Phase I Study of Inotuzumab With Augmented BFM Re-Induction for Younger Adults With Relapsed/Refractory B-cell ALL

Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Izutsu ◽  
Kiyoshi Ando ◽  
Daisuke Ennishi ◽  
Hirohiko Shibayama ◽  
Junji Suzumiya ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Hamlin ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Nina Wagner‐Johnston ◽  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
Greg P. Coffey ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 6150-6159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin R. Kelly ◽  
Jonathan W. Friedberg ◽  
Steven I. Park ◽  
Kevin McDonagh ◽  
John Hayslip ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1803-1803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Roschewski ◽  
Mohammed Farooqui ◽  
Georg Aue ◽  
Clifton C. Mo ◽  
Janet Valdez ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1803 Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and related B-cell malignancies are incurable diseases that universally relapse after initial therapy. Resultant cytopenias in refractory patients are a common barrier to salvage therapy. Innovative targeted agents with favorable tolerability profiles that can overcome acquired mechanisms of resistance are urgently needed. ON 01910.Na (rigosertib) is a selective non-ATP competitive multikinase inhibitor that potently inhibits PI3 kinase and induces reactive oxygen species and NOXA-dependent apoptosis in vitro. Pre-clinical testing of rigosertib demonstrated selective cytotoxicity against CLL and MCL cells with minimal effects on normal B and T cells (Chapman et al 2012). Extensive clinical testing of rigosertib in patients with solid tumors or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has indicated lack of myelosuppression and overall good tolerability (Raza et al ASH 2011 #3822). Here, we present the results from the phase I study assessing the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intravenous rigosertib in patients with relapsed CLL, MCL, and related B-cell malignancies. Materials and Methods: phase I dose-escalation clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rigosertib in patients with CLL, MCL, MM, and HCL who were refractory or relapsed after ≥1 lines of therapy. Baseline cytopenias were permitted unless ANC < 500 or platelets were < 10K and unable to be supported with transfusion. Pts with GFR < 40ml/min, serum sodium < 134meq/L, and active ascites were excluded. Dose escalation followed a traditional 3+3 design and dosing cohorts were 1200mg/m2, 1500mg/m2 and 1800mg/m2 over 48 hours and 1800mg (flat dose), and 2100mg (flat dose) over 72 hours. Infusions were delivered via an ambulatory infusion pump and repeated in 14 day cycles for up to 4 cycles. Response was determined in patients who completed 4 cycles. Pts who demonstrated a biologic response without DLT were allowed to continue infusions until disease progression. Primary endpoint was toxicity after 2 cycles. Secondary endpoints included the toxicity with extended dosing and measures of biologic activity after 4 cycles. Results: Increasing doses of rigosertib were evaluated in 16 pts with relapsed CLL (10), MCL (2), MM (2), and HCL (2). All patients were evaluated for toxicity, while 10 patients completed 4 cycles of therapy and were evaluable for secondary endpoints. Median age was 61 yrs [range 52–65]. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 15 pts (94%) and were almost exclusively grade ≤2. Most frequent drug-related AEs were fatigue 31%, musculoskeletal pain 31%, nausea 19%, constipation 19%, and diarrhea 12%. Grade 3/4 drug-related AEs included 2 cases of G4 neutropenia (both patients had neutropenia at baseline) and 1 case of syncope; there was 1 cardiac death in a patient with pre-existing heart disease that was classified as unrelated. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Analysis of blood samples collected for pharmacokinetics is planned. Response data in the 13 patients evaluable for response indicated that 7 had stable disease and 6 had disease progression. No clinical responses or evidence of biologic activity was observed. Conclusions: Escalating doses of rigosertib were well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies with rare G3/G4 toxicities. Of note, most patients with baseline cytopenias tolerated the therapy well. The highest dose level studied in this study is one step up from the dose level of the ongoing pivotal trial of rigosertib in MDS. However, as a single agent no clinical responses were observed with rigosertib in B-cell malignancies. Further development of rigosertib in lymphoid malignancies will require either combination therapy or alternative dosing schedules. Disclosures: Wilhelm: Onconova: Employment, Equity Ownership.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 156-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan H Fowler ◽  
Ranjana H Advani ◽  
Jeff Sharman ◽  
Sonali M. Smith ◽  
Jesse McGreivy ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 156 Background Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a central mediator of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling and is essential for normal B-cell development. Subtypes of non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) may be dependent on chronic activation of the BCR pathway and primary follicular lymphoma (FL) cells have been found to maintain enhanced signaling when compared to normal B-cells (Irish JM, et al. Blood 2006; 108: 3135). Ibrutinib is an orally administered, covalently-bound inhibitor of BTK which induces apoptosis and inhibits cellular migration and adhesion in malignant B-cells. Based on promising preclinical data in B-cell malignancies, a phase I study was conducted to test the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ibrutinib in relapsed NHL. We report the long-term tolerability and sustained activity of ibrutinib in FL patients in this study with extended follow-up. Methods Adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma were eligible for trial entry and 16 patients with FL were enrolled in this Phase I study. Ibrutinib was administered orally with dose escalation according to protocol-defined dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) to define a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or until 3 dose levels above attainment of full BTK occupancy. A 28-day on/7-day off (intermittent) schedule was evaluated in 5 cohorts (1.25–12.5 mg/kg PO qd) and a once daily oral dose (without a drug holiday) in 2 cohorts (8.3 mg/kg and 560-mg fixed dose). Patients were evaluable for safety if they received study drug. Efficacy was evaluated in all patients who received 2.5 mg/kg or higher (which achieves full BTK occupancy) and had one on-study imaging assessment. Efficacy was also analyzed at higher doses to determine if there was improved efficacy. Responses were assessed every 2 months using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results Median age 60 (41–71), equal numbers of males and females, median time from diagnosis 54 months (19–186), median number of prior therapies 3 (1–5) including: stem cell transplantation (6%), alkylators (88%), anthracyclines (56%), nucleoside analogs (19%), and rituximab (100%). FLIPI scores at baseline: low risk = 19%, intermediate risk = 37%, high risk = 44%. Treatment-emergent AEs occurring in ≥ 25% included: diarrhea (50%), fatigue (44%), nausea (38%), cough (31%) and myalgia (25%). Observed grade 3 AEs included: anemia, anxiety, hypersensitivity, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, decreased neutrophil count, non-cardiac chest pain, pancytopenia, pneumonia and vomiting (one event each). A Grade 4 hypokalemia occurred and was considered to be related to study drug by the investigator. One case of myelodysplastic syndrome occurred 29 days after the last dose of ibrutinib in a patient with pre-existing anemia and multiple lines of prior treatment and was considered to be unrelated by the investigator. One patient in the 2.5 mg/kg/day intermittent cohort experienced DLTs of grade 2 neutropenia resulting in the ibrutinib dose being held > 7 days and a grade 4 hypokalemia. One patient in the 8.3 mg/kg/day intermittent cohort experienced a Grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction. No DLTs were observed in the 12.5 mg/kg/day cohort and the MTD was not reached. In the 16 patients with FL, 11 patients received ibrutinib at 2.5 mg/kg or higher and were evaluable for efficacy (2 patients at 2.5 mg/kg, 1 at 5 mg/kg, 3 at 8.3 mg/kg intermittent, 3 at 12.5 mg/kg, 2 at 8.3 mg/kg continuous dosing). Median time on ibrutinib was 7 months (0–29). Overall response rate (ORR) 54.5% (3 CRs, 3 PRs), duration of response (DOR) 12.3 months, median PFS 13.4 months. In the 9 patients who received ibrutinib at 5 mg/kg or higher, the median time on ibrutinib, ORR and DOR were similar to the efficacy in the 11 patients. However, there was a slight trend toward improved PFS of 19.6 months; 2 patients are still responding to ibrutinib at 25 and 29 months. Conclusions The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (PCI-32765) is well tolerated and active in patients with relapsed FL. Based upon drug occupancy and clinical responses, a dose of 5 mg/kg/day or above is recommended for phase II studies. Extended dosing did not appear to increase toxicity and response rates improved with continued treatment in some patients. Phase II studies with ibrutinib in FL are planned. Disclosures: Advani: Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding. Sharman:Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Calistoga: Honoraria; Portola pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. McGreivy:pharmacyclics: Employment. Kunkel:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Troung:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhou:Pharmacyclics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7534-7534 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Forero-Torres ◽  
R. R. Furman ◽  
J. D. Rosenblatt ◽  
A. Younes ◽  
K. Harrop ◽  
...  

7534 Background: CD40 is a member of the TNF receptor family and is widely expressed on hematologic malignancies of B-cell origin. SGN-40 is a humanized antibody against CD40 with effector cell function and mild agonistic activity. Preclinical toxicity studies and efficacy data supported initiation of a multi-institutional phase I study to test the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and efficacy of SGN-40 in patients with relapsed NHL. Methods: Cohorts of 3–6 pts were treated weekly with a maximum dose of 2, 3, or 4 mg/kg/wk SGN-40. A dose escalation schedule is used such that patients receive 1 mg/kg on D1 and D4, 2 mg/kg on D8, and higher doses on weeks 3–5. Responding patients may receive a second cycle. Further dose escalation up to 8 mg/kg is planned. Results: 16 pts have been treated with multiple histologic subtypes: follicular (1), marginal zone (MZL; 1), mantle cell (4), and diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL; 10). One patient (2 mg/kg) developed a reversible Grade 3 unilateral conjunctivitis and ipsilateral loss of visual acuity. No other dose limiting toxicity has been observed up to 4 mg/kg. Preliminary pharmacokinetic data suggest that the antibody has a relatively short half-life, perhaps reflecting a route of elimination or binding that is not saturated at current doses. Two partial responses have been observed at 3 mg/kg (1 MZL, 1 DLBCL) and one partial response has been observed at 4 mg/kg dose (DLBCL relapsed after autologous stem cell transplant with small volume tumor). Conclusions: Using an intra-patient dose escalation schedule, SGN-40 has been well-tolerated at doses up to 4 mg/kg/wk. Further dose-escalation is ongoing to determine the maximum tolerated dose. Three objective responses have been seen, including two in patients with extensively treated aggressive disease. Correlative studies are underway measuring soluble CD40, cytokine release, effect of FcR polymorphisms, and SGN-40-induced immunogenicity. Given the favorable tolerability and activity, phase II studies in NHL are planned. [Table: see text]


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8010-8010 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Kuhnowski ◽  
C. Thieblemont ◽  
F. Jardin ◽  
F. Broussais-Guillemot ◽  
M. Meignan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document