scholarly journals Necessity of In-hospital Neurological Observation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Negative Computed Tomography Brain Scans

Author(s):  
Chin Taweesomboonyat ◽  
Anukoon Kaewborisutsakul ◽  
Thara Tunthanathip ◽  
Sakchai Saeheng ◽  
Thakul Oearsakul

Objective: The authors aimed to evaluate the necessity of in-hospital neurological observation for mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients, who did not have any evidence of intracranial injury from initial computed tomography (CT) brain scans. Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed mild TBI patients with initial negative CT brain scans, receiving treatment at Songklanagarind hospital between January and December, 2018. All patients were observed in the emergency department short stay observation unit for 24 hours after injury. Patients’ medical records, initial and official CT brain scan interpretation were collected and analyzed. Results: This study included 493 cases. No patient deteriorated from intracranial injury, while one patient deteriorated from hypoglycemia, associated with his underlying adrenal insufficiency. However, one patient was admitted to the in patient ward, due to a missed diagnosis of acute subdural hematoma from his initial CT interpretation. The incidence of missed intracranial injury from initial CT brain scan interpretation was 1.6%. The need for neurosurgical intervention (in-patient ward admission, anticonvulsant and repeat brain imaging) was 0.2% (1/493). No patient required surgical intervention.Conclusion: Mild TBI patients, with initial negative CT brain scans, have very low risk for deterioration or need of neurosurgical intervention. Patient's underlying major comorbidity may be considered as an indication for in-hospital observation.

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 538-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin James Tierney ◽  
Natasha V. Nayak ◽  
Charles J. Prestigiacomo ◽  
Ziad C. Sifri

OBJECT The object of this study was to determine the mortality and neurological outcome of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) who require neurosurgical intervention (NSI), identify clinical predictors of a poor outcome, and investigate the effect of failed nonoperative management and delayed NSI on outcome. METHODS A cross-sectional study of 10 years was performed, capturing all adults with mTBI and NSI. Primary outcome variables were mortality and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score. Patients were divided into an immediate intervention group, which received an NSI after the initial cranial CT scan, and a delayed intervention group, which had failed nonoperative management and received an NSI after 2 or more cranial CT scans. RESULTS The mortality rate in mTBI patients requiring NSI was 13%, and the mean GOS score was 3.6 ± 1.2. An age > 60 years was independently predictive of a worse outcome, and epidural hematoma was independently predictive of a good outcome. Logistic regression analysis using independent variables was calculated to create a model for predicting poor neurological outcomes in patients with mTBI undergoing NSI and had 74.1% accuracy. Patients in the delayed intervention group had worse mortality (25% vs 9%) and worse mean GOS scores (2.9 ± 1.3 vs 3.7 ± 1.2) than those in the immediate intervention group. CONCLUSIONS Data in this study demonstrate that patients with mTBI requiring NSI have higher mortality rates and worse neurological outcomes and should therefore be classified separately from mTBI patients not requiring NSI. Additionally, mTBI patients requiring NSI after the failure of nonoperative management have worse outcomes than those receiving immediate intervention and should be considered separately.


Brain Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shadi Asadollahi ◽  
Kamran Heidari ◽  
Mehrdad Taghizadeh ◽  
Arash Mohammad Seidabadi ◽  
Morteza Jamshidian ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 1085-1090
Author(s):  
George A Alexiou ◽  
Georgios D Lianos ◽  
Aggeliki Tzima ◽  
Athanasios Sotiropoulos ◽  
Anastasios Nasios ◽  
...  

Aim: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious health concern. We set out to investigate the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocytes ratio (NLR) at admission for predicting the need for computed tomography (CT) in mild-TBI. Materials & methods: A retrospective study of adult patients who presented with mild-TBI Results: One hundred and thirty patients met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-four patients had positive CT-findings. The mean NLR-levels at presentations were 5.6 ± 4.8. Patients with positive CT-findings had significant higher NLR-levels. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted and the threshold of NLR-levels for detecting the cases with positive CT-findings was 2.5, with 78.1% sensitivity and 63% specificity Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge no previous study has assessed the value of NLR-levels for predicting the need for CT in mild-TBI.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daphne C. Voormolen ◽  
Marina Zeldovich ◽  
Juanita A. Haagsma ◽  
Suzanne Polinder ◽  
Sarah Friedrich ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive examination of the relation of complicated and uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) with multidimensional outcomes at three- and six-months after TBI. We analyzed data from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research (CENTER-TBI) research project. Patients after mTBI (Glasgow Coma scale (GCS) score of 13–15) enrolled in the study were differentiated into two groups based on computed tomography (CT) findings: complicated mTBI (presence of any traumatic intracranial injury on first CT) and uncomplicated mTBI (absence of any traumatic intracranial injury on first CT). Multidimensional outcomes were assessed using seven instruments measuring generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (SF-36 and QOLIBRI), functional outcome (GOSE), and psycho-social domains including symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (PCL-5), depression (PHQ-9), and anxiety (GAD-7). Data were analyzed using a multivariate repeated measures approach (MANOVA-RM), which inspected mTBI groups at three- and six-months post injury. Patients after complicated mTBI had significantly lower GOSE scores, reported lower physical and mental component summary scores based on the SF-36 version 2, and showed significantly lower HRQoL measured by QOLIBRI compared to those after uncomplicated mTBI. There was no difference between mTBI groups when looking at psychological outcomes, however, a slight improvement in PTSD symptoms and depression was observed for the entire sample from three to six months. Patients after complicated mTBI reported lower generic and disease specific HRQoL and worse functional outcome compared to individuals after uncomplicated mTBI at three and six months. Both groups showed a tendency to improve from three to six months after TBI. The complicated mTBI group included more patients with an impaired long-term outcome than the uncomplicated group. Nevertheless, patients, clinicians, researchers, and decisions-makers in health care should take account of the short and long-term impact on outcome for patients after both uncomplicated and complicated mTBI.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne E. Taylor ◽  
Renée F. Seebeck

Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) accounts for the majority of TBIs. Most cases recover within 3 months and usual medical advice covers physical and cognitive rest, activity and fatigue management, and education. However, in some cases, symptoms can persist and there may be ongoing postconcussion difficulties. It is well established that pre- and postinjury psychological factors can contribute to cases of persistent postconcussion symptoms. However, there are few illustrative case examples in the published literature on mild TBI. This case example demonstrates the pivotal role that preinjury psychological factors can play in recovery from mild TBI, using an example of a 35-year-old woman with persistent mild TBI symptoms who had a limited response to previous brief treatment through a Concussion Clinic. Through the process of assessment and development of a psychological case formulation, preinjury psychological factors that had been barriers to recovery and prior rehabilitation efforts were identified. Rehabilitation counselors are equipped to (1) identify and address such barriers, (2) communicate this information to other rehabilitation professionals in the treatment team to facilitate a shared understanding of how factors might affect the client’s functioning and (3) contribute to team case formulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document