scholarly journals PENINGKATAN PENGETAHUAN HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL GURU-GURU MAN 3 JAKARTA DALAM MENUMBUHKAN KESADARAN BERKEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Endang Purwaningsih ◽  
Chandra Yusuf ◽  
Mohammad Ryan Bakry
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Teacher Knowledge ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Training Methods ◽  
Teacher Creativity ◽  
The Right ◽  
Creativity And Innovation ◽  
And Training

In Article 14 of Law Number 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers, it is stated among other things the right of the teacher to obtain protection in carrying out duties and intellectual property rights; get the opportunity to improve competence; and obtain and utilize learning facilities and infrastructure to support the smooth functioning of professionalism; so it is appropriate if the teacher has intellectual property rights. Activities to increase teacher knowledge related to intellectual property rights have been well implemented, relevant to the interests of State Madrasah Aliyah 3 (MAN 3), and carried out by lecture and training methods with a participatory approach. There is a significant increase in MAN 3 teacher knowledge about the scope of IPR (20-60%). Likewise, IPR legal counseling can increase the knowledge of IPR teachers to be more aware of intellectual property by being done programmatically, synergies between community services Team, Structural MAN 3 and participants (teachers). Factors supporting the growth of teacher legal awareness of IPR include the development of the digital age of technology that must be well adapted by teachers in their profession and the need to protect teacher creativity and innovation. An obstacle to the growing legal awareness of teachers towards IPR is only to change the mindset that makes the module or work just meet the teacher's credit and the obligation of teaching materials for each teacher. Keywords: IPR, teacher, Madrasah Aliyah, Jakarta

scholarly journals KEEPING THE NATION'S ASSETS THROUGH THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF COPYRIGHT WORKS OF CULTURE

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-71
Author(s):  
Zulkifli Makkawaru
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Literature And Science ◽  
Community Rights ◽  
Art And Culture ◽  
The Right

Indonesia positioned copyright art and culture based on its strength as a nation or community rights over an Alliance grouping of the society which can give the effect of distortions in its protection. Which institution can be megurus and oversee the interests between countriesCultivate ideas/ideas in the fields of art, literature and science in the context of intellectual property rights (HKI) categorized into areas of HKI named Copyright (Copyright). The scope of the rights provided for the protection of copyright in the context of this very broad following elements known in several countries. There is a different understanding about the copyright status of culture from both the substance of the right nor of the appreciation of the case which threatens foreign claims copyright over the culture of Indonesia

scholarly journals THE RIGHT OF AUTHORSHIP ON A WORK

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-160
Author(s):  
Ciprian Raul Romiţan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Natural Connection ◽  
Artistic Work ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship

The moral rights represent the legal expression of the relationship between the workand its creator; they precede, survive and exert a permanent influence on the economic rights.Moral rights are independent of economic rights, the author of a work preserving these rightseven after the transfer of its property rights.The right to claim recognition as the author of the work, called in the doctrine as the"right of paternity of the work" is enshrined in art. 10 lit. b) of the law and it is based on theneed to respect the natural connection between the author and his work. The right toauthorship is the most important prerogative that constitutes intellectual property rights ingeneral and consists of recognizing the true author of a scientific, literary or artistic work.

scholarly journals Peran Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Pencipta Lagu Dan Pemilik Hak Terkait

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (01) ◽  
pp. 37-54
Author(s):  
Elly Hernawati
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Business Climate ◽  
Management Agency ◽  
Collective Management ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Right

Copyright is one of the Intellectual Property Rights components and should be paid attention to. Even more in technology era that developing, copyright protection needed to be enhanced, so that the right of creator, Copyright holder or owner of relevant rights can be protected and urge people to create. Indirectly, good and healthy business climate could be fostered.  Not all people have skill to create, that is why those people who have skill to create must be protected and even awarded, hoping that people urged to create. One of the creations that protected are song and music. In creating song or music, creator involve recording producer, music director or arranger. Regarding the creation, creator holds moral and economy rights, while parties involved hold the relevant rights to it. Collective Management Agency is an agency that help creator or relevant rights owner in managing and distributing the creation which is song or music that being commercialized. Yet the creator must be the member of the agency beforehand. Commercialization of a song or music by user can rise problem. Protection to the song or music is for the whole thing, including lyric, notation, arrangement and song title. The utilization of a song or music should be still protecting the parties that hold the copyright and the relevant right to it.

scholarly journals The right to protection against unfair use of the means of individualization: content and features

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 313-318
Author(s):  
Pekar A.
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Unfair Competition ◽  
Economic Competition ◽  
Economic Entity ◽  
Objective Meaning ◽  
The Right

The article deals with the nature and features of the right to protection against unfair use of the means of individualization. It is argued that it is inappropriate to distinguish the right to protection against unfair use of the means of individualization in the structure of intellectual property rights from the right to protection of economic competition. Based on a system analysis of the legislation, scientific literature review, and the practice of its application, the right to protection is classified in an objective and subjective meaning. In its objective meaning, the right to protection against unfair use of the means of individualization is a component of the right to intellectual property, to protection against unfair competition. The subjective right to protection against the unfair use of the means of individualization is an independent right. The following features of the right to protection against unfair use of the means of individualization are identified on the basis of the analysis. The objective right to protection against unfair use of the means of individualization is characterized by a set of civil law rules governing relations in the field of intellectual property rights and economic competition and determining the grounds, forms, procedure and methods of protection of such rights. This right combines two components: the protection of intellectual property rights and economic competition relations. The subjects of this right are economic entities. At the same time, the exercise of the right to protection in connection with the violation of the law on protection against unfair competition ensures the protection of consumers’ rights, as it guarantees them good quality goods on the market. The object of this right is relations in the field of intellectual property rights and economic competition. The subjective right to protection against unfair use of the means of individuation is the use of a provided by law capacity to renew, recognize or award the right to use the means of individualization by an economic entity. Such subjective right is characterized by the following features: it always implies the implementation of active actions, the possibility of choosing the forms and methods of protection. Keywords: means of individualization, unfair use, right to protection, objective right, subjective right, intellectual property rights, unfair competition.

Pledge of intellectual property rights

2020 ◽  
pp. 369-375
Author(s):  
Anna Savina
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Federal Budget ◽  
Number Of Factors ◽  
Lectual Property ◽  
The Right ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Statistical Indicators

We consider certain issues of pledge of intellectual property, analyze the definitions of the concepts “pledge”, “intellectual property”, “objects of intellectual rights”, etc. We comprehend the issues of civil law regulation of pledge relations, investigate the mechanisms of state support for the intel-lectual property pledge, and identify a number of factors that determine the positive effect of innovative enterprises development, receiving loans secured by intellectual property. We describe the risk factors of pledged collateral for loans, we note the criteria according to which the borrower has the right to conclude an agreement on the provision of subsidies from the federal budget to small and medium-sized businesses to expense reimbursement associated with obtaining loans secured by intellectual property rights. We pay attention to the issue of correlation of derivative rights with an independent object of pledge. We examine the insurance and market issues related to the risk factors of intellectual property pledge. We study the practice of granting loans secured by intellectual property, and also analyze the statistical indicators of such practice in individual countries of Europe and Asia.

While the Treaty does not affect the existence of intellectual property rights, there are nonetheless circumstances in which the exercise of such rights may be restricted by the prohibitions laid down in the treaty. 2. Article 36 permits exceptions to the free movement of goods only to the extent to which such exceptions are necessary for the purpose of safeguarding the rights that constitute the specific subject-matter of the type of intellectual property in question. Perhaps the main advantage of this formula, apart from the fact that it narrows the scope of the exceptions permitted by Article 36, is that it allows subtle distinctions to be made depending on the type of intellectual property in issue. 3. The exclusive right conferred on the owner of intellectual property is exhausted in relation to the products in question when he puts them into circulation anywhere within the Common Market. Spelt out more fully, ‘the proprietor of an industrial or commercial property right protected by the legislation of a Member State may not rely on that legislation in order to oppose the importation of a product which has lawfully been marketed in another Member State by, or with the consent of, the proprietor of the right himself or person legally or economically dependent on him’. The expression ‘industrial and commercial property’ clearly embraces patents and trademarks. It also extends to such specialised areas as plant breeders’ rights. The court has held that copyright can also be a form of industrial or commercial property because it ‘includes the protection conferred by copyright, especially when exploited commercially in the form of licences capable of affecting distribution in the various Member States of goods incorporating the protected literary or artistic work’. The principle that the Treaty does not affect the existence of industrial and commercial property rights is derived from Article 222 of the treaty. This provides that ‘the treaty shall in no way prejudice the rules in Member States governing the system of property ownership’. Consequently intellectual property rights are unaffected by the provisions of the treaty unless they hinder free movement or offend the rules of competition. In Keurkoop v Nancy Kean (see below) the design of a handbag which was manufactured in Taiwan was registered in the Benelux countries but without the authority of the actual author. In Case 78/70, Deutsche Grammophon v Metro-SB Grossmärkte [1971] ECR 487, [1971] CMLR 631, the European Court stated:

1997 ◽  
pp. 110-114
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Member State ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Free Movement ◽  
Member States ◽  
Commercial Property ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Right ◽  
Exclusive Right

21. Dealings in intellectual property rights

2019 ◽  
pp. 553-583
Author(s):  
Stavroula Karapapa ◽  
Luke McDonagh
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Economic Importance ◽  
Work Design ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
The Right

This chapter examines dealings in intellectual property (IP) rights. Given the economic importance of IP rights, it is necessary to understand how IP dealings — or transactions — work. The starting point for considering IP transactions is a simple principle — there is a distinction between being the author/creator of the underlying work, invention, mark, or design and being the owner of the right. For this reason, being the author/creator does not necessarily mean that one will always have the ability to enter into transactions with others concerning the work, design, invention, or mark. Generally, it is owners, or their agents/trustees, who will have the power to engage in IP transactions. There are two basic forms of IP dealings: assignment, and licensing. An assignment involves the outright transfer of ownership from the current owner to the new owner. By contrast, a licence is a mere permission to use the IP right.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document