Abortion across Borders: Transnational Travel and Access to Abortion Service by Christabelle Sethna and Gayle Davis, eds.

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 229-232
Author(s):  
Nancy Janovicek
Keyword(s):  
BMJ ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 1 (5953) ◽  
pp. 340-340
Author(s):  
D. B. Paintin ◽  
R. W. Beard
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Erica Chong ◽  
Tara Shochet ◽  
Elizabeth Raymond ◽  
Ingrida Platais ◽  
Holly A. Anger ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 1 (5958) ◽  
pp. 628-628
Author(s):  
H. C. McLaren
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Eva Dickson ◽  
Rachel K. Jewkes ◽  
Heather Brown ◽  
Jonathan Levin ◽  
Helen Rees ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patience Aniteye ◽  
Beverley O’Brien ◽  
Susannah H. Mayhew

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirgha Raj Shrestha ◽  
Shibesh Chandra Regmi ◽  
Ganesh Dangal

Unsafe abortion is affecting a lot, in health, socio-economic and health care cost of many countries. Despite invention of simple technology and scientifically approved safe abortion methods, women and girls are still using unsafe abortion practices. Since 2002, Nepal has achieved remarkable progress in developing policies, guidelines, task shifting, training human resources and increasing access to services. However, more than half of abortion in Nepal are performed clandestinely by untrained or unapproved providers or induced by pregnant woman herself. Knowledge on legalization and availability of safe abortion service among women is still very poor. Stigma on abortion still persists among community people, service providers, managers, and policy makers. Access to safe abortion, especially in remote and rural areas, is still far behind as compared to their peers from urban areas. The existing law is not revised in the spirit of current Constitution of Nepal and rights-based approach. The existence of abortion stigma and the shifting of the government structure from unitary system to federalism in absence of a complete clarity on how the safe abortion service gets integrated into the local government structure might create challenge to sustain existing developments. There is, therefore, a need for all stakeholders to make a lot of efforts and allocate adequate resources to sustain current achievements and ensure improvements in creating a supportive social environment for women and girls so that they will be able to make informed decisions and access to safe abortion service in any circumstances.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel K. Jones ◽  
Meghan Ingerick ◽  
Jenna Jerman

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjupa Shrestha ◽  
S. Sharma

Introduction: Abortion was legalized in Nepal in September 2002. Only a trained and listed provider can provide abortion services at a health. For many women, especially in developing countries like Nepal, safe abortion may not be available, affordable or accessible despite the liberalization of abortion law. The aim of this study was to determine the status of abortion in Jumla. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted from the record of District Health Office; Jumla from the month of Ashad 2074 to Jestha 2075. Total Enumerative sampling technique was used. Data of public health sector and Marie Stopes Center, Jumla were retrieved and analyzed in terms of frequency, rate, and percentage. Results: Total 1196 women have received abortion services and abortion rate was 36.077 per 1000 (15-49 Years women). Most of the women(90%) were more than 20 years of age and majority of women (82%) chose medical method for abortion service. Majority (88.62%) have used Post abortion family Planning services. Conclusions: The abortion rate of Jumla was still high. Nine out of ten women who received abortion services were more than 20 years of age. Women preferred medical method rather than surgical method for abortion service. Nearly one tenth women had not used any post abortion family planning method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document