Imperfect Pasts, Conflicting Presents, Sustainable Futures - Recent Canadian Environmental ScholarshipTHE GREENING OF CANADA: FEDERAL INSTITUTIONS AND DECISIONS. G. Bruce Doem and Thomas Conway. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994.PASSING THE BUCK: FEDERALISM AND CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY. Kathryn Harrison. Vancouver: UBC Press, 1996.FISHERIES AND UNCERTAINTY: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO RESOURCE MANAGEMENT. Daniel V. Gordon and Gordon R. Munro, eds. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 1996.ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Ann Dale and John B. Robinson, eds. Vancouver: UBC Press, 1996.LIFE IN 2030: EXPLORING A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE FOR CANADA. John B. Robinson, David Biggs, George Francis, Russel Legge, Sally Lemer, D. Scott Slocombe, and Caroline Van Bers. Vancouver: UBC Press, 1996.

1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-182
Author(s):  
Stephen Bocking
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul W. Chan ◽  
Christine Räisänen

The contested nature of knowledge about sustainable development makes it difficult to embed sustainable development in engineering curricula, which tend to have a deterministic approach to understanding theoretical concepts. Such an approach does not align well with the emergent thinking of sustainable development, where thinking about the future requires dealing not only with what is known, but also with what is unknown and at times unknowable. Text-based approaches that privilege explicit and codified knowledge are limited in helping students visualise what a sustainable future might look like. To facilitate such visualisation would require expansion of the repertoire of tools and artefacts beyond text-based materials. In this article, we critically reflect on a series of student-centred ‘Open-space’ workshops over the past several years aimed at promoting debate and co-production of knowledge around developing sustainable futures using a range of artefacts such as pictorial illustrations, wiki terms, art materials and chill-out music. Attention is paid on critically appraising the role artefacts play in developing knowledge to empower students to collectively reflect on, imagine and visualise sustainable futures.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib Rifqi Setiawan

Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) empowers people to change the way they think and work towards a sustainable future.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 6612
Author(s):  
Peter Jones ◽  
Martin Wynn

The increasingly stellar attraction of the digital technologies and the growing, though not universal, consensus of the need to build a sustainable future, are two powerful trends within society. The aim of this article is to offer an exploratory review of how the leading companies within the digital transformation market have addressed sustainable development. As such, the article’s originality and value lie in offering a review of current corporate thinking within that market. The study adopts an inductive, qualitative approach based on an examination of published company reports, and identifies six major sustainability themes being actively promoted and supported. The article concludes that the current sustainability objectives of the technology companies are driven as much by commercial reality as any altruistic motives, and that support and promotion of the circular economy may offer the best opportunity for digital technologies to meaningfully impact sustainable development.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 6601
Author(s):  
Johan Nordensvard ◽  
Jason Alexandra ◽  
Markus Ketola

The aim of this editorial is to explore, conceptualize, and research the need to internalize both animals and ecosystems in our understanding of social citizenship and social policy. This editorial should be seen as a brief overview of the themes that should be covered in the contributions to the Special Issue, “Internalizing Animals and Ecosystems in Social Citizenship and Social Policy: From Political Community to Political Country”. This Special Issue argues the importance of integrating animals and ecosystems as a way to re-politicize humans’ social relation with both animals and our ecosystem as in sustainable development and social policy. If environmental policy becomes social policy, we would re-construct social citizenship to include consideration for animals and ecosystems as integral part of social policy. This expansion in scope is a progression from seeing humans as part of a political community to becoming more involved in their political country. This aligns with the concept of Country—an all-encompassing term in Australia, involving a people’s territory, land, water, biological resources, the complex obligations and relationships involved.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn Strachan

Abstract An objective of the European Union’s Entrepreneurship 2020 Action Plan is to address high levels of youth unemployment in Europe by promoting entrepreneurship. Implementing entrepreneurship education in schools, colleges and universities is one of three strategic interventions proposed by the Action Plan. Sustainable entrepreneurship is a recognised branch of the wider field of entrepreneurship and the literature on sustainable entrepreneurship sees it as a means of addressing some of the sustainability challenges of the 21st century. This article compares the pedagogical approaches and the competences of ESD (Education for Sustainable Development) with those of entrepreneurship education to identify how ESD might influence entrepreneurship education in order to develop entrepreneurs that contribute to a sustainable future. This comparison is placed in the context of the broader debate on the need to transform the dominant neo-liberal economic systems as part of the precondition for achieving a more sustainable future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document