Cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure, and head elevation

1986 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 636-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Rosner ◽  
Irene B. Coley
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Pressure Waves ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Head Elevation ◽  
Adequate Hydration ◽  
Fine Print

✓ Previous investigations have suggested that intracranial pressure waves may be induced by reduction of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). Since pressure waves were noted to be more common in patients with their head elevated at a standard 20° to 30°, CPP was studied as a function of head position and its effect upon intracranial pressure (ICP). In 18 patients with varying degrees of intracranial hypertension, systemic arterial blood pressure (SABP) was monitored at the level of both the head and the heart. Intracranial pressure and central venous pressure were assessed at every 10° of head elevation from 0° to 50°. For every 10° of head elevation, the average ICP decreased by 1 mm Hg associated with a reduction of 2 to 3 mm Hg CPP. The CPP was not beneficially affected by any degree of head elevation. Maximal CPP (73 ± 3.4 mm Hg (mean ± standard error of the mean)) always occurred with the head in a horizontal position. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure waves occurred in four of the 18 patients studied as a function of reduced CPP caused by head elevation alone. Thus, elevation of the head of the bed was associated with the development of CPP decrements in all cases, and it precipitated pressure waves in some. In 15 of the 18 patients, CPP was maintained by spontaneous 10- to 20-mm Hg increases in SABP, and pressure waves did not occur if CPP was maintained at 70 to 75 mm Hg or above. It is concluded that 0° head elevation maximizes CPP and reduces the severity and frequency of pressure-wave occurrence. If the head of the bed is to be elevated, then adequate hydration and avoidance of pharmacological agents that reduce SABP or prevent its rise are required to maximize CPP.

Pressure reactivity as a guide in the treatment of cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with brain trauma

2005 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Howells ◽  
Kristin Elf ◽  
Patricia A. Jones ◽  
Elisabeth Ronne-Engström ◽  
Ian Piper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Regression Line ◽  
Brain Trauma ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Pressure Reactivity ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different treatment protocols on physiological characteristics and outcome in patients with brain trauma. One protocol was primarily oriented toward reducing intracranial pressure (ICP), and the other primarily on maintaining cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). Methods. A series of 67 patients in Uppsala were treated according to a protocol aimed at keeping ICP less than 20 mm Hg and, as a secondary target, CPP at approximately 60 mm Hg. Another series of 64 patients in Edinburgh were treated according to a protocol aimed primarily at maintaining CPP greater than 70 mm Hg and, secondarily, ICP less than 25 mm Hg for the first 24 hours and 30 mm Hg subsequently. The ICP and CPP insults were assessed as the percentage of monitoring time that ICP was greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg and CPP less than 60 mm Hg, respectively. Pressure reactivity in each patient was assessed based on the slope of the regression line relating mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) to ICP. Outcome was analyzed at 6 months according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). The prognostic value of secondary insults and pressure reactivity was determined using linear methods and a neural network. In patients treated according to the CPP-oriented protocol, even short durations of CPP insults were strong predictors of death. In patients treated according to the ICP-oriented protocol, even long durations of CPP insult—mostly in the range of 50 to 60 mm Hg—were significant predictors of favorable outcome (GOS Score 4 or 5). Among those who had undergone ICP-oriented treatment, pressure-passive patients (MABP/ICP slope ≥ 0.13) had a better outcome. Among those who had undergone CPP-oriented treatment, the more pressure-active (MABP/ICP slope < 0.13) patients had a better outcome. Conclusions. Based on data from this study, the authors concluded that ICP-oriented therapy should be used in patients whose slope of the MABP/ICP regression line is at least 0.13, that is, in pressure-passive patients. If the slope is less than 0.13, then hypertensive CPP therapy is likely to produce a better outcome.

Use of indomethacin in brain-injured patients with cerebral perfusion pressure impairment: preliminary report

1995 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 627-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto A. Biestro ◽  
Ricardo A. Alberti ◽  
Ana E. Soca ◽  
Mario Cancela ◽  
Corina B. Puppo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Rectal Temperature ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Fine Print ◽  
Indomethacin Treatment

✓ The effect of indomethacin, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, was studied in the treatment of 10 patients with head injury and one patient with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage, each of whom presented with high intracranial pressure (ICP) (34.4 ± 13.1 mm Hg) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) impairment (67.0 ± 15.4 mm Hg), which did not improve with standard therapy using mannitol, hyperventilation, and barbiturates. The patients had Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 8 or less. Recordings were made of the patients' ICP and mean arterial blood pressure from the nurse's end-hour recording at the bedside, as well as of their CPP, rectal temperature, and standard therapy regimens. The authors assessed the effects of an indomethacin bolus (50 mg in 20 minutes) on ICP and CPP; an indomethacin infusion (21.5 ± 11 mg/hour over 30 ± 9 hours) on ICP, CPP, rectal temperature, and standard therapy regimens (matching the values before and during infusion in a similar time interval); and discontinuation of indomethacin treatment on ICP, CPP, and rectal temperature. The indomethacin bolus was very effective in lowering ICP (p < 0.0005) and improving CPP (p < 0.006). The indomethacin infusion decreased ICP (p < 0.02), but did not improve CPP and rectal temperature. The effects of standard therapy regimens before and during indomethacin infusion showed no significant changes, except in three patients in whom mannitol reestablished its action on ICP and CPP. Sudden discontinuation of indomethacin treatment was followed by significant ICP rebound. The authors suggest that indomethacin may be considered one of the frontline agents for raised ICP and CPP impairment.

Effect of cerebral perfusion pressure on contusion volume following impact injury

1999 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 520-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan-Nikolaus Kroppenstedt ◽  
Michael Kern ◽  
Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale ◽  
Gerd-Helge Schneider ◽  
Wolfgang Reinhardt Lanksch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Controlled Cortical Impact Injury ◽  
Impact Injury ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Although it is generally acknowledged that a sufficient cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is necessary for treatment of severe head injury, the optimum CPP is still a subject of debate. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of various levels of blood pressure and, thereby, CPP on posttraumatic contusion volume.Methods. The left hemispheres of 60 rats were subjected to controlled cortical impact injury (CCII). In one group of animals the mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) was lowered for 30 minutes to 80, 70, 60, 50, or 40 mm Hg 4 hours after contusion by using hypobaric hypotension. In another group of animals the MABP was elevated for 3 hours to 120 or 140 mm Hg 4 hours after contusion by administering dopamine. The MABP was not changed in respective control groups. Intracranial pressure (ICP) was monitored with an ICP microsensor. The rats were killed 28 hours after trauma occurred and contusion volume was assessed using hematoxylin and eosin—stained coronal slices. No significant change in contusion volume was caused by a decrease in MABP from 94 to 80 mm Hg (ICP 12 ± 1 mm Hg), but a reduction of MABP to 70 mm Hg (ICP 9 ± 1 mm Hg) significantly increased the contusion volume (p < 0.05). A further reduction of MABP led to an even more enlarged contusion volume. Although an elevation of MABP to 120 mm Hg (ICP 16 ± 2 mm Hg) did not significantly affect contusion volume, there was a significant increase in the contusion volume at 140 mm Hg MABP (p < 0.05; ICP 18 ± 1 mm Hg).Conclusions. Under these experimental conditions, CPP should be kept within 70 to 105 mm Hg to minimize posttraumatic contusion volume. A CPP of 60 mm Hg and lower as well as a CPP of 120 mm Hg and higher should be considered detrimental.

Intracranial pressure in nontraumatic ischemic and hypoxic cerebral insults

1981 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard J. Senter ◽  
Aizik Wolf ◽  
Franklin C. Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Effect Of Treatment ◽  
Cerebral Insult ◽  
Salvage Rate ◽  
Increased Icp ◽  
Fine Print

✓ Intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure were monitored in 12 patients who were comatose secondary to hypoxic (five cases) or hypotensive (seven cases) nontraumatic cerebral insults. Patients who were hypotensive but not hypoxic developed significant increased ICP. In patients who were comatose from hypoxic cerebral insults without hypotension, ICP was normal. When an increase in ICP was diagnosed, patients were managed aggressively so as to improve cerebral perfusion and lower ICP. Although a functional salvage rate of 25% was obtained, this may reflect the severity of the initial cerebral insult rather than the effect of treatment. In order to prevent the potential deleterious effects of raised ICP, it is concluded that monitoring ICP and maintaining adequate perfusion may be warranted in comatose patients who have suffered nontraumatic diffuse ischemic but not purely hypoxic cerebral insults.

Experimental cerebral oligemia and ischemia produced by intracranial hypertension

1975 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence F. Marshall ◽  
David I. Graham ◽  
Felix Durity ◽  
Robert Lounsbury ◽  
Frank Welsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Raised Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Complete Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Fine Print

✓ The authors studied the morphological sequelae of 15 minutes of cerebral oligemia (20 torr cerebral perfusion pressure) and complete cerebral ischemia produced by raised intracranial pressure in rabbits. Ischemic cell change was present in five of seven ischemic animals; it was most extensive in the striatum and hippocampus, with only a few ischemic nerve cells in the thalamus and neocortex. The brains of control and oligemic animals were normal. These results indicate the following: 1) ischemia is a more severe insult than oligemia; 2) compression ischemia results in a pattern of damage that differs from that produced by other types of ischemia; and 3) the method used to reduce cerebral perfusion pressure is an important factor in determining the pattern and extent of brain damage produced.

Is cerebral perfusion pressure a major determinant of cerebral blood flow during head elevation in comatose patients with severe intracranial lesions?

2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 606-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Jacques Moraine ◽  
Jacques Berré ◽  
Christian Mélot
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cerebral Blood Flow ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Head Elevation ◽  
Intracranial Lesions ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Head elevation as a treatment for lower intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with intracranial hypertension has been challenged in recent years. Therefore, the authors studied the effect of head position on cerebral hemodynamics in patients with severe head injury.Methods. The effect of 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° head elevation on ICP, cerebral blood flow (CBF), systemic arterial (PsaMonro) and jugular bulb (Pj) pressures calibrated to the level of the foramen of Monro, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and the arteriovenous pressure gradient (PsaMonro − Pj) was studied in 37 patients who were comatose due to severe intracranial lesions. The CBF decreased gradually with head elevation from 0 to 45°, from 46.3 ± 4.8 to 28.7 ± 2.3 ml · min−1 · 100 g−1 (mean ± standard error, p < 0.01), and the PsaMonro − Pj from 80 ± 3 to 73 ± 3 mm Hg (p < 0.01). The CPP remained stable between 0° and 30° of head elevation, at 62 ± 3 mm Hg, and decreased from 62 ± 3 to 57 ± 4 mm Hg between 30° and 45° (p < 0.05). A simulation showed that the 38% decrease in CBF between 0° and 45° resulted from PsaMonro − Pj changes for 19% of the decrease, from a diversion of the venous drainage from the internal jugular veins to vertebral venous plexus for 15%, and from CPP changes for 4%.Conclusions. During head elevation the arteriovenous pressure gradient is the major determinant of CBF. The influence of CPP on CBF decreases from 0 to 45° of head elevation.

Cerebral perfusion pressure in head-injured patients: a noninvasive assessment using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography

1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 802-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Czosnyka ◽  
Basil F. Matta ◽  
Piotr Smielewski ◽  
Peter J. Kirkpatrick ◽  
John D. Pickard
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Transcranial Doppler ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Doppler Ultrasonography ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Head Injured ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors studied the reliability of a new method for noninvasive assessment of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in head-injured patients in which mean arterial blood pressure (ABP) and transcranial Doppler middle cerebral artery mean and diastolic flow velocities are measured. Methods. Cerebral perfusion pressure was estimated (eCPP) over periods of continuous monitoring (20 minutes—2 hours, 421 daily examinations) in 96 head-injured patients (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 13) who were admitted to the intensive care unit. All patients were sedated, paralyzed, and ventilated. The eCPP and the measured CPP (ABP minus intracranial pressure, measured using an intraparenchymal microsensor) were compared. The correlation between eCPP and measured CPP was r = 0.73; p < 10−6. In 71% of the examinations, the estimation error was less than 10 mm Hg and in 84% of the examinations, the error was less than 15 mm Hg. The method had a high positive predictive power (94%) for detecting low CPP (< 60 mm Hg). The eCPP also accurately reflected changes in measured CPP over time (r > 0.8; p < 0.001) in situations such as plateau and B waves of intracranial pressure, arterial hypotension, and refractory intracranial hypertension. A good correlation was found between the average measured CPP and eCPP when day-by-day variability was assessed in a group of 41 patients (r = 0.71). Conclusions. Noninvasive estimation of CPP by using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography may be of value in situations in which monitoring relative changes in CPP is required without invasive measurement of intracranial pressure.

Intracranial hypertension and cerebral perfusion pressure: influence on neurological deterioration and outcome in severe head injury

2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Juul ◽  
Gabrielle F. Morris ◽  
Sharon B. Marshall ◽  
_ _ ◽  
Lawrence F. Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Head Injury ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Severe Head Injury ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Neurological Deterioration ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Recently, a renewed emphasis has been placed on managing severe head injury by elevating cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), which is defined as the mean arterial pressure minus the intracranial pressure (ICP). Some authors have suggested that CPP is more important in influencing outcome than is intracranial hypertension, a hypothesis that this study was designed to investigate.Methods. The authors examined the relative contribution of these two parameters to outcome in a series of 427 patients prospectively studied in an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of the N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist Selfotel. Mortality rates rose from 9.6% in 292 patients who had no clinically defined episodes of neurological deterioration to 56.4% in 117 patients who suffered one or more of these episodes; 18 patients were lost to follow up. Correspondingly, favorable outcome, defined as good or moderate on the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months, fell from 67.8% in patients without neurological deterioration to 29.1% in those with neurological deterioration. In patients who had clinical evidence of neurological deterioration, the relative influence of ICP and CPP on outcome was assessed. The most powerful predictor of neurological worsening was the presence of intracranial hypertension (ICP ≥ 20 mm Hg) either initially or during neurological deterioration. There was no correlation with the CPP as long as the CPP was greater than 60 mm Hg.Conclusions. Treatment protocols for the management of severe head injury should emphasize the immediate reduction of raised ICP to less than 20 mm Hg if possible. A CPP greater than 60 mm Hg appears to have little influence on the outcome of patients with severe head injury.

Hyperacute measurement of intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, jugular venous oxygen saturation, and laser Doppler flowmetry, before and during removal of traumatic acute subdural hematoma

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bon H. Verweij ◽  
J. Paul Muizelaar ◽  
Federico C. Vinas
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Laser Doppler ◽  
Bone Flap ◽  
Acute Subdural Hematoma ◽  
Laser Doppler Flow ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Venous Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The poor prognosis for traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) might be due to underlying primary brain damage, ischemia, or both. Ischemia in ASDH is likely caused by increased intracranial pressure (ICP) leading to decreased cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), but the degree to which these phenomena occur is unknown. The authors report data obtained before and during removal of ASDH in five cases. Methods. Five patients who underwent emergency evacuation of ASDH were monitored. In all patients, without delaying treatment, a separate surgical team (including the senior author) placed an ICP monitor and a jugular bulb catheter, and in two patients a laser Doppler probe was placed. The ICP prior to removing the bone flap in the five patients was 85, 85, 50, 59, and greater than 40 mm Hg, resulting in CPPs of 25, 3, 25, 56, and less than 50 mm Hg, respectively. Removing the bone flap as well as opening the dura and removing the blood clot produced a significant decrease in ICP and an increase in CPP. Jugular venous oxygen saturation (SjvO2) increased in four patients and decreased in the other during removal of the hematoma. Laser Doppler flow also increased, to 217% and 211% compared with preevacuation flow. Conclusions. Intracranial pressure is higher than previously suspected and CPP is very low in patients with ASDH. Removal of the bone flap yielded a significant reduction in ICP, which was further decreased by opening the dura and evacuating the hematoma. The SjvO2 as well as laser Doppler flow increased in all patients but one immediately after removal of the hematoma.

scholarly journals Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0245291
Author(s):  
Alexander Ruesch ◽  
Deepshikha Acharya ◽  
Samantha Schmitt ◽  
Jason Yang ◽  
Matthew A. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Animal Model ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Autoregulation ◽  
Cerebral Perfusion ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Phase Lag ◽  
Arterial Blood

The brain’s ability to maintain cerebral blood flow approximately constant despite cerebral perfusion pressure changes is known as cerebral autoregulation (CA) and is governed by vasoconstriction and vasodilation. Cerebral perfusion pressure is defined as the pressure gradient between arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure. Measuring CA is a challenging task and has created a variety of evaluation methods, which are often categorized as static and dynamic CA assessments. Because CA is quantified as the performance of a regulatory system and no physical ground truth can be measured, conflicting results are reported. The conflict further arises from a lack of healthy volunteer data with respect to cerebral perfusion pressure measurements and the variety of diseases in which CA ability is impaired, including stroke, traumatic brain injury and hydrocephalus. To overcome these differences, we present a healthy non-human primate model in which we can control the ability to autoregulate blood flow through the type of anesthesia (isoflurane vs fentanyl). We show how three different assessment methods can be used to measure CA impairment, and how static and dynamic autoregulation compare under challenges in intracranial pressure and blood pressure. We reconstructed Lassen’s curve for two groups of anesthesia, where only the fentanyl anesthetized group yielded the canonical shape. Cerebral perfusion pressure allowed for the best distinction between the fentanyl and isoflurane anesthetized groups. The autoregulatory response time to induced oscillations in intracranial pressure and blood pressure, measured as the phase lag between intracranial pressure and blood pressure, was able to determine autoregulatory impairment in agreement with static autoregulation. Static and dynamic CA both show impairment in high dose isoflurane anesthesia, while low isoflurane in combination with fentanyl anesthesia maintains CA, offering a repeatable animal model for CA studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document