scholarly journals Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Terhadap Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Pada Perusahaan High Profile di BEI

Akuntabilitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-220
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rivandi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
High Profile ◽  
Research Population ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is an important element for the company's success and can provide benefits to the company. The purpose of this study obtained empirical evidence regarding the effect of ownership structure on CSR disclosure. The research population are all high profile companies listed on the IDX. The sample in this study were 42 companies selected by the purposive sampling method. The analysis method used the panel regression method. Based on the hypothesis the results of the study shown that managerial ownership has a negative effect on CSR disclosure, and institutional ownership has a positive effect on CSR disclosure, while public ownership does not effectonCSR disclosure

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN TERHADAP PENGUNGKAPAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rivandi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
High Profile ◽  
Research Population ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

<p><em>Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is an important element for the company's success and can provide benefits to the company. The purpose of this study is to obtain empirical evidence regarding the effect of ownership structure on CSR disclosure. The research population is all high-profile companies listed on the IDX. The sample in this study were 42 companies with 120 sample  selected by the purposive sampling method. The analysis method used is the panel regression method. Based on the hypothesis the results of the study show that managerial ownership has a negative effect on CSR disclosure, and institutional ownership has a positive effect on CSR disclosure, while public ownership does not effect on CSR disclosure.</em></p>

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF FIRM SIZE, GROSS PROFIT MARGIN AND INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP ON DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-308
Author(s):  
Pipit Rosita Andarsari
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Profit Margin ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

The objective of this research is to analyze influence of Size, Gross Profit Margin (GPM) and Institusional Ownership to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure. Sample of this research are annual report for manufacture companies that listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2014-2016. Sample were selected using purposive sampling method and 11 sample were able to fullfill the criteria used as sample. This research uses multiple regression data analysis techniques . The result of the research showns that size and gross profit margin has positive effect on the corporate social responsibility , meanwhile Institutional ownership has negative effect on the corporate social responsibility. Keywords: Size, Gross Profit Margin, Institutional Ownership, Corporate Social Responsibility

scholarly journals The effect of profitability and liquidity on CSR disclosure and its implication to economic consequences

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 143
Author(s):  
Dody Hapsoro ◽  
Ratna Dwi Sulistyarini
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Trading Volume ◽  
Price Volatility ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

This study examines the effect of profitability and liquidity on CSR disclosure and its implication on economic consequences. This study was driven by the inconsistency of the results of previous studies in testing the factors that influence the CSR disclosure. This study used the CSR disclosure to measure Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure index (CSRDI) based on the index of the Global Reporting Initiatives G4 Guideline (GRI G4). The results show that profitability has a significant and positive effect on CSR disclosure, while liquidity does not affect CSR disclosure. Furthermore, CSR disclosure has a negative effect on the bid-ask spread, CSR disclosure has a positive effect on trading volume, while CSR disclosure doesn't affect stock price volatility. This study impklies as the following;: companies that have high profitability should have strong commitment to disclose corporate social responsibility because it can help reduce information asymmetry.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage, dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan dengan Corporate Social Responsibility Sebagai Variabel Moderasi

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Bima Andika Ivanda Putra ◽  
Sunarto Sunarto
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Corporate Social

This study aims to analyze and test the effect of profitability, leverage, and managerial ownership on firm value with the moderating variable, namely Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The population used in this study is all manufacturing companies that have been listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in the last three years, namely 2017-2019. The sampling method used in this study was purposive sampling technique. The results of this study explain that profitability and leverage do not have an effect on firm value, while managerial ownership has a negative effect on firm value. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is able to moderate the effect of profitability and managerial ownership on firm value, while Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is unable to moderate the effect of leverage on firm value.

scholarly journals PENGUNGKAPAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: UKURAN DAN PERTUMBUHAN PERUSAHAAN, SERTA RISIKO KEUANGAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
Nisha Octarina ◽  
Majidah Majidah ◽  
Muhamad Muslih
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Size Growth ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

This research aims to determine the affect of size, growth, and leverage to the corporate social responsibility disclosure of the plantation companies in Indonesia, Malaysia, or both countries during 2013-2015. Purposive sampling method was used, obtained from 15 companies in Indonesia and 38 in Malaysia. Descriptive and multiple linear regression analysis were used in this research. The result shows that simultaneously, the size, the growth, and the leverage significantly affects CSR disclosure of the plantation companies in Indonesia, Malaysia, or both countries. In Indonesia, the size partially affect, growth does not affect, while leverage negatively affect of CSR disclosure. In Malaysia, the size and growth does not affect, while leverage has positive effect on the CSR disclosure. In both countries, the size has positive affect, while growth and leverage does not affect the CSR disclosure.

scholarly journals Does Managerial Owneship and Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility Reduce Tax Aggressiveness?

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Maya Indriastuti ◽  
Fudji Sri Mar�ati ◽  
Dianing Ratna Wijayani
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Tax Aggressiveness ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

This study aims to test empirically the effect of managerial ownership on tax aggressiveness with Islamic corporate social responsibility as the intervening variable. The populations of this study were all entities listed in Jakarta Islamic Index from 2015-2019. 40 entities were obtained by using purposive sampling technique. All data were analyzed by using multiple linear regression analysis and sobel test. The results showed that managerial ownership has a significant positive effect on Islamic corporate social responsibility. In contrast, managerial ownership has a negative and insignificant effect on tax aggressiveness. Furthermore, Islamic corporate social responsibility has a significant negative effect on tax aggressiveness and Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility is able to moderate the effect of managerial ownership on tax aggressiveness.

scholarly journals Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Leverage dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Pada Nilai Perusahaan

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Gde Shinta Vidarani ◽  
I Gusti Ayu Nyoman Budiasih
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

ABSTRACT This study aims to determine and obtain empirical evidence about the effect of leverage and managerial ownership on firm value by disclosing corporate social responsibility as a moderating factor. This research was conducted on mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2018. The research sample was selected using the nonprobability sampling method with a purposive sampling technique and obtained 13 mining companies, so the number of observations in the study was 65 observations over 5 years. Data analysis techniques used is Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). Based on the results of the study, it shows that disclosure of corporate social responsibility as a moderating variable weakens the influence of leverage on firm value, disclosure of corporate social responsibility as a moderating variable that strengthens the effect of managerial ownership on firm value. Keywords : Csr disclosure, leverage, managerial ownership, firm value

scholarly journals PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, INSTITUSIONAL DAN KOMITE AUDIT TERHADAP PENGUNGKAPAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-115
Author(s):  
Padma Adriana Sari ◽  
Berlia Tri Handini
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Significant Positive Effect ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

This study aims to analyze the influence of managerial ownership, institutional ownership and audit committee on the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility. The population in this study is consumer goods industry company registered in the Indonesian Stock Exchange period 2014 to 2018. The research sample was selected using purposive sampling method with a total of 16 companies and a period of 4 years. The research uses quantitative methods with multiple linear regression methods. The results showed that managerial ownership had no significant effect on CSR disclosure, institutional ownership had a significant positive effect on CSR disclosure and audit committees had a significant positive effect on CSR disclosure.

scholarly journals Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) pada Lembaga Keuangan yang Terdaftar di BEI

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-21
Author(s):  
Fadilla Cahyaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

This study aimed to examine the determinant of the disclosure of corporate social respinsiblity in the Indonesian financial institutions. By using purposive sampling method, there are 76 financial institutions that used as sample research, with data as much as 228 data. The sample were financial institutions, which had published an annual report between 2014 to 2016. This study uses multiple linear regression analysis to test the research hypothesis. The results showed that firm size and leverage gave a significant positive effect on CSR disclosure. Meanwhile, the calculation of profitability showed no significant effect on CSR disclosure. INTISARIPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji determinan pengungkapan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan di lembaga keuangan Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan metode purposive sampling, terdapat 76 lembaga keuangan yang digunakan sebagai sampel penelitian, yakni sebanyak 228 data. Sampe lpenelitian adalah lembaga keuangan yang telah menerbitkan laporan tahunan antara tahun 2014 hingga 2016. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi linier berganda untuk menguji hipotesis penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ukuran perusahaan dan leverage memberikan pengaruh positif signifikan terhadap pengungkapan CSR. Perhitungan profitabilitas tidak menunjukkan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadappengungkapan CSR.   Keywords: corporate social responsibility, financial institutions, company size,profitability, leverage

scholarly journals Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 2525
Author(s):  
I Dewa Nyoman Alit Ariawan ◽  
I Gusti Ayu Nyoman Budiasih
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Industry Type ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

This research is an empirical study that aims to determine the effect of managerial ownership, leverage, profitability, and type of industry on the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The population uses all companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018 and the sample is chosen using purposive sampling. Managerial ownership is measured by the percentage of shares owned by management. The level of leverage is measured by the debt ratio (DER). Profitability is measured by ROA, and industry types are grouped into high-profile and low-profile. CSR is measured by the CSR index, CSRDI. Data were tested for normality, multicollinearity, and heteroscedasticity. Data analysis uses multiple linear regression analysis techniques. The results indicate that managerial ownership has no effect on CSR disclosure. The level of leverage has a negative effect on CSR disclosure. Profitability has a positive effect on CSR disclosure. Industry type has no effect on CSR disclosure. Keywords: Leverage; Profitability; Industry Type; Corporate Social Responsibility.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document