scholarly journals Implementation and Effectiveness of Early Chest Tube Removal during an Enhanced Recovery Programme after Oesophago-gastrectomy

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (197) ◽  
pp. 24-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajeev Bhandari ◽  
You Yong-hao
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Introduction: Oesophageal resection were notoriously complicated and produces a cohort of patients prone to postoperative complications and here we would like to focus on the implementation and effectiveness of early chest tube removal in ERAS after oesophago-gastrectomy considering the various aspect like pleural effusion and reducing the length of hospital stay which ultimately lead to reducing the economic burden on patient.Methods: An ERAS programme was devised and implemented with the support of a dedicated in-hospital task-force. The patients underwent esophago-gastrectomy were randomly divided into two groups: the ERAS group and the control group (non-ERAS). The ERAS group was treated with early removal of the chest tube after surgery, and the control group was treated with traditional way and outcomes were compared between them.Results: The length of hospital stay and the cost of hospitalization in the ERAS group were significantly lower than those in the control group（p<0.05. However, there was no statistical significant difference in the incidences of pleural effusion between the two groups（p＞0.05).Conclusions: The introduction of early chest tube removal as an ERAS programme after oesophago-gastrectomy would not increase the risk of pleural effusion and would not increase the total length of stay and cost of hospitalisation without jeopardising patient safety or clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals The Effect of Distraction with a Loved One’s Voice on Pain Reduction While Extracting the Chest Tube after Open Heart Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Hakimeh Sheykhasadi ◽  
Abbas Abbaszadeh ◽  
Homira Bonakdar ◽  
Fatemeh Salmani ◽  
Asghar Tavan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Open Heart Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Heart ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
The Impact

Background:One of the forms of ost-operative care after open heart surgery is controlling the pain resulting from chest tube insertion. Management of pain is considered vital and requires the awareness of health care providers. One of the main responsibilities of nurses is to prepare patients for invasive procedures such as the removal of the chest tube. This study was designed to analyze the impact of a loved one’s voice for distraction in patients undergoing open heart surgery.Methods:This study was a clinical trial. The research sample was randomly selected from patients undergoing open heart surgery. In this study, the number of samples for each group was considered to be 64 people, where the total number of samples was 128 people. The data collection tools included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessment tool and a researcher-made questionnaire. After selecting the eligible samples and obtaining the informed consent, each patient was randomly assigned to one of the two groups (intervention group and control group). The pain was measured before, immediately, and 10 minutes after removing the chest tube.Results:The findings of this study indicated that the two groups had no statistically significant differences in pain before chest tube removal. The mean pain during chest tube removal and 10 minutes later in both groups indicated a significant difference based on Mann-Whitney test (P<0.001).Conclusion:This study showed that a loved one’s voice is effective in reducing pain during chest tube removal after open heart surgery.

scholarly journals Enhanced recovery care versus traditional non- ERAS  care following osteotomies in developmental dysplasia of the hip in children : a retrospective case-cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Li ◽  
Saroj Rai ◽  
Renhao Ze ◽  
Xin Tang ◽  
Ruikang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Postoperative Fever ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Abstract Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been shown to shorten the length of hospital stay and reduce the incidence of perioperative complications in many surgical fields. However, there has been a paucity of research examining the application of ERAS in major pediatric orthopedic surgeries. This study aims to compare the perioperative complications and length of hospital stay after osteotomies in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) between ERAS and traditional non-ERAS group. Methods: The ERAS group consisted of 86 patients included in the ERAS program from January 2016 to December 2017. The Control group consisted of 82 DDH patients who received osteotomies from January 2014 to December 2015. Length of hospital stay, physiological function, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The mean duration of hospital stay was significantly reduced from 10.0±3.1 in the traditional care group to 6.0±0.8 days in the ERAS(P<0.001). The VAS score in 3-day was significantly lower in ERAS group (2.9±0.8) than traditional non-ERAS group (4.0±0.8) (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the frequency of breakout pain (VAS >4) between two groups (29.5±6.3 vs.30.6±6.5, P=0.276). The frequency of postoperative fever was lower in the ERAS group. The frequency of urinary tract infection in both groups were not noticeable because the catheter was removed promptly after the surgery. Conclusion: The ERAS protocol is both safe and feasible for pediatric DDH patients undergoing osteotomies, and it can shorten the length of hospital stay without increasing the risk of perioperative complications.

Effect of Chewing Gum on Bowel Motility in Women Undergoing Post-Operative Cesarean Section

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr.Randa Mohammed AboBaker
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Chewing Gum ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Bowel Motility ◽  
Gum Chewing ◽  
Significant Difference

Postoperative Ileus (POI) is one of the most common problems after obstetrics, gynecologic and abdominal surgeries. Sham feeding, such as gum chewing, accelerates the return of bowel function and the length of hospital stay. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of chewing gum on bowel motility in women undergoing post-operative cesarean section. Intervention study was used at the Postpartum Department of Maternity and Children Hospital, KSA. A randomized controlled clinical trial research design. Through a convenience technique, 80 post Caesarian Section (CS) women were included in the study. Data were collected through three tools: Tool (I): Socio-demographic data and reproductive history interview schedule. Tool (II): Postoperative Assessment Sheet. Tool (III): Outcomes of gum chewing and the length of hospital stay.  Method: subjects were assigned randomly into two groups of (40) the experimental and (40) the control. Subjects in the study group were asked to chew two pieces of sugarless gum for 30 min/three times daily in the morning, noon, and evening immediately after recovery from anesthesia and in Postpartum Department; while subjects in the control group followed the hospital routine care. Each woman in both groups was tested abdominally using a stethoscope to auscultate the bowel sounds and asked to report immediately the time of either passing flatus or stool. Results: illustrated that a highly statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning their gum chewing outcomes. Where, P = 0.000. The study concluded that gum chewing is safe, well tolerated and appears to be effective in reducing the incidence and consequences of POI following CS.

scholarly journals Safety of early discharge with a chest tube after pulmonary segmentectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 613-618
Author(s):  
Feichao Bao ◽  
Natasha Toleska Dimitrovska ◽  
Shoujun Hu ◽  
Xiao Chu ◽  
Wentao Li
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Air Leak ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Prolonged Air Leak ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Chest Tube Removal ◽  
Hospital Days

Abstract OBJECTIVES Early removal of chest tube is an important step in enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. However, after pulmonary resection with a wide dissection plane, such as pulmonary segmentectomy, prolonged air leak, a large volume of pleural drainage and the risk of developing empyema in patients can delay chest tube removal and result in a low rate of completion of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety of discharging patients with a chest tube after pulmonary segmentectomy. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon’s experience of pulmonary segmentectomy from May 2019 to September 2019. Patients who fulfilled the criteria for discharging with a chest tube were discharged and provided written instructions. They returned for chest tube removal after satisfactory resolution of air leak or fluid drainage. RESULTS In total, 126 patients underwent pulmonary segmentectomy. Ninety-five (75%) patients were discharged with a chest tube postoperatively. The mean time to chest tube removal after discharge was 5.6 (range 2–32) days, potentially saving 532 inpatient hospital days. Overall, 90 (95%) patients experienced uneventful and successful outpatient chest tube management. No life-threatening complications were observed. No patient experienced complications resulting from chest tube malfunction. Five (5%) patients experienced minor complications. Overall, all patients reported good-to-excellent mobility with a chest tube. CONCLUSIONS Successful postoperative outpatient chest tube management after pulmonary segmentectomy can be accomplished in selected patients without a major increase in morbidity or mortality.

Etomidate Use for Rapid Sequence Intubation Is Not Associated With Nosocomial Infection

2020 ◽  
pp. 089719002097961
Author(s):  
Daniel Colon Hidalgo ◽  
Vishali Amin ◽  
Arushi Hukku ◽  
Kathryn Kutlu ◽  
Megan A. Rech
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Secondary Infection ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Adrenal Suppression ◽  
Rapid Sequence Intubation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Secondary Infections ◽  
Rapid Sequence ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Introduction: Etomidate is commonly used for induction of anesthesia for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). It has little impact on hemodynamic status, making it a widely used agent. Due to the inhibition of cortisol production, etomidate causes adrenal suppression. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a correlation with etomidate use and the incidence of secondary infections. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients who received either etomidate or control (ketamine, propofol, or no agent) for RSI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of secondary infections. Secondary outcomes included number of mechanical ventilator-free days within 28 days, 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and length of intensive care unit stay. Results: A total of 434 patients were reviewed, of which 129 (29.7%) met the study criteria (n = 94 etomidate; n = 35 control). The incidence of secondary infection was numerically higher in the etomidate group compared with the control group, though this was not statistically significant (38.7% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.447). Also, though the secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference between the groups, the patients in the control group had a longer hospital stay (14.0 vs. 18.1, p = 0.20) and a longer ICU stay (11.0 vs. 14.1, p = 030). Furthermore, the etomidate group had a non-statistically significant higher incidence of bacteremia (8 vs. 0, p = 0.17) Conclusion: The use of etomidate was not associated with increased incidence of secondary infection. To fully understand the effects of etomidate use and its subsequent adrenal suppression, larger studies are needed.

scholarly journals Analgesic efficacy of lidocaine and multimodal analgesia for chest tube removal: A randomized trial study

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1000-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valdecy Ferreira de Oliveira Pinheiro ◽  
José Madson Vidal da Costa ◽  
Marcelo Matos Cascudo ◽  
Ênio de Oliveira Pinheiro ◽  
Maria Angela Ferreira Fernandes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Subcutaneous Administration ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Multimodal Analgesia ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Objective: to assess the analgesic efficacy of subcutaneous lidocaine and multimodal analgesia for chest tube removal following heart surgery. Methods: sixty volunteers were randomly allocated in two groups; 30 participants in the experimental group were given 1% subcutaneous lidocaine, and 30 controls were given a multimodal analgesia regime comprising systemic anti-inflammatory agents and opioids. The intensity and quality of pain and trait and state anxiety were assessed. The association between independent variables and final outcome was assessed by means of the Chi-squared test with Yates' correction and Fisher's exact test. Results: the groups did not exhibit significant difference with respect to the intensity of pain upon chest tube removal (p= 0.47). The most frequent descriptors of pain reported by the participants were pressing, sharp, pricking, burning and unbearable. Conclusion: the present study suggests that the analgesic effect of the subcutaneous administration of 1% lidocaine combined with multimodal analgesia is most efficacious.

scholarly journals Early postoperative day 0 chest tube removal using a digital drainage device protocol after thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 657-663
Author(s):  
Karel Pfeuty ◽  
Bernard Lenot
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Pulmonary Resection ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Lung Resection ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Complication ◽  
Drainage Device ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the safety of early chest tube removal on postoperative day 0 (POD 0) on the basis of a digital drainage device protocol in patients undergoing thoracoscopic major lung resection and its contribution as a component of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme. METHODS One hundred consecutive patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy were submitted to the following criteria for chest tube removal: Air flow ≤20 ml/min for at least 4 h without fluid threshold, except if haemorrhagic or chylous. Two groups were defined according to chest tube removal on POD 0 (G0) or POD ≥1 (G1). Primary outcome was pleural complication and secondary outcomes were cardiopulmonary complication, length of drainage, length of stay (LOS), compliance with opioid-free analgesic protocol and readmission. The follow-up was 90 days from discharge. RESULTS The chest tube was removed on POD 0 in 45% of patients (G0). None of them required tube reinsertion for pneumothorax and 1 patient was readmitted for a delayed pleural effusion. Among the 55% remaining patients (G1), the median length of drainage was 2 days, including 3 prolonged air leaks (&gt;5 days). G0 and G1 were not different in terms of cardiopulmonary complication and readmission (6.6% vs 9% and 4.4% vs 7.2%, respectively). The median LOS was 1 day in G0 and 2 days in G1. The compliance with opioid-free analgesic protocol was significantly higher (75% vs 45%, P = 0.004) in G0 compared to G1. CONCLUSIONS Early POD 0 chest tube removal after thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection is safe in selected patients on the basis of a digital drainage device protocol. Also, it may contribute, by reducing early postoperative pain, to enhance postoperative recovery as part of an advanced enhanced recovery after surgery programme.

scholarly journals Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following osteotomies in developmental dysplasia of the hip in children: a retrospective case-cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Li ◽  
Saroj Rai ◽  
Renhao Ze ◽  
Xin Tang ◽  
Ruikang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Traditional Care ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Abstract Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been shown to shorten the length of hospital stay and reduce the incidence of perioperative complications in many surgical fields. However, there has been a paucity of research examining the application of ERAS in major pediatric orthopedic surgeries. This study aims to compare the perioperative complications and length of hospital stay after osteotomies in children of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) between ERAS and traditional care group.Methods: The ERAS group consisted of 86 patients included in the ERAS program from January 2016 to December 2017. The Control group consisted of 82 DDH patients who received osteotomies from January 2014 to December 2015. Length of hospital stay, physiological function, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results: The mean duration of hospital stay was significantly reduced from 10.0±3.1 in the traditional care group to 6.0±0.8 days in the ERAS(P<0.001). Pain response was better in the ERAS group than traditional care group in terms of mean 3-day VAS score (2.9±0.8 vs. 4.0±0.8, P<0.001) and maximum VAS score (4.1±0.8 vs. 4.9±0.8, P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the frequency of break-out pain (VAS >4) between two groups (29.5±6.3 vs.30.6±6.5, P=0.276 ). The frequency of fever is lower in the ERAS group, possibly due to better temperature monitoring and management in the operating room. The frequency of urinary infection in both groups were not noticeable because the catheter was removed promptly after the surgery. Conclusion: The ERAS protocol is both safe and feasible for pediatric DDH patients undergoing osteotomies, and it can shorten the length of hospital stay without increasing the risk of perioperative complications.

scholarly journals Does the Chest Tube Removal Time Influence the Outcomes of Primary Spontaneus Pneumothorax First Episode Management?

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-245
Author(s):  
Matas Mongirdas ◽  
Audrius Untanas ◽  
Žymantas Jagelavičius ◽  
Ričardas Janilionis
Keyword(s):  
Chest Tube ◽  
Spontaneous Pneumothorax ◽  
Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Air Leak ◽  
Removal Time ◽  
Tube Removal ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chest Tube Removal

Background / objectives. The main treatment option for the first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax is chest tube drainage, however, whether delayed chest tube removal might influence the recurrence is unclear.Methods. A prospective study, which included 50 patients, with an initial episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax was performed. Patients were randomized into two groups according to the chest tube removal time: 1-day and 5-days after the air-leak has stopped. All patients were followed-up for at least six months. Both groups were compared according to the recurrence rate and possible complications.Results. There were 39 (78%) men and the median age was 27 (23–35) years. Successful management with a chest tube was achieved in 43 (86%) patients, others were operated on because of the continuous air-leak or relapse of the pneumothorax after the chest tube was removed. Significant difference was not found comparing groups by age, gender, side, tobacco smoking, alpha-1-antitrypsin level, rate of prolonged air-leak, necessity of surgery, and the mean follow-up time. There was a significant difference between groups in hospitalization time: 1-day group – 6 (4–12), 5-days group – 8 (7–10) days, p = 0.017. Five (20%) patients from 1-day group and 3 (12%) from 5-days group had a recurrence, however the difference was not significant (p = 0.702). There were no significant differences comparing groups by the recurrence time or complications.Conclusions. The recurrence rate of primary spontaneous pneumothorax was higher if the chest tube was removed earlier, however not significantly. More data and longer follow-up are necessary to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Development and Feasibility of the Early Rehabilitation Program on Postoperative Enhanced Recovery Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Funa Yang ◽  
Lijuan Li ◽  
Yanzhi Mi ◽  
Limin Zou ◽  
Xiaofei Chu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Rehabilitation Program ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Early Rehabilitation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Function Recovery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Physical Function Recovery

Abstract Background: Perioperative rehabilitation management is essential to enhanced recovery after surgery. Few reports, however, focused on quantitative, detailed early activity plans for patients after esophagectomy. Aim: The purpose of this research was to estimate the effect of the Early Rehabilitation Program (ERP) on the recovery of bowel function and physical function for patients undergoing esophagectomy. Method: In this single-blind, 2-arm, parallel-group, randomized pilot clinical trial, patients were selected from June 2019 to February 2020 and assigned to the intervention group (IG) or the control group(CG) randomly. The participants in IG received an ERP strategy during the perioperative period, and the CG received routine care. The recovery of bowel and physical function, readiness for hospital discharge (RHD) and postoperative hospital stay were evaluated on the day of discharge. Results: 215 cases were enrolled and randomized to the CG (n=108) or IG (n=107). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics and baseline physical function. After the ERP intervention, the IG group presented a significantly shorter time to first flatus (P<0.001) and to first bowel movement postoperative (P=0.024), and a better physical function recovery (P＜0.001), compared with the CG group. The analysis also showed that participants in the IG have higher scores of RHD and shorter length of postoperative stay than the CG (P＜0.05). Conclusion: The findings suggest that the ERP can improve bowel and physical function recovery, ameliorate patients' RHD, and shorten postoperative hospital stay for patients undergoing MIE.Trial registration：ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01998230

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document