scholarly journals INTRODUCTION THE CONCEPT OF STRENGHTENING THE RESILIENCE OF SOCIETY

The concept of building societal resilience is most often used in various documents of the European Union, the most important ones including the 2016 Global Strategy for the European Union's Foreign and Security Policy. The resilience concept is most often associated with an organism’s health and immunity to various viruses, bacteria and other phenomena that threaten an individual's health. The resilience of a society, however, sounds like a set of activities that is necessary for the whole society to be resilient to what threatens all of us. This phenomenon is most often referred to as threats, and when the notion of threats emerges, we immediately find ourselves in the realm of security. However, the concept of strengthening a company’s resilience encompasses much more than just countering security threats. The Global Strategy for the European Union's Foreign and Security Policy refers to the definition of societal resilience used by the EU Council as early as 2013 namely that societal resilience is "the ability of an individual, a household, a community, a country or a region to withstand, cope, adapt, and quickly recover from stresses and shocks without compromising long-term development.” The documents produced in the European Union on the concept of increasing societal resilience are, of course, very important. For a long time in the development of the European Union, the concept of security has not been among the priorities. With the emergence of various inconveniences and dangers caused by climate change, terrorism, mass and illegal migration, social and political change, however, they confirm that the concept of increasing the societal resilience in the broadest possible sense has grown even more important. The resilience of Slovenian society has been tested many times. Let us only briefly mention the turning point of 1991, when a lot changed for the people of Slovenia. In some of the following years the floods showed all their power and scale. The ice storm of 2014, however, came as a particular surprise demanding a new, different reflection on the provision of national security. This was followed by mass migration flows in 2015, which ended as a European migrant crisis in March 2016. In 2020 Illegal migration requires intensive effort of the Police and the Slovenian Armed Forces. Additionally, in various fields, Covid-19 has come as a surprise to the entire world, and will continue to leave its mark in the future. During the epidemic, the activities to prevent, contain and assist in the organizational efforts included numerous state authorities, including the Slovenian Armed Forces. All of the above is just one more reason to draft a concept of increasing Slovenia’s societal resilience, which as an integral part of the European family of nations will be able to contribute more to the security and prosperity both nationally and beyond, in Europe. The present issue was created as part of the concept of increasing societal resilience. Since this is a very broad area, we focused on just a few topics related to security, defence and the armed forces. China, security challenge for the European Union is the article of Mojca Pešec. China's global influence is growing, and is at its greatest in the economic and geopolitical fields. This country is increasingly present in other areas as well. In the article, the author focuses most on the political, security and military aspects of China's influence on the European Union, which consequently also affect Slovenia. The concept of cyberspace is certainly the fastest growing area of all, and is as such providing unimagined opportunities for anyone who wants to change something for the better, as well as for those who want to cause harm or benefit in any other way. Rapid progress is hard to keep up with. A prerequisite for professional and scientific discussions is the synchronisation of terminology. Damjan Štrucl writes about it in the article entitled Terminology confusion in ensuring cyberspace security. Darko Lubi was prompted to write his article by the problems of how critical the national critical infrastructure is and how to identify it, on what basis the criticality is determined and under what circumstances certain critical infrastructure is considered more critical than the other. The methodological model for identifying national critical infrastructure can make an important contribution to addressing this issue, but security circumstances are constantly changing. The Slovenian Armed Forces has been cooperating with the Police in ensuring the effective protection of the Schengen border since 2015. Both organizations have their own statutory tasks. They are different, which stems from the differences in their missions. In the article Cooperation of the Slovenian Armed Forces and the Police in ensuring internal stability and security of the Republic of Slovenia, Gregor Potočnik writes about what their cooperation really means from a legal and organizational point of view. Special Forces are elite units in the armed forces that perform particularly demanding tasks. Members of these forces are required to achieve higher standards of physical and mental fitness compared to their counterparts from other military units. Higher standards are usually achieved by men, which is why female members of Special Forces are more an exception than a rule. Karmen Poklukar and Pavel Vuk are wondering about the Integration of women in the Special Forces. The knowledge and experience of authors in the Contemporary Military Challenges vary. Security conflicts in their various forms have consequences. One of such consequences are also the mines in Kosovo, which stayed behind after most people left. A few of those who have remained behind face the threat posed by this lethal ordnance every day. Matjaž Bizjak shares his demining experience from Kosovo in his article Mine threat in Kosovo between 1999 and 2001. Next year we will mark the 30th anniversary of Slovenia’s independence with one of the issues of Contemporary Military Challenges. Readers are therefore welcome to contribute articles on security, defence and the military particularly focusing on the future.

Author(s):  
Evanthia Balla

The European Union currently faces a plethora of security threats, which are global in nature, cause and treatment. This dangerous situation has not only put the key European humanistic and democratic values at risk, but also the European project in itself. Moreover, it has emphasised the need for redefining its ideological limitations. Under this prism, two main questions arise: How can one perceive Europeanism today, and to what extent can old European nationalist conceptions contribute to a better understanding of Europe’s current global security strategy? In this context, this work tests the demonstration and relevance of Giuseppe Mazzini’s pro-national European nationalism rhetoric in the current European security agenda. The methodological approach to this challenge is based on an essentially conceptual analysis of the European security strategy, focusing on ‘The Global strategy for the foreign and security policy of the European Union’, in light of Mazzini’s thoughts of nationalism and unity, as presented in his work. The main argument of this paper is that the concept of Pro-national European Nationalism is present in the current security documents. However, this seems to limit the ambition of the vision itself.


Politeja ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (54) ◽  
pp. 45-64
Author(s):  
Janusz J. Węc

The Reform of the Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union in 2016‑2017The subject of the article is the reform of the Common Security and Defence Policy in 2016‑2017 following the adoption of the new EU External Security Strategy by the European Council in June 2016. The first part of the article analyzes the European Union’s Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy. However, the second part of the article reconstructs the process of implementing the global strategy and describes the successes and failures of the reform.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-64
Author(s):  
Richard Rousseau

Turkey‟s state-centered and traditional security policy gives priority to “high politics” and attempts to solve problems on the basis of military power. In contrast to the global trend, and particularly in the European Union (EU), Turkey‟s securitization tradition has not changed in the last few decades and its Armed Forces have even enlarged their profile, especially whilst dealing with the Kurdish issue and the rise of political Islam, both of which are threats to the core principles of the Turkish Republic. This article argues that the Turkish security identity is not compatible with the European identity, which is a product of the Europeanization of security. This incompatibility of security identities poses the main impediment to Turkey‟s inclusion into the EU‟s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). Turkey should Europeanize its security identity by stressing low-political considerations while dealing with its internal and external threats in order to be a member of the European Club.


2003 ◽  
Vol 55 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 339-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dejan Gajic

After the end of World War II leaders of the West European countries had realised the necessity to create new security frameworks, thus making the security of the continent the concern of the Europeans themselves. However, immediately after it had been formed the North Atlantic Alliance, as a trans-Atlantic defence shield against the danger from the "communist East", became the central security component in Europe. Just after the end of the Cold War and disappearance of the "danger from the East" the European leaders initiated the process of creation of the new European defence system. The system would be designed in such a way not to jeopardise the position of the NATO, improving at the same time the security and stability in the continent. In the first part of the article the author considers the course of European integration in the second half of the last century that proceeded through creation of institutions preceding the establishment of the European Union. During the period of creation of this specific form of action performed by the European states at the internal and international levels, the deficiency of integration in the military field was notable. In that regard, the author stresses the role of the Western European Union as an alliance for collective defence of West European countries. The second part of the paper discusses the shaping of the EU security component through the provisions on the Common Foreign and Security Policy, which are included in the EU agreements. The Maastricht Treaty defined the Common Foreign and Security Policy as an instrument to reach agreement by member states in the defence field. The Amsterdam Treaty confirmed the role of this mechanism expanding the authorities resulting from it. The Treaty of Nice supplements the existing mechanism by a new military and political structure that should help implement the decisions made by the European Union institutions in the military field. In the third part of the article, the author presents the facts concerning the establishment and internal organisation of the Eurocorps. The creation of this military formation took place in early 1990s and was initiated by the two states of "the old Europe" - Germany and France. The authors also emphasises that the establishment of this formation is the first step towards creation of the armed forces in Europe. The fourth part of the paper treats the Rapid Reaction Force that was established by the Helsinki Agreement (1999). It became operative in early 2003 and its basic aim is to prevent the outbreak of crises in the region and to improve stability in Europe. In spite of the opinions that the establishment of such a force is the skeleton for creation of the European armed forces, the author thinks that, at least in the near future, they will not be a rival to the NATO. In his opinion, their possible military missions will be carried out only when the alliance takes no interest in being engaged in them.


2021 ◽  
pp. 43-59
Author(s):  
Tomasz Dubowski

In the discussion on the EU migration policy, it is impossible to evade the issue of the relation between this policy and the EU foreign policy, including EU common foreign and security policy. The subject of this study are selected links between migration issues and the CFSP of the European Union. The presented considerations aim to determine at what levels and in what ways the EU’s migration policy is taken into account in the space of the CFSP as a diplomatic and political (and subject to specific rules and procedures) substrate of the EU’s external action.


Author(s):  
Bernhard Schima

The Court of Justice of the European Union shall not have jurisdiction with respect to the provisions relating to the common foreign and security policy nor with respect to acts adopted on the basis of those provisions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document