scholarly journals Erratum. Validation of prognostic models in intensive care unit-treated pediatric traumatic brain injury patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 476
Author(s):  
Era D. Mikkonen
Epilepsia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-701
Author(s):  
Era D. Mikkonen ◽  
Markus B. Skrifvars ◽  
Matti Reinikainen ◽  
Stepani Bendel ◽  
Ruut Laitio ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 330-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Era D. Mikkonen ◽  
Markus B. Skrifvars ◽  
Matti Reinikainen ◽  
Stepani Bendel ◽  
Ruut Laitio ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThere are few specific prognostic models specifically developed for the pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) population. In the present study, the authors tested the predictive performance of existing prognostic tools, originally developed for the adult TBI population, in pediatric TBI patients requiring stays in the ICU.METHODSThe authors used the Finnish Intensive Care Consortium database to identify pediatric patients (< 18 years of age) treated in 4 academic ICUs in Finland between 2003 and 2013. They tested the predictive performance of 4 classification systems—the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) TBI model, the Helsinki CT score, the Rotterdam CT score, and the Marshall CT classification—by assessing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the explanatory variation (pseudo-R2 statistic). The primary outcome was 6-month functional outcome (favorable outcome defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4–5).RESULTSOverall, 341 patients (median age 14 years) were included; of these, 291 patients had primary head CT scans available. The IMPACT core-based model showed an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78–0.91) and a pseudo-R2 value of 0.40. Of the CT scoring systems, the Helsinki CT score displayed the highest performance (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.78–0.90; pseudo-R2 0.39) followed by the Rotterdam CT score (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.86; pseudo-R2 0.34).CONCLUSIONSPrognostic tools originally developed for the adult TBI population seemed to perform well in pediatric TBI. Of the tested CT scoring systems, the Helsinki CT score yielded the highest predictive value.


2020 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 64-70
Author(s):  
Era D. Mikkonen ◽  
Markus B. Skrifvars ◽  
Matti Reinikainen ◽  
Stepani Bendel ◽  
Ruut Laitio ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia F. Salorio ◽  
Beth S. Slomine ◽  
Anne-Marie Guerguerian ◽  
James R. Christensen ◽  
Jeanette R. M. White ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. S31-S35 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Belavić ◽  
E. Jančić ◽  
P. Mišković ◽  
A. Brozović-Krijan ◽  
B. Bakota ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roghieh Nazari ◽  
Saeed Pahlevan Sharif ◽  
Kelly A Allen ◽  
Hamid Sharif Nia ◽  
Bit-Lian Yee ◽  
...  

Introduction: A consistent approach to pain assessment for patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) is a major difficulty for health practitioners due to some patients’ inability, to express their pain verbally. This study aimed to assess pain behaviors (PBs) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients at different levels of consciousness. Methods: This study used a repeated-measure, within-subject design with 35 patients admitted to an ICU. The data were collected through observations of nociceptive and non-nociceptive procedures, which were recorded through a 47-item behavior-rating checklist. The analyses were performed by SPSS ver.13 software. Results: The most frequently observed PBs during nociceptive procedures were facial expression levator contractions (65.7%), sudden eye openings (34.3%), frowning (31.4%), lip changes (31.4%), clear movement of extremities (57.1%), neck stiffness (42.9%), sighing (31.4%), and moaning (31.4%). The number of PBs exhibited by participants during nociceptive procedures was significantly higher than those observed before and 15 minutes after the procedures. Also, the number of exhibited PBs in patients during nociceptive procedures was significantly greater than that of exhibited PBs during the non-nociceptive procedure. The results showed a significant difference between different levels of consciousness and also between the numbers of exhibited PBs in participants with different levels of traumatic brain injury severity. Conclusion: The present study showed that most of the behaviors that have been observed during painful stimulation in patients with traumatic brain injury included facial expressions, sudden eye opening, frowning, lip changes, clear movements of extremities, neck stiffness, and sighing or moaning.


2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 408-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. Jonsdottir ◽  
S. H. Lund ◽  
B. Snorradottir ◽  
S. Karason ◽  
I. H. Olafsson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document