New Summary Measures of Population Health and Well-Being for Implementation by Health Plans and Accountable Care Organizations

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Kottke ◽  
◽  
Jason M. Gallagher ◽  
Sachin Rauri ◽  
Juliana O. Tillema ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Kottke ◽  
Jason M. Gallagher ◽  
Sachin Rauri ◽  
Juliana O. Tillema ◽  
Nicolaas P. Pronk ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Douglas J. Noble

<p>Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) in the United States of America (USA) and Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG) in the United Kingdom (UK) are new proposed organizations in health services both tasked with a role which includes improving public health.  Although there are very significant differences between the UK and USA health systems there appears to be a similar confusion as to how ACO and CCG will regard and address public or population health.  The role of ACO in improving population health and evaluating the health needs of their registered and insured patients remains ill-defined and poorly explored.  Likewise, in the current UK National Health Service (NHS) reorganisation, control and commissioning of appropriate local health services are passing from Primary Care Trusts (PCT) to new cross-organizational structures (CCG).  CCG groups aim to be, like ACO, physician led.  They will also assume a role for public or population health, but this role, like that of the newly-forming ACO, is currently unclear.  Lessons learned from the USA and UK experience of new organizations tasked with a role in improving public health may inform mechanisms for physician led organizations in the UK and the USA to assess health needs, monitor population health information and improve population health outcomes.</p>


2020 ◽  
pp. 089011712091422
Author(s):  
Tyler J. VanderWeele ◽  
Arthur C. Brooks

There is clear evidence that the prevalence of negative media reporting has increased substantially over the past years. There is evidence that this negative reporting adversely affects social interactions, and thereby also health and well-being outcomes. Given the wide reach of negative media reporting and the contagion of such reporting and the resulting interactions, the effects on health are arguably substantial. Moreover, there is little incentive at present for media outlets to change practices. A commitment of news outlets to report one positive story for every 3 negative stories, and of news consumers to restrict attention to outlets that do, could dramatically alter practices and, consequently, population health.


JAMA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 309 (11) ◽  
pp. 1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas J. Noble ◽  
Lawrence P. Casalino

JAMA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 310 (3) ◽  
pp. 324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas J. Noble ◽  
Lawrence P. Casalino

Author(s):  
James Moody ◽  
Dana K. Pasquale

People constantly interact with each other and their environment, and these interactions—with whom and with what they interact—are not random. Interactions at multiple levels (cellular, neurological, social, physical, environmental) shape one’s experiences and affect health and well-being. These interactions can be represented as a set of networks that feedback and influence other networks. Here we limit our scope to the complex relationship between human social networks and behavior, which frequently forms a feedback loop, and the effect of this relationship on population health outcomes. This chapter introduces traditional network analysis as it pertains to population health, explores examples of interactions between macro-level networks, and proposes future directions for network analysis


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 821-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. P. Casalino ◽  
N. Erb ◽  
M. S. Joshi ◽  
S. M. Shortell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document