Mechanically Stabilized Earth Reinforcement Tensile Strength from Tests of Geotextile-Reinforced Soil

Author(s):  
David J. Elton ◽  
Maria Aries B. Patawaran
Author(s):  
Timothy A. Wood ◽  
William D. Lawson ◽  
Priyantha W. Jayawickrama ◽  
James G. Surles

Instrumented pullout tests of unprecedented scope and scale explore the pullout behavior for three steel mechanically stabilized earth reinforcement types: ribbed strips, ladder-like strips, and three-wire bar mat grids. These data quantify the distribution of pullout resistance between longitudinal elements and illustrate the nature of certain reinforcement deformations. Consistent with characteristic inextensible pullout behavior and soil-reinforcement interaction, synthesized strain-gage data illustrate linear stress reduction along the embedment length during pullout for all three reinforcement styles. For ladder-like strips, the axial force divides evenly between the two longitudinal elements. For the three-wire bar mat grid, the center bar carries approximately 40% of the axial force, whereas each outside bar carries approximately 30% of the axial force. Observed pullout-induced deformation in the transverse elements of three-wire bar mat grids having widely spaced longitudinal bars is conceptually different from extensible behavior and suggests the need for refinement in current pullout resistance formulations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 355
Author(s):  
Kyungho Park ◽  
Daehyeon Kim ◽  
Jongbeom Park ◽  
Hyunho Na

The concept of designing mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls is divided into internal and external stability review methods, and one of the design factors required in internal stability analysis is the frictional characteristics between soil and geogrids for civil engineering applications. Typical methods for evaluating the frictional characteristics between soil and geogrids include the direct shear test and pullout test. It is desirable to apply the pullout test to geogrid reinforcements for pulling out geogrids embedded in soil, to measure both the surface-frictional force and passive resistance at the same time. Pullout parameters can be significantly affected by confining the stress and tensile strength of reinforcements. In general, the pullout parameters tend to be overestimated for low confining stresses in the pullout test, and underestimated for high confining stresses. Therefore, to address these issues, this study aims to evaluate the influence of the confining stress and the tensile strength of a geogrid reinforcement in the pullout test, and to propose a reasonable method for obtaining practical pullout parameters. Based on the pullout tests, the maximum pullout force depending on the tensile strength of the geogrid reinforcement was measured for one-third of the reinforcement tensile strength, and it was ruptured when pullout force greater than the maximum pullout force was exerted. Furthermore, it was observed that, in the reinforcement pullout test, pullout force was measured in the whole area of the reinforcement at a confining stress smaller than one-half of the tensile strength of the grid. As a result, the effective confining stress method considering only the confining stress at which the reinforcement is fully pulled out to develop the pullout characteristics can be a practical method for obtaining pullout parameters without regard to the reinforcement tensile strength.


Author(s):  
Naser M. Abu-Hejleh ◽  
Dennis Hanneman ◽  
Trever Wang ◽  
Ilyess Ksouri

To alleviate the common bridge bump problem, the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) has employed three new alternatives for bridge abutment backfill since 1992: flowfill, mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) using well-graded granular Class 1 backfill (reinforced soil mass as in MSE walls), and MSE using free-draining Class B filter material. However, the occurrence of bridge bump problems is still reported. A study evaluated CDOT current practice for design and construction of bridge approaches and then developed recommendations to improve this practice (improve performance and reduce costs) on the basis of the results of the following: (a) best practices for bridge approaches collected from CDOT staff and reported in the literature, (b) evaluation of the performance and cost-effectiveness of Colorado's MSE and flowfill bridge approaches, and (c) identification of the causes of significant bridge approach settlement problems observed in some of Colorado's MSE and flowfill bridge approaches. Evaluation procedures and forensic investigations were developed and applied to obtain the information needed for the first two items. Flowfill should remain a viable alternative for certain field and construction scenarios that justify its higher costs. MSE approaches with both Class B and Class 1 backfill materials should be routinely used in future CDOT projects with documentation of their performance and cost (construction and repair costs) for a future evaluation. Comprehensive recommendations are presented to mitigate the observed bridge approach settlement problem; the most important recommendations are for improved support and drainage systems for the sleeper slab where the settlement problem occurs.


Author(s):  
Richard J. Bathurst ◽  
Nezam Bozorgzadeh ◽  
Yoshihisa Miyata ◽  
Tony M. Allen

The paper demonstrates reliability-based design (RBD) and analysis for tensile strength (rupture) and pullout limit states for mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls constructed with steel grid reinforcement in combination with frictional soils. Five different reinforcement tensile load models for walls under operational conditions are considered in combination with six different pullout models and one tensile strength model. The general approach considers the accuracy of the load and resistance models that appear in each limit state equation plus uncertainty in the choice of nominal values at time of design that is linked to the concept of “level of understanding” that is used in Canadian load and resistance factor design (LRFD) foundation engineering practice. The effect of potential steel corrosion on reliability index for the tensile strength limit state is considered in calculations. A well-documented MSE wall case study is used to demonstrate the general approach. The relationship between nominal factor of safety and reliability index is used to demonstrate how to optimize steel grid member diameters and arrangement to achieve a target reliability index of β = 2.33. The approach described in this paper is an important contribution to next-generation analysis and design using modern concepts of RBD for MSE walls.


Author(s):  
Andrew M. Kasozi ◽  
Raj V. Siddharthan ◽  
Rajib Mahamud

Two-dimensional (2D) transient numerical thermal modeling was undertaken using ansys fluent v12.1 software to estimate distribution of soil backfill temperatures in a typical mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall. The modeling was calibrated using field-measured temperature data from the Tanque-Verde MSE wall in Tucson, Arizona (AZ) in which computed temperature data were found to be within ±5% of the field data. The calibrated model predictions for Las Vegas, Nevada (NV) showed an overall average soil backfill temperature of 34.3 °C relative to a maximum outside surface temperature of 51.6 °C. Such a high average soil backfill temperature calls for modification of design procedures since conventional designs are based on geosynthetic tensile strength determined at 20 °C.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document