A comparison of endoscopic strip craniectomy and pi craniectomy for treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 708-714
Author(s):  
Suresh N. Magge ◽  
Arthur R. Bartolozzi ◽  
Neil D. Almeida ◽  
Deki Tsering ◽  
John S. Myseros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Sagittal Craniosynostosis ◽  
Cranial Index ◽  
Helmet Therapy ◽  
Operative Strategies ◽  
Single Suture ◽  
Strip Craniectomy

OBJECTIVESagittal craniosynostosis is managed with a wide variety of operative strategies. The current investigation compares the clinical outcomes of two widely performed techniques: pi craniectomy and minimally invasive endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) followed by helmet therapy.METHODSThis IRB-approved retrospective study examined patients diagnosed with nonsyndromic, single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis treated with either pi craniectomy or ESC. Included patients had a minimum postoperative follow-up of 5 months.RESULTSFifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria (pi 21 patients, ESC 30 patients). Compared to patients who underwent ESC, the pi patients were older at the time of surgery (mean age 5.06 vs 3.11 months). The mean follow-up time was 23.2 months for ESC patients and 31.4 months for pi patients. Initial cranial index (CI) was similar between the groups, but postoperatively the ESC patients experienced a 12.3% mean increase in CI (from 0.685 to 0.767) compared to a 5.34% increase for the pi patients (from 0.684 to 0.719), and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Median hospital length of stay (1 vs 2 days) and operative duration (69.5 vs 93.3 minutes) were significantly less for ESC (p < 0.001 for both). The ESC patients showed a trend toward better results when surgery was done at younger ages. Craniectomy width in ESC cases was positively associated with CI improvement (slope of linear regression = 0.69, p = 0.026).CONCLUSIONSWhile both techniques effectively treated sagittal craniosynostosis, ESC showed superior results compared to pi craniectomy. ESC showed a trend for better outcomes when done at younger ages, although the trend did not reach statistical significance. A wider craniectomy width (up to 2 cm) was associated with better outcomes than smaller craniectomy widths among the ESC patients.

Spring-mediated cranioplasty versus endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Shih-Shan Lang ◽  
Petra M. Meier ◽  
William Z. Paden ◽  
Phillip B. Storm ◽  
Gregory G. Heuer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Sagittal Craniosynostosis ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Data Points ◽  
Incident Rate ◽  
Invasive Techniques ◽  
Strip Craniectomy

OBJECTIVE Endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) and spring-mediated cranioplasty (SMC) are two minimally invasive techniques for treating sagittal craniosynostosis in early infancy. Data comparing the perioperative outcomes of these two techniques are sparse. Here, the authors hypothesized that outcomes would be similar between patients undergoing SMC and those undergoing ESC and conducted a study using the multicenter Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery Perioperative Registry (PCSPR). METHODS The PCSPR was queried for infants under the age of 6 months who had undergone SMC or ESC for sagittal synostosis. SMC patients were propensity score matched 1:2 with ESC patients on age and weight. Primary outcomes were transfusion-free hospital course, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital length of stay (HLOS). The authors also obtained data points regarding spring removal. Comparisons of outcomes between matched groups were performed with multivariable regression models. RESULTS The query returned data from 676 infants who had undergone procedures from June 2012 through September 2019, comprising 580 ESC infants from 32 centers and 96 SMC infants from 5 centers. Ninety-six SMC patients were matched to 192 ESC patients. There was no difference in transfusion-free hospital course between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.45–1.35). SMC patients were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (aOR 7.50, 95% CI 3.75–14.99) and had longer ICU LOSs (incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.42, 95% CI 1.37–1.48) and HLOSs (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.17–1.39). CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter study of ESC and SMC, the authors found similar transfusion-free hospital courses; however, SMC infants had longer ICU LOSs and HLOSs. A trial comparing longer-term outcomes in SMC versus ESC would further define the roles of these two approaches in the management of sagittal craniosynostosis.

scholarly journals Optimal duration of postoperative helmet therapy following endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 610-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajiv R. Iyer ◽  
Xiaobu Ye ◽  
Qiuyu Jin ◽  
Yao Lu ◽  
Luckmini Liyanage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peak Level ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Final Outcome ◽  
Sagittal Synostosis ◽  
Sagittal Craniosynostosis ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Helmet Therapy ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
Strip Craniectomy

OBJECTIVEMany infants with sagittal craniosynostosis undergo effective surgical correction with endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) and postoperative helmet therapy (PHT). While PHT is essential to achieving optimal cosmesis following ESC, there has been little comprehensive analysis of the ideal PHT duration needed to attain this goal.METHODSThe authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of infants undergoing ESC and PHT for sagittal synostosis at our institution between 2008 and 2015. Data collected included age at surgery, follow-up duration, and PHT duration. Cephalic index (CI) was evaluated preoperatively (CIpre), at its peak level (CImax), at termination of helmet therapy (CIoff), and at last follow-up (CIfinal). A multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine factors influencing CIfinal.RESULTSThirty-one patients (27 male, 4 female) were treated in the studied time period. The median age at surgery was 2.7 months (range 1.6 to 3.2) and the median duration of PHT was 10.4 months (range 8.4 to 14.4). The mean CImax was 0.83 (SD 0.01), which was attained an average of 8.4 months (SD 1.2) following PHT initiation. At last follow-up, there was an average retraction of CIfinal among all patients to 0.78 (SD 0.01). Longer helmet duration after achieving CImax did not correlate with higher CIfinal values. While CImax was a significant predictor of CIfinal, neither age at surgery nor CIpre were found to be predictive of final outcome.CONCLUSIONSPatients undergoing ESC and PHT for sagittal synostosis reach a peak CI around 7 to 9 months after surgery. PHT beyond CImax does not improve final anthropometric outcomes. CIfinal is significantly dependent on CImax, but not on age, nor CIpre. These results imply that helmet removal at CImax may be appropriate for ESC patients, while helmeting beyond the peak does not change final outcome.

A single-center experience with symptomatic postoperative calvarial growth restriction after extended strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Adamo ◽  
Ian F. Pollack
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Increased Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Sagittal Synostosis ◽  
Sagittal Craniosynostosis ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Single Suture ◽  
Strip Craniectomy

Object Sagittal synostosis accounts for the most common form of craniosynostosis, occurring with an incidence of 1 in 2000–5000 live births. In most cases of single-suture, nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis, a single operation is all that is required to achieve a reasonable cosmetic result. However, there are a number of patients who may experience symptomatic postoperative calvarial growth restriction secondary to fibrosis of newly formed bone and pericranium that replace the surgically removed sagittal suture, or due to fusion of other previously open sutures leading to increased intracranial pressure, necessitating a second operation. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of all cases involving infants who had undergone an extended sagittal strip craniectomy with bilateral parietal wedge osteotomies at our institution between 1990 and 2006 for single-suture, nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. The frequency with which subsequent operations were required for cranial growth restriction was then defined. Results There were a total of 164 patients with single-suture nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis. Follow-up data were available for 143 of these patients. The average age at time of initial operation was 5.25 months, and the mean duration of follow-up was 43.85 months. There were 2 patients (1.5%) who required a second operation for symptomatic postoperative calvarial growth restriction. Conclusions Recurrence of synostosis with resultant increased intracranial pressure in cases of single-suture, nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis is an uncommon event, but does occur sporadically and unpredictably. Therefore, we recommend routine neurosurgical follow up for at least 5 years, with regular ophthalmological examinations to assess for papilledema.

Endoscopic treatment of combined metopic-sagittal craniosynostosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-121
Author(s):  
Ema Zubovic ◽  
Gary B. Skolnick ◽  
Sybill D. Naidoo ◽  
Mark Bellanger ◽  
Matthew D. Smyth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Treatment ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Sagittal Synostosis ◽  
Sagittal Craniosynostosis ◽  
Cranial Index ◽  
Helmet Therapy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Normal Controls ◽  
Cranial Vault Remodeling

OBJECTIVECombined metopic-sagittal craniosynostosis is traditionally treated with open cranial vault remodeling and fronto-orbital advancement, sometimes in multiple operations. Endoscopic treatment of this multisuture synostosis presents a complex challenge for the surgeon and orthotist.METHODSThe authors retrospectively analyzed the preoperative and 1-year postoperative CT scans of 3 patients with combined metopic-sagittal synostosis, all of whom were treated with simultaneous endoscope-assisted craniectomy of the metopic and sagittal sutures followed by helmet therapy. Established anthropometric measurements were applied to assess pre- and postoperative morphology, including cranial index and interfrontal divergence angle (IFDA). Patients’ measurements were compared to those obtained in 18 normal controls.RESULTSTwo boys and one girl underwent endoscope-assisted craniectomy at a mean age of 81 days. The mean preoperative cranial index was 0.70 (vs control mean of 0.82, p = 0.009), corrected postoperatively to a mean of 0.82 (vs control mean of 0.80, p = 0.606). The mean preoperative IFDA was 110.4° (vs control mean of 152.6°, p = 0.017), corrected postoperatively to a mean of 139.1° (vs control mean of 140.3°, p = 0.348). The mean blood loss was 100 mL and the mean length of stay was 1.7 days. No patient underwent reoperation. The mean clinical follow-up was 3.4 years.CONCLUSIONSEndoscope-assisted craniectomy with helmet therapy is a viable single-stage treatment option for combined metopic-sagittal synostosis, providing correction of the stigmata of trigonoscaphocephaly, with normalization of the cranial index and IFDA.

scholarly journals Regression of cephalic index following endoscopic repair of sagittal synostosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-60
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Pickersgill ◽  
Gary B. Skolnick ◽  
Sybill D. Naidoo ◽  
Matthew D. Smyth ◽  
Kamlesh B. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Time Course ◽  
Strong Positive Correlation ◽  
Cephalic Index ◽  
Sagittal Synostosis ◽  
Endoscopic Repair ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Helmet Therapy ◽  
Significant Regression ◽  
Strip Craniectomy

OBJECTIVEMetrics used to quantify preoperative severity and postoperative outcomes for patients with sagittal synostosis include cephalic index (CI), the well-known standard, and the recently described adjusted cephalic index (aCI), which accounts for altered euryon location. This study tracks the time course of these measures following endoscopic repair with orthotic helmet therapy. The authors hypothesize that CI and aCI show significant regression following endoscope-assisted repair.METHODSCT scans or 3D photographs of patients with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis treated before 6 months of age by endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and postoperative helmet therapy (n = 41) were reviewed retrospectively at three time points (preoperatively, 0–2 months after helmeting, and > 24 months postoperatively). The CI and aCI were measured at each time point.RESULTSMean CI and aCI increased from 71.8 to 78.2 and 62.7 to 72.4, respectively, during helmet treatment (p < 0.001). At final follow-up, mean CI and aCI had regressed significantly from 78.2 to 76.5 and 72.4 to 69.7, respectively (p < 0.001). The CI regressed in 33 of 41 cases (80%) and aCI in 39 of 41 cases (95%). The authors observed a mean loss of 31% of improvement in aCI achieved through treatment. A strong, positive correlation existed between CI and aCI (R = 0.88).CONCLUSIONSRegression following endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet therapy commonly occurs in patients with sagittal synostosis. Future studies are required to determine whether duration of helmet therapy or modifications in helmet design affect regression.

Endoscopically assisted versus open repair of sagittal craniosynostosis: the St. Louis Children's Hospital experience

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish N. Shah ◽  
Alex A. Kane ◽  
J. Dayne Petersen ◽  
Albert S. Woo ◽  
Sybill D. Naidoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Endoscopic Procedure ◽  
Sagittal Craniosynostosis ◽  
Helmet Therapy ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Strip Craniectomy

Object This study investigated the differences in effectiveness and morbidity between endoscopically assisted wide-vertex strip craniectomy with barrel-stave osteotomies and postoperative helmet therapy versus open calvarial vault reconstruction without helmet therapy for sagittal craniosynostosis. Methods Between 2003 and 2010, the authors prospectively observed 89 children less than 12 months old who were surgically treated for a diagnosis of isolated sagittal synostosis. The endoscopic procedure was offered starting in 2006. The data associated with length of stay, blood loss, transfusion rates, operating times, and cephalic indices were reviewed. Results There were 47 endoscopically treated patients with a mean age at surgery of 3.6 months and 42 patients with open-vault reconstruction whose mean age at surgery was 6.8 months. The mean follow-up time was 13 months for endoscopic versus 25 months for open procedures. The mean operating time for the endoscopic procedure was 88 minutes, versus 179 minutes for the open surgery. The mean blood loss was 29 ml for endoscopic versus 218 ml for open procedures. Three endoscopically treated cases (6.4%) underwent transfusion, whereas all patients with open procedures underwent transfusion, with a mean of 1.6 transfusions per patient. The mean length of stay was 1.2 days for endoscopic and 3.9 days for open procedures. Of endoscopically treated patients completing helmet therapy, the mean duration for helmet therapy was 8.7 months. The mean pre- and postoperative cephalic indices for endoscopic procedures were 68% and 76% at 13 months postoperatively, versus 68% and 77% at 25 months postoperatively for open surgery. Conclusions Endoscopically assisted strip craniectomy offers a safe and effective treatment for sagittal craniosynostosis that is comparable in outcome to calvarial vault reconstruction, with no increase in morbidity and a shorter length of stay.

Incidence and predictors of epilepsy in children with congenital heart disease

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Carlos Castillo-Pinto ◽  
Jessica L. Carpenter ◽  
Mary T. Donofrio ◽  
Anqing Zhang ◽  
Gil Wernovsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Length ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Acute Seizures ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Arterial Ischaemic Stroke

Abstract Objective: Children with CHD may be at increased risk for epilepsy. While the incidence of perioperative seizures after surgical repair of CHD has been well-described, the incidence of epilepsy is less well-defined. We aim to determine the incidence and predictors of epilepsy in patients with CHD. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with CHD who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass at <2 years of age between January, 2012 and December, 2013 and had at least 2 years of follow-up. Clinical variables were extracted from a cardiac surgery database and hospital records. Seizures were defined as acute if they occurred within 7 days after an inciting event. Epilepsy was defined based on the International League Against Epilepsy criteria. Results: Two-hundred and twenty-one patients were identified, 157 of whom were included in our analysis. Five patients (3.2%) developed epilepsy. Acute seizures occurred in 12 (7.7%) patients, only one of whom developed epilepsy. Predictors of epilepsy included an earlier gestational age, a lower birth weight, a greater number of cardiac surgeries, a need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or a left ventricular assist device, arterial ischaemic stroke, and a longer hospital length of stay. Conclusions: Epilepsy in children with CHD is rare. The mechanism of epileptogenesis in these patients may be the result of a complex interaction of patient-specific factors, some of which may be present even before surgery. Larger long-term follow-up studies are needed to identify risk factors associated with epilepsy in these patients.

scholarly journals Abdominal emergency surgery in patients over 90 years old: is it worthwhile? An Italian multicenter retrospective study

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Tarasconi ◽  
Fausto Catena ◽  
Hariscine K. Abongwa ◽  
Belinda De Simone ◽  
Federico Coccolini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Asa Score ◽  
Abdominal Emergency ◽  
Emergency Abdominal Surgery

Unlike other surgical fields, such as cardiac surgery, where many trials have been made about safety, feasibility and outcome of surgical procedures in the elderly, there is lack of literature about emergency abdominal surgery in very old patients, especially in people over 90 years of age. The available data reported survival of about 50% one year after the operation. The aim of the study is to determine the survival rate two years after emergency abdominal surgery in a nonagenarian population and to identify any demographic and surgical parameters that could predict a poor outcome in this type of patient. The study was a retrospective multicenter trial. Patient inclusion criteria were: age 90 years old or older, urgent abdominal surgery. The medical charts reviewed and data collected were: gender, age, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and comorbidities, diagnosis, time elapsed between arrival to the Emergency Room and admission to the Operatory Room, surgical procedures, open versus laparoscopic procedure, type of anesthesia and outcomes with hospital length of stay. Phone call follow-up was performed for patient discharged alive and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate survival. We identified 72 (20 males and 52 females) nonagenarian patients who underwent abdominal emergency surgery at 6 Italian hospitals (Parma, Bergamo, Bologna, Brescia, Chiari, Adria). Mean age was 92.5 years [range 90-100, standard deviation (SD) 2.6], median ASA score was 3 (range 2-5, mean 3.32) and only 7 patients were without comorbidities. Mean hospital length of stay was 13 days (range 1-60, SD 11.52); 56 patients (77.7%) were discharged alive; 2 years survival rate was 23% [mean follow-up=10 months (range 1-27)]. Among all the parameters analyzed, only ASA score was significantly correlated with survival. Neither the presence of malignancy nor the absence of comorbidities seems to correlate with survival. Nonagenarian patients undergoing emergent abdominal surgical procedures have a high overall in-hospital mortality rate (23%) and a low 2 years survival rate (51.4%). Except for ASA score, there are no other factors predicting poor outcome. Based on the present study emergency abdominal surgery in frail patients over 90 years of age has to be carefully evaluated: only 1 out 5 patients will be alive after 2 years.

Outcomes of open and endovascular repair of Kommerell diverticulum

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan P Bloom ◽  
Rizwan Q Attia ◽  
Thoralf M Sundt ◽  
Duke E Cameron ◽  
Sandeep S Hedgire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Anomaly ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Base Diameter ◽  
Management Algorithm ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Kommerell Diverticulum

Abstract OBJECTIVES Kommerell diverticulum (KD) is a rare congenital vascular anomaly often associated with an aberrant subclavian artery (ASCA). Definitive indications for intervention remain unclear. We present open and endovascular (EV) operative outcomes in a large contemporary series and propose a management algorithm. METHODS Between 2004 and 2020, 224 patients presented with ASCA and associated KD to our institution. Of the 43 (19.2%) patients who underwent operative repair, 31 (72.1%) had open surgical (OS) repair via thoracotomy and 12 (27.9%) had EV repair. Univariable and bivariable statistical analyses were conducted stratified by approach. The median follow-up time was 5.4 years (IQR, 2.9–9.7). RESULTS Patients in EV group were older (68 years vs 47 years, P &lt; 0.001) and had larger aneurysms (base diameter 3.2 cm vs 21.5 cm, P = 0.007). All patients with dysphagia lusoria were treated with open surgery (n = 20). Asymptomatic patients with incidentally detected KD (50% vs 16.1%), those with chest or back pain (50% vs 19.4%) and patients who presented with an aortic emergency (25% vs 6.5%) were more likely to be treated endovascularly (P = 0.001). Carotid-to-subclavian bypass was used in 38 (88.4%) patients. There were no operative mortalities. In-hospital mortality was similar between groups (3.2% vs 16.7%, P = 0.121). Mid-term mortality was higher in the EV group [4 (33.8%) vs 0, P &lt; 0.001]. There were 2 (15.4%) postoperative strokes in the EV group. There were no statistically significant differences in other postoperative complications or hospital length of stay between groups. CONCLUSIONS KD can be managed using open or EV approaches with low morbidity and mortality. Treatment strategy should depend on clinical presentation and patient factors.

scholarly journals 2669. Evaluation of Post-Operative Acute Kidney Injury with Piperacillin–Tazobactam Combined with Vancomycin for Lung Transplant Prophylaxis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S936-S936
Author(s):  
Natasha N Pettit ◽  
Cynthia T Nguyen ◽  
Lisa Potter ◽  
Jennifer Pisano
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Lung Transplant ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotic ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
The Difference

Abstract Background Several studies have identified that the addition of vancomycin (VAN) to piperacillin–tazobactam (PT) is associated with a higher incidence of nephrotoxicity when compared with other antibiotic regimens. Beginning in June 2017, our lung transplant antibiotic prophylaxis regimen was modified from PT monotherapy to VAN and PT. Methods All adult lung transplant patients between January 1, 2015 and November 10, 2018 were included. Patients were excluded if acute kidney injury (AKI) was present prior to transplant. Rates of AKI within 7 days of transplant were compared between those who received prophylaxis with PT and VAN vs. those receiving alternative regimens (AR). Patients receiving less than 1 dose of vancomycin or less than 3 doses PT (less than 24hours) were deemed to be in the alternative regimen group. AKI was defined as either an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) by ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or increase in SCr to ≥1.5 times baseline (within 7 days post-transplant). Secondary outcomes included duration of initial prophylactic antibiotic regimens, hospital length of stay (LOS), and all-cause inpatient mortality. Results Eighty-six patients were included, 44 (51%) patients received PT/VAN. Baseline characteristics and results shown in Table 1. Of those receiving PT/VAN for prophylaxis, 24 (54%) developed AKI within 7 days of transplant while 15 (36%) of 42 patients receiving AR developed AKI (P = 0.08). Conclusion A larger proportion of patients that received PT/VAN for transplant antibiotic prophylaxis experienced AKI within 7 days. Although the difference did not reach statistical significance, a 19% higher incidence of AKI warrants need for further investigation. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document