Current comprehensive management of cranial base chordomas: 10-year meta-analysis of observational studies

2011 ◽  
Vol 115 (6) ◽  
pp. 1094-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Di Maio ◽  
Nancy Temkin ◽  
Dinesh Ramanathan ◽  
Laligam N. Sekhar

Object The role of surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy for cranial base chordomas is not well established. This meta-analysis measures the relationship of complete resection and type of adjuvant radiation therapy to 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of cranial base chordomas. Methods A systematic MEDLINE search (1999–present) yielded 23 observational studies and 807 patients who fit inclusion criteria. The following analyses were performed: 1) Kaplan-Meier 5-year PFS and OS compared based on the extent of resection and type of adjuvant radiation therapy using the log-rank method; 2) a random-effects model comparing 5-year PFS with complete or incomplete resection; and 3) paired z-test comparisons of weighted average 5-year OS and PFS grouped by type of adjuvant radiation therapy. Results The weighted average follow-up was 53.6 months. The weighted average 5-year PFS and OS were 50.8% and 78.4%, respectively. Complete resection conferred a higher 5-year PFS than incomplete resection from the random effects model (mean difference in PFS 20.7%; 95% CI 6.57%–34.91%). Patients with incomplete resection were 3.83 times more likely to experience a recurrence (95% CI 1.63–9.00) and 5.85 times more likely to die (95% CI 1.40–24.5) at 5 years versus patients with complete resection. There was no difference in 5-year OS by type of adjuvant radiation, although 5-year PFS was lower in patients receiving Gamma Knife surgery relative to carbon ion radiotherapy (p = 0.042) on paired z-test. No survival difference occurred between radiation therapy techniques on Kaplan-Meier analysis of compiled patient data. Conclusions Patients with complete resection of cranial base chordomas have a prolonged 5-year PFS and OS. Adjuvant proton-beam, carbon ion, and modern fractionated photon radiation therapy techniques offered a similar rate of PFS and OS at 5 years.

2013 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 330-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin Ohri ◽  
Madhur K. Garg ◽  
Santiago Aparo ◽  
Andreas Kaubisch ◽  
Wolfgang Tome ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 448-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iván A. Rodríguez-Fernández ◽  
Laura Rodríguez-Romo ◽  
David Hernandez-Barajas ◽  
Galileo A. Gonzalez-Conchas ◽  
Adrian Verdines-Perez ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 178 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yara Abdou ◽  
Ahmed Elkhanany ◽  
Kristopher Attwood ◽  
Wenyan Ji ◽  
Kazuaki Takabe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Primary and secondary breast angiosarcoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy with limited published literature. Optimal management is mostly based on expert opinion. Our study aims to describe a single institution experience with breast angiosarcoma and evaluate other publications on this topic to further clarify prognostic outcomes and treatment modalities in this disease. Methods Twenty two cases of breast angiosarcoma from Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed. Additionally, a systemic review and meta-analysis was conducted to study the association between survival outcomes, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in both primary (PAS) and secondary breast angiosarcoma (SAS). Results 9 PAS patients (41%) and 13 SAS patients (59%) were retrospectively analyzed. No significant differences were noted in tumor characteristics and survival outcomes between PAS and SAS. Treatment modality had no significant effects on survival outcomes although adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a trend towards improved RFS in high grade tumors. 380 PAS and 595 SAS patients were included in the outcome meta-analysis. Survival outcomes were significantly worse with high grade tumors and tumor size of > 5 cm. Adjuvant radiation therapy demonstrated significantly better RFS, while adjuvant chemotherapy had no effect on survival outcomes. Conclusion Tumor size and grade seem to be reliable predictors of survival in both PAS and SAS. Mastectomy does not seem to be adding any additional benefit to BCS. Adjuvant radiation therapy showed statistically significant RFS benefit, while adjuvant chemotherapy can be beneficial in high grade tumors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document