scholarly journals A Walk on the Wild Side: 2018 Cool-Season Forage Recommendations for Wildlife Food Plots in North Florida

EDIS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Blount ◽  
M. Wallau ◽  
H. K. Ober ◽  
E. Rios ◽  
J. M. B. Vendramini ◽  
...  

Forage variety recommendation for wildlife.  Revised October 2019. Previous version: Blount, A., S. Olson, D. Francis, C. Mackowiak, H. Ober, J. Freeman, K. Quesenberry, R. Barnett, T. Wilson, and R. Gornto. 2013. “A Walk on the Wild Side: 2013 Cool-Season Forage Recommendations for Wildlife Food Plots in North Florida”. EDIS 2013 (11). https://journals.flvc.org/edis/article/view/88388.

EDIS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wallau ◽  
A. R. Blount ◽  
J. M. Campos Krauer ◽  
M. A. Lashley ◽  
E. Rios ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

The list of cool-season forage recommendations for wildlife in this publication includes varieties that have been tested and are known to perform well in Florida. Written by M. Wallau, A. R. Blount, J. M. Campos-Krauer, M. A. Lashley, E. Rios, J. M. B. Vendramini, J. C. B. Dubeux, Md. A. Babar, C. L. Mackowiak, and K. H. Quesenberry, and published by the UF/IFAS Agronomy Department, revised October 2021.


EDIS ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Blount ◽  
S. M. Olson ◽  
D. L. Francis ◽  
C. L. Mackowiak ◽  
H. K. Ober ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

A. R. Blount, S. M. Olson, D. L. Francis, C. L. Mackowiak, H. K. Ober, J. H. Freeman, K. H. Quesenberry, R. D. Barnett, T. W. Wilson, and R. W. Gornto


EDIS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (5) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
A. R. Blount ◽  
M. Wallau ◽  
E. Rios ◽  
J. M. B. Vendramini ◽  
J. C. B. Dubeux ◽  
...  

Perennial warm-season pasture grasses used in Florida become dormant in late fall and winter because of short days, cooler temperatures, and frosts. Many livestock producers may choose to establish cool-season annual pasture species to supplement their forage production. These plants are usually higher in total digestible nutrients (TDN) and crude protein (CP) than summer perennial grasses, translating into greater animal performance (Dubeux et al., 2016). Planting and growing these forage crops can involve considerable expense and is somewhat risky because rainfall is often unpredictable during the fall establishment period. The species and varieties for potential use vary in the distribution of production during the cooler months and in the type of soils where they are best adapted. This publication provides the most up-to-date information on current adapted cool-season forage varieties. The recommendation of varieties is based on multi-location, multi-year cultivar evaluation experiments that may include trials in Georgia and other states. Previous version: Wallau, Marcelo, Ann Blount, Esteban Rios, Joao Vendramini, Jose Dubeux, Md Babar, and Kevin Kenworthy. 2019. “2019 Cool-Season Forage Variety Recommendations for Florida”. EDIS2019 (August). https://journals.flvc.org/edis/article/view/115513.


EDIS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose C.B. Dubeux ◽  
Nicolas DiLorenzo ◽  
Kalyn Waters ◽  
Jane C. Griffin

Florida has 915,000 beef cows and 125,000 replacement heifers (USDA, 2016). Developing these heifers so that they can become productive females in the cow herd is a tremendous investment in a cow/calf operation, an investment that takes several years to make a return. The good news is that there are options to develop heifers on forage-based programs with the possibility of reducing costs while simultaneously meeting performance targets required by the beef industry. Mild winters in Florida allows utilization of cool-season forages that can significantly enhance the performance of grazing heifers. During the warm-season, integration of forage legumes into grazing systems will provide additional nutrients to meet the performance required to develop a replacement heifer to become pregnant and enter the mature cow herd. In this document, we will propose a model for replacement heifer development, based on forage research performed in trials at the NFREC Marianna.   


Author(s):  
K.H. Widdup ◽  
T.L. Knight ◽  
C.J. Waters

Slow establishment of caucasian clover (Trifolium ambiguum L.) is hindering the use of this legume in pasture mixtures. Improved genetic material is one strategy of correcting the problem. Newly harvested seed of hexaploid caucasian clover germplasm covering a range of origins, together with white and red clover and lucerne, were sown in 1 m rows in a Wakanui soil at Lincoln in November 1995. After 21 days, the caucasian clover material as a group had similar numbers of emerged seedlings as white clover and lucerne, but was inferior to red clover. There was wide variation among caucasian clover lines (48-70% seedling emergence), with the cool-season selection from cv. Monaro ranked the highest. Recurrent selection at low temperatures could be used to select material with improved rates of seedling emergence. Red clover and lucerne seedlings produced significantly greater shoot and root dry weight than caucasian and white clover seedlings. Initially, caucasian clover seedlings partitioned 1:1 shoot to root dry weight compared with 3:1 for white clover. After 2 months, caucasian clover seedlings had similar shoot growth but 3 times the root growth of white clover. Between 2 and 5 months, caucasian clover partitioned more to root and rhizome growth, resulting in a 0.3:1 shoot:root ratio compared with 2:1 for white clover. Both clover species had similar total dry weight after 5 months. Unhindered root/ rhizome devel-opment is very important to hasten the establishment phase of caucasian clover. The caucasian clover lines KZ3 and cool-season, both selections from Monaro, developed seedlings with greater shoot and root growth than cv. Monaro. KZ3 continued to produce greater root growth after 5 months, indicating the genetic potential for improvement in seedling growth rate. Different pasture estab-lishment techniques are proposed that take account of the seedling growth characteristics of caucasian clover. Keywords: establishment, genetic variation, growth, seedling emergence, Trifolium ambiguum


Crop Science ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Johnson ◽  
Kay H. Asay ◽  
Larry L. Tieszen ◽  
James R. Ehleringer ◽  
Paul G. Jefferson
Keyword(s):  

Crop Science ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 810-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Kenno ◽  
M. A. Brick ◽  
C. E. Townsend
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document