scholarly journals Introduction: Action Research, Policy and Politics. Special Issue of the International Journal of Action Research

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1-2021) ◽  
pp. 3-17
Author(s):  
Julia Wittmayer ◽  
Koen Bartels ◽  
Miren Larrea
Corrections ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Cody W. Telep ◽  
Kevin A. Wright ◽  
Danielle L. Haverkate ◽  
Travis J. Meyers

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Guthrie ◽  
John Dumay

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of the articles presented in this special issue. The Special Issue is inspired by our recent review of the intellectual capital (IC) literature in Guthrie et al. (2012, p. 74), in which the authors found that the public sector is one of the least addressed areas of IC research. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a literature and published document review, experiential reflections and argument. Findings – The paper reveals that interest in public sector and IC is alive and well and the major difference between public sector and mainstream IC research is a complete lack of normative research. The papers in this Journal of Intellectual Capital (JIC) Special Issue continue that tradition. Research limitations/implications – The authors call on public sector IC researchers to continue the third stage and fourth stage IC research tradition encouraging them to explore emerging issues alongside the changes in the social, political and economic realities impacting public sector IC in the future. Doing so will ensure that public sector IC research is timely, relevant, impactful and contributes to future practice, research, policy and above all, benefits the citizens who need and consume public services. Originality/value – The paper presents a précise of current public sector research and encourages public sector researchers to continue developing research into how IC works.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 320-324
Author(s):  
Sally Wyatt

This short commentary reflects on policy making for open data. The articles in this special issue all raise interesting challenges and questions for research policy, broadly defined, including how to stimulate researchers to make data open in the first place, how to reuse data sensibly, and how to ensure data are appropriately stored and made accessible for future users. This commentary reflects on the author’s own experience of taking part in an international policy forum that was tasked with preparing a report about the importance of making research data open. The author describes how she attempted to ensure insights from science and technology studies—made by contributors to this special issue and many others in the field—were incorporated in the final report. She also describes how technologically determinist arguments were invoked to close down discussions about the political dimensions of open access to research data.


2005 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
JoAnne L. Pedro-Carroll ◽  
Irwin N. Sandler ◽  
Sharlene A. Wolchik

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document