scholarly journals Ipilimumab Prognostic Score in Progressive Metastatic Melanoma Patients. A Retrospective Analysis on Behalf of Italian Melanoma Intergroup

Author(s):  
Marconcini Riccardo
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10024-10024
Author(s):  
Vincent The-Luc Ma ◽  
Stephanie Daignault ◽  
Jessica Waninger ◽  
Leslie Anne Fecher ◽  
Michael Green ◽  
...  

10024 Background: Nearly half of all metastatic melanoma patients possess the BRAF V600 mutation. Several therapies are approved for BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma, but it is unclear if there is a differential outcome to various immunotherapy regimens. Our aim was to better assess if BRAF mutation status has any impact on survival to combination ipilimumab/nivolumab (I/N) versus single-agent PD-1 inhibitor (PD-1i). Methods: We performed a single center, retrospective analysis on a cohort of patients diagnosed with metastatic or unresectable melanoma from 2012 to 2019 at the University of Michigan who were treated with standard I/N or PD-1i (nivolumab or pembrolizumab). A univariate analysis of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was stratified by treatment type and BRAF mutation status. A multivariate Cox regression of survival was used to compare the effects of the treatment groups adjusted by BRAF status, age, gender, pre-treatment LDH level, prior treatment status, and brain metastases status. Results: 323 patients were identified. 132 had BRAF V600 mutation and 191 had BRAF wildtype (WT) status. 138 patients received I/N and 185 patients received PD-1i. In our univariate analysis, there was no difference in PFS [HR: 0.72, 95% CI, 0.46 – 1.13] or OS [HR: 0.78, 0.44 – 1.38] with I/N versus PD-1i in the BRAF mutant cohort, but there was improved PFS [HR: 0.55, 0.35 – 0.88) and OS [HR: 0.52, 0.28 – 0.95] with I/N compared to PD-1i in the BRAF WT group. In the multivariate analysis, the BRAF WT group continued to show PFS benefit with I/N compared to PD-1i [HR: 0.57, 95% CI, 0.35 – 0.95], but the OS benefit no longer achieved statistical significance [HR: 0.54, 0.28 – 1.03]. Conclusions: Our study results were discordant with the observation in the landmark CheckMate 067 trial, which noted improved PFS and OS with I/N compared to nivolumab alone in the BRAF mutant group and no difference in the BRAF WT group. In our real-world retrospective analysis, I/N over PD-1i should be considered as initial immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma patients regardless of BRAF mutation status, but even more favorably in BRAF WT.


2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nezka Hribernik ◽  
Marko Boc ◽  
Janja Ocvirk ◽  
Jasna Knez-Arbeiter ◽  
Tanja Mesti ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundBased on recent data from clinical trials, the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab prolongs survival and has a good toxicity profile in patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma. However, the question remains whether these results are transmitted into daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of pembrolizumab in treatment-naive patients with metastatic melanoma in everyday clinical practice in Slovenia and compare it to the results from clinical trials.Patients and methodsThis observational retrospective cohort study included 138 consecutive metastatic treatment-naive melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana in Slovenia, from January 2016 to December 2018. Patient and treatment characteristics were retrospectively collected from hospital data base. Statistical data was obtained using the SPSS software version 22. Survival rate was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Observation period took place between January 2016 and the end of June 2019.ResultsThe estimated median overall survival (OS) was 25.1 months (95% CI, 14.6–35.6) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.7 months (95% CI, 5.9–15.4). Among all patients, 29 (21.0%) achieved complete response, 31 (22.5%) partial response and 23 (16.7%) reached stable disease. The number of organs with metastatic involvement and the level of baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration had significant influence on survival rates. Immune-related adverse events (irAE) were reported in 88 (63%) patients, while grade 3–4 irAE occurred in 12 (8.7%). Due to toxicity, 16 (11.6%) patients discontinued the treatment.ConclusionsOur real-world data from single centre retrospective analysis of treatment-naive metastatic melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab showed inferior median OS and similar median PFS, compared to the results from clinical trials. However, patients with normal serum levels of LDH and a small number of organs with metastatic involvement had comparable survival outcomes. Toxicity rates of pembrolizumab were quite similar. These results further support the use of pembrolizumab for metastatic treatment-naive melanoma patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 552-561
Author(s):  
Johanna S. Ziegler ◽  
Stephanie Kroeze ◽  
Marie-Luise Hilbers ◽  
Laurence Imhof ◽  
Matthias Guckenberger ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kata Czirbesz ◽  
Eszter Gorka ◽  
Tímea Balatoni ◽  
Gitta Pánczél ◽  
Krisztina Melegh ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. ix125
Author(s):  
L. Orgiano ◽  
A. Dessi ◽  
A. Cubeddu ◽  
E. Lai ◽  
R. Mascia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
Florentia Dimitriou ◽  
Anne Zaremba ◽  
Clara Allayous ◽  
Katharina C. Kähler ◽  
Camille L. Gerard ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. S27
Author(s):  
Frank Malinoski ◽  
Robert Hawkins ◽  
Christian Ottensmeier ◽  
John Smyth ◽  
Adrian Harris ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document