Revisiting the Eland Field Lodgepole Mound Complex (Stark County, North Dakota) Twenty Years after its Discovery

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Longman ◽  
Stephen Cumella

Eland Field, the most prolific Lower Mississippian Lodgepole mound complex found to date in the Williston Basin, covers an area of about 6 mi2 and has produced more than 29 MMBO from 16 wells in the 20 years since the field was discovered. Three of the field’s updip wells have each produced more than 4 MMBO from mounds more than 250 ft thick although generally only the top 20 to 30 ft of the mound is perforated. The lower Lodgepole reservoir rocks are commonly called Waulsortian mounds, but they are Waulsortian in age only and not the micrite-rich mudmounds found in the type area of Waulsort, Belgium. Instead of being mudmounds, they are composed mainly of marine-cemented microbial boundstones and skeletal grainstones with local stromatactis structures. The edges of the mounds dip as steeply as 40 to 60 degrees. Such steep dips would be impossible in a typical micrite-rich Waulsortian mound. In addition to the abundant microbial and marine cementation that lithified the Eland Field mound complex penecontemporaneously, organisms such as stalked crinoids, fenestrate bryozoans, and articulated brachiopods and ostracods thrived on the hard substrate provided by the mounds. However, these organisms were themselves incapable of forming a true reef framework. Unusual inward dip of the Upper Bakken black shale and significant thickening of the “Extra Bakken Shale” from zero up to about 40 ft immediately beneath the oil-producing lower Lodgepole mounds both support the idea that something structurally significant such as salt dissolution helped localize mound development. We conclude that dissolution of the Lower Devonian Prairie salt created a fracture network during and immediately after deposition of the upper Bakken black shale that allowed compaction-water expulsion-vents and/or warm springs to initiate formation of carbonate “towers” that localized formation of the Lodgepole mounds. The discovery well for Eland Field, the Knopik #1-11 (NW NW Sec. 11, T139N, R97W), was completed in January 1995 for 2707 BOPD and 1550 MCFGPD with no water. The field was developed over the next few years with up to 16 producing wells and 7 water injection wells. Waterflooding of Eland Field began in 1997 and climbed to over 500,000 barrels per month in just two months. Through September 2015, more than 95 MMBW had been injected into the field, but it has produced over 29.6 MMBO, doubling the 1996 estimated ultimate recovery of 12 to 15 MMBO. The field continues to produce with about a 5.5% oil cut. In terms of total cumulative oil production in the U.S. portion of the Williston Basin, Eland Field contains 3 of the top 10 wells, and other nearby Lodgepole producing fields contain 4 additional top 10 wells. This excellent oil production leads to the question: Is it possible that the only productive Lodgepole mound reservoirs in the Williston Basin, eight of which have been discovered to date (with all but one discovered in the mid-1990s) are limited to a small atoll-like area about 7 miles in diameter in northern Stark County, North Dakota? Certainly the presence of similar Lodgepole mounds in outcrops in central Montana (e.g., Bridger Range and Big Snowy and Little Belt mountains) and in the subsurface of the western Williston Basin suggests that other Lodgepole mound-type reservoirs could occur across much of the basin. The most promising areas in which to search for other Lodgepole mound reservoirs will be those where the Upper Bakken black shale is well developed and thermally mature because it is the source for the oil in the Lodgepole reservoirs in the Eland Field area.

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-72
Author(s):  
Mohammad Amirul Islam ◽  
ASM Woobaidullah ◽  
Badrul Imam

Haripur field is the first oil producing field in Bangladesh. The field produced approximately 0.53 MMSTB of oil from the well No. SY-7. The oil production began in 1987 and terminated in 1994. All of the oil was produced by the reservoir own energy from the depth of 2030 meter. Recent investigation and study have revealed that approximately 31 MMSTB Oil is remaining in that formation as validated by the reservoir performance based study i.e. oil production rate and tube head pressure history matching. At present condition, the reservoir has no pressure energy to lift the oil to surface as it requires minimum 1500 psi pressure, so it needs pressure energy to lift the oil to surface. Among the recent developed technologies water injection is one of the best methods to sweep oil towards the production well from the injection well as well as to provide sufficient pressure for lifting. In this study we proposed design for optimum waterflooding pattern and defined optimum number of injection and production wells. In addition the production and injection rates are optimized along with selection of the best placement of production and injection wells and their life.Bangladesh J. Sci. Res. 28(1): 61-72, June-2015


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 352-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Tao ◽  
Yang Shenglai ◽  
Zhu Weihong ◽  
Bian Wanjiang ◽  
Liu Min ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (01) ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.R. Brown ◽  
A.A. Vadie ◽  
J.O. Stephens

Summary This project demonstrated the effectiveness of a microbial permeability profile modification (MPPM) technology for enhancing oil recovery by adding nitrogenous and phosphorus-containing nutrients to the injection water of a conventional waterflooding operation. The MPPM technology extended the economic life of the field by 60 to 137 months, with an expected recovery of 63 600 to 95 400 m3 (400,000 to 600,000 bbl) of additional oil. Chemical changes in the composition of the produced fluids proved the presence of oil from unswept areas of the reservoir. Proof of microbial involvement was shown by increased numbers of microbes in cores of wells drilled within the field 22 months after nutrient injection began. Introduction The target for enhanced oil recovery processes is the tremendous quantity of unrecoverable oil in known deposits. Roughly two thirds [approximately 55.6×109 m3 (350 billion bbl)] of all of the oil discovered in the U.S. is economically unrecoverable with current technology. Because the microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) technology in this report differs in several ways from other MEOR technologies, it is important that these differences be delineated clearly. In the first place, the present project is designed to enhance oil recovery from an entire oil reservoir, rather than treat single wells. Even more important is the fact that this technology relies on the action of the in-situ microflora, not microorganisms injected into the reservoir. It is important to note that MPPM technology does not interfere with the normal waterflood operation and is environmentally friendly in that neither microorganisms nor hazardous chemicals are introduced into the environment. Description of the Oil Reservoir. The North Blowhorn Creek Oil Unit (NBCU) is located in Lamar County, Alabama, approximately 75 miles west of Birmingham. This field is in what is known geologically as the Black Warrior basin. The producing formation is the Carter sandstone of Mississippian Age at a depth of approximately 700 m (2,300 ft). The Carter reservoir is a northwest/ southeast trending deltaic sand body, approximately 5 km (3 miles) long and 1 to 1.7 km (1/2 to 1 mile) wide. Sand thickness varies from only 1 m up to approximately 12 m (40 ft). The sand is relatively clean (greater than 90% quartz), with no swelling clays. The field was discovered in 1979 and initially developed on 80-acre spacing. Waterflooding of the reservoir began in 1983. The initial oil in place in the reservoir was approximately 2.54×106 m3 (16 million bbl), of which 874 430 m3 (5.5 million bbl) had been recovered by the end of 1995. To date, North Blowhorn Creek is the largest oil field discovered in the Black Warrior basin. Oil production peaked at almost 475 m3/d (3,000 BOPD) in 1985 and has since declined steadily. Currently, there are 20 injection wells and 32 producing wells. Oil production at the outset of the field demonstration was approximately 46 m3/d oil (290 BOPD), 1700 m3/d gas (60 MCFD), and 493 m3/d water (3,100 BWPD), with a water-injection rate of approximately 660 m3/d (4,150 BWPD). Projections at the beginning of the project were that approximately 1.59×106 m3 oil (10 million bbl of oil) would be left unrecovered if some new method of enhanced recovery were not effective. Prefield Trial Studies The concepts of the technology described in this paper had been proven to be effective in laboratory coreflood experiments.1,2 However, it seemed advisable to conduct coreflood experiments with cores from the reservoir being used in the field demonstration. Toward this end, two wells were drilled, and cores were obtained from one for the laboratory coreflood experiments to determine the schedule and amounts of nutrients to be employed in the field trial.3


2012 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 656
Author(s):  
Wee Yong Gan ◽  
Lina Hartanto ◽  
Andrew Haynes ◽  
Morteza Sayarpour

Waterflood development drilling of the Windalia reservoir on Barrow Island at 40-acre spacing started in 1968, using five-spot and nine-spot inverted drive flood patterns. There was a general conversion to line drive in mid-1970 with various infill and realignment projects. The field comprises more than 220 active injectors and 400 producers. The reservoir is geologically complex, with low permeability and significant heterogeneity. Historically, empirical techniques and fractional flow models were used for forecasting, but these approaches have many inherent limitations; for example, they do not provide individual well performance and they are not sensitive to changes in operating conditions. More recently, a capacitance-resistance model (CRM) that uses historical injection and production data has been used to establish long-term behaviours between water injection and oil production wells, including inter-well connectivity, delay time constants and productivity indices. The evaluation of these behaviours allows direct quantification of waterflood efficiency at well-to-well level and improves identification of opportunities for changing injection patterns and prioritisation of operations and well workovers. Optimisation and forecasting of the Windalia waterflood is performed by maximising cumulative oil production by reallocating the available field wide injection water and evaluating individual injection wells target rates. Numerous optimisation scenarios were built into the models to account for the impact of changing operating conditions such as water availability and aging of wells and processing facilities. CRM is robust and is appropriate for simultaneous optimisation of well rates in a field where water injection and oil production wells are shut-in frequently. The PowerPoint presentation is not available to APPEA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-08
Author(s):  
Desy Hikmatul Siami ◽  
◽  
Novi Hery Yono ◽  

The need for petroleum is increasing along with the development of the industry, while the production results from the process of recovering oil from the reservoir by using primary recovery and secondary recovery are still very low so that it takes an advanced stage, namely tertiary recovery or, known as EOR. EOR is a method that produces oil production above 50%. EOR is an effort to increase oil production, so it is included in the IOR (Improved Oil Recovery) section. EOR consists of various applications, ranging from water injection, chemical injection, gases injection to microbiology injection. The stages in the injection of water and gas still leave oil trapped in the rocks in the reservoir. MEOR is one method that can be used to bring oil trapped in reservoir rocks to the surface. The effectiveness of the MEOR method is measured based on several parameters that is formation temperature, oil viscosity, permeability, saltwater salinity, water cut, API gravity crude oil, pH, pressure, residual oil saturation, porosity depth and bacterial content in the reservoir.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document