scholarly journals Correlation of Ki67 Expression with Hormone Receptors, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER-2) Status, P53 Mutation and Clinicopathological Characteristics in Pathologic Specimens of Breast Cancer Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-97
Author(s):  
Seyed Abbas Mirmalek ◽  
Maedeh Ghorbani ◽  
Ala Gholamrezaei Boushehrinejad ◽  
Masoud Salehi ◽  
Seyed Alireza Salimi-Tabatabaee ◽  
...  

Background: Breast cancer is the main cause of cancer in women and the second cause of ma­lignancy deaths. Ki-67 is one of the molecular markers used to evaluate cancer prognosis along with other factors such as age, tumor size, lymph node involvement, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), P53, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2), histolog­ical and nuclear grades. This study was aimed to evaluate the correlation of KI-67 expression with some biomarkers and clinico-pathological characteristics in breast cancer patients. Mate­rials and Methods: A total of 513 cases (all female) aged 40- 80 years, were randomly selected from patients who were admitted in two centers affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Buo-alli and Kasra hospitals) over a 7-year period (2010-2015). Assessment of tumors for HER-2, P53, ER PR, pathological type and histologic grade was performed. Ki-67 labelling index (Ki-67LI) was defined as the percentage of MIB1-positive cells among a total number of 1,000 malignant cells at high-power magnification (×400). Results: Our study showed that age, ER and PR status were negatively correlated with Ki-67LI (P<0.05). Moreover, number of lymph nodes involved, HER-2, P53 and nuclear grades had a positive correlation with Ki-67LI (P<0.05), whereas, tumor size and histological grade showed no significant correlation with Ki-67LI (P =0.195 and P=0.721, respectively). Conclusion: Results of our study and other studies confirm that the expression of Ki-67 is significantly associated with ER, PR, HER-2 and P53 status. On the other hand, Ki-67 relationship with clinical characteristics such as age, tumor size and lymph node metastasis is not completely established and needs further research.[GMJ.2016;5(2):90-97]

Oncology ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 441-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias W. Beckmann ◽  
Dieter Niederacher ◽  
Gero Massenkeil ◽  
Boris Tutschek ◽  
Andreas Beckmann ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 3649
Author(s):  
Shikha Shukla ◽  
Fahad Ansari

Background: Breast cancer is the most commonly occurring cancer in women and the second most common cancer overall. Owing to a unique pattern of presentation in terms of clinical and biological features, finding their mutual association may be important and may help predict prognosis. HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)/neu is one such important immunohistochemical factor that is considered to be more prevalent amongst Indians and therefore makes up for an emerging area for studies. The study aimed to assess the patients of breast carcinoma in terms of their HER2/neu statuses and find out their association with clinical parameters.Methods: This was a prospective comparative study conducted in department of surgery, Hamidia hospital, Bhopal, India, with a total duration of 1 year between November 2018 to September 2019 including a total of 98 consecutive in house breast carcinoma patients.Results: A total of 98 breast cancer patients were tested for HER-2/neu gene presence. Of these 25 (25.5%) samples tested positive and 73 (7.48%) tested negative. A comparison of the two groups revealed that none of the clinic-pathological factors tested were found to have a statistically significant association with the HER2/neu status.Conclusions: It appeared that there is no defining factor in terms of clinic-pathological presentation that helps to separate significantly HER-2/neu positive with HER-2/neu negative cases with breast cancer. Still, immune-histochemical marker analysis should be an integral part of the overall work up of the breast cancer patients because of its both prognostic and therapeutic application and significance.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (36) ◽  
pp. 5658-5663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsolt Gabos ◽  
Richie Sinha ◽  
John Hanson ◽  
Nitin Chauhan ◽  
Judith Hugh ◽  
...  

Purpose As survival in breast cancer patients is improving, brain metastases are becoming increasingly prevalent. The risk of brain metastases in newly diagnosed human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) –overexpressing breast cancer patients is not yet fully defined. We aimed to analyze the risk of brain metastasis in newly diagnosed HER-2–positive breast cancer patients in comparison with HER-2–negative patients. Patients and Methods To determine the incidence of brain metastases in HER-2–overexpressing patients, we analyzed a cohort of newly diagnosed 301 HER-2–positive and 363 HER-2–negative patients identified between January 1998 and December 2003. The association between histologic features and the occurrence of brain metastases was evaluated with univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results Median follow-up was 3.9 years. Brain metastases were identified in 9% (27 patients) with HER-2–overexpressing breast cancer compared with only 1.9% (7 patients) in the HER-2 negative patients (hazard ratio 4.23 [1.84-9.74], P = .0007). HER-2 overexpression, tumor size larger than 2 cm, at least one positive node, and grade 2/3 disease were predictors of brain metastases in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, HER-2 overexpression, tumor size larger than 2 cm, and hormone-receptor negativity were independent prognostic factors for the development of brain metastases, whereas hormone-receptor expression was protective. Conclusion Our study shows that newly diagnosed HER-2–overexpressing breast cancer patients are at increased risk for brain metastases. Because most brain metastases occur after the development of systemic disease, these findings prompt consideration of brain prophylaxis strategies with HER-2–inhibiting small molecules able to cross the blood-brain barrier and/or radiologic screening to detect asymptomatic brain metastases.


2021 ◽  
Vol 165 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-25
Author(s):  
Iveta Kolarova ◽  
Bohuslav Melichar ◽  
Jaroslav Vanasek ◽  
Ales Ryska ◽  
Katerina Horackova ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document