scholarly journals Predictive Value of Alvarado Score and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis (A prospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
Waleed Saadi Ahmed ◽  
Salah M. Tajer ◽  
Hend M. Sayaly
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
General Surgeon ◽  
Emergency Ward ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Combined Application ◽  
Abdominal Emergencies ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background:  Acute appendicitis is the commonest non traumatic cause of acute abdominal pain that needs surgical management .Alvarado score and ultrasonographies are the most cost effective, easy and available aids for diagnosis. The aim of the study was determining   the reliability of Alvarado score and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Results: The study was applied with 100 cases with different types of abdominal pain at presentation with 51 males and 49 females .The sensitivity was97.3% ,specificity 90%, and accuracy  89 of combined usage of Alvarado score and U/S findings preoperatively. Patients and method:  A prospective non-interventional study including patients admitted with suggestive history with signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis to the surgical emergency ward of Baghdad teaching hospital from July 1st 2017 to Feb 10th 2018, Alvarado score calculated and ultrasonography done for each patient enrolled in this study, then to be followed for intraoperative findings. Conclusions: Combined application of Alvarado score and U/S has sensitivity 94.1% ,specificity 90% and accuracy 89% . In our medical facility and emergency ward, acute appendicitis remains as one of the top acute abdominal emergencies needing surgery in patients presenting with atypical clinical finding. So diagnosis becomes difficult. So Alvarado score along with ultrasound findings are useful for increasing the reliability in emergency department for  accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis therefore there should be training for the use of U/S by emergency physician and general surgeon in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in order to decrease the rate of negative appendectomies .  

scholarly journals Max appendicitis score: a new diagnostic score for diagnosing acute appendicitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 3067
Author(s):  
Vidur Jyoti ◽  
Akhilesh Kumar ◽  
Preeti Yadav ◽  
Vaibhav Kapoor
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Diagnostic Score ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
Appendicitis Score

Background: Scoring systems are valuable and valid for discriminating between acute appendicitis and nonspecific abdominal pain. Alvarado scoring is classical and different modifications of Alvarado score have been introduced but none is ideal and negative appendicectomy rate is still high. The aim of the study is to design a more reliable scoring system which is cost effective, simple, easy to learn, high accuracy, which can be applied by any doctor at any health care facility.Methods: Retrospective study of 160 patients hospitalized with abdominal pain suggestive of acute appendicitis and subsequently operated over a period of 5 year from January 2012 to January 2017 at Max Super Speciality Hospital, Gurgaon.Results: In the present study based on six clinically most significant variables, a diagnostic accuracy of 96.25% was achieved while the same was 85% for classical Alvardo Score. This significantly increased the diagnostic accuracy and lowered the negative appendicectomy rate.Conclusions: Max Appendicitis Score is perfect scoring system for diagnosing appendicitis, it can be specially very handy in peripheral health centers where radiological facilities are sparse.

A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY ON ACUTE NON-TRAUMATIC ABDOMINAL EMERGENCIES

2021 ◽  
pp. 14-16
Author(s):  
Md. Quamar Zubair ◽  
A. K. Jha Suman
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Accurate Diagnosis ◽  
Postoperative Patient ◽  
Correct Treatment ◽  
Abdominal Emergencies ◽  
Comprehensive Study

Abdominal pain is one of the most common reasons for visit to the emergency room. Acute appendicitis is the commonest cause. An accurate diagnosis is essential for the correct treatment, which in many cases will prevent the death of the patient. Mainstay of diagnosis is history and physical examination. If this information is inadequate to establish a diagnosis and urgent or immediate operation is unnecessary, the periodic re-examination helps document the progression of the disease and often avoids unnecessary surgical intervention. Today the combination of improved diagnostic procedures, antibiotic and better anaesthesia and preoperative and postoperative patient care has led to a decrease in morbidity and mortality of patients with acute abdomen. The objective of this study was to determine the various causes of nontraumatic acute abdominal emergencies, their incidence, management and mortality in both sexes and all age groups >12 years age.

“A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RIPASA SCORE AND ALVARADO SCORE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS”

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
M. Vijaya Kumar ◽  
Manasa Manasa
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Local Population ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Ripasa Score

Acute appendicitis is the most common condition encountered in the Emergency department .Alvarado and Modied Alvarado scores are the most commonly used scoring system used for diagnosing acute appendicitis.,but its performance has been found to be poor in certain population . Hence our aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA and ALVARADO Scoring system and study and compare sensitivity, specicity and predictive values of these scoring systems. The study was conducted in Government district hospital Nandyal . We enrolled 176 patients who presented with RIF pain . Both RIPASA and ALVARADO were applied to them. Final diagnosis was conrmed either by CT scan, intra operative nding or post operative HPE report. Sensitivity,specicity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy was calculated both for RIPASA and ALVARADO. It was found that sensitivity and specicity of the RIPASA score in our study are 98.7% and 83.3%, respectively. PPV and NPV were 98.1% and 88.2% and sensitivity and specicity of the Alvardo score in our study are 94.3% and 83.3%, respectively. PPV and NPV were 98% and 62.5%.Diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA score and Alvarado score are 97% and 93% respectively. RIPASA is a more specic and accurate scoring system in our local population when compared to ALVARADO . It reduces the number of missed appendicitis cases and also convincingly lters out the group of patients that would need a CT scan for diagnosis (score 5-7.5 ) BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most commonly dealt surgical emergencies, with a lifetime prevalence rate of approximately 1 one in seven. The incidence is 1.5–1.9 per 1,000 in the male and female population, and is approximately 1.4 times greater in men than in women. Despite being a common problem, it remains a difcult diagnosis to establish, particularly among the young, the elderly and females of reproductive age, where a host of other genitourinary and gynaecological inammatory conditions can present with signs and symptoms that are 2 similar to those of acute appendicitis. A delay in performing an appendectomy in order to improve its diagnostic accuracy increases the risk of appendicular perforation and peritonitis, which in turn increases morbidity and mortality. A variable combination of clinical signs and symptoms has been used together with laboratory ndings in several scoring systems proposed for suggesting the probability of Acute Appendicitis and the possible subsequent management pathway. The Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) and ALVARADO score are new diagnostic scoring systems developed for the diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis and has been shown to have signicantly higher sensitivity, specicity and diagnostic accuracy. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES PRIMARY OBJECT 1. To compare RIPASA Scoring system and ALVARADO Scoring system in terms of diagnostic accuracy in Acute Appendicitis. 2. To study and compare sensitivity, specicity and predictive values of above scoring systems. SECONDARY OBJECT 1. To study the rate of negative appendicectomy based on above scoring systems. CONCLUSION: The RIPASA score is a simple scoring system with high sensitivity and specicity for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The 14 clinical parameters are all present in a good clinical history and examination and can be easily and quickly applied. Therefore, a decision on the management can be made early. Although the RIPASA score was developed for the local population of Brunei, we believe that it should be applicable to other regions. The RIPASA score presents greater Diagnostic accuracy and Sensitivity and equal specicity as a diagnostic test compared to the Alvarado score and is helpful in making appropriate therapeutic decisions. In hospitals like ours, the diagnosis of AA relies greatly on the clinical evaluation performed by surgeons. An adequate clinical scoring system would avoid diagnostic errors, maintaining a satisfactory low rate of negative appendectomies by adequate patient stratication, while limiting patient exposure to ionizing radiation, since 21 there is an increased risk of developing cancer with computed tomography, particularly for the paediatric age group.

scholarly journals Clinico-pathological and etiological evaluation of acute appendicitis and assessment of significance of laboratory and ultrasonography examination as an ancillary aid to clinical diagnosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1954
Author(s):  
Sailendra Nath Paul ◽  
Dilip Kumar Das
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Lower Abdominal Pain ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
Operative Findings

Background: Timely diagnosis and intervention of acute appendicitis reduces morbidity and mortality associated with the disease condition. The study aimed to evaluate the etiology of acute appendicitis, to analyze the sensitivity of modified Alvarado scoring system and radiology in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to correlate the observations of laboratory tests, operative findings with the histopathological report of specimen of appendix.Methods: This was a prospective study done on 100 patients with clinical symptoms of acute right lower abdominal pain suggestive of appendicular origin during the period from February 2015 to January 2016 in the department of surgery thorough clinical assessment, laboratory investigations, ultrasound findings as were done for all patients. After confirming the diagnosis of AA the patients had operative intervention and specimens were sent for histopathological study.Results: Male preponderance was seen in the study. Majority of them belongs to 21 to 30 years age group (50%). Faecolith was the most common etiological factor observed (58%). Abdominal pain (100%) was the most common clinical symptom. Alvarado score had sensitivity of 95.74% and specificity of 66.67% in diagnosing AA. In correlation to histopathological findings, ultrasonography findings showed 100% positive visualization rate in all 71 cases. Elevated ESR (94%) had high diagnostic accuracy as confirmed by HPE finding (96.81%) which is statistically significant (p<0.000).Conclusions: Alvarado scoring system, elevated ESR levels and USG findings of the appendix can be considered as adjuncts to clinically diagnose the AA, to improve the diagnostic accuracy thereby consequently the rate of negative appendicectomy can be reduced and thus decreases the complication rates.

scholarly journals The use of ultrasonographic and Alvarado scores in evaluating abdominal pain suggestive of acute appendicitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Fernández Álvarez ◽  
José Manuel Gómez López ◽  
Alberto M González Chávez ◽  
Benjamín Valente Acosta ◽  
Diego Abelardo Álvarez Hénandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Lower Quadrant ◽  
Efficient Alternative ◽  
Two Parameters ◽  
The Right ◽  
Right Lower Quadrant

Background: Ultrasonographic scores for appendicitis to determine if, combined with Alvarado scores, they can increase the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of appendicitis.Methods: All cases of abdominal pain suggestive of appendicitis presented between 2013 and 2015 were analysed. An Alvarado score was obtained. All patients underwent ultrasound, and an ultrasonographic score was determined, including the appendicitis classical findings.Results: Two hundred and fifty-one patients with abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant were analysed. Appendicitis was confirmed in 211 (84%) patients. For these patients, the average Alvarado score was 7.95/10 (±1.25) vs. 5.7/10 (± 1.11) for patients who did not have appendicitis (p < 0.001). In patients with confirmed appendicitis, the average ultrasonographic score was 2.48/6 (± 1.06) vs. 0.6/6 (± 0.92) for patients who did not have acute appendicitis (p < 0.001). The ultrasonographic score has a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 87% with only two parameters. The combination of the Alvarado and ultrasonographic scores decreased the percentage of negative appendectomies to 2.36% and increased the area under the curve by 0.970.Conclusions: The sum of the Alvarado and ultrasonographic scores provides an efficient alternative for diagnosing abdominal pain suggestive of appendicitis and predicts which patients should undergo surgery with good certainty.

scholarly journals A study of correlation between clinical, radiological and pathological diagnosis of appendicitis: a retrospective analytic study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 3011
Author(s):  
Prabhu R. ◽  
Vijayakumar C. ◽  
Balagurunathan K. ◽  
Senthil Velan M. ◽  
Kalaiarasi R. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Acute Abdominal Pain ◽  
Histopathological Examination ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Radiological Finding ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Alvarado Score

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdominal pain in young adults requiring emergency surgery. Appendicectomy is the most frequently performed surgery. The diagnosis is often challenging and the decision to operate in an emergency setting is always debatable. A combination of clinical signs and symptoms with laboratory findings in many scoring systems are suggesting the probability of appendicitis and the possible subsequent management pathway. The aim was to evaluate accuracy of the clinical Alvarado scoring system, radiological finding and histopathological examination for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in the department of general surgery in a tertiary care centre in South India. Total of 237 patients with acute abdominal pain were included and evaluated with the clinical Alvarado scoring system, radiological finding with (USG/CT abdomen) and histopathological examination for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The data was collected and analyzed retrospectively.Results: Of the 237 patients, 164 patients were male (69.1%) and rest is female. The correlation of the Alvaroda score with histopathological findings in groups with score > 7 and ≤7 the correlation of Alvarado score and the ultrasound findings were comparable between the study groups. The sensitivity of ultrasound in diagnosing acute appendicitis in patients with Alvarado score >7 was 72.99%. The sensitivity of ultrasound in diagnosing acute appendicitis in patients with Alvarado score ≤7 was decreased to 27%.Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of clinical features is far better than radiological investigations in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Therefore, it is concluded that it is better to use radiological investigations only to confirm the diagnosis of acute appendicitis rather to diagnose it.

Management of Acute Appendicitis in Covid Pandemic- A Prospective Study of 25 Cases

2020 ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
Dr. Abhishek Mahadik ◽  
Dr. Meena Kumar ◽  
Dr. Nida Khan ◽  
Dr. Manish Kumar ◽  
Dr. Meenal Mapari
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Surgical Team ◽  
Lower Abdomen ◽  
Open Appendicectomy ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Multimodality Approach ◽  
A Prospective Study

Acute Appendicitis is a surgical emergency. Patients present with pain in right lower abdomen, with other symptoms like nausea/vomiting, fever, diarrhoea, urinary symptoms. Diagnosis is based on a multimodality approach that includes, clinical, radiological and pathological findings. Alvarado Score helps determine the severity of infection, confirm diagnosis and guide further management. Management is either conservative with antibiotics or surgical depending on severity. However approach to surgical management has changed with the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. It has necessitated categorisation of surgical procedures into essential and non essential to limit risk to both patient and surgical team and also for prioritization of resources to the rising, continued spread of Covid-19. We present a prospective study of 25 cases of appendicitis presenting during the Covid Pandemic between 15th March and 30th May to our hospital, with an intent to try conservative management for all patients except in the presentations with complications like perforation, abscess or the presence of fecolith or poor response to conservative management.Patients not amenable to conservative management were treated by Open appendicectomy.

COPROLITHS IN CHILDREN: RECOGNITION AND SIGNIFICANCE

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-377
Author(s):  
Hugh J. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Subsequent Development ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Proper Treatment ◽  
Asymptomatic Child ◽  
Abdominal Symptoms

1. Coproliths are sufficiently common in children and of such significance that the pediatrician should be "coprolith cognizant." 2. Eleven children with coproliths are reported including 2 under 2 years of age, the youngest recorded cases to date. 3. An abdominal roentgenogram in any child with unusual abdominal symptoms or pain is recommended since only by this step can a coprolith be detected and proper treatment implemented. 4. Immediate appendectomy is indicated in the child with abdominal pain and a demonstrable coprolith, even though the signs and symptoms are atypical for appendicitis. In 50% of such cases, rupture has already occurred. 5. Prophylactic appendectomy in the asymptomatic child in whom a coprolith is incidentally discovered is justified because of the frequent subsequent development of acute appendicitis.

scholarly journals Nail Biting as a Cause of Appendicitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Michael Pagacz ◽  
Philip Bao ◽  
Juan Carlos Alvarez Moreno ◽  
Lydia Howard
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Lower Quadrant ◽  
Nail Biting ◽  
Periappendiceal Abscess ◽  
The Right

Ingestion of a foreign body is commonly encountered in clinical practice, but most cause no complications, passing spontaneously through the gastrointestinal tract. However, they can cause obstructive signs and symptoms, and surgical intervention for extraction of the foreign body may be required after identifying its location. We present here the case of a 49-year-old woman who presented to our emergency room with abdominal pain localizing to the right lower quadrant. Evaluation was most consistent with acute appendicitis, and she underwent uncomplicated appendectomy. A keratin nail with Actinomyces was identified in her appendix. Foreign bodies in the appendix can cause simple appendicitis, perforation, periappendiceal abscess, and peritonitis. Regardless of etiology, an appendectomy often ends up the primary treatment, but unusual and rare causes are worth noting if only for the clinician to be aware of when evaluating the next patient with abdominal pain and considering treatment options or future prevention. Our case is an example of a rare scenario in which an Actinomyces-contaminated human nail lodged in the appendix of a woman eventually resulting in acute appendicitis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document