scholarly journals THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL AS A BASIS FOR THE SEPARATION OF INTERNATIONAL FAIR JUSTICE STANDARDS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (42) ◽  
pp. 136-140
Author(s):  
G. Kret
Keyword(s):  
Fair Trial ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
The Right ◽  
International Fair

scholarly journals THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN PROCEEDINGS CHALLENGING THE MINUTES OF DISPUTING CONTRAVENTIONS

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana-Florina Bălăşoiu
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
The Right

The offenses field is assimilated to the criminal one from the perspective of theEuropean Court of Human Rights, in the sense of article 6 of the Convention, the personaccused of committing an act regarded in national law as an offense must benefit from theguarantees specific to criminal proceedings.

scholarly journals EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL IN CASES RELATED TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

2020 ◽  
pp. 44-54
Author(s):  
Liudmyla Golovko ◽  
◽  
Viktor Ladychenko ◽  
Olena Gulaс ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Functional Method ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
The Right

The purpose of the article is to investigate the effectiveness of Ukrainian legislation in the fieldof combating domestic violence, as well as the implementation of the right to a fair trial in casesinvolving domestic violence. The following methods were used in the study: analysis and synthesis,system-functional method, comparative method. Results. The article analyzes the legislation ofUkraine in the field of prevention and counteraction to domestic violence, lists both its advantagesand disadvantages, reveals measures in the field of prevention and counteraction to domesticviolence, responsibility for domestic violence, the main directions of state policy in the field ofprevention and counteraction to domestic violence, types of domestic violence. Legal regulation of judicial protection for victims of domestic violence has been studied. Judicial practice in casesrelated to domestic violence was considered. Problems of exercising the right to a fair trial inUkraine in cases related to domestic violence were revealed. Conclusions. Undoubtedly, theadoption of the Law of Ukraine “On Prevention and Counteraction to Domestic Violence”, theintroduction of criminal liability for domestic violence and amendments to a number of regulationsto address domestic violence is a positive step in combating such a negative phenomenon asdomestic violence. At the same time, a significant number of issues remain unresolved. This isespecially true for the resolution of cases of domestic violence and the exercise of the right to afair trial in cases of domestic violence, as well as for the enforcement of court decisions on theissuance of restrictive orders. The need to develop a form for assessing the risks of recurrenceof domestic violence has been demonstrated, as has been done for police officers during theessessment of the need to issue an emergency injunction. The need to enshrine at the legislativelevel what is the preventive work of police officers with the offender and how it is carried outwas proved, because without proper regulation of this issue, this type of special measure tocombat domestic violence is declarative and not applied in practice. In addition, the problem ofrefusal of public and private executive services to enforce court decisions on the establishmentof restrictive measures is pointed out, which also requires legislative regulation. The need tostrengthen the position of the victim of domestic violence by giving her/him the opportunity toclaim compensation for non-pecuniary damage in criminal proceedings was noted.

The Right to a Fair Trial in International Law

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clooney Amal ◽  
Webb Philippa
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The World ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

This book brings together the diverse sources of international law that define the right to a fair trial in the context of criminal proceedings. It aims to make the law accessible to counsel and meaningful to victims in courtrooms all over the world. By focusing on what the right to a fair trial means in practice, it seeks to bring to life the commitment made by over 170 states parties to the ICCPR. The book is subdivided into 14 substantive chapters each dealing with one component of the right to a fair trial. Each chapter collates and analyses international sources, highlighting both consensus and division in the international jurisprudence. The book aims to be the global reference for the most frequently litigated human right in the world.

12 Right to Equality

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clooney Amal ◽  
Webb Philippa
Keyword(s):  
Fair Trial ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Equal Protection ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Foreign Nationality ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Procedural Rights ◽  
Equality Of Access

This chapter focuses on the right to equality before courts and tribunals, which requires that all parties to criminal proceedings are treated without discrimination. The right underlies the rule of law. It is codified in Article 14(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which provides ‘[a]ll persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals’. It is also enshrined in Article 14(3), which refers to the minimum guarantees of a fair trial ‘in full equality’. This chapter considers three areas in which the right to equality before courts and tribunals may arise in criminal proceedings: equality of treatment, equality of arms, and equality of access. In terms of equal treatment, Article 26 of the ICCPR provides ‘that all persons are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection of the law without discrimination, and that the law shall guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on any of the enumerated grounds’. These grounds include ‘race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status’. Equality of treatment applies to all individuals, not just to defendants, and requires equal treatment by all organs of the state, not just judicial authorities. Meanwhile, equality of arms ensures that the same procedural rights are to be provided to all the parties to a case, ‘unless distinctions are based on law and can be justified on objective and reasonable grounds, not entailing actual disadvantage or other unfairness to the defendant’. It does not necessarily require mathematical equality between the prosecution and the defence. Equality of access issues may arise in criminal proceedings when a defendant’s access to court is hindered because of his detention, disability, or his foreign nationality, or when a defendant is forced to be tried before a military or special court rather than having access to a regular civilian court. The right to equality before courts and tribunals has been used relatively infrequently to vindicate fair trial violations, which may in part be attributed to the challenges of proving discrimination.

ANONIMNI SVEDOCI I ZAŠTITA LjUDSKIH PRAVA

2021 ◽  
pp. 277-296
Author(s):  
Veljko Turanjanin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
Step Test ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
National Legislation ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Right ◽  
Insufficient Knowledge

Тhe author deals with the problem of anonymous witnesses in the context of the right to a fair trial in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. One of the problems in the application of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights is related to the testimonies of anonymous witnesses in criminal proceedings. The case law of the European Court of Human Rights has developed certain criteria that must be followed in national legislation, but it is obvious that there is insufficient knowledge regarding this problem, as well as the reluctance to apply the mentioned rules. The standards developed by the ECtHR are very important for national laws and jurisprudence. The author explains the development of a three-step test that needs to be examined when assessing a violation of the right to a fair trial, through an analysis of a multitude of judgments, in order to provide guidance on the application of Article 6 § 3 (d) of the European Convention on Human Rights. After introductory considerations, the author explains who can be a witness under the Convention, since this question is raised independently of national legislation, and then explains the right to examine witnesses, the admissibility of testimonies by anonymous witnesses and the examination of the three-stage test, and gives concluding remarks.

Remote Participation in Criminal Proceedings: Does the Reformed Italian Regulation Represent an Application Extension Able to Conflict with the Right to a Fair Trial?

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-201
Author(s):  
Giulia Angiolini
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Italian Law ◽  
European Court ◽  
Recent Reform ◽  
The Right ◽  
Remote Participation

The purpose of this paper is to try to analyse the Italian regulation of accused persons’ remote participation in criminal proceedings. The interest in this matter arises from the suspected frictions of the provisions at hand with fundamental rights to be guaranteed for a fair trial. These suspicions, aroused right after the introduction of the institute in Italian law, have been increased by the recent reform of the discipline of remote participation, and they become even clearer after a comparison of Italian regulation with those of other European Countries. Hence, an inescapable question occurs: will the European Court of Human Rights and the Italian Constitutional Court save the new regulation as they did with the previous one?

scholarly journals Wybrane zagadnienia dotyczące zwalczania terroryzmu w kontekście prawa do rzetelnego procesu

2019 ◽  
pp. 163-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Matusiak-Frącczak
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
International Peace ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Targeted Killing ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Peace And Security ◽  
The Right

Terrorism is nowadays one of the biggest threats to international peace and security. Nevertheless, its combatting must be compatible with the requirements of human rights protection, including the right to a fair trial. First the article discusses procedural guarantees of suspects of terrorist crimes in criminal proceedings. Then the article deliberates the aspects of judicial control of targeted sanctions. The next part will constitute the exploration of the legal professional privilege in the discussed area. Finally, the article will discuss the judicial control of targeted killing. The aim of the article is to prove that actually the right to a fair trial and the procedural guarantees enshrined therein constitute a guarantee to other human rights.

scholarly journals The right of the defense to request an explanation of the accusation during the criminal investigation phase

2021 ◽  
pp. 7-14
Author(s):  
Tatiana Vizdoaga ◽  
◽  
Adriana Esanu ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Fair Trial ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Criminal Investigation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Republic Of Moldova ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Right To Know ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

Pursuant to Article 66 paragraph (2) point 1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused has the right to know for what deed he is accused […], i.e. to be informed on the nature and cause of the accusation brought against him. If the person is not properly informed about the accusation, he is deprived of the right to ensure the possibility of preparing and exercising his defense, being seriously affected by the principles of a fair trial, guaranteed by Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Although the principle governing the exercise of rights by the accused in criminal proceedings guarantees the use of any means and procedures of defense, except those expressly prohibited by law, some prosecutors are reluctant to defenders’ requests to explain the accusation in criminal proceedings, context in which, in most cases, either declares them inadmissible or considers them unfounded. Such an approach does not reconcile the right to a fair trial; or, the clarity of what is set out in the indictment is also linked to the right of the accused to defend himself – as an indispensable element of the protection of the person against arbitrariness. Therefore, in this study, the authors will come up with pertinent arguments to annihilate the vicious practice of prosecutors to disregard the importance of predictability of the accusation in order to ensure the right to defense, as well as avoiding the conviction of the Republic of Moldova by the European Court for European Convention.

scholarly journals EVOLUTION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF UKRAINE WITHIN THE PERIOD OF 30 YEARS OF UKRAINIAN INDEPENDENCE

2021 ◽  
pp. 128-142
Author(s):  
V. Shybiko
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
The Right ◽  
Procedural Rights ◽  
The Military ◽  
Procedure Development

In the article, the author explores relevant issues of the formation and development of the Ukrainian criminal process over the 30 years of existence of the state of Ukraine since the proclamation of its independence. The main stages of the development of the criminal procedure are highlighted and analysed in detail, namely: the stage of its formation since Ukraine's independence proclamation in 1990-1991; the stage of development of the criminal procedure after Ukraine's accession to the Council of Europe and the adoption of the new Constitution of 1996; the stage of the criminal procedure development after the adoption of the new Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) of Ukraine in 2012. The novelties of the CrPC of 2012 are comprehensively analysed. Firstly, the Code incorporated the relevant key provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine and international legal acts on human rights and justice. Secondly, it settled a number of issues that were important for criminal proceedings but were either unregulated or partially regulated by other laws or regulations. The article provides an analysis of the principle of access to justice enshrined in the CrPC of 2012, which provides for the right of participants in criminal proceedings who have a vested interest in the results of these proceedings (suspect, accused, victim), not only to obtain a fair trial but also to use broad procedural rights and to take an active part in criminal proceedings both during the pre-trial investigation and during the trial, contributing to the comprehensive, complete, and impartial establishment of the circumstances of the criminal proceedings and the adoption of a fair trial. The author also touches on the amendments to the CrPC of 2012, which are related to the military aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and the impossibility of pre-trial investigation and trial in the areas of the anti-terrorist operation, as well as those related to the implementation of the UN Convention against Corruption, aimed at strengthening the fight against corruption crimes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document