scholarly journals A successful case of multiple stereotactic radiosurgeries for ipsilateral recurrent trigeminal neuralgia

2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 1324-1329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Daugherty ◽  
Shripal Bhavsar ◽  
Seung Shin Hahn ◽  
Daniel Bassano ◽  
Walter Hall

Trigeminal neuralgia is a common pain syndrome primarily managed medically, although many patients require surgical or radiotherapeutic intervention. Stereotactic radiosurgery has become a preferred method of treatment given its high efficacy rates and relatively favorable toxicity profile. However, many patients have refractory pain even after repeat courses of stereotactic radiosurgery. Historically, 2 courses have been the limit in such patients. The authors present a case of multiply recurrent trigeminal neuralgia treated with a third course of radiosurgery in which the patient had successful pain control and no additional toxicity. Meticulous attention to the therapeutic technique allows the continued application of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-129
Author(s):  
Taohida Yasmin ◽  
Narendra Kumar ◽  
Sandip K Das ◽  
Murugan Appasamy ◽  
KM Masud Rana ◽  
...  

Purpose: To present first case of refractory trigeminal Neuralgia treated with SRS in Bangladesh, procedural technique, and outcomes in terms of pain relief. Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN), classically known as tic doloureaux is a chronic and recurrent disabling pain syndrome, which described as episodes of lancinating pain over the face along the sensory distribution of trigeminal nerve. First line management of TN is medical with different permutation & combination to control the pain. After the failure of medical management, non-invasive SRS is an established modality to achieve long term pain control. Here, we are reporting a case of TN treated with LINAC based SRS. Case Presentation: A 61 years old, gentleman who developed piercing pain inside his left eye for a duration 1-1.5 sec, precipitated while shaving, brushing teeth in year 2015, occurred 4-5 time a day. He was diagnosed as left TN of V1, started on Carbamazepine, Pregabalin. In 3 years, pain progressed to involve all 3 branches. Even combination Carbamazepine, Gabapentin, Tramadol, Amitriptyline, Clonazepam, & Morphine could not control the pain. Pain was persisting all over the day and he also developed suicidal tendency. Later he has been referred to us for SRS. SRS was done in April-2019, a dose of 90Gy was delivered to the Distal Retrogasserian (RG) also called Marseille point of trigeminal nerve root. Eight months after the SRS patient is almost free of pain without any Medicine. Conclusions: LINAC based SRS is a non-invasive, frameless, and safe procedure with excellent pain control for refractory Trigeminal neuralgia. Bang. J Neurosurgery 2020; 10(1): 123-129


Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 633-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce E. Pollock ◽  
Kimberly A. Schoeberl

Abstract BACKGROUND Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is the most common facial pain syndrome, with an incidence of approximately 27 per 100 000 patient-years. OBJECTIVE To prospectively compare facial pain outcomes for patients having either a posterior fossa exploration (PFE) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as their first surgery for idiopathic TN. METHODS Prospective cohort study of 140 patients with idiopathic TN who had either PFE (n = 91) or SRS (n = 49) from June 2001 until September 2007. The groups were similar with regard to sex, pain location, and pain duration. Patients who had SRS were older (67.1 vs 58.2 years; P < .001). The median follow-up after surgery was 38 months. RESULTS Patients who had PFE more commonly were pain free off medications (84% at 1 year, 77% at 4 years) compared with the SRS patients (66% at 1 year, 56% at 4 years; hazard ratio = 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.4–4.6; P = .003). Additional surgery for persistent or recurrent face pain was performed in 14 patients after PFE (15%) compared with 17 patients after SRS (35%; P = .009). Nonbothersome facial numbness occurred more frequently in the SRS group (33% vs 18%; P = .04). No difference was noted in other complications between patients who had PFE (12%) (dysesthetic facial pain, n = 3; cerebrospinal fluid leakage, n = 3; hearing loss, n = 2; wound infection, n = 1; pneumonia, n = 1; deep vein thrombosis, n = 1) and patients who had SRS (8%) (dysesthetic facial pain, n = 4; P = .47). CONCLUSION PFE is more effective than SRS as a primary surgical option for patients with idiopathic TN.


2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 573-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Willsey ◽  
Kelly L. Collins ◽  
Erin C. Conrad ◽  
Heather A. Chubb ◽  
Parag G. Patil

OBJECTIVETrigeminal neuralgia (TN) is an uncommon idiopathic facial pain syndrome. To assist in diagnosis, treatment, and research, TN is often classified as type 1 (TN1) when pain is primarily paroxysmal and episodic or type 2 (TN2) when pain is primarily constant in character. Recently, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has revealed microstructural changes in the symptomatic trigeminal root and root entry zone of patients with unilateral TN. In this study, the authors explored the differences in DTI parameters between subcategories of TN, specifically TN1 and TN2, in the pontine segment of the trigeminal tract.METHODSThe authors enrolled 8 patients with unilateral TN1, 7 patients with unilateral TN2, and 23 asymptomatic controls. Patients underwent DTI with parameter measurements in a region of interest within the pontine segment of the trigeminal tract. DTI parameters were compared between groups.RESULTSIn the pontine segment, the radial diffusivity (p = 0.0049) and apparent diffusion coefficient (p = 0.023) values in TN1 patients were increased compared to the values in TN2 patients and controls. The DTI measures in TN2 were not statistically significant from those in controls. When comparing the symptomatic to asymptomatic sides in TN1 patients, radial diffusivity was increased (p = 0.025) and fractional anisotropy was decreased (p = 0.044) in the symptomatic sides. The apparent diffusion coefficient was increased, with a trend toward statistical significance (p = 0.066).CONCLUSIONSNoninvasive DTI analysis of patients with TN may lead to improved diagnosis of TN subtypes (e.g., TN1 and TN2) and improve patient selection for surgical intervention. DTI measurements may also provide insights into prognosis after intervention, as TN1 patients are known to have better surgical outcomes than TN2 patients.


2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (Supplement3) ◽  
pp. 351-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Rahimian ◽  
Joseph C. Chen ◽  
Ajay A. Rao ◽  
Michael R. Girvigian ◽  
Michael J. Miller ◽  
...  

Object. Stringent geometrical accuracy and precision are required in the stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of patients. Accurate targeting is especially important when treating a patient in a single fraction of a very high radiation dose (90 Gy) to a small target such as that used in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (3 to 4—mm diameter). The purpose of this study was to determine the inaccuracies in each step of the procedure including imaging, fusion, treatment planning, and finally the treatment. The authors implemented a detailed quality-assurance program. Methods. Overall geometrical accuracy of the Novalis stereotactic system was evaluated using a Radionics Geometric Phantom Chamber. The phantom has several magnetic resonance (MR) and computerized tomography (CT) imaging—friendly objects of various shapes and sizes. Axial 1-mm-thick MR and CT images of the phantom were acquired using a T1-weighted three-dimensional spoiled gradient recalled pulse sequence and the CT scanning protocols used clinically in patients. The absolute errors due to MR image distortion, CT scan resolution, and the image fusion inaccuracies were measured knowing the exact physical dimensions of the objects in the phantom. The isocentric accuracy of the Novalis gantry and the patient support system was measured using the Winston—Lutz test. Because inaccuracies are cumulative, to calculate the system's overall spatial accuracy, the root mean square (RMS) of all the errors was calculated. To validate the accuracy of the technique, a 1.5-mm-diameter spherical marker taped on top of a radiochromic film was fixed parallel to the x–z plane of the stereotactic coordinate system inside the phantom. The marker was defined as a target on the CT images, and seven noncoplanar circular arcs were used to treat the target on the film. The calculated system RMS value was then correlated with the position of the target and the highest density on the radiochromic film. The mean spatial errors due to image fusion and MR imaging were 0.41 ± 0.3 and 0.22 ± 0.1 mm, respectively. Gantry and couch isocentricities were 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.6 ± 0.15 mm, respectively. The system overall RMS values were 0.9 and 0.6 mm with and without the couch errors included, respectively (isocenter variations due to couch rotation are microadjusted between couch positions). The positional verification of the marker was within 0.7 ± 0.1 mm of the highest optical density on the radiochromic film, correlating well with the system's overall RMS value. The overall mean system deviation was 0.32 ± 0.42 mm. Conclusions. The highest spatial errors were caused by image fusion and gantry rotation. A comprehensive quality-assurance program was developed for the authors' stereotactic radiosurgery program that includes medical imaging, linear accelerator mechanical isocentricity, and treatment delivery. For a successful treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with a 4-mm cone, the overall RMS value of equal to or less than 1 mm must be guaranteed.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1637-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Kano ◽  
Douglas Kondziolka ◽  
Huai-Che Yang ◽  
Oscar Zorro ◽  
Javier Lobato-Polo ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) that recurs after surgery can be difficult to manage. OBJECTIVE: To define management outcomes in patients who underwent gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSR) after failing 1 or more previous surgical procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes after GKSR in 193 patients with TN after failed surgery. The median patient age was 70 years (range, 26-93 years). Seventy-five patients had a single operation (microvascular decompression, n = 40; glycerol rhizotomy, n = 24; radiofrequency rhizotomy, n = 11). One hundred eighteen patients underwent multiple operations before GKSR. Patients were evaluated up to 14 years after GKSR. RESULTS: After GKSR, 85% of patients achieved pain relief or improvement (Barrow Neurological Institute grade I-IIIb). Pain recurrence was observed in 73 of 168 patients 6 to 144 months after GKSR (median, 6 years). Factors associated with better long-term pain relief included no relief from the surgical procedure preceding GKSR, pain in a single branch, typical TN, and a single previous failed surgical procedure. Eighteen patients (9.3%) developed new or increased trigeminal sensory dysfunction, and 1 developed deafferentation pain. Patients who developed sensory loss after GKSR had better long-term pain control (Barrow Neurological Institute grade I-IIIb: 86% at 5 years). CONCLUSION: GKSR proved to be safe and moderately effective in the management of TN that recurs after surgery. Development of sensory loss may predict better long-term pain control. The best candidates for GKSR were patients with recurrence after a single failed previous operation and those with typical TN in a single trigeminal nerve distribution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document