Ustalenie właściwości organu administracji publicznej w zakresie prowadzenia egzekucji obowiązkowych szczepień ochronnych i występowania z wnioskiem o ukaranie za uchylanie się od tego obowiązku

The article is devoted to determine the authority competent to carry out the execution of the obligation to vaccinate, as well as the authority competent to apply for punishment of those who persistently evade preventive vaccinations on the basis of the Code of Misdemeanours in Poland. After analysing the competencies of the public administration bodies and comparing them with the judicial decisions of the administrative courts and the Supreme Court issued in cases involving mandatory preventive vaccination, which present an inconsistent line of jurisprudence, the author concludes that the enforcement body is the province governor. However, it is necessary to postulate legislative changes, primarily in the area of the possible transfer of competencies from the province governor to the State Sanitary Inspection.

Download Full-text

Problemy związane z deﬁnicją lasu w polskim systemie prawnym

Studia Prawa Publicznego ◽

10.14746/spp.2017.3.19.4 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 71-91

Author(s):

Jędrzej Bujny ◽

Tymoteusz Mądry

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Administrative Law ◽

Vast Number ◽

Judicial Decisions ◽

Data Binding ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Administrative Courts ◽

Administrative Proceedings ◽

Normative Value ◽

Potential Use

The article touches upon the controversies around the deﬁ nition of a forest contained in the provision of Article 3 of the Act of 28 September 1991 on forests, present in the doctrine as well as in judicial decisions in administrative law. The interpretation of the above provision is analysed and the views presented in the doctrine and the judicial rulings, which sometimes include contradicting arguments, are examined. In the ﬁ rst part of the article individual elements of the deﬁ nition of a forest have been identiﬁ ed and the diffi culties with their interpretation that have led to the emergence of a vast number of judicial decisions and rulings delivered by administrative courts as well as the Supreme Court have been presented. The second part contains deliberations on the importance of the data included in the land and buildings register and their potential use for the classiﬁ cation of land as a forest on the grounds of concrete administrative proceedings, including these on tax matters. In this context the normative value of the provisions of the Act of 17 May 1989: Geodetic and Cartographic Law and individual tax laws making these data binding and applicable has been examined as well. Also this latter issue generates frequently diverging opinions expressed by administrative courts. The last part of the paper contains de lege lata and de lege ferenda postulates intended to reconcile the presented controversies connected with the classiﬁ cation of individual land as forest. The authors hope that implementation of these postulates will contribute to the uniﬁ cation of the judiciary opinions regarding the concept of a forest and consequently will help to eliminate the existing doubts.

Download Full-text

Pengaturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Secara Elektronik

Jurist-Diction ◽

10.20473/jd.v4i4.28454 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 4 (4) ◽

pp. 1399

Author(s):

Guntur Aris Prabowo

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Dispute Settlement ◽

The State ◽

Legal Issues ◽

The Public ◽

Procedural Law ◽

Technological Advances ◽

State Administration ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

The Law

AbstractThe title of this research is “Elektonic State Administration Dispute Settlement Arrangements” provides an explanation of the legal issues discussed by the author about 1) Comparison of procedural law ini State Administrative Courts which is carried out coventionally and electronically; and 2) Constraints to the application of Electronic Court in the State Administrative Court. Rapid technological advances make it easy for humans in all area, one of which is in the law. Legal breakthroughs carried out by the Supreme Court can be seen in the existence of Electronic Court. The State Administrative Court, which is an institution under the Supreme Court, implements electronic court. The State Administrative Court has a function to protect the public against government actions and policies.Keywords: The State Administrative Court; Electronic Court; Conventional Court.AbstrakPenelitian ini yang berjudul “Pengaturan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Secara Elektronik” memberikan penjelasan pada rumusan masalah yang dibahas oleh penulis tentang 1) Perbandingan hukum acara di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yang dilakukan secara konvensional dengan elektronik; dan 2) Kendala penerapan Peradilan Elektronik di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Kemajuan teknologi yang sangat pesat memberikan kemudahan bagi manusia di segala bidang, salah satunya adalah di bidang hukum. Terobosan hukum yang dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Agung dapat dilihat dengan adanya Peradilan Elektronik. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yang merupakan lembaga yang berada di bawah Mahkamah Agung menerapkan peradilan elektronik. Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara memiliki fungsi untuk melindungi masyarakat terhadap tindakan dan kebijakan pemerintah.Kata Kunci: Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara; Peradilan Elektronik; Peradilan Konvensional.

Download Full-text

A Note on Mandela v Executors, Estate Nelson Mandela 2018 (4) SA 86 (SCA) and the Conundrum around the Customary Marriage between Nelson and Winnie Mandela

Southern African Public Law ◽

10.25159/2522-6800/4027 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 34 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Sipho Stephen Nkosi

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

The State ◽

The Other ◽

Customary Law ◽

Eastern Cape ◽

High Court ◽

Nelson Mandela ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Court Of Appeal

The note is about the appeal lodged by the late Mrs Winnie Madikizela-Mandela to the SCA against the decision of the Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha, dismissing her application for review in 2014. In that application, she sought to have reviewed the decision of the Minister of Land Affairs, to transfer the now extended and renovated Qunu property to Mr Mandela and to register it in his name. Because her application was out of time, she also applied for condonation of her delay in making the application. The court a quo dismissed both applications with costs, holding that there had been an undue delay on her part. Mrs Mandela then approached the Supreme Court of Appeal, for special leave to appeal the decision of the court a quo. Two questions fell for decision by the SCA: whether there was an unreasonable and undue delay on Mrs Mandela’s part in instituting review proceedings; and whether the order for costs was appropriate in the circumstances of the case. The SCA held that there was indeed an unreasonable delay (of seventeen years). Shongwe AP (with Swain, Mathopo JJA, Mokgothloa and Rodgers AJJA concurring) held that the fact that there had been an undue delay does not necessarily mean that an order for costs should, of necessity, particularly where, as in this case, the other litigant is the state. It is the writer’s view that two other ancillary points needed to be raised by counsel and pronounced on by the Court: (a) the lawfulness and regularity of the transfer of the Qunu property to Mr Mandela; and (b) Mrs Mandela’s status as a customary-law widow—in relation to Mr Mandela.

Download Full-text

The Right to Housing: Challenges Associated with the ‘Waiting List System’ Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality V Various Occupiers, Eden Park Extension 5 2014 3 SA 23 (SCA)

Southern African Public Law ◽

10.25159/2522-6800/3531 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 30 (1) ◽

pp. 112-121

Author(s):

Shamier Ebrahim

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Waiting Lists ◽

The State ◽

Waiting List ◽

Allocation Process ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

The Right ◽

The Impact ◽

Court Of Appeal

The right to adequate housing is a constitutional imperative which is contained in section 26 of the Constitution. The state is tasked with the progressive realisation of this right. The allocation of housing has been plagued with challenges which impact negatively on the allocation process. This note analyses Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality v Various Occupiers, Eden Park Extension 51 which dealt with a situation where one of the main reasons provided by the Supreme Court of Appeal for refusing the eviction order was because the appellants subjected the unlawful occupiers to defective waiting lists and failed to engage with the community regarding the compilation of the lists and the criteria used to identify beneficiaries. This case brings to the fore the importance of a coherent (reasonable) waiting list in eviction proceedings. This note further analyses the impact of the waiting list system in eviction proceedings and makes recommendations regarding what would constitute a coherent (reasonable) waiting list for the purpose of section 26(2) of the Constitution.

Download Full-text

PERSINGGUNGAN KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PENYALAHGUNAAN DISKRESI ANTARA PENGADILAN TUN DAN PENGADILAN TIPIKOR / INTERCEPTION OF JUSTICE AUTHORITY OF DISCRETION ABUSE BETWEEN ADMINISTRATION COURT AND CORRUPTION COURTS

JURNAL HUKUM DAN PERADILAN ◽

10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.213-236 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 213

Author(s):

Budi Suhariyanto

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Administrative Law ◽

The State ◽

Government Officials ◽

Criminal Process ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

State Finance ◽

The Law ◽

To Receive

Diskresi sebagai wewenang bebas, keberadaannya rentan akan disalahgunakan. Penyalahgunaan diskresi yang berimplikasi merugikan keuangan negara dapat dituntutkan pertanggungjawabannya secara hukum administrasi maupun hukum pidana. Mengingat selama ini peraturan perundang-undangan tentang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi tidak merumuskan secara rinci yang dimaksudkan unsur menyalahgunakan kewenangan maka para hakim menggunakan konsep penyalahgunaan wewenang dari hukum administrasi. Problema muncul saat diberlakukannya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 dimana telah memicu persinggungan dalam hal kewenangan mengadili penyalahgunaan wewenang (termasuk diskresi) antara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dengan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Pada perkembangannya, persinggungan kewenangan mengadili tersebut ditegaskan oleh Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 bahwa PTUN berwenang menerima, memeriksa, dan memutus permohonan penilaian ada atau tidak ada penyalahgunaan wewenang (termasuk diskresi) dalam Keputusan dan/atau Tindakan Pejabat Pemerintahan sebelum adanya proses pidana. Sehubungan tidak dijelaskan tentang definisi dan batasan proses pidana yang dimaksud, maka timbul penafsiran yang berbeda. Perlu diadakan kesepakatan bersama dan dituangkan dalam regulasi tentang tapal batas persinggungan yang jelas tanpa meniadakan kewenangan pengujian penyalahgunaan wewenang diskresi pada Pengadilan TUN.Discretion as free authority is vulnerable to being misused. The abuse of discretion implicating the state finance may be prosecuted by both administrative and criminal law. In view of the fact that the law on corruption eradication does not formulate in detail the intended element of authority abuse, the judges use the concept of authority abuse from administrative law. Problems arise when the enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 triggered an interception in terms of justice/ adjudicate authority on authority abuse (including discretion) between the Administrative Court and Corruption Court. In its development, the interception of justice authority is affirmed by Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2015 that the Administrative Court has the authority to receive, examine and decide upon the appeal there is or there is no misuse of authority in the Decision and / or Action of Government Officials prior to the criminal process. That is, shortly before the commencement of the criminal process then that's when the authority of PTUN decides to judge the misuse of authority over the case. In this context, Perma No. 4 of 2015 has imposed restrictions on the authority of the TUN Court in prosecuting the abuse of discretionary authority.

Download Full-text