Long-term effects of the Chêneau brace on coronal and sagittal alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

OBJECT The aim of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate progressive correction of coronal and sagittal alignment and pelvic parameters in patients treated with a Chêneau brace. METHODS Thirty-two patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) were assessed before initiation of bracing treatment and at the final follow-up. Each patient underwent radiological examinations, and coronal, sagittal, and pelvic parameters were measured. RESULTS No statistically significant modification of the Cobb angle was noted. The pelvic incidence remained unchanged in 59% of the cases and increased in 28% of the cases. The sacral slope decreased in 34% of the cases but remained unchanged in 50%. Thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis were significantly decreased, whereas the sagittal vertical axis was significantly increased from a mean of -44.0 to -30.2 mm (p = 0.02). The mean pelvic tilt increased significantly from 4.5° to 8.3° (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The Chêneau brace can be useful for preventing curvature progression in patients with AIS. However, the results of this study reveal high variability in the effect of brace treatment on sagittal and pelvic alignment. Treatment with the Chêneau brace may also influence sagittal global balance.

Download Full-text

Sagittal profile modifications in hybrid versus all screw technique in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-020-79523-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Laura Scaramuzzo ◽

Antonino Zagra ◽

Giuseppe Barone ◽

Stefano Muzzi ◽

Leone Minoia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽

Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽

Cobb Angle ◽

Thoracic Kyphosis ◽

Sagittal Alignment ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Sagittal Profile ◽

Sacral Slope ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

Lenke Classification

AbstractAim of the study was to evaluate sagittal parameters modifications, with particular interest in thoracic kyphosis, in patients affected by adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) comparing hybrid and all-screws technique. From June 2010 to September 2018, 145 patients were enrolled. Evaluation included: Lenke classification, Risser scale, coronal Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS). Patients were divided in two groups (1 all-screws and 2 hybrid); a further division, in both groups, was done considering preoperative TK values. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was conducted. 99 patients were in group 1, 46 in group 2 (mean follow-up 3.7 years). Patients with a normo-kyphotic profile developed a little variation in TK (Δ pre–post = 2.4° versus − 2.0° respectively). Hyper-kyphotic subgroups had a tendency of restoring a good sagittal alignment. Hypo-kyphotic subgroups, patients treated with all-screw implants developed a higher increase in TK mean Cobb angle (Δ pre–post = 10°) than the hybrid subgroup (Δ pre–post = 5.4°) (p = 0.01). All-screws group showed better results in restoring sagittal alignment in all subgroups compared to hybrid groups, especially in hypo-TK subgroup, with the important advantage to give better correction on coronal plane.

Download Full-text

Normal Age-Adjusted Sagittal Spinal Alignment Is Achieved with Surgical Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Asian Spine Journal ◽

10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.770 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 11 (5) ◽

pp. 770-779 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Subaraman Ramchandran ◽

Norah Foster ◽

Akhila Sure ◽

Thomas J. Errico ◽

Aaron J. Buckland

Keyword(s):

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽

Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Thoracic Kyphosis ◽

Pelvic Incidence ◽

Sagittal Alignment ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Surgical Correction ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis

<sec><title>Study Design</title>Retrospective analysis.</sec><sec><title>Purpose</title>Our hypothesis is that the surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) maintains normal sagittal alignment as compared to age-matched normative adolescent population.</sec><sec><title>Overview of Literature</title>Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in AIS has been reported, however, whether corrective spinal fusion surgery re-establishes normal alignment remains unverified.</sec><sec><title>Methods</title>Sagittal profiles and spino-pelvic parameters of thirty-eight postsurgical correction AIS patients ≤21 years old without prior fusion from a single institution database were compared to previously published normative age-matched data. Coronal and sagittal measurements including structural coronal Cobb angle, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, C2–C7 cervical lordosis, C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis, and T1 pelvic angles were measured on standing full-body stereoradiographs using validated software to compare preoperative and 6 months postoperative changes with previously published adolescent norms. A sub-group analysis of patients with type 1 Lenke curves was performed comparing preoperative to postoperative alignment and also comparing this with previously published normative values.</sec><sec><title>Results</title>The mean coronal curve of the 38 AIS patients (mean age, 16±2.2 years; 76.3% female) was corrected from 53.6° to 9.6° (80.9%, <italic>p</italic><0.01). None of the thoracic and spino-pelvic sagittal parameters changed significantly after surgery in previously hypo- and normo-kyphotic patients. In hyper-kyphotic patients, thoracic kyphosis decreased (<italic>p</italic>=0.003) with a reciprocal decrease in lumbar lordosis (<italic>p</italic>=0.01), thus lowering pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch mismatch (<italic>p</italic>=0.009). Structural thoracic scoliosis patients had slightly more thoracic kyphosis than age-matched patients at baseline and surgical correction of the coronal plane of their scoliosis preserved normal sagittal alignment postoperatively. A sub-analysis of Lenke curve type 1 patients (n=24) demonstrated no statistically significant changes in the sagittal alignment postoperatively despite adequate coronal correction.</sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title>Surgical correction of the coronal plane in AIS patients preserves sagittal and spino-pelvic alignment as compared to age-matched asymptomatic adolescents.</sec>

Download Full-text

Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic Outcomes and Complications

Global Spine Journal ◽

10.1177/2192568220960759 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 219256822096075

Author(s):

Philip K. Louie ◽

Sravisht Iyer ◽

Krishn Khanna ◽

Garrett K. Harada ◽

Alina Khalid ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽

Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽

Revision Surgery ◽

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Pelvic Incidence ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

Radiographic Outcomes ◽

Harrington Rod

Study Design: Retrospective case series. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following revision surgery following Harrington rod instrumentation. Methods: Patients who underwent revision surgery with a minimum of 1-year follow-up for flatback syndrome following Harrington rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were identified from a multicenter dataset. Baseline demographics and intraoperative information were obtained. Preoperative, initial postoperative, and most recent spinopelvic parameters were compared. Postoperative complications and reoperations were subsequently evaluated. Results: A total of 41 patients met the inclusion criteria with an average follow-up of 27.7 months. Overall, 14 patients (34.1%) underwent a combined anterior-posterior fusion, and 27 (65.9%) underwent an osteotomy for correction. Preoperatively, the most common lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was at L3 and L4 (61%), whereas 85% had a LIV to the pelvis after revision. The mean preoperative pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch and C7 sagittal vertical axis were 23.7° and 89.6 mm. This was corrected to 8.1° and 28.9 mm and maintained to 9.04° and 34.4 mm at latest follow-up. Complications included deep wound infection (12.2%), durotomy (14.6%), implant related failures (14.6%), and temporary neurologic deficits (22.0%). Eight patients underwent further revision surgery at an average of 7.4 months after initial revision. Conclusions: There are multiple surgical techniques to address symptomatic flatback syndrome in patients with previous Harrington rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. At an average of 27.7 months follow-up, pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch and C7 sagittal vertical axis can be successfully corrected and maintained. However, complication and reoperation rates remain high.

Download Full-text

Improvement in cervical lordosis and sagittal alignment after vertebral body sliding osteotomy in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and kyphosis

Journal of Neurosurgery Spine ◽

10.3171/2020.3.spine2089 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 33 (3) ◽

pp. 307-315 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Dong-Ho Lee ◽

Choon Sung Lee ◽

Chang Ju Hwang ◽

Jae Hwan Cho ◽

Jae-Woo Park ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Vertebral Body ◽

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽

Sagittal Alignment ◽

Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Sacral Slope ◽

Cervical Lordosis ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

Segmental Lordosis

OBJECTIVEVertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) is a safe, novel technique for anterior decompression in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Another advantage of VBSO may be the restoration of cervical lordosis through multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) above and below the osteotomy level. This study aimed to evaluate the improvement and maintenance of cervical lordosis and sagittal alignment after VBSO.METHODSA total of 65 patients were included; 34 patients had undergone VBSO, and 31 had undergone anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). Preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up radiographs were used to evaluate the improvements in cervical lordosis and sagittal alignment after VBSO. C0–2 lordosis, C2–7 lordosis, segmental lordosis, C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores were measured. Subgroup analysis was performed between 15 patients with 1-level VBSO and 19 patients with 2-level VBSO. Patients with 1-level VBSO were compared to patients who had undergone 1-level ACCF.RESULTSC0–2 lordosis (41.3° ± 7.1°), C2–7 lordosis (7.1° ± 12.8°), segmental lordosis (3.1° ± 9.2°), and C2–7 SVA (21.5 ± 11.7 mm) showed significant improvements at the final follow-up (39.3° ± 7.2°, 13° ± 9.9°, 15.2° ± 8.5°, and 18.4 ± 7.9 mm, respectively) after VBSO (p = 0.049, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.038, respectively). The postoperative segmental lordosis was significantly larger in 2-level VBSO (18.8° ± 11.6°) than 1-level VBSO (10.3° ± 5.5°, p = 0.014). The final segmental lordosis was larger in the 1-level VBSO (12.5° ± 6.2°) than the 1-level ACCF (7.2° ± 7.6°, p = 0.023). Segmental lordosis increased postoperatively (p < 0.001) and was maintained until the final follow-up (p = 0.062) after VBSO. However, the postoperatively improved segmental lordosis (p < 0.001) decreased at the final follow-up (p = 0.045) after ACCF.CONCLUSIONSNot only C2–7 lordosis and segmental lordosis, but also C0–2 lordosis and C2–7 SVA improved at the final follow-up after VBSO. VBSO improves segmental cervical lordosis markedly through multiple ACDFs above and below the VBSO level, and a preserved vertebral body may provide more structural support.

Download Full-text

Can posterior stand-alone expandable cages safely restore lumbar lordosis? A minimum 5-year follow-up study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-27368/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Seung-Kook Kim ◽

Ogeil Mubarak Elbashier ◽

Su-chan Lee ◽

Woo-jin Choi

Keyword(s):

Sagittal Balance ◽

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Control Group ◽

Sacral Slope ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

Expandable Cage ◽

Cage Group

Abstract Background: Lumbar lordosis (LL) can be restored, and screw-related complications may be avoided with the stand-alone expandable cage method. However, the long-term spinopelvic changes and safety remain unknown. We aimed to elucidate the long-term radiologic outcomes and safety of this technique. Methods: Data from patients who underwent multi-level stand-alone expandable cage fusion and 80 patients who underwent screw-assisted fusion between February 2007 and December 2012, with at least 5 years of follow-up, were retrospectively analyzed. Segmental angle and translation, short and whole LL, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, and presence of subsidence, pseudoarthrosis, retropulsion, cage breakage, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and screw malposition were assessed. The relationship between local, lumbar, and spinopelvic effects was investigated. The implant failure rate was considered a measure of procedure effectiveness and safety. Results: In total, 69 cases were included in the stand-alone expandable cage group and 150 cases in the control group. The stand-alone group showed shorter operative time (58.48±11.10 versus 81.43±13.75, P=.00028), lower rate of PJK (10.1% versus 22.5%, P=.03), and restoration of local angle (4.66±3.76 versus 2.03±1.16, P=.000079) than the control group. However, sagittal balance (0.01±2.57 versus 0.50 ±2.10, P=.07) was not restored, and weakness showed higher rate of subsidence (16.31% versus 4.85 %, P=.0018), pseudoarthrosis (9.92% versus 2.42%, P=.02), cage, and retropulsion (3.55% versus 0, P=.01) than the control group.Conclusions: Stand-alone expandable cage fusion can restore local lordosis; however, global sagittal balance was not restored. Furthermore, implant safety has not yet been proven.

Download Full-text

Can posterior stand-alone expandable cages safely restore lumbar lordosis? A minimum 5-year follow-up study

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-020-01866-5 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Seung-Kook Kim ◽

Ogeil Mubarak Elbashier ◽

Su-chan Lee ◽

Woo-Jin Choi

Keyword(s):

Sagittal Balance ◽

Lumbar Lordosis ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Control Group ◽

Sacral Slope ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

Expandable Cage ◽

Cage Group

Abstract Background Lumbar lordosis (LL) can be restored, and screw-related complications may be avoided with the stand-alone expandable cage method. However, the long-term spinopelvic changes and safety remain unknown. We aimed to elucidate the long-term radiologic outcomes and safety of this technique. Methods Data from patients who underwent multi-level stand-alone expandable cage fusion and 80 patients who underwent screw-assisted fusion between February 2007 and December 2012, with at least 5 years of follow-up, were retrospectively analyzed. Segmental angle and translation, short and whole LL, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, and presence of subsidence, pseudoarthrosis, retropulsion, cage breakage, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and screw malposition were assessed. The relationship between local, lumbar, and spinopelvic effects was investigated. The implant failure rate was considered a measure of procedure effectiveness and safety. Results In total, 69 cases were included in the stand-alone expandable cage group and 150 cases in the control group. The stand-alone group showed shorter operative time (58.48 ± 11.10 vs 81.43 ± 13.75, P = .00028), lower rate of PJK (10.1% vs 22.5%, P = .03), and restoration of local angle (4.66 ± 3.76 vs 2.03 ± 1.16, P = .000079) than the control group. However, sagittal balance (0.01 ± 2.57 vs 0.50 ± 2.10, P = .07) was not restored, and weakness showed higher rate of subsidence (16.31% vs 4.85%, P = .0018), pseudoarthrosis (9.92% vs 2.42%, P = .02), cage, and retropulsion (3.55% vs 0, P = .01) than the control group. Conclusions Stand-alone expandable cage fusion can restore local lordosis; however, global sagittal balance was not restored. Furthermore, implant safety has not yet been proven.

Download Full-text

Lumbar Level Significantly Influences Postoperative Global Sagittal Balance Following Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy

Global Spine Journal ◽

10.1177/21925682211032563 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 219256822110325

Author(s):

Athan G. Zavras ◽

T. Barrett Sullivan ◽

Navya Dandu ◽

Howard S. An ◽

Christopher J. DeWald ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sagittal Balance ◽

Sagittal Alignment ◽

Adult Spinal Deformity ◽

Vertical Axis ◽

Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Sacral Slope ◽

Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽

Lumbar Level ◽

Global Sagittal Alignment

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: The current evidence regarding how level of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) influences correction of sagittal alignment is limited. This study sought to investigate the relationship of lumbar level and segmental angular change (SAC) of PSO with the magnitude of global sagittal alignment correction. Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated 53 consecutive patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent lumbar PSO at a single institution. Radiographs were evaluated to quantify the effect of PSO on lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), T1-spinopelvic inclination (T1SPI), T1-pelvic alignment (TPA), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Results: Significant correlations were found between PSO SAC and the postoperative increase in LL ( r = 0.316, P = .021) and PT ( r = 0.352, P = .010), and a decrease in TPA ( r = −0.324, P = .018). PSO level significantly correlated with change in T1SPI ( r = −0.305, P = .026) and SVA ( r = −0.406, P = .002), with more caudal PSO corresponding to a greater correction in sagittal balance. On multivariate analysis, more caudal PSO level independently predicted a greater reduction in T1SPI (β = −3.138, P = .009) and SVA (β = −29.030, P = .001), while larger PSO SAC (β = −0.375, P = .045) and a greater number of fusion levels (β = −1.427, P = .036) predicted a greater reduction in TPA. Conclusion: This study identified a gain of approximately 3 degrees and 3 cm of correction for each level of PSO more caudal to L1. Additionally, a larger PSO SAC predicted greater improvement in TPA. While further investigation of these relationships is warranted, these findings may help guide preoperative PSO level selection.

Download Full-text