scholarly journals Stochastic Modeling of Multiple Ovulation and Embryo Transfer Breeding Schemes in Small Closed Dairy Cattle Populations

1990 ◽  
Vol 73 (7) ◽  
pp. 1938-1944 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.J. Jeon ◽  
I.L. Mao ◽  
J. Jensen ◽  
T.A. Ferris
1991 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Ruane

ABSTRACTThe importance of family sizes in adult multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) nucleus schemes with discrete generations of single trait selection was examined using Monte Carlo simulation. Two areas were investigated. Firstly, the number of sons and daughters per dam was varied in schemes using hierarchical mating designs. With four or eight sires and 32 dams selected, increasing the number of sons per dam from one up to four achieved 1 to 8% higher rates of response but at the expense of increased variation in response and 10 to 56% higher rates of inbreeding. With four or eight sires and 16, 32 or 64 dams selected, the number of daughters was set to two, four or eight (with one son per dam in each case). For schemes transferring equal numbers of embryos, responses were lower with two daughters per dam but were fairly similar with four or eight daughters per dam while inbreeding rates increased as fewer sires and dams were selected. Secondly, the effects of variation in family sizes due to biological factors and chance were investigated with eight sires and 32 dams selected and with hierarchical or factorial (two or four sires per dam) mating designs. When all selected cows yielded embryos, changes in family sizes due to differences in sex ratios, in survival rates of embryos to selection and to variation in the number of embryos per donor reduced response by 1 to 4%. However, when 20% or 33% of the superovulated females yielded no embryos, thus requiring the use of genetically inferior replacements, response was reduced by a further 9 to 13%


2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 ◽  
pp. 129-129
Author(s):  
M. Aminafshar ◽  
M. Moradi Shahrebabak ◽  
M. Sanjabi ◽  
A. Lavvaf

Breeding schemes with multiple ovulation and embryo transfer opens up a possibility to enhance genetic improvement through intense female selection and short generation intervals. The potential improvement in genetic response may increase when elite cows produce a number of embryos, instead of one calf per year. Also different ratio of proven bull and young bull semen may be used to inseminate cows in the herd. The objective of this project has been to investigate genetic response and coefficient of inbreeding, when elite cows produce number of embryos during a year, instead of reproducing one calf per year. Also genetic response and inbreeding coefficient were estimated when different ratio of proven bull and young bull semen were used to inseminate cows in the herd.


1983 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. W. Nicholas ◽  
C. Smith

ABSTRACTPossibilities for increased rates of genetic change in dairy cattle through embryo transfer and embryo splitting are examined, using the multiple ovulation and embryo transfer systems previously proposed. These involve embryo transfer from 1-year-old females (juvenile scheme, generation interval 1·8 years) and from females after 1 lactation (adult scheme, generation interval 3·7 years), with use of males at similar ages. Though selection is less accurate than in conventional progeny testing, the annual rate of genetic improvement can be increased, and even doubled. If the number of transfers is restricted andm the inbreeding rate is limiting, the adult scheme for both sexes is preferred. A scheme with 1 024 transfers per year and 512 females milk-recorded per year will sustain a rate of genetic improvement some 30% above that possible by a conventional national progeny-testing programme. Because of the relatively small number of animals involved, it is argued that greater control over recording, breeding and selection should be possible, leading to a larger proportion of the possible genetic gains being realized in practice. Other advantages, and disadvantages of these systems, and their integration in dairy cattle improvement are discussed.


2008 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Dochi ◽  
K. Takahashi ◽  
T. Hirai ◽  
H. Hayakawa ◽  
M. Tanisawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document