Comparison of High-dose Rosuvastatin Versus Low-dose Rosuvastatin Plus Ezetimibe on Carotid Plaque Inflammation in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Author(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Chen ◽  
Y Liu ◽  
C Duan ◽  
H Fan ◽  
L Zeng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Statins remain a standard treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. We aimed to determine the association between different dosages of in-hospital statins and the prognoses among patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods NSTE-ACS patients were retrospectively enrolled from January 2010 to December 2014 from five centres in China. Patients receiving either atorvastatin or rosuvastatin during their hospitalizations were included. All the patients were categorized into high-dose statin group (40mg atorvastatin or 20mg rosuvastatin) or low-dose statin group (20mg atorvastatin or 10mg rosuvastatin). In-hospital events and long-term all-cause death was recorded. Results Of the 7,008 patients included in the study, 5,248 received low-dose intensive statin (mean age: 64.28±10.39; female: 25.2%), and 1,760 received high-dose intensive statin (mean age: 63.68±10.59; female: 23.1%). There was no significant difference in in-hospital all-cause death between the two groups (adjusted OR, 1.27; P=0.665). All-cause death was similar between the two groups during the long-term follow-up period (30-day: adjusted HR, 1.28; P=0.571; 3-year: adjusted HR, 0.83; P=0.082). However, there was a robust association between the high-dose statin and the reduction in in-hospital dialysis (adjusted OR, 0.11; P=0.030). Conclusions The in-hospital high-dose intensive statin is not associated with lower risks of in-hospital or follow-up all-cause death in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI. Considering the robust beneficial effect of in-hospital dialysis, an individualized high-dose intensive statin can be rational in specified populations. Univariate and multivariate analyses Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): The Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou City athe China Youth Research Funding


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmadnoor Abdi ◽  
◽  
Shafei Rahimi ◽  
Hossein Farshidi ◽  
Vahid VahdatKhah ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-251
Author(s):  
AEM M Islam ◽  
AAS Mazumder

Increasing burden of cardiovascular disease risk factors has led to increase in the incidence in the coronary artery disease (CAD). Advancements in medical and surgical care of patients with heart disease have led to a large number of people surviving acute coronary events. Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high risk for recurrent coronary events, sudden death, and all cause mortality. Conventional revascularization therapies reduce the risk of further ischaemia but do not affect the underlying atherosclerotic disease. Statins have a proven record in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Furthermore, statins have been shown to exert various pleotropic effects, which may stabilize vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. Therefore, initiating, statin therapy in patients with established CAD is both beneficial and more cost effective. Trials conducted in recent times have addressed the issue of whether higher dose statin therapy provides further reductions in the risks of cardiovascular events following an acute coronary syndrome diagnosis, over and above that provided by a conventional dose statin regimen. However, recent trials of high dose statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes have yielded conflicting results. The aim of this article is to provide a critical and up-to-date summary of the findings of clinical trials of intensive statin therapy, including a brief overview of safety and efficacy of such treatments. Keywords: Statin; Acute coronary syndrome. DOI: 10.3329/cardio.v2i2.6648Cardiovasc. j. 2010; 2(2) : 245-251


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document