scholarly journals Social Media and Scientific Meetings: An Analysis of Twitter Use at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Radmanesh ◽  
A.L. Kotsenas
Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4469-4469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saurabh Dahiya ◽  
Ankit J. Kansagra ◽  
Syed S. Ali

Abstract Background: The use of social media is expanding in medicine. More and more healthcare professionals, patients and advocates are using social media as a common platform to enhance communication. Methods: Each year American Society of Hematology (ASH) creates a hashtag (#) followed by year of the annual meeting (e.g. ASH 2014 had this hashtag: #ASH14) on Twitter. We conducted a retrospective study of annual meeting's hashtag use on Twitter for past 4 annual meetings using data from Symplur, LLC. Symplur is an online forum offering analytics of the global Twitter based conversations. Following hashtags were used for analysis, #ASH11, #ASH12, #ASH13 and #ASH14. Results: Overall there is an increasing trend for use of annual meeting's hashtag (see table 1). Last year's meeting generated over 72 million impressions. Number of tweets being sent out is doubling every year. More twitter users are engaging in conversations than the year before using annual meeting's hashtag. Last year almost 4000 individual twitter accounts were used during the annual meeting. Number of tweets per participant has stayed relatively constant over past four years. @ash_hematology remains the most commonly mentioned twitter handle every year since 2011. In 2014 itself, @ash_hematology was mentioned over 2000 times. Conclusion: Twitter is a very powerful tool that amplifies the content of scientific meetings. Use of twitter using meeting's hashtag is increasing every year at annual ASH meetings. This analysis provides a snapshot of twitter activity at the conference. Avenues for further research are: trend identification, "influencer" identification, and qualitative analysis. Interdisciplinary research should focus on evaluation methods that can assess the quality, value, and impact of tweeting. Table 1. Year Impressions Tweets Participants Average tweet per participant 2011 12,255,646 3123 606 5 2012 18,153,786 5,094 870 6 2013 30,018,580 12,233 1942 6 2014 72,433,270 24,185 3977 6 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 54

Rosemary Bland, of the Biomedical Research Institute at the University of Warwick, used a Biochemical Society Travel Grant to go to St Louis, MO, for the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Nephrology (ASN).


2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-40

Julie Crockett of the Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, used a Biochemical Society Grant to go to Seattle for the 26th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. e623-e631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen Pemmaraju ◽  
Michael A. Thompson ◽  
Ruben A. Mesa ◽  
Tejas Desai

Purpose: The use of social media, in particular Twitter, has substantially increased among health care stakeholders in the field of hematology and oncology, with an especially sharp increase in the use of Twitter during times of major national meetings. The most attended meeting in the oncology field is the ASCO annual meeting. Little is known about the detailed metrics involved in the use, volume, and impact of Twitter during the ASCO annual meeting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of tweets during the ASCO annual meetings from 2011 to 2016. The total data set encompassed 190,732 tweets from 39,745 authors over six consecutive ASCO meetings from 2011 to 2016 (inclusive). Tweets, all publically available, were collected by Nephrology On-Demand Analytics. Results: The number of individual authors increased from 1,429 during the 2011 ASCO meeting to 15,796 during the 2016 ASCO meeting, an 11-fold increase over the total 5-year period. There was a notable increase in tweets from the 2011 ASCO meeting (n = 7,746) to the 2016 ASCO meeting (n = 72,698), a nine-fold increase during the study period. The most commonly tweeted term or topic changed over time, generally reflecting the breakthroughs of each designated year; these terms were “melanoma” for both the 2011 and 2012 ASCO meetings; “breast cancer” for the 2013 ASCO meeting; “lung cancer” for the 2014 ASCO meeting; and “ImmunOnc” or “immunotherapy/immuno-oncology” for both the 2015 and 2016 ASCO meetings. Conclusion: The use of Twitter among health care stakeholders during the ASCO meeting has markedly increased over time, demonstrating the increasing role of social media in the dissemination of findings at the most highly attended hematology and oncology conference of the year.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric S. Schwenk ◽  
Kellie M. Jaremko ◽  
Rajnish K. Gupta ◽  
Ankeet D. Udani ◽  
Colin J.L. McCartney ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Kazahn Masur

The Women in Cell Biology (WICB) committee of the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB) was started in the 1970s in response to the documented underrepresentation of women in academia in general and cell biology in particular. By coincidence or causal relationship, I am happy to say that since WICB became a standing ASCB committee, women have been well represented in ASCB's leadership and as symposium speakers at the annual meeting. However, the need to provide opportunities and information useful to women in developing their careers in cell biology is still vital, given the continuing bias women face in the larger scientific arena. With its emphasis on mentoring, many of WICB's activities benefit the development of both men and women cell biologists. The WICB “Career Column” in the monthly ASCB Newsletter is a source of accessible wisdom. At the annual ASCB meeting, WICB organizes the career discussion and mentoring roundtables, childcare awards, Mentoring Theater, career-related panel and workshop, and career recognition awards. Finally, the WICB Speaker Referral Service provides a list of outstanding women whom organizers of scientific meetings, scientific review panels, and university symposia/lecture series can reach out to when facing the proverbial dilemma, “I just don't know any women who are experts.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document