scholarly journals Survival in women diagnosed with breast and cervical cancer in Poland – compared to European countries, based on CONCORD - 3 Programme

2019 ◽  
pp. 499-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Gliniewicz ◽  
Anna Zielińska ◽  
Katarzyna Kwiatkowska ◽  
Dorota Dudek-Godeau ◽  
Magdalena Bielska–Lasota

INTRODUCTION. The 5-year population-based survival rate, next to cancer incidence and mortality, is a key element for the assessment of effective health care quality provided by OECD in order to establish the condition of health care and set up health care policies. They also apply when assessing breast and cervical cancer prevention in Poland. AIM. The aim of the paper was to analyse the breast and cervical cancer survival in women in Poland in 2010-2014 and its changes in 2000-2014 in comparison to other European countries. RESULTS. The analysis of the 5-year survival rate was performed with the CONCORD-3 programme data. In order to guarantee the comparability of results, the uniform standards for data quality control, all calculations and analyses were performed by a world-leading centre for research, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The absolute value of the survival rate was used to assess survival variations in 2000-2004 and 2010-2014. In 2010-2014 the highest 5-year survival rate in women with breast cancer was in Island (89%), Sweden (89%), Finland (89%) and Norway (88%). Despite its systematic improvement, the 5-year survival rate in Poland was lower than in the majority of European countries, and in the final period amounted to 76,6%. In 2010-2014 the highest survival in women with cervical cancer in Europe was in Island (80%), Norway (73%) and Switzerland (71%). The progress of favourable changes in Poland was not sufficient enough to allow the survival rate (55%) to be significantly closer to the European average. CONCLUSIONS. The 5-year survival rate for breast and cervical cancer in Poland in 2010-2014 was significantly different than in other European countries, and placed Poland among the countries with the lowest survival rate. In 2000-2014 in Poland there was an insignificant progress in survival in women with breast and cervical cancer, which did not contribute to fighting the substantial differences when compared to other European countries.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 322-322
Author(s):  
Pamela Crenshaw Spain ◽  
Hannah Margaret Clare ◽  
Christina Fowler

322 Background: The Affordable Care Act (Section 1139B) requires the Secretary of HHS to identify and publish a core set of health care quality measures for adult Medicaid beneficiaries aimed at standardizing health care quality measurement across state Medicaid programs. On January 1, 2013, the Medicaid Quality Measurement Program was established to fund the development, testing, and validation of the adult health quality measures. The Medicaid Adult Core Set of Adult Health Care Quality includes two cancer screening measures (Exhibit 1). With grants from The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), three state Medicaid agencies carried out quality improvement projects (QIPs) aimed at increasing breast and cervical cancer screening rates. This study describes a qualitative assessment of these states’ QIPs. Methods: Data included grantee applications, semi-annual, and annual progress reports to CMS, as well as in-depth interviews with grantees. Qualitative content analysis (using both structured abstraction and deductive and inductive coding) was conducted in NVivo 11. Results: Breast and cervical cancer screening rates for adult Medicaid beneficiaries improved in these states during the 3-year grant. The most effective interventions identified by the states included: System-level interventions such as the distribution of performance dashboards with peer comparison data; Provider-level interventions such as the distribution of unmet need or gap-in-care reports; and Beneficiary-level interventions such as direct nurse outreach to beneficiaries with a gap in care. Conclusions: QIPs can improve breast and cervical cancer screening rates in adult Medicare beneficiaries. The most effective interventions are multi-pronged and should target health care systems, providers, and beneficiaries.[Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignatius Bau ◽  
Robert A. Logan ◽  
Christopher Dezii ◽  
Bernard Rosof ◽  
Alicia Fernandez ◽  
...  

The authors of this paper recommend the integration of health care quality improvement measures for health literacy, language access, and cultural competence. The paper also notes the importance of patient-centered and equity-based institutional performance assessments or monitoring systems. The authors support the continued use of specific measures such as assessing organizational system responses to health literacy or the actual availability of needed language access services such as qualified interpreters as part of overall efforts to maintain quality and accountability. Moreover, this paper is informed by previous recommendations from a commissioned paper provided by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) to the Roundtable on Health Literacy of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. In the commissioned paper, NCQA explained that health literacy, language access, and cultural competence measures are siloed and need to generate results that enhance patient care improvements. The authors suggest that the integration of health literacy, language access, and cultural competence measures will provide for institutional assessment across multiple dimensions of patient vulnerabilities. With such integration, health care organizations and providers will be able to cultivate the tools needed to identify opportunities for quality improvement as well as adapt care to meet diverse patients’ complex needs. Similarly, this paper reinforces the importance of providing more “measures that matter” within clinical settings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 797-797
Author(s):  
Nicholas Reed

Abstract Hearing Loss (HL) is common among older adults and is associated with poor health care quality outcomes include 30-day readmissions, length of stay, poorer satisfaction, and increased medical expenditures. These associations may manifest in changes in help-seeking behaviour. In the 2015 Current Medicare Beneficiary Study (MCBS) (n=10848; weighted sample=46.3 million), participants reported whether they knowingly had avoided seeking care in the past year and self-reported HL was measured as degree of trouble (none, a little, or a lot) hearing when using a hearing aid if applicable. In a model adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, and health factors, those with a little trouble (OR= 1.612; 95% CI= 1.334-1.947; P<0.001) and a lot of trouble hearing (OR= 2.011; 95% CI= 1.443-2.801; P<0.001) had 61.2% and 101.1% higher odds of avoiding health care over the past year relative to participants with no trouble hearing. Future work should examine whether hearing care modifies this association.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document