scholarly journals Exploring design considerations of acute care for the elderly to improve patient outcomes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holle Michoski
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 313-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi L. Wald ◽  
Jeffrey J. Glasheen ◽  
Jeannette Guerrasio ◽  
Jean M. Youngwerth ◽  
Ethan Ulysses Cumbler

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa Mason ◽  
Tiffany Jackman

The administration of regional or general anesthesia is dependent upon many factors to help reduce complications and improve patient outcomes after surgery.  In this comparative analysis, the advantages and disadvantages of both types of anesthesia as well as their respective contraindications are reviewed.  Both regional and general anesthetics come with adverse effects including morbidity/mortality, and a certain threshold that warrants a type of anesthesia suitable for a surgical procedure.  Although there are risks associated with both, certain patient populations may be at higher risk of complications including the elderly, severely ill, and individuals with specific medical conditions.  A review of current literature advises the following factors to be examined prior to choosing an anesthesia method most appropriate for the patient including: body mass index (BMI), medical history, age, current medications, fasting time, alcohol/drug intake, pharmaceutical drug use, dental work and airway inspection, as well as neck flexibility and head extension.  The research suggests that the patient be fully informed of the risks and benefits of both regional and general anesthesia, as well as taking part in the decision-making process.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Aileen Horgan ◽  
Michelle Carr ◽  
Aileen Murphy

Abstract Background Unnecessary bed rest results in a loss of mobility and an increased length of hospital stay. Despite mobilising regularly being acknowledged as an important preventative measure for deconditioning, inpatient functional decline continues to pose a significant challenge in hospital settings. Hospital-based mobility initiatives offer the potential to address issues of functional decline, improve patient outcomes and hospital length of stay. The aim of this research is to examine the impact of an early mobilisation initiative called “End PJ Paralysis”. Methods The research design comprises of three elements: (i) an examination of a period that promoted mobility to all patients on one acute unit (ii) an analysis of the reported number of falls during the study period and (iii) an exploration of perceptions and attitudes of nurses, nurse managers, and patients involved with the initiative. Results Our study demonstrates that following a 10-week promotion of the initiative from April 17th-June 26th 2018 in an acute care setting in south of Ireland, an increase of 15% of patients were mobilising and a decrease in the number of reported falls. In addition, staff participation was found to increase and self-reported patient satisfaction improved. Factors identified as influencing the impact of the initiative included patient and staff behavior, nurse management leadership, and effective communication. Conclusion The study provides evidence to suggest that early mobilisation initiatives can prevent deconditioning and improve patient outcomes. Each day a patient spends in hospital should contribute towards their recovery and discharge and mobilising patients while in hospital has a profound impact on their functional status.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdalla ◽  
Mehul Adhaduk ◽  
Raad A. Haddad ◽  
Yanal Alnimer ◽  
Carlos F. Ríos-Bedoya ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 247-252
Author(s):  
Sue Thomas

Originally launched in 2015, the Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) programme has become a leading authority for quality improvement in the NHS. In September 2021, the programme published an impressive series of reviews in no fewer than 18 subject areas, neurology being one of these. While earlier GIRFT reports tended to focus on acute care, the new reports have a much wider scope and scan a whole pathway approach for unwarranted variations in practice and what needs to happen to improve patient outcomes. In Part 1, Sue Thomas explores what GIRFT says about the organisation of neurological services and recommendations for service delivery, while Part 2 will explore parallel services, commissioning and future directions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-216
Author(s):  
Stella Ye ◽  
Sarah Boyko ◽  
Melissa Patel ◽  
Kruti Shah ◽  
Sara Turbow ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate deprescribing of select high-risk medications (HRMs) in an Acute Care for the Elderly (ACE) unit with pharmacist involvement compared with usual care in older people. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center case-control study. SETTING: Medical-surgical units at an urban academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 65 years of age and older admitted April-June 2019, with 1 or more of the following target HRMs prior to admission were included in the study: acid suppressants, antipsychotics, or insulin. Patients admitted to the ACE unit were included in the case group; all other patients were randomly matched by HRMs in a 2:1 ratio into the control group. INTERVENTIONS: The Acute Care for the Elderly pharmacist reviewed patients' medications to identify and deprescribe select HRMs. Deprescribing was defined as discontinuation, dose or frequency reduction. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients with 56 HRMs and 89 patients with 126 HRMs were included in the case and control groups, respectively. The primary outcome of HRMs deprescribed were similar between the case and control groups (21.4% and 25.4%; P = 0.56). Among the HRMs deprescribed (discontinued, dose or frequency reduced), 83.2% were complete discontinuations in case patients and 34.4% were complete discontinuations in control patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document