Expanded endoscopic endonasal transcribriform approach for resection of anterior skull base olfactory schwannoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (Suppl1) ◽  
pp. E3 ◽  
Author(s):  
James K. Liu ◽  
Jean Anderson Eloy
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Anterior Skull Base ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Olfactory Groove ◽  
Anterior Cranial Base ◽  
Ventral Skull Base ◽  
Brain Retraction

Anterior skull base (ASB) schwannomas are extremely rare and can often mimic other pathologies involving the ASB such as olfactory groove meningiomas, hemangiopericytomas, esthesioneuroblastomas, and other malignant ASB tumors. The mainstay of treatment for these lesions is gross-total resection. Traditionally, resection for tumors in this location is performed through a bifrontal transbasal approach that can involve some degree of brain retraction or manipulation for tumor exposure. With the recent advances in endoscopic skull base surgery, various ASB tumors can be resected successfully using an expanded endoscopic endonasal transcribriform approach through a “keyhole craniectomy” in the ventral skull base. This approach represents the most direct route to the anterior cranial base without any brain retraction. Tumor involving the paranasal sinuses, medial orbits, and cribriform plate can be readily resected. In this video atlas report, the authors demonstrate their step-by-step techniques for resection of an ASB olfactory schwannoma using a purely endoscopic endonasal transcribriform approach. They describe and illustrate the operative nuances and surgical pearls to safely and efficiently perform the approach, tumor resection, and multilayered reconstruction of the cranial base defect. The video can be found here: http://youtu.be/NLtOGfKWC6U.

The Role of 3D tractography in Skull Base Surgery: Technological Advances, Feasibility, and Early Clinical Assessment with Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srikant S. Chakravarthi ◽  
Melanie B. Fukui ◽  
Alejandro Monroy-Sosa ◽  
Lior Gonen ◽  
Austin Epping ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Cranial Nerve ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Olfactory Groove ◽  
Volume Functional ◽  
Signal Abnormality ◽  
Anterior Cranial Base

Abstract Objective The aim of this study is to determine feasibility of incorporating three-dimensional (3D) tractography into routine skull base surgery planning and analyze our early clinical experience in a subset of anterior cranial base meningiomas (ACM). Methods Ninety-nine skull base endonasal and transcranial procedures were planned in 94 patients and retrospectively reviewed with a further analysis of the ACM subset. Main Outcome Measures (1) Automated generation of 3D tractography; (2) co-registration 3D tractography with computed tomography (CT), CT angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); and (3) demonstration of real-time manipulation of 3D tractography intraoperatively. ACM subset: (1) pre- and postoperative cranial nerve function, (2) qualitative assessment of white matter tract preservation, and (3) frontal lobe fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal abnormality. Results Automated 3D tractography, with MRI, CT, and CTA overlay, was produced in all cases and was available intraoperatively. ACM subset: 8 (44%) procedures were performed via a ventral endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) corridor and 12 (56%) via a dorsal anteromedial (DAM) transcranial corridor. Four cases (olfactory groove meningiomas) were managed with a combined, staged approach using ventral EEA and dorsal transcranial corridors. Average tumor volume reduction was 90.3 ± 15.0. Average FLAIR signal change was –30.9% ± 58.6. 11/12 (92%) patients (DAM subgroup) demonstrated preservation of, or improvement in, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus volume. Functional cranial nerve recovery was 89% (all cases). Conclusions It is feasible to incorporate 3D tractography into the skull base surgical armamentarium. The utility of this tool in improving outcomes will require further study.

Anterior Skull Base Meningioma: Surgical approach and complication avoidance

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhawan Nangarwal ◽  
Jaskaran Singh Gosal ◽  
Kuntal Kanti Das ◽  
Deepak Khatri ◽  
Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Vascular Complications ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Anterior Skull Base ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Medical Complication ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Olfactory Groove ◽  
Skull Base Meningioma

Background: Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) and keyhole transcranial approaches are being increasingly used in anterior skull base meningioma (ASBM) surgery. Objective: We compare tumor resection rates and complication profiles of EEA and supraorbital key hole approach (SOKHA) against conventional transcranial approaches (TCA). Methods: Fifty-four patients with ASBM [olfactory groove (OGM), n=19 and planum sphenoidale/tuberculum sellae (PS/TSM), n=35) operated at a single centre over 7 years were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The overall rate of GTR was higher in OGM (15/19, 78.9%) than PS-TSM group (23/35, 65.7%, p=0.37). GTR rate with OGM was 90% and 75% with TCA and EEA. Death (n=1) following medical complication (TCA) and CSF leak requiring re-exploration (n=2, one each in TCA and EEA) accounted for the major complications in OGM. For the PS/TSM group, the GTR rates were 73.3% (n=11/15), 53.8% (n=7/13) and 71.4% (n=5/7) with TCA, EEA and SOKHA respectively. Seven patients (20%) of PS-TSM developed major postoperative complications including 4 deaths (one each in TCA, SOKHA and 2 in EEA group) and 3 visual deteriorations. Direct and indirect vascular complications were common in lesser invasive approaches to PS-TSM especially if the tumor has encased intracranial arteries. Conclusions: No single approach is applicable to all ASBMs. TCA is still the best approach to obtain GTR but has tissue trauma related problems. SOKHA may be a good alternative to TCA in selected PS-TSMs while EEA may be an alternate option in some OGMs. A meticulous patient selection is needed to derive reported results of EEA for PS-TSM.

scholarly journals Septal transposition: a novel technique for preservation of the nasal septum during endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningiomas

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. E6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc R. Rosen ◽  
Mindy R. Rabinowitz ◽  
Christopher J. Farrell ◽  
Madeleine R. Schaberg ◽  
James J. Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Septum ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Septal Perforation ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Olfactory Groove ◽  
Anterior Cranial Base ◽  
Nasal Septal Flap ◽  
Early Tumor ◽  
Brain Retraction ◽  
Wide Exposure

Endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningiomas allows for several advantages over transcranial routes, including a direct approach to the bilateral anterior cranial base and dura mater, early tumor devascularization, and avoidance of brain retraction. Although considered minimally invasive, the endoscopicapproach to the cribriform plate typically requires resection of the superior nasal septum, resulting in a large superior septal perforation. The septal transposition technique improves preservation of sinonasal anatomy through the elimination of a septal perforation while allowing for wide exposure to the midline anterior cranial base and harvest of a nasal septal flap. Herein, the authors describe a 39-year-old female who presented with a progressively enlarging olfactory groove meningioma. An endoscopic endonasal resection with a septal transposition technique was performed. On follow-up, the nasal cavity had completely normal anatomy with preservation of the turbinatesand nasal septum. The authors conclude that septal transposition is a useful technique that allows wide exposure of the anterior cranial base with maximal preservation of normal nasal anatomy and avoidance of a large septal perforation.

Anatomic Considerations of Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila J. Mady ◽  
Thomas M. Kaffenberger ◽  
Khalil Baddour ◽  
Katie Melder ◽  
Neal R. Godse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Free Tissue Transfer ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Skull Base Reconstruction ◽  
Recipient Vessel ◽  
Tissue Transfer ◽  
Anterior Cranial Base ◽  
Pedicle Length

Abstract Objective Though microvascular free tissue transfer is well established for open skull base reconstruction, normative data regarding flap design and inset after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (ESBS) is lacking. We aim to describe anatomical considerations of endoscopic endonasal inset of free tissue transfer of transclival (TC) and anterior cranial base resection (ACBR) defects. Design and Setting Radial forearm free tissue transfer (RFFTT) model. Participants Six cadaveric specimens. Main Outcome Measures Pedicle orientation, pedicle length, and recipient vessel intraluminal diameter. Results TC and ACBR defects averaged 17.2 and 11.7 cm2, respectively. Anterior and lateral maxillotomies and endoscopic medial maxillectomies were prepared as corridors for flap and pedicle passage. Premasseteric space tunnels were created for pedicle tunneling to recipient facial vessels. For TC defects, the RFFTT pedicle was oriented cranially with the flap placed against the clival defect (mean pedicle length 13.1 ± 0.6 cm). For ACBR defects, the RFFTT pedicle was examined in three orientations with respect to anterior–posterior axis of the RFFTT: anteriorly, posteriorly, and laterally. Lateral orientation offered the shortest average pedicle length required for anastomosis in the neck (11.6 ± 1.29 cm), followed by posterior (13.4 ± 0.7cm) and anterior orientations (14.4 ± 1.1cm) (p < 0.00001, analysis of variance). Conclusions In ACBR reconstruction using RFFTT, our data suggests lateral pedicle orientation shortens the length required to safely anastomose facial vessels and protects the frontal sinus outflow anteriorly while limiting pedicle exposure through a maxillary corridor within the nasal cavity. With greater understanding of anatomical factors related to successful preoperative flap planning, free tissue transfer may be added to the ESBS reconstruction ladder. Level of Evidence NA

scholarly journals Preservation of nasal turbinates in endoscopic, anterior skull base surgery—yes, we can!

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Wolf ◽  
Alexandros Andrianakis ◽  
Peter Valentin Tomazic ◽  
Michael Mokry ◽  
Georg Clarici ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Anterior Skull Base ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Preoperative Information ◽  
Medical University ◽  
Significant Factors

Abstract Objective To evaluate the frequency, type and indications of nasal turbinate (NT) resection during endoscopic, anterior skull base surgery and to analyze factors that may have an impact on the need of NT removal. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 306 subjects (150 males and 156 females, mean age 55.4 ± 15.3 years) who underwent multidisciplinary, transnasal, endoscopic tumor surgery of the anterior skull base using 4-handed techniques between 2011 and 2019 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Graz, were included. Results In the majority of interventions (n = 281/306; 91.8%), all NT were preserved. Significant factors influencing the need of NT resections turned out to be type of endoscopic approach (p < 0.001; V = 0.304), sagittal (p = 0.003; d = 0.481) and transversal (p = 0.017; d = 0.533) tumor diameter, tumor type (p < 0.001; V = 0.355) and tumor location (p < 0.001; V = 0.324). Conclusions NT can be preserved in the majority of patients undergoing tumor resection in anterior, transnasal, skullbase surgery and routine resection of NT should be avoided. Variables that have an impact on the need of NT resections are types of endoscopic approaches, sagittal and transversal tumor extension and tumor type. These factors should be considered in planning of surgery and preoperative information of patients.

Combined endoscopy-assisted cranionasal approach for resection of infantile myofibromatosis of the ethmoid and anterior skull base

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ercole Galassi ◽  
Ernesto Pasquini ◽  
Giorgio Frank ◽  
Gianluca Marucci
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Radical Resection ◽  
Permanent Tooth ◽  
Anterior Skull Base ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Skull Base Reconstruction ◽  
Endoscopic Techniques ◽  
Tooth Roots

The advent and widespread development of endonasal endoscopic techniques have recently expanded the frontiers of skull base surgery. The reduced invasiveness, wider and adjustable visualization of the operative field, and lack of postoperative cosmetic defects are well-known advantages of the endonasal endoscopic approaches compared with traditional surgical exposures both in adults and in children. The need to avoid disruption of facial growth centers and permanent tooth roots represents a further special consideration in favor of these endoscopic techniques in children. The authors report on a case of solitary myofibroma involving the ethmoid, mesial orbits, and anterior skull base with intracranial intradural expansion in a 17-month-old girl. The occurrence of such proliferative disease along the skull base is exceedingly rare. The tumor was successfully excised via an endoscopy-assisted cranionasal approach in which a transcranial microsurgical exposure was combined with endonasal endoscopic access to ensure a radical resection and optimize skull base reconstruction. To the authors' knowledge, the patient in this case is the youngest reported patient in the literature who has undergone treatment with this surgical strategy. The outcome in this patient underscores the feasibility and safety of endoscopic endonasal surgery even in toddlers and early childhood.

Residual and Recurrent Disease Following Endoscopic Endonasal Approach as a Reflection of Anatomic Limitation for the Resection of Midline Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradeep Setty ◽  
Juan C Fernandez-Miranda ◽  
Eric W Wang ◽  
Carl H Snyderman ◽  
Paul A Gardner
Keyword(s):  
Optic Nerve ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Average Diameter ◽  
Anterior Skull Base ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Olfactory Groove ◽  
Orbital Roof ◽  
Skull Base Meningiomas

Abstract BACKGROUND Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) to anterior skull base meningiomas have grown in popularity, though anatomic limitations remain unclear. OBJECTIVE To show the anatomic limits of EEA for meningiomas. METHODS Retrospective chart review for all patients that underwent EEA for anterior skull base meningiomas from 2005 to 2014. RESULTS A total of 100 patients averaged follow-up of 46.9 mo (24-100 mo). A total of 35 patients (35%) had olfactory groove, 33 planum sphenoidale (33%), and 32 tuberculum sella (32%) meningiomas. The average diameter was 2.9 cm (0.5-8.1 cm). Vascular encasement was seen in 11 patients (11%) and calcification in 20 (20%). Simpson Grade 1 (SG1) resection was achieved in 64 patients (64%). Only calcification impacted degree of resection (40% SG1, P = .012). The most common residual was on the anterior clinoid dura (11 patients [11%]). Six (6%) had residual superior/lateral to the optic nerve. Residual tumor was adherent to the optic apparatus or arteries in 5 patients (5%) each, and 3 patients (3%) had residual lateral to the mid-orbit. Rates of residual decreased over time. A total of 11 patients (11%) had tumor recurrence (mean of 40 mo): 4 (4%) on the anterior clinoid, 2 (2%) each on the lateral orbital roof, adherent to optic apparatus and superolateral to the optic nerve, and 1 (1%) was at the anterior falx. CONCLUSION Anterior skull base meningiomas can effectively be approached via EEA in most patients; tumors extending to the anterior clinoid, anterior falx, or superolateral to the optic nerve or orbital roof, especially if calcified, may be difficult to reach via EEA.

Use of Mixed Reality Visualization in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Zeiger ◽  
Anthony Costa ◽  
Joshua Bederson ◽  
Raj K Shrivastava ◽  
Alfred M C Iloreta
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Endoscopic Surgery ◽  
Mixed Reality ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Anterior Skull Base ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Camera View ◽  
Clinical Series ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks

Abstract BACKGROUND Neuronavigation systems assist with spatial orientation during endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery, but they require a correlation of 3-dimensional (3D) views with 2-dimensional (2D) radiology studies. OBJECTIVE To outline an initial experience with a novel technology platform that provides intraoperative navigation using 3D reconstructions of patient anatomy for endoscopic surgery. METHODS A retrospective study of endoscopic anterior skull base and complex paranasal procedures was performed. Data from preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans were fused to create 3D digital models of patient anatomy. Using the technology developed by Surgical Theater (Mayfield Village, Ohio), these reconstructions were designed to highlight particular anatomic regions of interest. The models were studied to guide the surgical approach and anticipate critical structures. The reconstructions were linked with the navigational technology created by Brainlab (Munich, Germany) during endoscopic surgery. A dynamic image of the reconstruction was displayed alongside a matching endoscopic camera view. These 2 views could be overlaid to provide an immersive, mixed reality image of the patient's anatomy. RESULTS A total of 134 cases were performed. The pathologies included tumors of the anterior skull base or sinonasal cavity, inflammatory sinus disease, and cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Specific anatomic structures, such as the internal carotid arteries and optic nerves, were chosen for enhancement. Surgeons felt that the technology helped to guide the extent of bony dissection and to identify critical structures. CONCLUSION We describe the first clinical series of complex skull base pathologies treated using a novel mixed reality platform.

Pericranial Flap for Endoscopic Anterior Skull-Base Reconstruction

Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihir R. Patel ◽  
Rupali N. Shah ◽  
Carl H. Snyderman ◽  
Ricardo L. Carrau ◽  
Anand V. Germanwala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Anterior Skull Base ◽  
Dural Defect ◽  
Skull Base Reconstruction ◽  
Pericranial Flap ◽  
Endonasal Reconstruction ◽  
Ventral Skull Base

Abstract BACKGROUND One of the major challenges of cranial base surgery is reconstruction of the dural defect and prevention of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula. The introduction of endoscopic techniques and an endonasal approach to the ventral skull base has created new challenges for reconstruction. OBJECTIVE We have developed an endoscopic pericranial flap (PCF) for skull base reconstruction and hereby present the initial cohort of patients who had endonasal reconstruction with a PCF after endoscopic skull base resection. We also demonstrate a method to radiographically incorporate anticipated skull base defects for preoperative planning of PCF length. METHODS Dural defects after endonasal skull base resection of invasive tumors were reconstructed with an onlay PCF (n = 10). We performed radiological studies to assist preoperative planning for where to make incisions while harvesting a PCF for anterior skull base, sellar, and clival defects. RESULTS Each of the 10 patients had excellent healing of their skull base and had no evidence of any postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Eight patients had radiation therapy without flap complications. Radiographic studies demonstrate that the adequate PCF length, covering defects of the anterior skull base, sellar, and clival defects are 11.31 to 12.44 cm, 14.31 to 15.57 cm, and 18.5 to 20.42 cm, respectively. CONCLUSION The PCF provides an option for endonasal reconstruction of cranial base defects and can be harvested endoscopically. Pre-operative radiographic evaluation may guide surgical planning. There is minimal donor site morbidity, and the flap provides enough surface area to cover the entire ventral skull base.

scholarly journals Endoscopic extended transsphenoidal resection of craniopharyngiomas: nuances of neurosurgical technique

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. E10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Conger ◽  
Joshua Lucas ◽  
Gabriel Zada ◽  
Theodore H. Schwartz ◽  
Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Third Ventricle ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Direct Access ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Transnasal Surgery ◽  
Recovery Times ◽  
Early Tumor ◽  
Ventral Skull Base ◽  
Brain Retraction

Endoscopic approaches to the midline ventral skull base have been extensively developed and refined for resection of cranial base tumors over the past several years. As these techniques have improved, both the degree of resection and complication rates have proven comparable to those for transcranial approaches, while visual outcomes may be better via endoscopic endonasal surgery and hospital stays and recovery times are often shorter. Yet for all of the progress made, the steep learning curve associated with these techniques has hampered more widespread implementation and adoption. The authors address this obstacle by coupling a thorough description of the technical nuances for endoscopic endonasal craniopharyngioma resection with detailed illustrations of the important steps in the operation. Traditionally, transsphendoidal approaches to craniopharyngiomas have been restricted to lesions mostly confined to the sella. However, recently, endoscopic endonasal resections are more frequently employed for extrasellar and purely third ventricle craniopharyngiomas, whose typical retrochiasmatic location makes them ideal candidates for endoscopic transnasal surgery. The endonasal endoscopic approach offers many advantages, including direct access to the long axis of the tumor, early tumor debulking with minimal manipulation of the optic apparatus, more precise visualization of tumor planes, particularly along the undersurface of the chiasm and the roof of the third ventricle, and a minimal-access corridor that obviates the need for brain retraction. Although much emphasis has been placed on technical tenets of exposure and “how to get there,” this article focuses on nuances of tumor resection “when you are there.” Three operative videos illustrate our discussion of technical tenets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document