Disaster Management Control: Decision Support through Performance Assessment

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 10758-10763 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Galasso ◽  
Carine Rongier ◽  
Matthieu Lauras ◽  
Didier Gourc
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-134
Author(s):  
Zainuddin Zainuddin ◽  
Nofriadi Nofriadi ◽  
Nasrun Marpaung

Abstract:Duty unit office Regional Disaster Management AgencyTanjungbalai Cityhave a big taskincludes looking for, helping, and save human worried lost or face danger in natural disasters. In carrying out this great task There are also duty unit  less active,  professional, and lack of sense of responsibility in work So that it affects other co-workers. This is due to the placement of the task force not in accordance with the skills he has. Therefore, the purpose of this researchis to assist the Technical Implementation Officer of Activities in determine performance duty unit appraisal best. System development method using Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP). The resulting Decision Support Systemcan make it easier Activity Technical Implementing Officer in do an assessmentduty unit performance at work environment office Regional Disaster Management AgencyTanjungbalai City. Keywords:SPK;Performance assessment;PPTK; MFEP  Abstrak:Satuan Tugas (SATGAS) Kantor Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Kota Tanjungbalai mempunyai tugas besar meliputi mencari, menolong, dan menyelamatkan jiwa manusia yang dikhawatirkan hilang atau menghadapi bahaya dalam musibah bencana alam. Dalam menjalankan tugas besar tersebut ada juga Satuan Tugas (SATGAS) yang kurang aktif,  propesional, dan kurang rasa tanggungjawab dalam bekerja, sehingga mempengaruhi rekan kerja lainnya dalam melaksanakan tugasnya. Hal ini di sebabkan penempatan satgas tidak sesuai dengan skill yang dimilikinya. Oleh karana itu tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk membantu Pejabat Pelaksana Teknis Kegiatan (PPTK) dalam menantukan penilaian kinerja Satuan Tugas (SATGAS) terbaik. Metode pengembangan sistem menggunakan Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan yang dihasilkan dapat mempermudah Pejabat Pelaksana Teknis Kegiatan (PPTK) dalam melakukan penilaian kinerja satagas di lingkungan kerja Kantor Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Kota Tanjungbalai Kata kunci: SPK;Penilaian Kinerja;PPTK; MFEP 


MATICS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Rizal Furqan Ramadhan ◽  
Herman Tolle ◽  
Muhammad Aziz Muslim

<span>The lecturer is one of the essential<br />components in the Higher Education system. Performance<br />assessment of lecturer needs to be conducted to measure<br />the lecturer capability based on the Tri Darma’s Higher<br />Education concept. Related to the nowadays technology<br />development, to conduct performance assessment of<br />lecturer can use the Decision Support System based on<br />several criteria as the assessment material. The provided<br />criteria in this paper seem to be the obtained criteria from<br />P2KP and BKD component. P2KP is performance<br />assessment of lecturer under the Badan Kepegawaian<br />Negara (BKN) supervision. Meanwhile BKD is<br />performance assessment of lecturer under the DIKTI<br />supervision. The lecturer criteria are taken from those two<br />components because the lecturers’ status cannot be<br />separated from the officer under BKN and educator under<br />the DIKTI support. It is expected that the criteria coming<br />from both components integration will be able to produce<br />performance assessment of lecturer objectively. The<br />method to proceed the assessment was Weighted Product<br />(WP). The examined data of the lecturers were the<br />Brawijaya University lecturers’ data. The final<br />examination data was conducted by taking the data<br />randomly from 20 Brawijaya University lecturers. The<br />final output from this Decision Support System is the<br />lecturers which are selected from three categories, which<br />are, less, normal, and good. It is expected that Decision<br />Support System is able to categorize the standard eligible<br />lecturer (Normal/medium category), and the lecturer<br />surpassing the standard (good category).<br /></span>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document