scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF FIRM SIZE, GROSS PROFIT MARGIN AND INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP ON DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-308
Author(s):  
Pipit Rosita Andarsari
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Profit Margin ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

The objective of this research is to analyze influence of Size, Gross Profit Margin (GPM) and Institusional Ownership to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure. Sample of this research are annual report for manufacture companies that listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2014-2016. Sample were selected using purposive sampling method and 11 sample were able to fullfill the criteria used as sample. This research uses multiple regression data analysis techniques . The result of the research showns that size and gross profit margin has positive effect on the corporate social responsibility , meanwhile Institutional ownership has negative effect on the corporate social responsibility. Keywords: Size, Gross Profit Margin, Institutional Ownership, Corporate Social Responsibility

scholarly journals Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Pada Perusahaan High Profile di BEI

Akuntabilitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-220
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rivandi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
High Profile ◽  
Research Population ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is an important element for the company's success and can provide benefits to the company. The purpose of this study obtained empirical evidence regarding the effect of ownership structure on CSR disclosure. The research population are all high profile companies listed on the IDX. The sample in this study were 42 companies selected by the purposive sampling method. The analysis method used the panel regression method. Based on the hypothesis the results of the study shown that managerial ownership has a negative effect on CSR disclosure, and institutional ownership has a positive effect on CSR disclosure, while public ownership does not effectonCSR disclosure

scholarly journals PENGARUH PENGUNGKAPAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TERHADAP KEPEMILIKAN INSTITUSIONAL

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-86
Author(s):  
Fenny Marietza ◽  
Dekker Yusuf Alfredo
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Product Category ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
The Other ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
A Company

disclosure on institutional ownership in the company. The company's institutional ownership is seen from the institutional ownership of shares in each company. The sample in this study is a company listed on the Stock Exchange Indonesia (IDX) in 2014-2015. Pursuant to sample purposive sampling method in this research is 94 company with observation 188 company. The results of this study indicate that CSR disclosure of community category has positive and insignificant effect on institutional ownership. On the other hand, CSR category disclosure of the Employment category and product category CSR have a negative and significant effect. Only CSR disclosure of environmental categories has a positive and significant influence on institutional ownership.Keywords : Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), institutional ownership.

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN TERHADAP PENGUNGKAPAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rivandi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
High Profile ◽  
Research Population ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

<p><em>Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is an important element for the company's success and can provide benefits to the company. The purpose of this study is to obtain empirical evidence regarding the effect of ownership structure on CSR disclosure. The research population is all high-profile companies listed on the IDX. The sample in this study were 42 companies with 120 sample  selected by the purposive sampling method. The analysis method used is the panel regression method. Based on the hypothesis the results of the study show that managerial ownership has a negative effect on CSR disclosure, and institutional ownership has a positive effect on CSR disclosure, while public ownership does not effect on CSR disclosure.</em></p>

scholarly journals Determinant of The Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure

ETIKONOMI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-172
Author(s):  
Uun Sunarsih ◽  
N. Nurhikmah
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Multiple Regression Analysis ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has a very important role for the company and now become an obligation for every company. The purpose of this study examined the effect of institutional ownership, board of commissioners, profitability and size on CSR disclosure. This research conducted at mining manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2013-2014 and obtained 76 sample companies. The method used is multiple regression analysis. The result showed only institutional ownership affecting CSR disclosure. This suggests institutional ownership structure can act in monitoring the company. Independent board has not effected on CSR, it failed to monitor the actions of top management. Profitability has not effected on the disclosure of CSR, it enabled the company to have two perspectives on CSR. The most companies view CSR as a deduction from earnings. CSR disclosure has not affect the size of the CSR disclosure area.DOI: 10.15408/etk.v16i2.5236

scholarly journals The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility, Profitability, and Leverage toward Tax Aggressiveness with Size of Company as Moderating Variable

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Riza Aulia Fitri ◽  
Agus Munandar
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Corporate Tax ◽  
Tax Aggressiveness ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Corporate Social

This research aimed to examine the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), profitability, and leverage toward tax aggressiveness by considering the size of the company as the moderating variable. The population was 111 companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (BEI) from 2010 to 2015. Determination of the sample used purposive sampling method, and it obtained a sample of 36 manufacturing based on certain criteria. The analysis technique used was the multiple regression analysis. The results show that CSR and leverage have a significant and negative effect influence on the tax aggressiveness of the corporate tax. Meanwhile, profitability does not significantly influence the tax aggressiveness in corporate taxes, and the size of company cannot moderate the influence of CSR, the profitability, and leverage on tax aggressiveness.

The effect of managerial and institutional ownership on corporate social responsibility disclosure

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurleni Nurleni ◽  
Agus Bandang ◽  
Darmawati Darmawati ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

PurposeThis study aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure that consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership of the extensive of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure.Design/methodology/approachThe population in this study is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI), as the manufacturing companies are considered to have great potential on environmental damage (Mathews, 2000). The selected sample were the companies which meet certain criteria (purposive sampling) which published the complete annual financial statements from 2011 to 2015. This study used an analysis method using partial least square (WarpPLS) to assess the effect of the structure of ownership consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership on the extent of the CSR disclosure.FindingsThe results showed that there is a direct effect of a negative and significant correlation between managerial ownership on CSR disclosure, and there is a direct effect of a positive and significant correlation between institutional ownership on CSR disclosure.Originality/valueOriginality of this paper shows PLS (WarpPLS) that applied to determine the effect between variables managerial and institutional ownership on CSR disclosure. This research is collected data financial statements and annual reports of manufacturing companies obtained from the Indonesia Capital Market Reference Center (PRPM), which is located in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), which there has not been research by the methods and the same location.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Rasio BOPO, Modal Intelektual, dan Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Pada Profitabilitas Perusahaan Perbankan

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 1405
Author(s):  
Putu Nesy Swendriani ◽  
Luh Gede Krisna Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

This study aims to obtain empirical evidence of the effect of BOPO ratio, intellectual capital, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure on profitability of banking companies. Research conducted on banking companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2013-2017 period. The sample is determined through non probability sampling method with purposive sampling technique. The number of samples used in this study were 60 observation samples. The data analysis technique used is the analysis of multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that BOPO ratio show a negative effect on profitability of banking companies. The results also show that intellectual capital and CSR disclosure doesn’t affect the probability of banking companies. The research implications theoretically prove stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, and resource-based theory in explaining the operational efficiency of banking companies. Keywords: BOPO; intellectual capital; CSR; profitability.

scholarly journals FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PENGUNGKAPAN CSR, SEBUAH STUDY EMPIRIS PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-73
Author(s):  
Kurnia Putri ◽  
Fitra Dharma ◽  
Dewi Sukmasari
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Media Exposure ◽  
Foreign Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

This studi aims to determine the effect of Board of Commissioners, Profitability, Media Exposure, and Foreign Ownership on CSR disclosure. Population used in this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2016-2018, and the samples obtained has 411 observation selected using purposive sampling method in order to obtain samples accordance with the research objectives. Analysis technique used is multiple regression. The result shows that Board of Commissioners, Media Exposure, and Foreign Ownership has a significant positive effect on the Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility. While Profitability dosen not affect the Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility.

scholarly journals ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI PENGUNGKAPAN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 426
Author(s):  
Neneng - Hasanah
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Company Size ◽  
Public Firms ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of leverage, company size, and profitability on the disclosure of corporate social responsibility of public firms of textiles and garment that listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange over 2016 until 2018. The independent variables of this study are leverage, company size, and profitability while the dependent variable is the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure. This study conducts logistic regression analysis on 45 public firms of textiles and garment that taken by purposive sampling method. The results of this study show that: (1) leverage significantly effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure; (2) company size insignificant on corporate social responsibility disclosure; and (3) profitability significantly effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure.

scholarly journals DETERMINAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE (CSRD) PADA PERUSAHAAN PERTAMBANGAN PERIODE 2014-2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-131
Author(s):  
Maria Suryaningsih ◽  
Mulia Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Significant Positive Effect ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

This research has a problem where the company implements corporate social responsibility with the existence of a law, not from awareness. Companies are also not yet aware of the benefits of implementing corporate social responsibility and there are still different previous researchers.This study aims to examine the effect of profitability, leverage, and ownership structure on corporate social responsibility. This study uses data from 15 mining companies listed on the Stock Exchange Index (IDX) during the period 2014 to 2018 using SPSS 24 software. The results showed that profitability had no effect on corporate social responsibility . Leverage has no effect on corporate social responsibility . Ownership Structure has a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility . That is, high institutional ownership can increase the existence of corporate social responsibility actions and Simultaneously Profitability, Leverage and ownership structures simultaneously have a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document