

Objective This study aimed to determine the prevalence of nonsyndromic congenital sensorineural hearing loss at the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia, and to describe the risk factors associated with this condition.Materials and Methods A prospective, observational cross-sectional study with bivariate analysis was conducted. A three-phase process using the Otoacoustic Emissions test screened all live newborns between June 2013 and June 2014. Negative cases were confirmed by Automated Auditory Brainstem Response test.Results A total of 962 newborns were screened with Otoacoustic Emissions test bilaterally: 401 males (46.36%), 464 females (53.64%). The mean weight was 2 798.10 g (95%CI: 2 766.51 - 2 839.76). The mean height was 48.60 cm (95%CI: 48.38 - 48.79). The mean age was 16.24 days (95%CI: 15.47 - 17.01). The mean maternal age was 27.37 years (95%CI: 26.76 - 27.98). There was a family history of hearing loss in 9.48% of the cases (n=90), and a family history of genetic diseases in 100 cases (10.56%). There were 14 cases of TORCH infections (1.45%), 375 admissions to the NICU (39.06%), 160 cases of neonatal jaundice (20.1%), and 79 cases of postpartum infections (8.21%). One live newborn presented with microtia.Conclusions The prevalence of congenital sensorineural hearing loss was 0.31% in both ears, and 0.11% in one ear. Currently, Colombia lacks a public universal newborn hearing screening program, and its future implementation faces great challenges. 

Audiometric Bing Test for Determination of Minimum Masking Levels for Bone-Conduction Tests

1974 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick N. Martin ◽  
Ernest C. Butler ◽  
Paul Burns
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Conductive Hearing Loss ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
The Other ◽  
Occlusion Effect ◽  
Conductive Hearing

Occlusion effects were determined and compared on three groups of subjects (20 normal hearers, 20 with conductive hearing loss, and 20 with sensorineural hearing loss). As in previous studies, the occlusion effects of the conductive group were clearly different from those of the other two groups, especially at 250 Hz. Two procedures are discussed which use the principle of the Bing test to determine when and how to compensate for the occlusion effect while masking for bone conduction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document