Three-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement

2003 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Langston T. Holly ◽  
Kevin T. Foley
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Spinal Navigation ◽  
Mean Diameter ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Fine Print

✓ The authors sought to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopic guidance for percutaneous placement of thoracic and lumbar pedicle screws in three cadaveric specimens. After attaching a percutaneous dynamic reference array to the surgical anatomy, an isocentric C-arm fluoroscope was used to obtain images of the region of interest. Light-emitting diodes attached to the C-arm unit were tracked using an electrooptical camera. The image data set was transferred to the image-guided workstation, which performed an automated registration. Using the workstation display, pedicle screw trajectories were planned. An image-guided drill guide was passed through a stab incision, and this was followed by sequential image-guided pedicle drilling, tapping, and screw placement. Pedicle screws of various diameters (range 4–6.5 mm) were placed in all pedicles greater than 4 mm in diameter. Postoperatively, thin-cut computerized tomography scans were obtained to determine the accuracy of screw placement. Eighty-nine (94.7%) of 94 percutaneous screws were placed completely within the cortical pedicle margins, including all 30 lumbar screws (100%) and 59 (92%) of 64 thoracic screws. The mean diameter of all thoracic pedicles was 6 mm (range 2.9–11 mm); the mean diameter of the five pedicles in which wall violations occurred was 4.6 mm (range 4.1–6.3 mm). Two of the violations were less than 2 mm beyond the cortex; the others were between 2 and 3 mm. Coupled with an image guidance system, 3D fluoroscopy allows highly accurate spinal navigation. Results of this study suggest that this technology will facilitate the application of minimally invasive techniques to the field of spine surgery.

Increased pedicle screw pullout strength with vertebroplasty augmentation in osteoporotic spines

2002 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Sarzier ◽  
Avery J. Evans ◽  
David W. Cahill
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Pullout Strength ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pullout Force ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Grade Iii ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors conducted a biomechanical study to evaluate pedicle screw pullout strength in osteoporotic cadaveric spines. Nonaugmented hemivertebrae were compared with pressurized polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)—augmented hemivertebrae. Methods. Six formalin-fixed cadaveric thoracolumbar spines at least two standard deviations below the mean bone mineral density (BMD) for age were obtained. Radiographic and BMD studies were correlated to grades I, II, and III osteoporosis according to the Jekei scale. Each of the 21 vertebrae underwent fluoroscopic placement of 6-mm transpedicular screws with each hemivertebra serving as the control for the contralateral PMMA-augmented hemivertebra. Pedicle screws were then evaluated for biomechanical axial pullout resistance. Augmented hemivertebrae axial pullout forces were increased (p = 0.0005). The mean increase in pullout force was 181% for Grade I, 206% for Grade II, and 213% for Grade III osteoporotic spines. Augmented Grade I osteoporotic spines demonstrated axial pullout forces near those levels reported in the literature for nonosteoporotic specimens. Augmented Grade II osteoporotic specimens demonstrated increases to levels found in nonaugmented vertebrae with low-normal BMD. Augmented Grade III osteoporotic specimens had increases to levels equal to those found in nonaugmented Grade I vertebrae. Conclusions. Augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae in PMMA-assisted vertebroplasty can significantly increase pedicle screw pullout forces to levels exceeding the strength of cortical bone. The maximum attainable force appears to be twice the pullout force of the nonaugmented pedicle screw for each osteoporotic grade.

Feasibility of mixed reality–based intraoperative three-dimensional image-guided navigation for atlanto-axial pedicle screw placement

2019 ◽  
Vol 233 (12) ◽  
pp. 1310-1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinghuo Wu ◽  
Rong Liu ◽  
Song Xu ◽  
Cao Yang ◽  
Shuhua Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Mixed Reality ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Upper Cervical Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Upper Cervical

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and accuracy of mixed reality–based intraoperative three-dimensional navigated pedicle screws in three-dimensional printed model of fractured upper cervical spine. A total of 27 cervical model from patients of upper cervical spine fractures formed the study group. All the C1 and C2 pedicle screws were inserted under mixed reality–based intraoperative three-dimensional image-guided navigation system. The accuracy and safety of the pedicle screw placement were evaluated on the basis of postoperative computerized tomography scans. A total of 108 pedicle screws were properly inserted into the cervical three-dimensional models under mixed reality–based navigation, including 54 C1 pedicle screws and 54 C2 pedicle screws. Analysis of the dimensional parameters of each pedicle at C1/C2 level showed no statistically significant differences in the ideal and the actual entry points, inclined angles, and tailed angles. No screw was misplaced outside the pedicle of the three-dimensional printed model, and no ionizing X-ray radiation was used during screw placement under navigation. It is easy and safe to place C1/C2 pedicle screws under MR surgical navigation. Mixed reality–based navigation is feasible within upper cervical spinal fractures with improved safety and accuracy of C1/C2 pedicle screw insertion.

scholarly journals P.174 Accuracy of pedicle screw placement with X-ray versus O-arm image-guided navigation

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (s3) ◽  
pp. S69-S70
Author(s):  
L Neuburger ◽  
Y Cheng ◽  
DR Fourney
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Pedicle Screw Placement ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Image Guided

Background: Image-guided navigation is routinely used in spine surgery to improve placement of pedicle screws. However, most reports have relied on two-dimensional X-ray evaluation to determine accuracy of screw positioning. In this study, computed tomography (CT) and O-arm imaging enabled a detailed three-dimensional comparison of screw placement. The objective was to compare the accuracy of pedicle screw placement with intraoperative X-ray versus O-arm image-guided navigation. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of image-guided pedicle screw placement in patients who underwent spinal instrumentation. Post-operative CT and O-arm imaging allowed grading of screw accuracy based on pedicle breaches. Clinical outcomes included patient and operative factors. Results: Pedicle screws were placed in 208 patients (1116 screws). Three-dimensional O-arm guidance was utilized for 126 patients, while the remainder underwent two-dimensional X-ray imaging and post-operative CT assessment. O-arm navigation was associated with improved pedicle screw accuracy: pedicle breaches were more likely to be low grade (odds ratio 2.84, p=0.001) and less likely to be medium grade (odds ratio 0.35, p=0.007) or high grade (odds ratio 0.31, p=0.025). Conclusions: This study provided a detailed comparison of surgical accuracy with X-ray versus O-arm guidance. Navigation with O-arm imaging is associated with benefits in spinal instrumentation, without impacting operative risks for patients.

Frameless stereotaxy for anterior spinal procedures

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Langston T. Holly ◽  
Orin Bloch ◽  
Chinyere Obasi ◽  
J. Patrick Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Optical Tracking ◽  
Frameless Stereotaxy ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Registration Error ◽  
The Mean ◽  
K Wires ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Intraoperative image guidance provides real-time three-dimensional visualization and has been successfully applied in many posterior spinal procedures. The feasibility of applying these techniques to anterior spinal surgery has not been studied systematically because the anterior spine, in contrast to the posterior spine, lacks distinct anatomical landmarks for registration. The authors sought to evaluate the practicality of performing stereotaxy in the anterior spine in a cadaveric model. Methods. Unilateral C4—L4 pedicle screws were placed posteriorly in three cadaveric specimens to serve as unknown markers within each vertebral body. The specimens then underwent computerized tomography (CT) scanning, and the CT data were transferred to an optical tracking system. The anterior surface of the spine was registered for use with the stereotactic system by using a paired point—matching technique. Attached to a surgical drill, K-wires were placed under stereotactic guidance in a tip-to-tip orientation with the posterior pedicle screws. A second postoperative CT scan was obtained, and accuracy was determined by measuring the distance between the tips of the K-wire and pedicle screw. The K-wires were placed tip to tip with pedicle screw markers in 57 vertebral levels. The mean registration error was 1.47 ± 0.04 mm, and when combined with the universal instrument registration error of 0.7 mm yielded an overall registration error of 2.17 ± 0.04 mm. The mean tip-to-tip distance for all K-wires placed was 2.46 ± 0.23 mm. The difference between the mean tip-to-tip distance and overall registration error was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), indicating that the K-wires were placed within the expected range of error. Conclusions. The results of this study confirmed the feasibility of performing anterior stereotactic procedures throughout the spine. The accuracy of the findings in this study indicates that anterior stereotaxy should be applicable in clinical practice.

High-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted sequence for neuronavigation: a new setup and clinical trial

2005 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 658-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Gralla ◽  
Raphael Guzman ◽  
Caspar Brekenfeld ◽  
Luca Remonda ◽  
Claus Kiefer
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Clinical Application ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Conventional imaging for neuronavigation is performed using high-resolution computerized tomography (CT) scanning or a T1-weighted isovoxel magnetic resonance (MR) sequence. The extension of some lesions, however, is depicted much better on T2-weighted MR images. A possible fusion process used to match low-resolution T2-weighted MR image set with a referenced CT or T1-weighted data set leads to poor resolution in the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and decreases accuracy, which is unacceptable for neuronavigation. The object of this work was to develop a 3D T2-weighted isovoxel sequence (3D turbo—spin echo [TSE]) for image-guided neuronavigation of the whole brain and to evaluate its clinical application. Methods. The authors performed a phantom study and a clinical trial on a newly developed T2-weighted isovoxel sequence, 3D TSE, for image-guided neuronavigation using a common 1.5-tesla MR imager (Siemens Sonata whole-body imager). The accuracy study and intraoperative image guidance were performed with the aid of the pointer-based Medtronic Stealth Station Treon. The 3D TSE data set was easily applied to the navigational setup and demonstrated a high registration accuracy during the experimental trial and during an initial prospective clinical trial in 25 patients. The sequence displayed common disposable skin fiducial markers and provided convincing delineation of lesions that appear hyperintense on T2-weighted images such as low-grade gliomas and cavernomas in its clinical application. Conclusions. Three-dimensional TSE imaging broadens the spectrum of navigational and intraoperative data sets, especially for lesions that appear hyperintense on T2-weighted images. The accuracy of its registration is very reliable and it enables high-resolution reconstruction in any orientation, maintaining the advantages of image-guided surgery.

Crossed-screw fixation of the unstable thoracic and lumbar spine

1995 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward C. Benzel ◽  
Nevan G. Baldwin
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Thoracic And Lumbar Spine ◽  
Spinal Segments ◽  
Fine Print

✓ An ideal spinal construct should immobilize only the unstable spinal segments, and thus only the segments fused. Pedicle fixation techniques have provided operative stabilization with the instrumentation of a minimal number of spinal segments; however, some failures have been observed with pedicle instrumentation. These failures are primarily related to excessive preload forces and limitations caused by the size and orientation of the pedicles. To circumvent these problems, a new technique, the crossed-screw fixation method, was developed and is described in this report. This technique facilitates short-segment spinal fixation and uses a lateral extracavitary approach, which provides generous exposure for spinal decompression and interbody fusion. The technique employs two large transverse vertebral body screws (6.5 to 8.5 mm in diameter) to bear axial loads, and two unilateral pedicle screws (placed on the side of the exposure) to restrict flexion and extension deformation around the transverse screws and to provide three-dimensional deformity correction. The horizontal vertebral body and the pedicle screws are connected to rods and then to each other via rigid crosslinking. The transverse vertebral body screws are unloaded during insertion by placing the construct in a compression mode after the interbody bone graft is placed, thus optimizing the advantage gained by the significant “toe-in” configuration provided and further decreasing the chance for instrumentation failure. The initial results of this technique are reported in a series of 10 consecutively treated patients, in whom correction of the deformity was facilitated. Follow-up examination (average 10.1 months after surgery) demonstrated negligible angulation. Chronic pain was minimal. The crossed-screw fixation technique is biomechanically sound and offers a rapid and safe form of short-segment three-dimensional deformity correction and solid fixation when utilized in conjunction with the lateral extracavitary approach to the unstable thoracic and lumbar spine. This approach also facilitates the secure placement of an interbody bone graft.

Thoracic pedicle screws: postoperative computerized tomography scanning assessment

2004 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Heary ◽  
Christopher M. Bono ◽  
Margaret Black
Keyword(s):  
Computerized Tomography ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Grading System ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Thoracic Pedicle Screws ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Grade Iii ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors evaluated the accuracy of placement of thoracic pedicle screws by performing postoperative computerized tomography (CT) scanning. A grading system is presented by which screw placement is classified in relation to neurological, bone, and intrathoracic landmarks. Methods. One hundred eighty-five thoracic pedicle screws were implanted in 27 patients with the assistance of computer image guidance or fluoroscopy. Postoperative CT scanning was conducted to determine a grade for each screw: Grade I, entirely contained within pedicle; Grade II, violates lateral pedicle but screw tip entirely contained within the vertebral body (VB); Grade III, tip penetrates anterior or lateral VB; Grade IV, breaches medial or inferior pedicle; and Grade V, violates pedicle or VB and endangers spinal cord, nerve root, or great vessels and requires immediate revision. Based on anatomical morphometry, the spine was subdivided into upper (T1–2), middle (T3–6), and lower (T7–12) regions. Statistical analyses were performed to compare regions. The mean follow-up period was 37.6 months. The following postoperative CT scanning—documented grades were determined: Grade I, 160 screws (86.5%); Grade II, 15 (8.1%); Grade III, six (3.2%); Grade IV, three (1.6%); and Grade V, one (0.5%). Among cases involving screw misplacements, Grade II placement was most common, and this occurred most frequently in the middle thoracic region. Conclusions. The authors' grading system has advantages over those previously described; however, further study to determine its reliability, reproducibility, and predictive value of clinical sequelae is warranted. Postoperative CT scanning should be considered the gold standard for evaluating thoracic pedicle screw placement.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jee-Soo Jang ◽  
Sang-Ho Lee
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Level Fusion ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The purpose of this study was to introduce a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) technique that involves ipsilateral pedicle screw (PS) and contralateral facet screw (FS) fixation. Methods. Eight men and 15 women (mean age 59.5 years, range 48–68) underwent the aforementioned TLIF procedure for degenerative spondylolisthesis and uni- or bilateral radiculopathy. Twenty-two patients underwent one-level fusion and one patient two-level fusion (L4—S1). In all cases the various procedures were undertaken via one small incision. There were no intraoperative complications. The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 310 ml, and the mean operative time was 150 minutes in cases of one-level fusion. The follow-up period ranged from 13 to 28 months (mean 19 months). The mean Numeric Rating Scale score reflected improvement-reductions from 7.5 (back pain) and 7.4 (leg pain) to 2.3 and 0.7, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores also reflected improved status (ODI of 33.1 before the surgery to 7.6 after the surgery; p < 0.0001). Examination indicated that 22 of 24 fusion sites exhibited osseous union. At the last follow-up examination, satisfactory outcomes were observed in 21 out of 23 patients. Conclusions. The TLIF with ipsilateral PS and contralateral FS fixation has the advantages over the conventional TLIF of reduced EBL and diminished soft-tissue injury.

Surgical anatomy of the C-2 pedicle

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay U. Howington ◽  
John J. Kruse ◽  
Deepak Awasthi
Keyword(s):  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Anatomical Study ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Surgical Anatomy ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Direct Visualization ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The goal of this anatomical study was to investigate the surgical and radiographic anatomy of the C-2 pedicle in relation to transpedicular screw placement in occipitocervical stabilization and to establish anatomical guidelines for the placement of C-2 pedicle screws. Methods. The C-2 pedicles in 10 cadaveric spines were evaluated using both computerized tomography (CT) scanning and manual measurements. The specimens were scanned; the mediolateral and rostrocaudal angulations of each pedicle were measured, with the midline sagittal plane and the inferior endplate of the C-2 facet, respectively, as references, and values were recorded in 1° increments by using a digital goniometer. The height, width, and length of the pedicles were also measured on the CT scans. Based on these measurements in conjunction with direct visualization of the C-2 pedicle through the C1–2 interlaminar space pedicle screws were then placed. The distances from the screw entry point to the midline, C2–3 joint line, and the medial aspect of the vertebral artery were also measured. Repeated CT scanning was then performed to assess screw placement. The average pedicle height, width, and length measured 9.1 mm, 7.9 mm, and 16.6 mm, respectively, and the medial inclination and rostrocaudal angulation averaged 35.2° and 38.8°, respectively. The cortex of the pedicle was not violated in any of the 20 cadaveric specimens. Conclusions. Adequate preoperative imaging studies in conjunction with direct visualization of the C-2 pedicle make transpedicular fixation safe and effective.

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness of Image-Guided Spine Surgery

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 228-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Green Watkins ◽  
Akash Gupta ◽  
Robert Green Watkins
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Image Guidance ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Guidance System ◽  
Screw Placement ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Time Required

Objective: To determine if image-guided spine surgery is cost effective. Methods: A prospective case series of the first 100 patients undergoing thoracolumbar pedicle screw instrumentation under image-guidance was compared to a retrospective control group of the last 100 patients who underwent screw placement prior to the use of image-guidance. The image-guidance system was NaviVision (Vector Vision-BrainLAB) and Arcadis Orbic (Siemens). Results: The rate of revision surgery was reduced from 3% to 0% with the use of image guidance (p=0.08). The cost savings of image guidance for the placement of pedicle screws was $71,286 per 100 cases. Time required for pedicle screw placement with image guidance was 20 minutes for 2 screws, 29 minutes for 4 screws, 38 minutes for 6 screws, and 50 min for 8 screws. Cost savings for the time required for placement of pedicle screws with image guidance can be estimated by subtracting the time required with currently used techniques without image guidance from the above averages, then multiplying by $93 per minute. The approximate costs of the navigation system is $475,000 ( $225,000 for Vector Vision-BrainLAB and $250,000 for Arcadis Orbic-Siemens). Conclusion: Image guidance for the placement of pedicle screws may be cost effective in spine practices with heavy volume, that perform surgery in difficult cases, and that require long surgical times for the placement of pedicle screws.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document