Perioperative results following lumbar discectomy: comparison of minimally invasive discectomy and standard microdiscectomy

2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. E20 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. German ◽  
Mathew A. Adamo ◽  
Regis G. Hoppenot ◽  
Jessin H. Blossom ◽  
Henry A. Nagle
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Fluid Leak ◽  
First Time

Object Minimally invasive lumbar discectomy is a refinement of the standard open microsurgical discectomy technique. Proponents of the minimally invasive technique suggest that it improves patient outcome, shortens hospital stay, and decreases hospital costs. Despite these claims there is little support in the literature to justify the adoption of minimally invasive discectomy over standard open microsurgical discectomy. In the present study, the authors address some of these issues by comparing the short-term outcomes in patients who underwent first time, single-level lumbar discectomy at L3–4, L4–5, or L5–S1 using either a minimally invasive percutaneous, muscle splitting approach or a standard, open, muscle-stripping microsurgical approach. Methods A retrospective chart review of 172 patients who had undergone a first-time, single-level lumbar discectomy at either L3–4, L4–5, or L5–S1 was performed. Perioperative results were assessed by comparing the following parameters between patients who had undergone minimally invasive discectomy and those who received standard open microsurgical discectomy: length of stay, operative time, estimated blood loss, rate of cerebrospinal fluid leak, post-anesthesia care unit narcotic use, need for a physical therapy consultation, and need for admission to the hospital. Results Forty-nine patients underwent minimally invasive discectomy, and 123 patients underwent open microsurgical discectomy. At baseline the groups did differ significantly with respect to age, but did not differ with respect to height, weight, sex, body mass index, level of radiculopathy, side of radiculopathy, insurance status, or type of preoperative analgesic use. No statistically significant differences were identified in operative time, rate of cerebrospinal fluid leak, or need for a physical therapy consultation. Statistically significant differences were identified in length of stay, estimated blood loss, postanesthesia care unit narcotic use, and need for admission to the hospital. Conclusions In this retrospective study, patients who underwent minimally invasive discectomy were found to have similiar perioperative results as those who underwent open microsurgical discectomy. The differences, although statistically significant, are of modest clinical significance.

Modified Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique Can Potentially Improve Safety of Interbody Graft Placement

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-301
Author(s):  
Khalid H Kurtom ◽  
Wendy S Towers
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Graft Placement ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Fluid Leak

Abstract BACKGROUND Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) is a well-described procedure with excellent reported outcomes. A modification of interbody graft placement can potentially improve the ease and safety of this procedure. OBJECTIVE To describe a modification of the MITLIF graft placement and retrospectively review our experience including intraoperative and postoperative complications. METHODS Single surgeon, single institution, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent a modified MITLIF technique between November 2011 and December 2013. Hospital records including operative notes and discharge summaries were reviewed for patient demographics, surgical parameters including operative time and estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications including durotomy/cerebrospinal fluid leak, and postoperative outcomes including time before ambulation and length of stay were all reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS Eighty-three consecutive MITLIF patients; 71 underwent 1-level fusion and 12 had multilevel fusions. Average operative time for single level was 181 min; multilevel was 323 min. Average estimated blood loss was 140 mL. Time before ambulation was <1 d, average length of stay was 1.6 d. There were a total of 4 complications in this series (4.8%). There was zero incidence of durotomy or cerebrospinal fluid leak. CONCLUSION This modified MITLIF technique of maintaining the medial facet prior to discectomy and interbody graft placement can offer the minimally invasive spine surgeons increased assurance while placing the graft and potentially enhance the overall safety and efficacy of this approach. Surgeons utilizing this approach will have little difficulty utilizing this slight modification.

Genitofemoral Nerve Protection During the Lateral Retroperitoneal Transpsoas Approach

2013 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. ons192-ons197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel C. Tender ◽  
Daniel Serban
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Femoral Nerve ◽  
Psoas Muscle ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Direct Visualization ◽  
Genitofemoral Nerve ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Abstract BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal approach for lumbar fusions is a novel technique with good results, but also with significant sensory and motor complications. OBJECTIVE: To present the early results of a modified surgical technique, in which the psoas muscle is dissected under direct visualization. METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients with L4-5 or L3-4 pathology were prospectively followed after being treated using a minimally invasive lateral approach with direct exposure of the psoas muscle before dissection. There were 7 woman and 6 men with a mean age of 52.3 years. Perioperative parameters like operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay, were noted. Pain, paresthesia, and motor weakness, as well as any other complications, were evaluated at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were 163 minutes, 126 mL, and 3 days, respectively. One patient exhibited anterior thigh pain and paresthesia at 2 weeks, both of which resolved by 3 months. Two patients experienced superficial wound infections that healed with antibiotics. The genitofemoral nerve was identified and protected in 7 patients; in 4 patients, it had a more posterior anatomic location than expected. The femoral nerve was not exposed or detected in the operative field by neuromonitoring, nor were there any symptoms related to a femoral nerve injury in any patient. CONCLUSION: Dissection of the psoas muscle under direct visualization during the minimally invasive lateral approach may provide increased safety to the genitofemoral and femoral nerves.

scholarly journals Retrospective comparison of three minimally invasive approaches for adrenal tumors: perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic, retroperitoneal laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy

BMC Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Changwei Ji ◽  
Qun Lu ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Feifei Zhang ◽  
Hao Ji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Adrenal Tumors ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy

Abstract Background To compare the perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic (TLA), retroperitoneal laparoscopic (RLA), and robot-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic (RATLA) adrenalectomy for adrenal tumors in our center. Methods Between April 2012 and February 2018, 241 minimally invasive adrenalectomies were performed. Cases were categorized based on the minimally invasive adrenalectomy technique. Demographic characteristics, perioperative information and pathological data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results This study included 37 TLA, 117 RLA, and 87 RATLA procedures. Any two groups had comparable age, ASA score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and preoperative hemoglobin. The tumor size for RLA patients was 2.7 ± 1.1 cm, which was significantly smaller compared to patients who underwent TLA/RATLA (p = 0.000/0.000). Operative time was similar in any two groups, while estimated blood loss was lower for RATLA group (75.6 ± 95.6 ml) compared with the TLA group (131.1 ± 204.5 ml) (p = 0.041). Conversion to an open procedure occurred in only one (2.7%) patient in the TLA group for significant adhesion and hemorrhage. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of transfusion rate and complication rate. Length of stay was shorter for the RATLA group versus the TLA/RLA group (p = 0.000/0.029). In all groups, adrenocortical adenoma and pheochromocytoma were the most frequent histotypes. Conclusions Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is associated with expected excellent outcomes. In our study, the RATLA approach appears to provide the benefits of decreased estimated blood loss and length of stay. Robotic adrenalectomy appears to be a safe and effective alternative to conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy: Almost a Decade of Experience at an Academic Center

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (10) ◽  
pp. 949-952
Author(s):  
Ethan Frank ◽  
Joshua Park ◽  
Alfred Simental ◽  
Christopher Vuong ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Total Thyroidectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Vocal Cord Dysfunction ◽  
Completion Thyroidectomy ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Study Population

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) has gained acceptance as an alternative to conventional thyroidectomy. This technique results in less bleeding, postoperative pain, shorter recovery time, and better cosmetic results without increasing morbidity. We retrospectively assessed outcomes in 583 patients having MIVAT from May 2005 to September 2014. The study population was divided into groups according to periods: 2005 to 2009 and 2010 to 2014. Operative data, complications, and length of stay were collected and compared. Total thyroidectomy was undertaken in 185, completion thyroidectomy in 49, and hemithyroidectomy in 349. Malignancy was present in 127 (21.8%). Mean incision was 3.4 ± 0.7 cm and estimated blood loss was 23.7 ± 21.7 mL. Mean operative time was 86.5 ± 39.3 minutes for all operations, 78.5 ± 37.0 minutes for hemithyroidectomy, 70.9 ± 30.1 minutes for completion thyroidectomy, and 106.8 ± 41.3 minutes for total thyroidectomy. Postoperatively, 56 (9.6%) had unilateral vocal cord dysfunction, which resolved except for one case (0.17%). Fifty-nine patients (10.1%) developed hypocalcemia, but only three cases (0.51%) became permanent. Only one patient required readmission. In conclusion, MIVAT results in short operative times, minimal blood loss, and few complications and is safely performed in an academic institution.

scholarly journals Surgical Outcomes for Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 847-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nickalus R. Khan ◽  
Aaron J. Clark ◽  
Siang Liao Lee ◽  
Garrett T. Venable ◽  
Nicholas B. Rossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)—or MI-TLIF—has been increasing in prevalence compared with open TLIF (O-TLIF) procedures. The use of MI-TLIF is an evolving technique with conflicting reports in the literature about outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of MI-TLIF in comparison with O-TLIF for early and late outcomes by using the Visual Analog Scale for back pain (VAS-back) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary end points include blood loss, operative time, radiation exposure, length of stay, fusion rates, and complications between the 2 procedures. METHODS: During August 2014, a systematic literature search was performed identifying 987 articles. Of these, 30 met inclusion criteria. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed by using both pooled and subset analyses based on study type. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that MI-TLIF reduced blood loss (P < .001), length of stay (P < .001), and complications (P = .001) but increased radiation exposure (P < .001). No differences were found in fusion rate (P = .61) and operative time (P = .34). A decrease in late VAS-back scores was demonstrated for MI TLIF (P < .001), but no differences were found in early VAS-back, early ODI, and late ODI. CONCLUSION: MI-TLIF is associated with reduced blood loss, decreased length of stay, decreased complication rates, and increased radiation exposure. The rates of fusion and operative time are similar between MI-TLIF and O-TLIF. Differences in long-term outcomes in MI-TLIF vs O-TLIF are inconclusive and require more research, particularly in the form of large, multi-institutional prospective randomized controlled trials.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Spine Metastatic Tumor Resection and Stabilization: New Technology Yield Improved Outcome

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Harel ◽  
Omer Doron ◽  
Nachshon Knoller
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Medical Condition ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Tubular Retractor ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Index Level

Spinal metastases compressing the spinal cord are a medical emergency and should be operated on if possible; however, patients’ medical condition is often poor and surgical complications are common. Minimizing surgical extant, operative time, and blood loss can potentially reduce postoperative complications. This is a retrospective study describing the patients operated on in our department utilizing a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach to decompress and instrument the spine from November 2013 to November 2014. Five patients were operated on for thoracic or lumbar metastases. In all cases a unilateral decompression with expandable tubular retractor was followed by instrumentation of one level above and below the index level and additional screw at the index level contralateral to the decompression side. Cannulated fenestrated screws were used (Longitude FNS) and cement was injected to increase pullout resistance. Mean operative time was 134 minutes and estimated blood loss was minimal in all cases. Improvement was noticeable in neurological status, function, and pain scores. No complications were observed. Technological improvements in spinal instruments facilitate shorter and safer surgeries in oncologic patient population and thus reduce the complication rate. These technologies improve patients’ quality of life and enable the treatment of patients with comorbidities.

scholarly journals Open Partial Nephrectomy with Zero Ischaemia Using a Supra 12th Rib Miniflank Incision: A Minimally Invasive Open Approach for Small Renal Masses

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Syed Ali Ehsanullah ◽  
Abida Sultana ◽  
Brian Kelly ◽  
Charlotte Dunford ◽  
Zaheer Shah
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Tumour Size ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
The Mean

Introduction. To assess a minimally invasive open technique for partial nephrectomy with zero ischaemia time. Methods. A review was performed in a prospectively maintained database of a single surgeon series of all patients undergoing partial nephrectomy using a supra 12th rib miniflank incision with zero ischaemia. Data of seventy one patients who underwent a partial nephrectomy over an 82-month period were analyzed. Data analyzed included operative time, estimated blood loss, pre and postoperative renal function, complications, final pathological characteristics, and tumour size. Results. Seventy one partial nephrectomies were performed from February 2009 to October 2015. None were converted to radical nephrectomy. Mean operative time was 72 minutes (range 30–250), and mean estimated blood loss was 608 mls (range 100–2500) with one patient receiving blood transfusion. The mean pre and postoperative haemoglobin levels were 144 and 112 g/l. The mean pre and postoperative creatinine levels were 82 and 103 Umol/L. There were 8 Clavian–Dindo Grade 2 complications and 1 major complication (Clavian IIIa). Histology confirmed 24 benign lesions and 47 malignant lesions, 46 cT1a lesions, 24 cT1b lesions, and 1 cT2 lesion. Median follow-up was 38 months with no local recurrence or progression of disease with 5 patients having a positive margin (7%). Conclusion. Our results demonstrate that a supra 12th miniflank incision open partial nephrectomy with zero ischaemic time for SRMs has satisfactory outcomes with preservation of renal function. A minimally invasive open partial nephrectomy remains an important option for units that cannot offer patients a laparoscopic or a robotic procedure.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Tubular Lumbar Discectomy Versus Conventional Open Lumbar Discectomy: An Observational Study From the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110298
Author(s):  
Nathan Evaniew ◽  
Andrew Bogle ◽  
Alex Soroceanu ◽  
W. Bradley Jacobs ◽  
Roger Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Same Day Discharge

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: We evaluated the effectiveness of minimally invasive (MIS) tubular discectomy in comparison to conventional open surgery among patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN). Methods: We performed an observational analysis of data that was prospectively collected. We implemented Minimum Clinically Important Differences (MCIDs), and we adjusted for potential confounders with multiple logistic regression. Adverse events were collected according to the Spinal Adverse Events Severity (SAVES) protocol. Results: Three hundred thirty-nine (62%) patients underwent MIS tubular discectomy and 211 (38%) underwent conventional open discectomy. There were no significant differences between groups for improvement of leg pain and disability, but the MIS technique was associated with reduced odds of achieving the MCID for back pain (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.99, P < 0.05). We identified statistically significant differences in favor of MIS for each of operating time (MIS mean (SD) 72.2 minutes (30.0) vs open 93.5 (40.9)), estimated blood loss (MIS 37.9 mL (36.7) vs open 76.8 (71.4)), length of stay in hospital (MIS 73% same-day discharge vs open 40%), rates of incidental durotomy (MIS 4% vs open 8%), and wound-related complications (MIS 3% vs open 9%); but not for overall rates of reoperation. Conclusions: Open and MIS techniques yielded similar improvements of leg pain and disability at up to 12 months of follow-up, but MIS patients were less likely to experience improvement of associated back pain. Small differences favored MIS for operating time, blood loss, and adverse events but may have limited clinical importance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document