scholarly journals USAGE OF SUPPORTING PAD FOR SUPINE PCNL: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

2022 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rizky Lukman Hakim ◽  
Ponco Birowo
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Ureteral Stones ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Effective Choice ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Free Rate

Objective: This study aims to compare the safety, efficacy, and other surgical outcomes of supine PCNLs performed with and without the use of supporting pad. Material & Methods: We enrolled 27 patients who undergone PCNL procedure with supine position for renal stones with all sizes between January - December 2019. Divided into two groups, operated with and without supporting pad, with 13 and 14 patients respectively. Inclusion criteria are patients with renal stones, including staghorn, multiple calyx, and proximal ureteral stones. Meanwhile, pediatric patients under 12 years old, uncorrectable bleeding disorders, active urinary infection, and pregnancy are excluded. Results: Our observation showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups, although blood loss and length of stay in supporting pad showed better results. A statistically significant difference was found in stone-free-rate (P = 0.006) favoring in supine PCNL with supporting pad. Conclusion: Supine PCNL with support padding may be a safe and more effective choice to treat renal stones. Nevertheless, the patient’s anatomic variations may influence this. Thus, a prospective study with a larger population is needed to verify our outcomes.

The Outcomes of Pre-Stenting on Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Han Chen ◽  
Yang Pan ◽  
Min Xiao ◽  
Jingruo Yang ◽  
Yong Wei
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Flexible Ureteroscopy ◽  
Ureteral Stones ◽  
Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Free Rate

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Pre-stenting (PS) on the outcomes of semirigid and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a different upper urinary urolithiasis remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of ureteroscopic lithotripsy between PS and non-PS. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Randomized, controlled trials and observational studies comparing PS and non-PS were identified from electronic databases. Stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, and complications were compared by qualitative and quantitative syntheses (meta-analyses). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Eleven articles were included in this study. Nearly, all of recently published studies exhibited relatively moderate or high quality during quality assessment. PS was more likely to achieve good SFR compared with non-PS (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.00001). The subgroup results indicated that PS improved the SFR for renal stones and the stones dealt by flexible ureteroscopy (<i>p</i> = 0.0002; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001, respectively; some ureteral stones were dealt by flexible ureteroscopy). Ureteral stones and the stones dealt by semirigid ureteroscopy were not influenced by PS (<i>p</i> = 0.62; <i>p</i> = 0.90, respectively). PS is equal as non-PS in terms of operative time for renal stones and the renal and ureteral stones dealt by flexible ureteroscopy (<i>p</i> = 0.47; <i>p</i> = 0.05). No significant difference was found in major complications between the 2 groups for total or for the subgroup of renal stones (<i>p</i> = 0.3; <i>p</i> = 0.69). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> For ureteral stones or the stones dealt by semirigid ureteroscopy, PS does not show any benefits. For renal stones or the stones dealt by flexible ureteroscopy, PS improves the SFR and may be as safe as non-PS.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of staghorn renal stones in pediatric patients using adult-sized instrument

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-215
Author(s):  
Akbar Nouralizadeh ◽  
Hamid Pakmanesh ◽  
Abbas Basiri ◽  
Mohammad Hadi Radfar ◽  
Behzad Narouie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Adult Size ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double J Stent ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Free Status

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure performed with adult-sized instruments in pediatric cases with staghorn kidney stone. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of 94 percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures performed during 15 years in a single center for 82 pediatric patients with staghorn calculi using adult-sized instruments (24-Fr nephroscope). Stone free status was defined as complete clearance of the stones or the presence of insignificant residual stones of <3 mm in diameter. Results: The mean age was 108 ± 53 months (range, 14–180 months). There were 39 patients (48%) with complete staghorn stones and 43 cases (52%) with partial staghorn. We fulfilled 91.4% of operations through a single access. The stone free rate was 86.6% after one percutaneous nephrolithotomy session. In total, seven patients referred for shock wave lithotripsy and four cases were scheduled for the second percutaneous nephrolithotomy session. Fever occurred in 18 patients (21%) and bleeding requiring transfusion in four children (5%). Prolonged leakage from nephrostomy site requiring anesthesia for double J stent placement occurred in one patient. No grade IV or V Clavien complication occurred. Conclusion: The success rate and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with adult-size instruments in pediatric patients are acceptable.

scholarly journals Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for treatment of staghorn stones in pediatric patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed R. EL-Nahas ◽  
Ahmed A Shokeir ◽  
Ahmed M Shoma ◽  
Ibrahim Eraky ◽  
Osama M Sarhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Staghorn Stones

Introduction: We compare percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery in the treatment of staghorn stones in children.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic records of children who underwent treatment for staghorn stones between September 2000 and August 2013. They were divided between Group 1 (patients who underwent PCNL) and Group 2 (patients who underwent open surgery). We compared stone-free and complications rates, need for multiple procedures, and hospital stay.Results: The study included 41 patients (35 boys and 6 girls), with mean age 7.4 ± 3.1 years (range: 2–15). Of these 41 patients, 26 had unilateral renal stone and 15 had bilateral renal stones. The total number of treated renal units was 56: 28 underwent PCNL and 28 underwent open surgery. The complication rate was comparable for both groups (32% for open surgery vs. 28.6%, p = 0.771). Multiple procedures were more needed in PCNL group (60.7% vs. 32% in open surgery, p = 0.032). The stone-free rate was 71.4% after PCNL and 78.6% after open surgery (p = 0.537). A significant difference was observed in shorter hospital stay after PCNL (5 vs. 8.8 days, p < 0.001). Our study’s limitations include its retrospective design and relatively small sample size.Conclusions: For the treatment of staghorn stones in children, PCNL was comparable to open surgery in complication and stone-free rates. PCNL had the advantage of a shorter hospital stay and open surgery showed a decreased need for multiple procedures. 

scholarly journals EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LUBRICATING JELLY INSTILLATION TO PREVENT RETROPULSION DURING URETEROLITHOTRIPSY FOR URETERAL STONES

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rameshdo Yuanda ◽  
Doddy M Soebadi ◽  
Soetojo Soetojo ◽  
Sunaryo Hardjowijoto
Keyword(s):  
Ureteral Stones ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Ureteral Catheter ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Enhanced Computed Tomography ◽  
And Control ◽  
Free Rate

Objective: We studied the efficacy and safety of lubricating jelly instillation before ureterolithotripsy for prevention of retropulsion and improvement in stone-free rate. Material & methods: We enrolled 22 subjects with ureteral stone in this prospective, randomized, single-blind and controlled clinical trial. Each subject was randomly assigned to the lubricating jelly instillation group (n=11) and control group (n=11). Ureteroscopy and lithotripsy was performed according the standard protocol, using 9.8 F semirigid ureteroscope and pneumatic lithotripter. A 6 F ureteral catheter was advanced beyond the stone, and lubricating jelly was instilled through the catheter lumen. Retropulsion and the presence of residual fragments were evaluated with plain kidneys, ureters and bladder x-ray and ultrasonography, or Non Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography. Any complication was reported and graded using the Modified Clavien Classification System.Results: The 2 groups had comparable preoperative characteristics. There were no statistically significant difference between the lubricating jelly instillation group and control group regarding the retropulsion rate (54.5% vs 72.7%, ρ=0.375), the stone-free rate (54.5% vs 36.4%, ρ=0.392), and the complication rate (45.5% vs 54.5%, ρ=0.670). Conclusion: Lubricating jelly instillation during ureterolithotripsy has limited value for prevention of retropulsion and improvement in stone-free rate.

scholarly journals Middle calyx access in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siavash Falahatkar ◽  
Ehsan Kazemnezhad ◽  
Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam ◽  
Majid Kazemzadeh ◽  
Ahmad Asadollahzade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
P Value ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Renal Anomalies ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hemoglobin Drop ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Staghorn Stones

Background: Middle calyx access has been underused in percutaneousnephrolithotomy (PCNL), especially in the supine position.We compared the safety and efficacy outcomes between middlecalyx and lower calyx accesses in the complete supine PCNL in anon-randomized single-surgeon clinical study.Methods: Between February 2008 and October 2011, 170 patientsunderwent posterior subcostal single tract complete supine PCNLwith one-shot dilation and middle calyx (n = 48) and lower calyx(n = 122) accesses. Stone location and surgeon decision determinedtarget calyx for access. Inclusion criteria were pelvis stones,staghorn stones and multiple location stones. Exclusion criteriawere renal anomalies, only upper calyx stones, only middle calyxstones and only lower calyx stones. Important parameters werecompared between the two groups. A p value of <0.05 was consideredsignificant.Results: Two groups were similar in important patient- and stonerelatedparameters. Mean operative time (60.7 minutes), meanpostoperative hospital stay (1.84 days) and mean hemoglobin drop(0.67 g/dL) in the middle calyx group were significantly lesser thanin the lower calyx group (80.1 minutes, 2.19 days, 1.36 g/dL). Themiddle calyx group (89.6%; 79.6%) had a higher stone-free rate(p = 0.054) and efficiency quotient than the lower calyx group(76.2%; 61.6%). In the middle calyx group (10.4%; 2.1%), complicationand transfusion rates were lesser (p > 0.05) than lowercalyx group (14.8%; 7.4%). No significant difference (p = 0.40)was seen between two groups using the modified Clavien classificationof complications.Interpretation: Middle calyx can be an optimal access in PCNLwith the complete supine position for many of upper urinary tractstones due to its superior outcomes.

scholarly journals Comparison Between Mini PCNL and Standard PCNL in Management of Nephrolithiasis

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-83
Author(s):  
Bharat Bahadur Bhandari ◽  
Bikash Bikram Thapa ◽  
Dhirendra Ayer ◽  
Suresh Thapa ◽  
Sanjeeb Bista
Keyword(s):  
Renal Stones ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Medium Size ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Urine Leak ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Free Rate

Introduction: The incidence of small and medium size renal stones is rising. Stone clearance, bleeding, urine leak and infectious complications are major concerns for urologist.  Urologist chooses best technique from list of armamentarium available. Minimally invasive approach like Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has significantly influenced the renal stone management since 1976. Miniaturisation of the instruments allow more effective and safer alternatives for urolithasis management. Methods: This is a retrospective study in which the outcome of mini PCNL (mPCNL) was compared with standard PCNL (sPCNL) in management of nephrolithiasis. Result: There were no significant difference in stone free rate between mPCNL and sPCNL (96.2 ± 3.6% vs 95.3 ± 4.8%). The total operative time was longer in mPCNL (55.2 ± 19.0 minute vs 62 ± 21.0 minute) but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Mini PCNL is as effective as standard PCNL with fewer bleeding complications in management of medium sized nephrolithiasis.

scholarly journals Retrograde versus Antegrade Approach for the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavros Sfoungaristos ◽  
Ioannis Mykoniatis ◽  
Ayman Isid ◽  
Ofer N. Gofrit ◽  
Shilo Rosenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Fluoroscopy Time ◽  
Ureteral Stones ◽  
Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy ◽  
Antegrade Approach ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stone Characteristics ◽  
Length Of Hospitalization ◽  
Free Rate

Objective. To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of retrograde versus antegrade ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of large proximal ureteral stones.Patients and Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with proximal ureteral stones >15 mm, treated in our institution from January 2011 to January 2016. Intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, and complications were recorded and compared between the two techniques.Results. Our analysis included 57 patients. Thirty-four patients (59.6%) underwent retrograde and 23 patients (40.4%) underwent antegrade ureteroscopy. There was no significant difference in patients’ demographics and stone characteristics between the groups. Stone-free rate was significantly higher (p=0.033) in the antegrade group (100%) compared to retrograde one (82.4%). Fluoroscopy time, procedure duration, and length of hospitalization were significantly (p<0.001) lower in retrograde approach. On the other hand, the need for postoperative stenting was significantly lower in the antegrade group (p<0.001). No difference was found between the groups (p=0.745) regarding postoperative complications.Conclusions. Antegrade ureteroscopy is an efficient and safe option for the management of large proximal ureteral stones. It may achieve high stone-free rates compared to retrograde ureteroscopy with the drawback of longer operative time, fluoroscopy time, and length of hospitalization.

Flexible Ureteroscopy with Holmium Laser Lithotripsy: A New Choice for Intrarenal Stone Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Xu ◽  
Ri-jin Song ◽  
Min-jun Jiang ◽  
Chao Qin ◽  
Xiao-lan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Stones ◽  
Laser Lithotripsy ◽  
Flexible Ureteroscopy ◽  
Stone Fragment ◽  
Stone Burden ◽  
Holmium Laser Lithotripsy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Free Status

Objective: To evaluate the efficiency and safety of flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) and holmium lithotripsy for intrarenal stones and to stratify the efficiency and safety by stone burdens of ≤20, 20-40, and ≥40 mm. Methods: Five hundred eighty-two patients with intrarenal stones were treated with FURS and holmium lithotripsy at a single department from August 2008 to October 2013. Stone size was evaluated by calculating the cumulative stone diameter of all intrarenal stones, and stone-free status was defined as the absence of any stone or stone fragment <1 mm in the kidney. Results: Data analysis revealed a mean stone burden of 21.8 ± 7.6 mm. The overall primary stone-free rate (SFR) was 65.3%, which increased to 89.0% 6 months after the first surgery. Complications developed in 6.7% of patients. A significant difference was found between lower-calyx stones and other stones (p < 0.001; p = 0.006), while noncalcium stones had a much higher SFR than calcium stones (p < 0.001; p = 0.04). Conclusion: Our study showed that the overall renal SFR with the use of FURS and holmium lithotripsy was satisfactory, with a relatively low complication rate. We believe that FURS with holmium lithotripsy could be a valuable choice for patients with renal stones, especially for patients with a cumulative stone burden ≤40 mm.

scholarly journals External validation of the T.O.HO. score and derivation of the modified T.O.HO. score for predicting stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy in ureteral and renal stones

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salih Polat ◽  
Yavuz Onur Danacioglu ◽  
Mustafa Soytas ◽  
Serkan Yarımoğlu ◽  
Omer Koras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Validation ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Turkish Population ◽  
Flexible Ureteroscopy ◽  
Ureteral Stones ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Stone Characteristics ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Free Status

Abstract The T.O.HO. scoring system was developed to predict stone-free status after flexible ureterenoscopy (fURS) lithotripsy applied for ureter and renal stones. This study aimed to perform the external validation of the T.O.HO. score in the Turkish population and propose a modification for this system. Material Methods Patients who underwent fURS for kidney and ureteral stones between January 2017 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patient and stone characteristics and perioperative findings were noted. The T.O.HO. score was externally validated and compared with the STONE score. Stone-free parameters were evaluated with the multivariate analysis. Based on the results of this analysis, the T.O.HO. score was modified and internally validated. Results A total of 621 patients were included in the study. The stone-free rate was determined as 79.8% (496/621) after fURS. The regression analysis showed that stone area had better predictive power than stone diameter (p=0.025). Lower pole (reference), middle pole [odds ratio (OR)=0.492 p=0.016] and middle ureteral (OR=0.227, p=0.024) localizations, stone density (OR=1.001, p<0.001), and stone volume (OR = 1.008, p <0.001) were determined as independent predictive markers for stone-free status. Based on the effect size of the stone surface area in the nomogram, stone volume was divided into five categories, at 1-point intervals. The AUC values of the T.O.HO., STONE, and modified T.O.HO. score in predicting stone-free status were calculated as 0.758, 0.634, and 0.821, respectively. The modified T.O.HO. created by adding stone volume was statistically significantly superior to the original version (ROC curve comparison, p < 0.001). Conclusion The T.O.HO. score effectively predicted stone-free status after fURS. However, Modified T.O.HO. SS showed the best predictive performance compared with original T.O.HO. SS.

scholarly journals Evaluation and comparison of S.T.O.N.E. and Guy’s scoring systems for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes in supine position

2022 ◽  
pp. 039156032110376
Author(s):  
Ahmet Arıman ◽  
Erkan Merder ◽  
Erdem Toprak
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Supine Position ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Residual Stone ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Operation Duration ◽  
Free Rate

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was applied in the prone position until recently. But also, in recent years supine positions was applied in patients with kidney stones. Predicting how much renal stones can be cleared after surgery and possibility of complications is an important question for both surgeons and patients. Therefore different scoring systems are used to evaluate outcomes of PCNL before surgery. Patients and methods: Between 2018 and 2020, 80 patients with renal stone who underwent PCNL in the supine position were evaluated preoperatively by S.T.O.N.E. and Guy’s scoring systems (GSS). The predictions of both scoring systems for stone-free and complication rates in patients who underwent PCNL in the supine position were evaluated. Also, these scoring systems were compared among themselves for reliability. Result: In both scoring systems, there was a statistically significant difference between postoperative stone-free (SF) and residual stone (RS) of patients and in predicting the likelihood of complications in patients. No statistically significant difference was found between the two scoring systems in predicting the stone-free rate. Conclusion: Our findings revealed that S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry and Guy’s score systems can be used effectively to predict stone-free rate, complications, and operation duration in supine position PCNL for renal stones.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document