Stereotactic radiosurgery for prostate cancer cerebral metastases: an international multicenter study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Stylianos Pikis ◽  
Adomas Bunevicius ◽  
Cheng-Chia Lee ◽  
Huai-Che Yang ◽  
Brad E. Zacharia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cerebral Metastases ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intracranial Metastases ◽  
The Mean

OBJECTIVE As novel therapies improve survival for men with prostate cancer, intracranial metastatic disease has become more common. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of intracranial prostate cancer metastases. METHODS Demographic data, primary tumor characteristics, SRS treatment parameters, and clinical and imaging follow-up data of patients from nine institutions treated with SRS from July 2005 to June 2020 for cerebral metastases from prostate carcinoma were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Forty-six patients were treated in 51 SRS procedures for 120 prostate cancer intracranial metastases. At SRS, the mean patient age was 68.04 ± 9.05 years, the mean time interval from prostate cancer diagnosis to SRS was 4.82 ± 4.89 years, and extracranial dissemination was noted in 34 (73.9%) patients. The median patient Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score at SRS was 80, and neurological symptoms attributed to intracranial involvement were present prior to 39 (76%) SRS procedures. Single-fraction SRS was used in 49 procedures. Stereotactic radiotherapy using 6 Gy in five sessions was utilized in 2 procedures. The median margin dose was 18 (range 6–28) Gy, and the median tumor volume was 2.45 (range 0.04–45) ml. At a median radiological follow-up of 6 (range 0–156) months, local progression was seen with 14 lesions. The median survival following SRS was 15.18 months, and the 1-year overall intracranial progression-free survival was 44%. The KPS score at SRS was noted to be associated with improved overall (p = 0.02) and progression-free survival (p = 0.03). Age ≥ 65 years at SRS was associated with decreased overall survival (p = 0.04). There were no serious grade 3–5 toxicities noted. CONCLUSIONS SRS appears to be a safe, well-tolerated, and effective management option for patients with prostate cancer intracranial metastases.

scholarly journals Treatment of Residual, Recurrent, or Metastatic Intracranial Hemangiopericytomas With Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using CyberKnife

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lichao Huang ◽  
Jingmin Bai ◽  
Yanyang Zhang ◽  
Zhiqiang Cui ◽  
Zhizhong Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Intracranial Metastasis ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Aggressive Tumors

PurposeHemangiopericytomas are aggressive tumors known for their recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the management of residual, recurrent, and metastatic intracranial hemangiopericytomas using CyberKnife (CK) stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).Materials and MethodsData were collected from 15 patients (28 tumors; eight men and seven women; 32–58 years) with residual, recurrent, or metastatic intracranial hemangiopericytomas, who were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy using CyberKnife between January 2014 and August 2019. All patients had previously been treated with surgical resection. Initial tumor volumes ranged from 0.84 to 67.2 cm3, with a mean volume of 13.06 cm3. The mean marginal and maximum radiosurgical doses to the tumors were 21.1 and 28.76 Gy, respectively. The mean follow-up time for tumors was 34.5 months, ranging from 13 to 77 months.Results15 patients were alive after treatment; the mean post-diagnosis survival at censoring was 45.6 months (range 13–77 months). The volumes of the 28 tumors in the 15 followed patients were calculated after treatment. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging revealed a mean tumor volume of 6.72 cm3 and a range of 0–67.2 cm3, with the volumes being significantly lower than pretreatment values. Follow-up imaging studies demonstrated tumor disappearance in seven (25%) of 28 tumors, reduction in 14 (50%), stability in one (3.57%), and recurrence in six (21.4%). Total tumor control was achieved in 22 (78.5%) of 28 tumors. The tumor grade and fraction time were not significantly associated with progression-free survival. Intracranial metastasis occurred in three patients, and extraneural metastasis in one patient.ConclusionsOn the basis of the current results, stereotactic radiotherapy using CyberKnife is an effective and safe option for residual, recurrent, and metastatic intracranial hemangiopericytomas. Long-term close clinical and imaging follow-up is also necessary.

scholarly journals Real-World Outcome of Dose-Adjusted EPOCH-R, a Single-Centre Experience

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 27-28
Author(s):  
Rachel Wong ◽  
Roopesh R. Kansara
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma

Introduction Dose adjusted (DA) EPOCH-R is an intensive outpatient infusional regimen, that incorporates intrathecal (IT) methotrexate to treat patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma including HIV associated aggressive B-cell lymphoma, double-hit lymphoma (DHL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) ineligible for intensive therapy, and gray zone lymphoma (GZL) with features in between BL and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We aimed to evaluate non-trial, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of Manitoba patients treated with DA-EPOCH-R, assess the role of prophylactic IT chemotherapy and toxicities. Methods Patients in MB approved to receive DA-EPOCH-R were identified through the CCMB Provincial Oncology Drug Program (PODP) database. Patients were included if they were older than 17 years, received at least 1 cycle of DA-EPOCH-R and with a diagnosis of HIV associated aggressive B-cell lymphoma, DHL, PMBCL, BL ineligible for more aggressive therapy, or GZL. All other diagnoses were excluded. Baseline demographic data, treatment characteristics, treatment responses, and treatment toxicity were collected. The primary endpoints of the study were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS was the time interval between the date of diagnosis to date of progression, last follow-up, or death from any cause. OS was the time interval between date of diagnosis to date of death by any cause, or last follow-up. The study was approved by the University of Manitoba Research Ethics Board and the CancerCare Manitoba Research Resource Impact Committee. Results A total of 40 patients were approved for DA-EPOCH-R between 2013 and 2019. 10 of these patients were excluded. 4 patients never received the therapy, 4 patients were treated in the relapsed setting, and 2 patients had histologies outside the inclusion criteria. Of the 30 patients included, 19 (63%) were male, 11 (37%) were female. The median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range 20-88). Our cohort was composed of DHL (n=9), triple hit lymphoma (THL, n=5), BL (n=4), GZL (n=3), and HIV-associated DLBCL (n=2). 87% (n=26) had advanced stage disease. By revised-IPI, 19 (63.3%) had poor prognosis (R-IPI ≥ 3). Response rate was 90%; CR 53.3% (n=16) and PR 37% (n=11). At a median follow-up of 25.3 months, the median PFS was 33.3 months and median OS was not reached. By histological subtype, median PFS was not reached in DHL, however THL, BL and PMBCL had worse median PFS (6.1, 8.4, and 5.6 months, respectively). Only 1 patient had CNS involvement at time of diagnosis. Of the patients with no documented CNS disease at presentation (n=29), none developed CNS involvement, including those who did not receive IT methotrexate. Median chemotherapy cycles per patient was 6 (range 1-6) and median IT treatment was 3 (range 0-6). 3 patients did not receive IT prophylaxis, and 2 stopped after 1 cycle due to intolerance. 56.7% (n=17) were able to undergo dose escalation beyond dose level 1, and 40% (n=T12) tolerated maximum dose level 3 or higher.77% of patients (n=23) experienced at least one adverse event of grade 3 or higher. 17 (57%) patients required blood transfusion at least once. 10 (33%) experienced neuropathy, 4 requiring vincristine dose reduction. 9 (30%) patients had febrile neutropenia complicating a total of 22 treatment cycles. 8 patients had grade 2-3 infectious complications. Conclusions While the real-world survival data for patients with DHL and HIV-associated lymphoma treated with DA-EPOCH-R are encouraging, those with THL, BL, and PMBCL did not attain durable response. Considering no patients (including those who did not receive IT chemotherapy) experienced CNS relapse, the role of IT chemotherapy needs to be further clarified. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Phase 1, 2 trial of concurrent anti-PD1 and stereotactic radiosurgery for melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases (NCT02858869).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2022-2022
Author(s):  
Mohammad Khurram Khan ◽  
Tahseen Nasti ◽  
Troy Kleber ◽  
David H. Lawson ◽  
Melinda Lynne Yushak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Early Activation ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Grade 3

2022 Background: The safety and efficacy of concurrent pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) is unknown. Methods: Patients with melanoma or NSCLC, 1-10 brain metastases, ≥ 1 extra-cranial lesion, age ≥ 18, and ECOG 0-1 were treated with anti-PD1 every 3 weeks. SRS was administered 1-2 days after starting anti-PD1. SRS used three different radiation arms: Arm A used 6 Gray (Gy) in 5 fractions (fx), Arm B used 9 Gy in 3 fx, and Arm C used 18-21 Gy in single fx. Primary endpoint was grade 3 CNS toxicity at 3 months (CTCAE v 4.0). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), local control (LC) within the SRS field, intra-cranial progression free survival (IC-PFS), extra-cranial progression free survival (EC-PFS), rate of extra-cranial clinical benefit, and immunological changes. OS, LC, IC-PFS, and EC-PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and covariates were compared using log-rank tests. 95% confidence intervals for 6-month and 12-month were estimated using Greenwood’s formula. Results: 25 patients were treated from 2016 until 2020. The mean age was 61. The mean number of CNS lesions was 2.7. The mean number of extra-cranial lesions was 2.5. Six were enrolled on Arm A, 12 on Arm B, and 7 on Arm C. 21 had melanoma. 4 had NSCLC. Of the melanoma, 8 were BRAF-, 10 were BRAF+, and 3 had unknown mutation status. 12 patients (48%) had progressed on prior immunotherapy and/or other oncological therapies. The trial met its primary endpoint, with no grade 3 CNS toxicity at 3 months. Two patients (8%) experienced ≥ Grade 3 anti-PD1 related toxicity, and no grade 5 toxicity was noted. The median OS was 32.8 months. The 6 and 12 month OS were 79.1% (56.5-90.8%) and 67.8% (43.3-83.5%), respectively. The 1 year OS was similar between previously treated and treatment naïve patients (71.8% vs. 65.6%), suggesting some role for SRS in overcoming therapy resistance. However, with longer follow-up, the OS trended worse (p=0.07) for previously treated patients. LC was 95.7% (72.9-99.4%) at 6 and 12 months. IC-PFS at 6 months was 69.1% (45.8-83.9%), and at 12 months was 57.5% (33.7-75.5%). The EC-PFS at 6 and 12 month was 54.5% (32.1-72.4%) and 43.6% (22.3-63.2%), respectively. Clinical benefit, which was defined as a best overall response of stable disease or better according to RECIST 1.1, occurred in 12 patients (48%). No outcome differences were noted amongst the three different SRS arms. 70% of the patients demonstrating early activation (within 3 weeks of starting SRS/anti-PD1) of CD8+PD1+Ki67+ T cells demonstrated a clinical benefit. 100% of patients that failed to show early activation of CD8+PD1+Ki67+ T cells progressed. Conclusions: Concurrent pembrolizumab (Anti-PD-1) and SRS is safe and effective. Early activation of CD8+PD1+Ki67+ T cells correlates with improved outcome. Further trials testing pembrolizumab and SRS are justified. Clinical trial information: NCT02858869.

Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5020-5020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phuoc T. Tran ◽  
C. Leigh Moyer ◽  
Ryan Phillips ◽  
Noura Radwan ◽  
Ashley Ross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Local Progression ◽  
Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer

5020 Background: The importance of local treatment in oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPC) is unknown. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is highly focused, high-dose radiation that is well suited for treatment of oligometastases. Here we report on the safety and preliminary clinical outcomes of SABR in a modern cohort of OPC men. Methods: Eighty four men who satisfied criteria of OPC diagnosed on imaging underwent consolidative SABR were then followed prospectively on our IRB approved registry by our GU multidisciplinary team. We collected demographic, clinical, toxicity and efficacy information. We examined the first 66 men in this preliminary report to allow for a minimum of 4.5 months follow-up. SABR was delivered in 1-5 fractions of 5-18 Gy. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess local progression-free survival (LPFS), biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS; PSA nadir+2), distant progression free survival (DPFS), ADT-free survival (ADT-FS) and time-to-next intervention (TTNI). Results: Of the 66 OPC patients analyzed, 25 (38%) men presented as synchronous OPC and the remaining 41 had recurrent OPC. Median and mean follow-up was 61 and 66 weeks, respectively. Patient and disease factors as listed in the Table. Crude Grade 1 and 2 acute toxicities were 36% and 11%, respectively, with no Grade > 2 toxicity. SABR was delivered to 134 metastases: 89 bone (66%), 40 nodal (30%) and 5 (4%) visceral metastases. Overall LPFS at 1-year was 92%. The bPFS and DPFS at 1-year were 69% and 69%, respectively. Median TTNI was not reached yet. Of the 18 men with hormone sensitive prostate cancer who had their ADT deferred, 11/18 (56%) remain free of disease following SABR (1-year ADT-FS was 78%) and in 17 castration resistant men, 11 had > 50% PSA declines with 1-year TTNI of 30% with a median of 45 weeks. Conclusions: Consolidative SABRfor OPCis feasible and well tolerated. The preliminary clinical outcomes in our series is limited by heterogeneity and size but our data suggests that this approach is worthy of further prospective study. [Table: see text]

Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A therapeutic option to increase overall survival?

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 97-97
Author(s):  
Cedric Pobel ◽  
Edouard Auclin ◽  
Diego Teyssonneau ◽  
Brigitte Laguerre ◽  
Mathilde Cancel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Grade 3

97 Background: Cabazitaxel rechallenge could be a more efficient therapy with an acceptable toxicity than docetaxel in the treatment of patients with a metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge. Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including patients from 9 centers in France who received 3 lines or more of cabazitaxel from February 2012 to July 2020. Cabazitaxel schedule differed between patients: 25 mg/m2 q3w, 20 mg/m2 q3w, 16 mg/m2 q2w or 10 mg/m2 weekly. Efficacy was assessed by overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from each cabazitaxel line start. Only toxicities grade ≥ 3 were reported. Results: Twenty-two patients were included. The median follow-up from mCRPC was 94.7 months, median age at initial diagnosis was 59.5 years old, median ISUP score at diagnosis was 4 and median PSA at diagnosis was 55 ng/ml. Median number of cabazitaxel cycles was 7 at first-line, 6 at first rechallenge, and 5 for subsequent rechallenges. Median OS from mCRPC diagnosis was 105 months. Median PFS from cabazitaxel line start was 11.8 months at first use, 9.6 for first rechallenge and 5.6 in second rechallenge (table). Only one case of febrile neutropenia and 6 events of grade ≥ 3 toxicity were reported. Conclusions: Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge could efficiently extend OS with manageable toxicities for patients. Even if anti-PARP therapy and immunotherapy are promising treatments, cabazitaxel rechallenge could be also a relevant therapeutic option for long responder patients. Specific biomarkers should be explored to predict the efficacy of cabazitaxel rechallenge. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document